Skip to main content

Restorative vs Punitive Approach. Eight Fundamental Principles of Juvenile Delinquency Prevention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Rights Protection and Ius Puniendi

Abstract

The chapter will identify and analyse juvenile delinquency prevention’s fundamental principles since every younger generation is faced with their own rules and dynamic lifestyle. Having in mind the “four D’s” model: diversion, de-judicialization, de-institutionalization and due process, the elaboration and analyzes will contribute toward defining the role and assessing the effectiveness of social, family, educational and other assumptions for the protection of children. The focus will be directed toward the role of the poverty, education, free time and peers influence toward juvenile delinquency. Some of those factors shall be addressed as the primary roots and reasons for the manifestation of youth’s antisocial behavior.

An important issue regarding juvenile delinquency is the stereotype that only children from divorced marriages, one-parent families and children without parental care, manifest troubled behavior, so the article will offer data and arguments toward avoiding this stereotype when analyzing juvenile delinquency. There is a need to emphasize that the Republic of North Macedonia is defined as welfare and modern country where humane and inclusive social development principles are implemented. At the same time, there is a necessity for taking care of the socially vulnerable categories, including the children at risk. Social policy, which covers all aspects of child protection, is an unavoidable part of the juvenile delinquency protection and prevention policies. National strategic documents regarding the prevention of juvenile delinquency will be, also analyzed. Within the chapter, there will be available statistical data, trends, and rates relevant to the topic of interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Annual work Report of the State Council for prevention of juvenile delinquency 2018 and 2019. Link: http://dspdp.com.mk/, last visit 16.12.2018.

  2. 2.

    “A total of 267 minors committed crimes in Kumanovo in 2017”, Lokalno, 6.12.2018. Source: https://lokalno.mk/vkupno-267-maloletnitsi-izvrshile-prestapnishtvo-vo-kumanovo-vo-2017-godina/, last visit 26.04.2023.

  3. 3.

    Article 40–42 of the Constitution of the Republic of North Macedonia, Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia, no. 52/1991; 1/1992; 1/1992; 31/1998; 31/1998; 91/2001; 91/2001; 84/2003; 84/2003; 107/2005; 107/2005; 3/2009; 3/2009; 13/2009; 49/2011; 49/2011; 6/2019 and 6/2019.

  4. 4.

    Macedonia in Figures, State Statistical Office 2018, p. 13.

  5. 5.

    Statistical review 2.4.18.07(898) 2018, p. 130.

  6. 6.

    North Macedonia in Figures, State Statistical Office 2022, p. 13.

  7. 7.

    While some legislations determine long-term institutional and educational measures for juvenile perpetrators, the US Congress has approved funding for “delinquency prevention” programmes. Programmes and funds are divided into two groups: some are for early intervention, while others are for young people who have already begun to manifest delinquent behaviours. Read more in: Bishop and Decker 2006, pp. 22–24.

  8. 8.

    Article 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of North Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of North Macedonia, Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia, no. 52/1991; 1/1992; 1/1992; 31/1998; 31/1998; 91/2001; 91/2001; 84/2003; 84/2003; 107/2005; 107/2005; 3/2009; 3/2009; 13/2009; 49/2011; 49/2011; 6/2019 and 6/2019.

  9. 9.

    Law on Child Protection, Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia, no. 23/2013, 12/2014, 44/2014, 144/2014, 10/2015, 25/2015, 150/2015, 192/2015, 27/2016, 163/2017, 21/2018, 198/201, 104/2019, 146/2019; 275/2019 and 311/2020.

  10. 10.

    Art.1 and 5, Law on Child Protection, Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia, no. 23/2013, 12/2014, 44/2014, 144/2014, 10/2015, 25/2015, 150/2015, 192/2015, 27/2016, 163/2017, 21/2018, 198/201, 104/2019, 146/2019; 275/2019 and 311/2020.

  11. 11.

    See more on https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRC/Pages/CRCIndex.aspx, last visit 16.12.2018.

  12. 12.

    Available on: General Comment No. 24 (201x), replacing General Comment No.10 (2007), Children’s rights in juvenile justice, https://www.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=/Documents/HRBodies/CRC/GeneralComment10.docx&action=default&DefaultItemOpen=1, last visit 16.12.2018.

  13. 13.

    Art. 2 par. 1 and 2, Law on Child Protection, Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia, no. 23/2013, 12/2014, 44/2014, 144/2014, 10/2015, 25/2015, 150/2015, 192/2015, 27/2016, 163/2017, 21/2018, 198/201, 104/2019, 146/2019; 275/2019 and 311/2020.

  14. 14.

    Sahin v. Germany, (30,943/96) [2003] ECHR 340.

  15. 15.

    Law on Justice for Children, Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia, no. 148/2013, 152/2019 and 275/2019.

  16. 16.

    Art. 20–23, Law on Justice for Children, Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia, no. 148/2013, 152/2019 and 275/2019.

  17. 17.

    It is mentioned, in the preface of the Strategy, that it is titled “Timjanik” in honour of the inhabitants of the village of Timjanik, within the Municipality of Negotino, who supported the opening of a small group home for children with intellectual disabilities in their community, during the final phase of the document (summer 2018) Despite the initial caution, the inhabitants of Timjanik accepted and welcomed their new neighbours, thus becoming an example of an inclusive community which offers equal opportunities for everyone. The Strategy is available at https://mtsp.gov.mk/content/pdf/strategii/Strategii%202018/Strategija_deinstitucionalizacija_Timjanik_2018-2027.pdf, last visit 26.04.2023.

  18. 18.

    National strategy for deinstitutionalization in Republic of Macedonia 2018–2027 “Timjanik” Ministry of Labor and Social Policy Skopje, 2018, p. 6.

  19. 19.

    National strategy for deinstitutionalization in Republic of Macedonia 2018–2027 “Timjanik” Ministry of Labor and Social Policy Skopje, 2018, p. 6.

  20. 20.

    Source: State Statistical Office, link: https://makstat.stat.gov.mk/PXWeb/pxweb/en/MakStat/MakStat__Sudstvo__ObvinetiOsudeniDecaStoriteli/550_SK4_Mk_T31_ml.px/table/tableViewLayout2/?rxid=46ee0f64-2992-4b45-a2d9-cb4e5f7ec5ef, last visit 26.04.2023.

References

  • Arnaudovski Lj, Velkova T (2017) Social Pathology. 2nd Amended ed, Shtip

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder A, Gilbert G, Bruce DD (2001) Juvenile delinquency: historical, cultural & legal perspectives. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop DM, Decker SH (2006) Punishment and control: juvenile justice reform in the USA. In: International handbook of juvenile justice. Springer, New York, pp 3–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Božičević-Grbić M, Vidlička SR (2011) Reforma maloljetničkog kaznenog prava I sudovanja. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno parvo I praksu 18(2):679–715

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzarovska-Lažetić G, Nanev L (2012) International documents for the implementation of juvenile justice, Modern trends in the treatment of juveniles. SPPDM, Kavadarci

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzarovska-Lažetić G, Nanev L (2015) Criminal treatment of children at risk and in conflict with the law. Skopje

    Google Scholar 

  • Doek J (2009) The UN convention on the rights of the child. In: Reforming juvenile justice. Springer, New York, pp 19–31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graham J, Moore C (2006) Beyond welfare versus justice: Juvenile justice in England and Wales. In: International handbook of juvenile justice, pp 65–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambovski V (2004) Criminal law - general part. Culture, Skopje

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambovski V, Lažetić G, Nanev L, Gruevska-Drakulevski A, Maljanovski K, Mujoska-Trpevska E (2018) Analysis of the situation in the institutions for accommodation of children at risk and children in conflict with the law in the Republic of Macedonia. Macedonian Society of Penology, Skopje

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerner HJ, Reich K, Coester M, Weitekamp EG (2008) Migration background, group affiliation, and delinquency among endangered youths in a south-west German city. In: Van Gemert F, Peterson D, Lien I-L (eds) Street gangs, migration and ethnicity. Willan, Portland, pp 173–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Kos J (2006) Izvršavanje maloljetničkih sankcija. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu 13(2):807–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeber R, Farrington DP (2000) Young children who commit crime: epidemiology, developmental origins, risk factors, early interventions, and policy implications. Dev Psychopathol 12(4):737–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony D, Campbell C (2006) Mainstreaming restorative justice for young offenders through youth conferencing: the experience of Northern Ireland. In: International handbook of juvenile justice, pp 93–115

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson GR, Yoerger K (1993) In: Hodgins S (ed) Developmental models for delinquent behavior. Sage Publications, Inc, pp 140–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Radić I (2017) Hrvatski sustav maloljetničkih sankcija: trenutačno stanje i prijedlozi za promjenu. Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu 24(1):83–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Laan PH (2006) Just desert and welfare: juvenile justice in the Netherlands. In: International handbook of juvenile justice, pp 145–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Zermatten J (2006) The Swiss Federal Statute on Juvenile Criminal Law. In: International handbook of juvenile justice, pp 295–307

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Mujoska Trpevska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Trpevska, E.M., Lažetić, G. (2023). Restorative vs Punitive Approach. Eight Fundamental Principles of Juvenile Delinquency Prevention. In: Czarnecki, L. (eds) Human Rights Protection and Ius Puniendi. European Union and its Neighbours in a Globalized World, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41253-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41253-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41252-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41253-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics