Skip to main content

Psychological Aspects of the Use of Firearms by the Police

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Police Conflict Management, Volume I

Abstract

The use of firearms by the police is a course of action that is probably the most severe option at their disposal. Other than in the USA, the use of firearms by the police is only taken in the rarest of occasions in the European jurisdictions. This chapter begins with an outline of the research pertaining to this subject area. Subsequently, the situation concerning the use of firearms by the police in Germany and Europe is described. Building on this foundation, the authors describe several fundamental scientific findings on aspects of particular importance before (basic and advanced training), during (deciding, experiencing, and hitting), and after shooting (consequences for shooters and targeted persons). The chapter concludes with an overview of the current state of research with regard to various problems associated with the use of firearms by the police.

Reviewer: Johan Martinus Ras

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although the firearm is part of the standard equipment of police officers in many countries, there are also countries, such as the United Kingdom, where only specific police units carry firearms. Nevertheless, the use of a firearm is one of the most drastic acts of a police officer and the most significant interference with the rights of a citizen.

References

  • Adang, O. (2012). Learning to deal with potentially dangerous situations: A situation-oriented approach. In M. Haberfeld, C. Clarke, & D. Sheehan (Eds.), Police organization and training (pp. 153–168). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0745-4_10

  • Andersen, J. P., & Gustafsberg, H. (2016). A training method to improve police use of force decision making: A randomized controlled trial. Sage Open, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016638708

  • Artwohl, A., & Christensen, L. W. (1997). Deadly force encounters. What cops need to know to mentally and physically prepare for and survive a gunfight. Paladin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aveni, T. J. (2004). Police marksmanship under fire: Paradox and promise. Polizei & Wissenschaft, 1, 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, A. T., Pistone, D., Riggenbach, M., Hamilton, J. A., & Blacker, K. J. (2021). How unintentional cues can bias threat assessments during shoot/don’t-shoot simulations. Applied Ergonomics, 95, 103451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, A., & Scharf, P. (1980). The violent police-citizen encounter. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452, 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, W. J. (2014). New York City Police Department annual firearms discharge report 2013. http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/downloads/pdf/analysis_and_planning/nypd_annual_firearms_discharge_report_2013.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2014.

  • Campbell, T. (2021, January 15). Black lives matter’s effect on police lethal use-of-force. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3767097

  • Cesario, J., Johnson, D. J., & Terrill, W. (2019). Is there evidence of racial disparity in police use of deadly force? Analyses of officer-involved fatal shootings in 2015–2016. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(5), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618775108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cojean, S., Combalbert, N., & Thaillandier-Schmitt, A. (2020). Psychological and sociological factors influencing police officers’ decisions to use force: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 70, 101569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., Wittenbrink, B., Sadler, M. S., & Keesee, T. (2007). Across the thin blue line: Police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1006–1023. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, W. T. L., Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A., & Schwartz, L. L. (2014). Toward a comprehensive understanding of officers’ shooting decisions: No simple answers to this complex problem. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2014.923312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diederichs, O. (2016). Polizeiliche Todesschüsse 2015. Bürgerrechte & Polizei CILIP, 111, 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donner, C. M., & Popovich, N. (2019). Hitting (or missing) the mark: An examination of police shooting accuracy in officer-involved shooting incidents. Policing: An International Journal, 42(3), 474–489. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-05-2018-0060

  • Durna, T. (2011). Situational determinants of police use of force: Who the suspect is vs. what the suspect does (International Police Executive Symposium, Working Paper No. 34). Geneva Center for the Democratic Control of the Armed Forces.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellrich, K., Baier, D., & Pfeiffer, C. (2011). Gewalt gegen Polizeibeamte. Befunde zu Einsatzbeamten, Situationsmerkmalen und Folgen von Gewaltübergriffen. Forschungsbericht Nr. 3, KFN.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2019, October 28, at 15:37). Police, court and prison personnel statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Police,_court_and_prison_personnel_statistics

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2020, May 4). FBI releases 2019 statistics on law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty. https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/press-releases/fbi-releases-2019-statistics-on-law-enforcement-officers-killed-in-the-line-of-duty

  • Feltes, T., & Alex, M. (2020). Polizeilicher Umgang mit psychisch gestörten Personen. In D. Hunold & A. Ruch (Eds.), Polizeiarbeit zwischen Praxishandeln und Rechtsordnung. Edition Forschung und Entwicklung in der Strafrechtspflege (pp. 279–299). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30727-1_13

  • Fuller, D. A., Lamb, H. R., Biasotti, M., & Snook, J. (2015, December). Overlooked in the undercounted: The role of mental illness in fatal law enforcement encounters. Treatment Advocacy Center. https://www.treatmentadvocacycenter.org/storage/documents/overlooked-in-the-undercounted.pdf

  • Fyfe, J. J. (1986). The split-second syndrome and other determinants of police violence. In R. G. Dunham & G. P. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing: Contemporary readings (pp. 531–546). 3rd. print, Waveland Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallenberger, F. (2014). Hoher stress: Traumata. In F. Hallenberger & C. Lorei (Eds.), Grundwissen stress (pp. 357–395). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallenberger, F., & Haller, C. (2015). Psychologische Krisenintervention in den deutschen Polizeien. Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, J. L., Zhang, D., & Greening, S. G. (2019). Basic processes in dynamic decision making: How experimental findings about risk, uncertainty, and emotion can contribute to police decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim, C. (2009). Wann schießen Polizisten? Auswirkungen verschiedener Reizsituationen in Einsatzlagen. Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsen, W. F., & Starkes, J. L. (1999). A new training approach to complex decision making for police officers in potentially dangerous interventions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(5), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(99)00012-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, J. H., Johnson, B. L., Meckley, D. P., Blackley, A., Peveler, W. W., Lowes, J. N., & Dawes, J. J. (2021). Effects of heart rate biofeedback, sleep, and alertness on marksmanship accuracy during a live-fire stress shoot. International Journal of Exercise Science, 14(6), 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. J., Cesario, J., & Pleskac, T. J. (2018). How prior information and police experience impact decisions to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(4), 601–623. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesic, D., & Thomas, S. D. (2020). Police use of force: An examination of Australian policing. In P. Birch, M. Kennedy, & E. Kruger (Eds.), Australian policing: Critical issues in 21st century police practice (pp. 183–197). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, M. (2017, July 15). Wie oft deutsche Polizisten wirklich zur Waffe greifen. Die Welt. https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article166675828/Wie-oft-deutsche-Polizisten-wirklich-zur-Waffe-greifen.html. Accessed 5 May 2020.

  • Klahm, C. F., & Tillyer, R. (2010). Understanding police use of force: A review of the evidence. Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 7(2), 214–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. (1996). The effect of acute stressors on decision making. In J. E. Driskell & E. Salas (Eds.), Stress and human performance (pp. 49–88). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, D. A., & Brunson, R. K. (2009). Police officers’ perceptual distortions during lethal force situations: Informing the reasonableness standard. Criminology & Public Policy, 8(1), 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landman, A., Nieuwenhuys, A., & Oudejans, R. R. (2016). The impact of personality traits and professional experience on police officers’ shooting performance under pressure. Ergonomics, 59(7), 950–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1107625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo, R. (1986). Post-shooting stress reactions among police officers. Journal of Human Stress, 12(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/0097840X.1986.9936763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorei, C. (1999). Der Schußwaffeneinsatz bei der Polizei: Eine empirisch-psychologische Analyse. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorei, C. (2005). Die unbeabsichtigte Schussabgabe bei Polizeikräften. Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorei, C. (2014). Stress & leistung. In F. Hallenberger & C. Lorei (Eds.), Grundwissen stress (pp. 87–146). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorei, C. (2017). Evaluation der neuen Polizeimunition. In C. Lorei (Ed.), Studien zum Schusswaffeneinsatz: Neue Studien zum Schießen. Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorei, C. (2020, May 12). Probleme im Zusammenhang mit dem polizeilichen Schusswaffeneinsatz. http://www.schusswaffeneinsatz.de/download/probleme.pdf

  • Lorei, C., & Balaneskovic, K. (2020a). Schusswaffengebrauch gegen Personen in Deutschland. In C. Lorei (Ed.), Studien zum Schusswaffeneinsatz: Polizeilicher Schusswaffengebrauch in Deutschland und Europa (pp. 3–60). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorei, C., & Balaneskovic, K. (2020b). Lagebild polizeilicher Schusswaffengebrauch in Europa. In C. Lorei (Ed.), Studien zum Schusswaffeneinsatz: Polizeilicher Schusswaffengebrauch in Deutschland und Europa (pp. 63–113). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorei, C., & Heim, C. (2022). Unbeabsichtigte Schussabgabe. In B. Körber & P. Schmalzl (Eds.), Polizeipsychologie in Schlüsselbegriffen. Boorberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorei, C., & Heimann, R. (2017). Schießen auf Flüchtende – Eine Replikation. In C. Lorei (Ed.), Studien zum Schusswaffeneinsatz: Neue Studien zum Schießen. Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorei, C., & Stiegler, G. (2014a). Schießen auf mit Schutzwesten ausgestattete Rechtsbrecher. In C. Lorei (Ed.), Studien zum Schusswaffeneinsatz: Schießen (pp. 131–158). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorei, C., & Stiegler, G. (2014b). Unterschiede zwischen verschiedenen Schießhaltungen. In C. Lorei (Ed.), Studien zum Schusswaffeneinsatz: Schießen (pp. 159–197). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorei, C., Grünbaum, B., Spöcker, W., & Spitz, S. (2017). Schnell Schießen oder genau Treffen? Zu Abhängigkeit von Schießgeschwindigkeit und Treffgenauigkeit. In C. Lorei (Ed.), Studien zum Schusswaffeneinsatz: Neue Studien zum Schießen (pp. 121–174). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorei, C., Hallenberger, F., Fischbach, A., & Lichtenthaler, P. W. (2014). Polizei & stress. In F. Hallenberger & C. Lorei (Eds.), Grundwissen stress (pp. 211–282). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorei, C., Stiegler, G., & Bäuerle, M. (2014). Polizeilicher Schusswaffengebrauch gegenüber flüchtenden Personen. In C. Lorei (Ed.), Studien zum Schusswaffeneinsatz: Schießen (pp. 51–130). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. (2006). Officer-involved shooting: Reaction patterns, response protocols, and psychological intervention strategies. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 8(4), 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. L., Zielaskowski, K., & Plant, E. A. (2012). The basis of shooter biases: Beyond cultural stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1358–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212450516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, G. B., & Vila, B. J. (1998). Police handgun qualification: Practical measure or aimless activity? Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 21, 510–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York City Police Department. (2019). Use of force report 2018. https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/nypd/downloads/pdf/use-of-force/use-of-force-2018.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2020.

