Skip to main content

The Self-serving Citizen as a Co-producer in the Digital Public Service Delivery

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Government (EGOV 2023)

Abstract

The promotion of digital self-services has generated a shift within digital government, which has implications for citizens that depend on welfare services. From the policy perspective, users can benefit from better service access, process efficiency and opportunities for citizens to co-produce their public services. These opportunities are accompanied by increasing responsibilities for citizens that are expected to serve themselves to a higher extent. This article analyses how vulnerable citizens engage in self-services and their co-production of public services that play out in the digital public service setting. Data were gathered through participatory observations at a service office at the Norwegian welfare administration (NAV) when citizens visited the office to apply for public welfare services. The article provides a novel theoretical framework for conceptualizing dynamic actor-co-production, showing how co-production preconditions can be understood in relation to the actors involved in the service procedure. From a citizen-centric perspective, the article explores the roles of the human state actor – frontline workers, technology state actor – self-service stations, and the private actor – citizens – in the co-production. It sheds light on how participation can be understood at different levels of abstraction and describes the impact of actors’ roles, motives, actions, and preconditions in the co-production of welfare services. The findings show that most citizens that visit the office are vulnerable in relation to financial circumstances and struggle to independently co-produce their services in the public self-service setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., Pestoff, V.: Co-production: the state of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas 23, 1083–1101 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alford, J.: Why do public-sector clients coproduce?: Toward a contingency theory. Adm. Soc. 34, 32–56 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bovaird, T.: Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services. Public Adm. Rev. 67, 846–860 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G.G., Loeffler, E., Parrado, S.: Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services. J. Soc. Pol. 44, 1–23 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., Sicilia, M.: Varieties of participation in public services: the who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Adm. Rev. 77, 766–776 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ostrom, E.: Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development. World Dev. 24, 1073–1087 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Joshi, A., Moore, M.: Institutionalised co-production: unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. J. Dev. Stud. 40, 31–49 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grönroos, C.: Value co-creation in service logic: a critical analysis. Mark. Theory 11, 279–301 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Madsen, C.Ø., Lindgren, I., Melin, U.: The accidental caseworker – how digital self-service influences citizens’ administrative burden. Gov. Inf. Q. 39, 101653 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z., Strokosch, K.: Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment? Public Manag. Rev. 18, 639–653 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Scupola, A., Mergel, I.: Co-production in digital transformation of public administration and public value creation: the case of Denmark. Gov. Inf. Q. 39, 101650 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heggertveit, I., Lindgren, I., Madsen, C.Ø., Hofmann, S.: Administrative burden in digital self-service: an empirical study about citizens in need of financial assistance. In: Krimmer, R., et al. (eds.) Electronic Participation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13392, pp. 173–187. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23213-8_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Pors, A., Schou, J.: Street-level morality at the digital frontlines: an ethnographic study of moral mediation in welfare work. Adm. Theory Praxis 43, 154–171 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Breit, E., Salomon, R.: Making the technological transition – citizens’ encounters with digital pension services. Soc. Policy Adm. 49, 299–315 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenthal, P., Peccei, R.: ‘The work you want, the help you need’: constructing the customer in jobcentre plus. Organization 14, 201–223 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Forster, R., Gabe, J.: Voice or choice? Patient and public involvement in the national health service in England under new labour. Int. J. Health Serv. 38, 333–356 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Larsson, K.K., Skjølsvik, T.: Making sense of the digital co-production of welfare services: using digital technology to simplify or tailor the co-production of services. Public Manag. Rev. 25, 1–18 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Voorberg, W.H., Bekkers, V.J.J.M., Tummers, L.G.: A Systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Manag. Rev. 17, 1333–1357 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brudney, J.L., England, R.E.: Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Adm. Rev. 43, 59–65 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Levine, C.H., Fisher, G.: Citizenship and service delivery: the promise of coproduction. Public Adm. Rev. 44, 178–189 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pestoff, V.: Towards a paradigm of democratic participation: citizen participation and co-production of personal social services in Sweden. Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 80, 197–224 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dunston, R., Lee, A., Boud, D., Brodie, P., Chiarella, M.: Co-production and health system reform – from re-imagining to re-making. Aust. J. Public Adm. 68, 39–52 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Boyle, D., Harris, M.: The challenge of co-production. London: New Econ. Found. 56 18

    Google Scholar 

  24. Whitaker, G.P.: Coproduction: citizen participation in service delivery. Public Adm. Rev. 40, 240–246 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parks, R.B., et al.: Consumers as coproducers of public services: some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Stud. J. 9, 1001–1011 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sorrentino, M., Sicilia, M., Howlett, M.: Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool. Policy Soc. 37, 277–293 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bovaird, T., Ryzin, G.G.V., Loeffler, E., Parrado, S.: Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services. J. Soc. Policy 44, 1–23 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin, J.C., Chang, H.: The role of technology readiness in self-service technology acceptance. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 21, 424–444 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jeffares, S.: The Virtual Public Servant: Artificial Intelligence and Frontline Work. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54084-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Hilton, T., Hughes, T.: Co-production and self-service: the application of service-dominant logic. J. Mark. Manag. 29, 861–881 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bovens, M., Zouridis, S.: From street-level to system-level bureaucracies: how information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Adm. Rev. 62, 174–184 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Reddick, C.G.: Citizen interaction with e-government: from the streets to servers? Gov. Inf. Q. 22, 38–57 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Eriksson, K.: Self-service society: participative politics and new forms of governance. Public Adm. 90, 685–698 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Noveck, B.S.: Smart Citizens, Smarter State: The Technologies of Expertise and the Future of Governing. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2015). https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674915435

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Polzer, T., Goncharenko, G.: The UK COVID-19 app: the failed co-production of a digital public service. Finan. Account. Manag. 38, 281–298 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cordelia, A.: E-government: towards the E-Bureaucratic form? J. Inf. Technol. 22, 265–274 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. O’Sullivan, S., Walker, C.: From the interpersonal to the internet: social service digitisation and the implications for vulnerable individuals and communities. Aust. J. Polit. Sci. 53, 490–507 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Myers, M.D.: Investigating information systems with ethnographic research. CAIS. 2 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 23, 67–93 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Moeran, B.: From participant observation to observant participation. Organ. Ethnogr. Study. Complexity Everyday Life, 139–155 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Göran, G.: The generation of qualitative data in information systems research: the diversity of empirical research methods. CAIS 44, 572–599 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Walsham, G.: Doing interpretive research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15, 320–330 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nunamaker, J.F., Chen, M., Purdin, T.D.M.: Systems development in information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 7, 89–106 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Orlikowski, W.J., Iacono, C.S.: Research commentary: desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inf. Syst. Res. 12, 121–134 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanne Höglund Rydén .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rydén, H.H., Hofmann, S., Verne, G. (2023). The Self-serving Citizen as a Co-producer in the Digital Public Service Delivery. In: Lindgren, I., et al. Electronic Government. EGOV 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14130. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-41137-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-41138-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics