Abstract
In this study, the performance of side jet control for two different altitudes (10 km/30 km) was numerically investigated and compared with the effectiveness of secondary injection thrust vector control for a supersonic missile at M = 6.2 and 7.0. This comparison also considered the behavior of the transient force signal caused by the side jet thrust increasing with time, resulting in a time delay between reaching the maximum side jet thrust and reaching the maximum control force. It was shown that, in contrast to thrust vector control, the performance of side jet control decreases with increasing altitude as a result of a less effective shock wave boundary layer interaction. With respect to this interaction, it was found that the boundary layer state has a great influence on this interaction and affects the induced force to a certain extent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It should be noted that different Mach numbers were examined for different altitudes.
References
DeSpirito, J.: Lateral reaction jet flow interaction effects on a generic fin-stabilized munition in supersonic crossflows. Technical report ARL-TR-6707, ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY (2013)
Gnemmi, P., Gruhn, P., Leplat, M., Nottin, C., Wallin, S.: Computation validation on lateral jet interactions at supersonic speeds. Int. J. Eng. Syst. Modell. Simul. 5(1–3), 68–83 (2013)
Deere, K.: Summary of fluidic thrust vectoring research at NASA Langley research center. In: 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA 2003-3800, Orlando, Florida (2003)
Babinsky, H., Harvey, J.K.: Shock Wave-Boundary-Layer Interactions, vol. 32. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)
Pandey, A., Casper, K.M., Spillers, R., Soehnel, M., Spitzer, S.: Hypersonic shock wave-boundary-layer interaction on the control surface of a slender cone. In: AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, AIAA 2020-0815, Orlando, Florida (2020)
Schwamborn, D., Gerhold, T., Heinrich, R.: The DLR TAU-code: recent applications in research and industry. In: European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, Delft, Netherland (2006)
Kovar, A., Schülein, E.: Effect of side jets in a supersonic flow measured and calculated on a flat plate and a generic missile configuration. RTO-MP AVT-135, German Aerospace Center (2013)
Smith, T.A.: Boundary layer development as a function of chamber pressure in the NASA Lewis 1030: 1 area ratio rocket nozzle. In: 24th Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA-88-3301, Boston, Massachusetts (1988)
Schneider, S.P.: Flight data for boundary-layer transition at hypersonic and supersonic speeds. J. Spacecr. Rockets 36(1), 8–20 (1999)
Berry, S.A., Kimmel, R., Reshotko, E.: Recommendations for hypersonic boundary layer transition flight testing. In: 41st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, AIAA 2011-3415, Honolulu, Hawaii (2011)
Polivanov, P.A., Sidorenko, A.A., Maslov, A.A.: Transition effect on the shock wave/boundary layer interaction region and the wake at low supersonic Mach number. In: International Conference on the Methods of Aerophysical Research, Paper 1770 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schnepf, C. (2024). Numerical Investigation of the Unsteady Behaviour of Side Jet Induced Control Concepts. In: Dillmann, A., Heller, G., Krämer, E., Wagner, C., Weiss, J. (eds) New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics XIV. STAB/DGLR Symposium 2022. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol 154. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40482-5_62
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40482-5_62
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-40481-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-40482-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)