  • Nieuwenhuys, A., Canal Bruland, R., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2012). Effects of threat on police officers’ shooting behavior: Anxiety, action specificity and affective influences on perception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 608–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuys, A., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2012). Shoot or don’t shoot? Why police officers are more inclined to shoot when they are anxious. Emotion, 12(4), 827–833. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuys, A., Savelsbergh, G. J. P., & Oudejans, R. R. D. (2015). Persistence of threat-induced errors in police officers’ shooting decisions. Applied Ergonomics, 48, 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osse, A., & Cano, I. (2017). Police deadly use of firearms: An international comparison. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21, 629–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oßwald-Meßner, S. (2020). Belastende Situationen im alltäglichen Polizeidienst: Häufigkeit und Umgang. Polizei & Wissenschaft, 3(2020), 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudejans, R. R. D. (2008). Reality-based practice under pressure improves handgun shooting performance of police officers. Ergonomics, 51, 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701577435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinizzotto, A. J., Davis, E. F., Bohrer, S. B., & Infanti, B. J. (2012). Law enforcement restraint in the use of deadly force within the context of ‘the deadly mix.’ International Journal of Police Science & Management, 14(4), 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plant, E. A., Goplen, J., & Kunstman, J. W. (2011). Selective responses to threat: The roles of race and gender in decisions to shoot. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(9), 1274–1281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211408617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleskac, T. J., Cesario, J., & Johnson, D. J. (2018). How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1301–1330. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1369-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Police Academy—Firearms and Tactics Section. (2006). Firearms discharge report. https://www.nyclu.org/sites/default/files/nypd_firearms_report_102207.pdf. Accessed 21 Apr 2020.

  • Rademacher, H. (2003, April 1). “Friendly fire”. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/friendly-fire-199290.html

  • Rothschild, M., & Kneubuehl, B. (2012). Wund-ballistische Grundlagen für die polizeiliche Eigensicherung. In C. Lorei & J. Sohnemann (Eds.), Grundwissen Eigensicherung (pp. 199–216). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade, T. V., & Bruns, G. H. (1989). Police shooting performance in threatening environments. American Journal of Police, 8(2), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharf, P., & Binder, A. (1983). The badge and the bullet—Police use of deadly force. Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoy, E. (2020, October 20). Black lives matter protests, fatal police interactions and crime. Contemporary Economic Policy, 39(2), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sim, J. J., Correll, J. & Sadler, M. S. (2013). Understanding police and expert performance: When training attenuates (vs. exacerbates) stereotypic bias in the decision to shoot. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212473157

  • Taverniers, J., & De Boeck, P. (2014). Force-on-force handgun practice: An intra-individual exploration of stress effects, biomarker regulation, and behavioral changes. Human Factors, 56(2), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720813489148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taverniers, J., Smeets, T., Van Ruysseveldt, J., Syroit, J., & von Grumbkow, J. (2011). The risk of being shot at: Stress, cortisol secretion, and their impact on memory and perceived learning during reality-based practice for armed officers. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. H. D. (2020). Critical essay: Fatal encounters involving people experiencing mental illness. Salus Journal, 8(2), 100–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, J., & Pronk, G. (2011). Comparing of police use of firearms in the EU. In C. Lorei (Ed.), Eigensicherung & Schusswaffeneinsatz bei der Polizei. Beiträge aus Wissenschaft und Praxis 2011 (pp. 181–192). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. D. (2006). Hitting the target (or not): Comparing characteristics of fatal, injurious, and non-injurious police shootings. Police Quarterly, 9(3), 303–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina Balaneskovic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lorei, C., Balaneskovic, K., Gorzka, RJ. (2023). Psychological Aspects of the Use of Firearms by the Police. In: Staller, M.S., Koerner, S., Zaiser, B. (eds) Police Conflict Management, Volume I. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41096-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics