Skip to main content

Debates About Life’s Origin and Adaptive Powers in the Early Nineteenth Century

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Evolution in Darwin's "Origin"

Part of the book series: History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences ((HPTL,volume 34))

  • 144 Accesses

Abstract

In the “Historical Sketch” he published in the third edition of On the Origin of Species (1861), Darwin famously argued that “the great majority of naturalists believe that species are immutable productions and have been separately created.” Commentators have implicitly endorsed this self-serving view since then. In fact, since the last decades of the eighteenth century, writers about nature and practitioners of the “system of nature” genre had engaged in discussions on the origin of life and the limits and extent of its capability to adapt to changing environments. By the early decades of the nineteenth century, several highly popular French encyclopedias and dictionaries published entries devoted to discussing spontaneous generations or the thesis that varieties were incipient species. A handful of such articles endorsing transformism caught Darwin’s attention, though their authors were ignored or snubbed in the “Historical Sketch.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a masterly discussion of broadly “evolutionist” views of living nature debated in French literary circles, see Wanlin (2018).

  2. 2.

    Robert Richards has strongly argued for the influence of German Naturphilosophie on Darwin’s work: Richards (1992, 2002). Another source is Gliboff (2008).

  3. 3.

    K.F. Kielmeyer, “Über die Verhältnisse der organischen Kräfte unter einander in der Reihe der verschiedenen Organisationen, die Gesetze und Folgen dieser Verhältnisse”; the manuscript lecture circulated widely throughout Europe. Analyses of the work of Kielmeyer can be read in Coleman (1973) and Bersier (2005).

  4. 4.

    Bory was also the editor of the Dictionnaire Classique d’histoire naturelle, 1822–1831. Analyses of his work can be found in Ferrière (2006, 2009).

  5. 5.

    For several references to Gérard in Darwin’s notebooks on works to read or read, and abstracts of his readings, see J. van Whye, ed., (http://darwin-online.org.uk)

  6. 6.

    Johnson (2019, pp. 324 and 329) wrongly claims that Darwin had never read a line of Bory and that Poiret did not believe in species change.

References

  • Aufrère, L. (1952). Soulavie et son secret: Un conflit entre l’actualisme et le créationnisme. Le temps géomorphologique. Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barruel, A. (1784–1788). Les Helviennes ou Lettres Provinciales Philosophiques, 2 vols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersier, G. (2005). Visualizing Karl Friedrich Kielmeyer’s organic forces: Goethe’s morphology. Monatschefte, 1, 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bory, J.-B. de. (1804). Voyage dans les quatre principales Îles des mers d’Afrique, 3 vols. Buisson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdin, J.-C. (1992). Le “profonde serieux” de Robinet selon Hegel. Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 302, 409–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W. (1973). Limits of the recapitulation theory: Carl Friedrich Kielmeyer’s critique of the presumed parallelism of earth history, ontogeny, and the present order of organisms. Isis, 64, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, P. (1986). Julien–Joseph Virey, le Premier Critique de Lamarck. In S. Atran et al. (Eds), Histoire du concept d’espèce dans les sciences de la Vie, (pp. 181–192). Fondation Singer–Polignac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, P. (2005). Before Darwin: Transformist concepts in European natural history. Journal of the History of Biology, 38, 67–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, P. (2011). The revolutions of evolution: Geoffroy and Lamarck, 1825–1840. Bulletin du Musée d’Anthropologie préhistorique de Monaco, 51, 97–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, P. (2018). “Systèmes de la nature” and theories of life: Bridging the eighteenth and the nineteenth centuries. In J. Riskin (Ed.), Early adventures in evolution (Republics of Letters 6, issue 1). https://arcade.stanford.edu/rofl_issue/volume-6-issue-1

  • Corsi, P. (2021). Edinburgh Lamarckians? The Authorship of Three Anonymous Papers (1826–1829). Journal of the History of Biology, 54, 345–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-021-09646-5

  • Darwin Correspondence Project. (1985–present). The Whale Bear. https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letters/darwins-works-letters/rewriting-origin-later-editions/whale-bear

  • Delamétherie, J.-C. (1799). Discours introductif. Journal de Physique, 48, 3–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deluc, J. A. (1798). Lettres sur l’histoire physique de la terre. Nyon.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Maillet, B. (1748/1750). Telliamed: Or, discourses between an Indian philosopher, and a French missionary, on the diminution of the sea, the formation of the earth, the origin of men and animals. Osborne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, P. (1972). Buffon and the concept of species. Journal of the History of Biology, 5, 259–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrière, H. (2006). Bory de Saint-Vincent, militaire naturaliste entre Révolution et Restauration. Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrière, H. (2009). Bory de Saint-Vincent: l’évolution d’un voyageur naturaliste. Syllepse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fray, J.-B. (1807). Nouvelles expériences extraites d’un manuscrit qui a pour titre: Essai sur l’origine des Corps Organisé et Inorganisés. Louis Quien/Grieshammer/Nicole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fray, J.-B. (1810). Nouvelles expériences extraites d’un manuscrit qui a pour titre: Essai sur l’origine des Corps Organisé et Inorganisés. Journal de Physique, 70, 427–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fray, J.-B. (1817). Essai sur l’origine des Corps Organisé et Inorganisés, et sur quelque phénomènes de Physiologie Animale et Végétale. Mme Ve Courcier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautieri, G. (1805). Slancio sulla genealogia della Terra e sull’origine dei Vermi abitanti le interiora degli Animali.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gérard, F. (1844). L’espèce. In C. D. d’Orbigny (Ed.), Dictionnaire Universel d’histoire Naturelle. d’Orbigny.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliboff, S. (2008). H. G. Bronn, Ernst Haeckel, and the origins of German Darwinism: A study in translation and transformation. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruithuisen, F. V. (1809). Ueber die chemischen und dynamischen Momente bey der Bildung der Infusorien mit einer Kritik der Versuche des Herrn Fray. Journal für die Chemie, Physik und Mineralogie, 8, 511–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoquet, T. (2005). Buffon, histoire naturelle et philosophie. Champion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. N. (2019). Darwin’s historical sketch: An examination of the “preface” to the origin of species. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, L. (Ed.). (1858). Lettres de Georges Cuvier à C. M. Pfaff. V. Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazon, A. (1893). Histoire de Soulavie (naturaliste, diplomate, historien), 2 vols. Fischbacher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, T. (1976). Jean Baptiste René Robinet: The career of a man of letters. Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, 150, 183–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, W. (2010). The world makers: Scientists of the restoration and the search for the origins of the Earth. Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (1992). The Meaning of Evolution. The morphological construction and ideological reconstruction of Darwin’s theory. Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (2002). The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, P. (1979). Buffon, German biology, and the historical interpretation of biological species. The British Journal for the History of Science, 12, 109–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulavie, J.-L. G. (1780–1784). Histoire naturelle de la France méridionale. 7 vols. J.-F. Quillau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. (1984). The Dark Abyss of Time: The History of the Earth & the History of Nations from Hooke to Vico. Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, M. J. S. (2005). Bursting the Limits of Time. The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupke, N. (2005). Neither creation nor evolution: The third way in mid-nineteenth century thinking about the origin of species. Annals of the History and Philosophy of Biology, 10, 143–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, J. A. (2000). Victorian sensation: The extraordinary publication, reception, and secret authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoczkowski, W. (1995). Le Portrait de l’ancêtre en singe: L’Hominisation sans évolutionnisme dans la pensée naturaliste du XVIIe Sicèle. In R. Corbey & B. Theunissen (Eds.), Man, Ape, Apeman: History of an idea, 1600–1900 (pp. 141–155). Pitecanthropus Centennial Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrinière, L. d. l. (1785). Pièces Relatives à l’Histoire naturelle de la France Méridionale. Grangé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviranus, L. C. (1811). Beyträge zur Pflanzenphysiologie. Dieterich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virey, J-J. (1803). Corps organisés. In: Nouveau dictionnaire d’histoire naturelle, 36 vols. Abel Laone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanlin, N. (Ed.). (2018). Evolutions. Litérature et sciences au XIXe siècle: Une Anthologie. Classiques Garnier.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro Corsi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Corsi, P. (2023). Debates About Life’s Origin and Adaptive Powers in the Early Nineteenth Century. In: Elice Brzezinski Prestes, M. (eds) Understanding Evolution in Darwin's "Origin". History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40165-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40165-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-40164-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-40165-7

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics