Skip to main content

Faith Traditions and Sustainability: Key Discourses and Emerging Field

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Faith Traditions and Sustainability

Part of the book series: Management, Change, Strategy and Positive Leadership ((MACHSTPOLE))

  • 87 Accesses

Abstract

Historically, academic debates on the sustainable development discourse have tended to sideline the influence of religion faith traditions. However, in the last two decades, with the growing instability in the social, economic, and environmental realms of the global economy, there has been intensive search for new paradigms and frameworks to guide human understanding of the interrelationship between human well-being and environmental protection and foster new forms of environmental activism at the ground level. This work intends to contribute to this emerging area of research by presenting how faith traditions can help to provide alternative explanations to deal with contemporary environmental challenges by creating alternative models of production and consumption in society, as well as providing individual motivation for pro-environmental behaviors. The chapters presented in this edited volume weave together the economic, ethical, cultural, and societal dimensions of varied Eastern and Western faith traditions and discusses their applicability to contemporary environmental problems. The work presents three main pathways through which faith-based traditions can help in steering mainstream sustainable development discourses in a new direction – promotion of ethical values, fostering new forms of ecological activism, and inculcating pro-environmental behaviors. The introductory chapter presents an analytical basis for understanding the causes behind sustainability challenges from a faith-based perspective and how these would lead to alternative adaptation and mitigation policies, discussed in the subsequent chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Alliance for Religion and Conservation (ARC) was a UK-based organization founded by Prince Philip in 1995. This organization aimed to help major religions of the world develop environmental programs based on their core values, teachings, and beliefs. Martin Palmer, the secretary general of the ARC, announced its closure in June 2019.

References

  • Abdelzaher, D. M., & Abdelzaher, A. (2017). Beyond environmental regulations: Exploring the potential of “eco-Islam” in boosting environmental ethics within SMEs in Arab markets. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abeydeera, S., Kearins, K., & Tregidga, H. (2016). Buddhism, sustainability and organizational practices fertile ground? The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 61, 44–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alliance for Religion and Conservation. (n.d.). ARC and the faiths. http://www.arcworld.org/arc_and_the_faiths.html

  • Banerjee, S. B., & Bonnefous, A. M. (2011). Stakeholder management and sustainability strategies in the French nuclear industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(2), 124–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, A., & Menrad, K. (2019). Standing up for the Paris agreement: Do global climate targets influence individuals’ greenhouse gas emissions? Environmental Science & Policy, 99, 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, L., & Zsolnai, L. (2012). Spirituality and business: An interdisciplinary overview. Society and Economy, 34(3), 489–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brekke, K. A., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2008). The behavioural economics of climate change. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(2), 280–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briassoulis, H. (1999). Who plans whose sustainability? Alternative roles for planners. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42(6), 889–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2012). Behavioral economics and environmental policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 4(1), 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, J. M., McCright, A. M., & Xiao, C. (2014). Green Christians? An empirical examination of environmental concern within the US general public. Organization & Environment, 27(1), 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, P. (2007). Buddhism and the transformation to sustainable economies. Society and Economy, 29(2), 155–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, P. L. (2010). Climate change, economics, and Buddhism—Part 2: New views and practices for sustainable world economies. Ecological Economics, 69(5), 962–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, J. R., & Hoffman, A. J. (2013). Flourishing: A frank conversation about sustainability. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006). The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism–experimental evidence and new theories. In Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity (Vol. 1, pp. 615–691).

    Google Scholar 

  • Felix, R., & Braunsberger, K. (2016). I believe therefore I care: The relationship between religiosity, environmental attitudes, and green product purchase in Mexico. International Marketing Review, 33(1), 137–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, P., & McDonagh, S. (2016). On care for our common home, Laudato Si’: The encyclical of Pope Francis on the environment. Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, R. S. (Ed.). (2010). Religion and the environment (Vol. 1). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • GPN. (n.d.). Green Pilgrimage network. http://www.arcworld.org/projectsa1c5.html?projectID=629

  • Grzeda, M. (2019). Tikkun Olam: Exploring a spiritual path to sustainability. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 16(5), 413–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guardian. (2009). Impact of religion will have “deeper roots” than Copenhagen. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/nov/02/impact-religion-copenhagen

  • Hallin, A., Karrbom-Gustavsson, T., & Dobers, P. (2021). Transition towards and of sustainability—Understanding sustainability as performative. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1948–1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. (2008). The freedom paradox: Towards a post-secular ethics. Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intezari, A. (2015). Integrating wisdom and sustainability: Dealing with instability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(7), 617–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, W., & Chapple, C. K. (2011). Religion and environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36(1), 441–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. F. (2014a). Sustainability as a global faith? The religious dimensions of sustainability and personal risk. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 82(1), 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. F. (2014b). Religion and sustainability: Social movements and the politics of the environment. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, P., Everard, M., Santillo, D., & Robèrt, K. H. (2007). Reclaiming the definition of sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 14(1), 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, G., & Greene, A. M. (2021). The dynamics of managing diversity and inclusion: A critical approach. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knetsch, J. L. (2010). Values of gains and losses: reference states and choice of measure. Environmental and Resource Economics, 46, 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, N. E., & Ohsowski, B. (2018). Identifying worldviews on corporate sustainability: A content analysis of corporate sustainability reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(1), 128–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefkowitz, J. (2017). Ethics and values in industrial-organizational psychology. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (2003). Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies, 37(6–7), 701–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J. (2010). Toward greater consciousness in the 21st century workplace: How Buddhist practices fit in. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., & Willoughby, B. L. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mongsawad, P. (2010). The philosophy of the sufficiency economy: A contribution to the theory of development. Asia Pacific Development Journal, 17(1), 123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munn, R. E. (Ed.). (2002). Encyclopedia of global environmental change. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, Y. (2013). Religion and sustainable development: Analysing the connections. Sustainable Development, 21(2), 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, S. (2013). Does religion affect the materialism of consumers? An empirical investigation of Buddhist ethics and the resistance of the self. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Centre. (2017). Global religious landscape. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2012/12/18/global-religious-landscape-exec/

  • Prill, S. E. (2015). Sikhi and sustainability: Sikh approaches to environmental advocacy. Sikh Formations, 11(1–2), 223–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakodi, C. (2012). Religion and development: Subjecting religious perceptions and organisations to scrutiny. Development in Practice, 22(5–6), 621–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandefur, R. L., & Laumann, E. O. (2009). A paradigm for social capital. In Knowledge and social capital: Foundations and applications (pp. 69–87). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scales, I. R. (2014). Green consumption, ecolabelling and capitalism’s environmental limits. Geography Compass, 8(7), 477–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K., & Zahidi, S. (2020). Global competitiveness report: Special edition 2020. World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiple, C. (2016). What faith can do for global systemic challenges. In World economic forum, ed., the role of faith in systemic global challenges. Geneva: World economic forum (pp. 5–6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (1988). Staying alive: Women, ecology, and survival in India (Vol. 84). Kali for Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. (2022a). Bioenergy and Ecosocialism. In The Routledge handbook on ecosocialism (pp. 320–327). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. (2022b). Sikhism and sustainability: New approaches to environmental ethics. In Faith traditions and practices in the workplace volume I (pp. 37–61). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N. (2022c). Sikhism and Covid-19: Ethics of community service and activism. Sikh Formations, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K., & Clark, J. S. (Eds.). (2016). Voices from religions on sustainable development. BMZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P., & Singh, N. (2019). Political economy of bioenergy transitions in developing countries: A case study of Punjab, India. World Development, 124, 104630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, H. C. (2020). Sufficiency economy philosophy: Buddhism-based sustainability framework in Thailand. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 2995–3005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starik, M., & Rands, G. P. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 908–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2008). The economics of climate change. American Economic Review, 98(2), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summer, J. (2005). Sustainability and the civil commons: Rural communities in the age of globalization. University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vu, M. C., & Burton, N. (2021). Bring your non-self to work? The interaction between self-decentralization and moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(2), 427–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vu, M. C., Singh, N., Burton, N., & Chu, I. (2022). Introduction: Faith traditions in unprecedented times. In Faith traditions and practices in the workplace volume I (pp. 3–14). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • WCED, S. W. S. (1987). World commission on environment and development. Our Common Future, 17(1), 1–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R. J. (1998). Corporate environmental management, technology, and sustainable development: Postmodern perspectives and the need for a critical research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 7(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Will, J. A., & Cochran, J. K. (1995). God helps those who help themselves. The effects of religious affiliation, religiosity, and deservedness on generosity toward the poor. Sociology of Religion, 56(3), 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WWF. (2022). How can you help tackle climate change. https://www.wwf.org.uk/climate-change-and-global-warming

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Singh, N., Vu, M.C., Chu, I., Burton, N. (2023). Faith Traditions and Sustainability: Key Discourses and Emerging Field. In: Singh, N., Vu, M.C., Chu, I., Burton, N. (eds) Faith Traditions and Sustainability. Management, Change, Strategy and Positive Leadership. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41245-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics