Skip to main content

Effective Remote Language Teaching

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language Education Programs

Abstract

This chapter provides a review of literature critical to remote teaching and online teaching in the context of English language learning. It investigates two areas specifically: (1) designing effective remote English teaching and learning; and (2) digital technologies for English teaching and learning. To explore these two areas, an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study in an Indonesian secondary state school is presented. The findings of this study provide important insights into technology acceptance during remote teaching, particularly in terms of enhancing teachers’ and students’ understanding of how to design remote and online teaching. Looking forward, teachers are now combining synchronous and asynchronous digital technologies into classroom-based design models and working to further increase students’ learning capacity through the use of these tools and environments. More research is needed to look at successful techniques for building these skills and incorporating them into online, at a distance and in-person teaching approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdullah, F., Tantantandiana, S., & Amelia, R. (2020). Storybird-based narrative writing activities among Indonesian EFL learners: Focusing on contributions. Premise Journal, 9, 164–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abed, E. K. (2019). Electronic learning and its benefits in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(3), em1672. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/102668

  • Angdhiri, R. P. (2020, July 21). Challenges of home learning during a pandemic through the eyes of a student. Life style, the Jakarta Post. Retrieved from https://www.thejakartapost.com/life/2020/04/11/challenges-of-home-learning-during-a-pandemic-through-the-eyes-of-a-student.html

  • Ansong, E., & Boateng, R. (2017). The nature of E-learning adoption by stakeholders of a university in Africa. E-Learning and Digital Media, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017731235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azhari, O., & Adnan, A. (2018). The use of Lyrics training website to improve student listening comprehension in senior high school. Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(3), 578–586. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt/article/view/101093

  • Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191

  • Barbour, M. K., LaBonte, R., Hodges, C., & Moore, S. (2020). Understanding pandemic pedagogy: Differences between emergency remote, remote, and online teaching. Canadian eLearning Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, A. G. G., & Wells, J. A. (2012). eFACT : Formative assessment of classroom teaching for online classes. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), 1(1), 68–78. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ976930

  • Bezhovski, Z. (2016). The evolution of e-Learning and new trends. Information and Knowledge Management, 6(3), 50–57. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/IKM/article/view/29274/30063

  • Brearley, F. Q., & Rod Cullen, W. (2012). Providing students with formative audio feedback. Bioscience Education, 20, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.11120/beej.2012.20000022

  • Bušelić, M. (2012). Distance learning—Concepts and contributions. Oeconomica Jadertina, 1, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.15291/oec.209

  • Cho, M. (2012). Online student orientation in higher education: A developmental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 1051–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9271-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coker, D. C. (2021). Education, policy, and juvenile delinquents: A mixed methods investigation during COVID-19. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n1p22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, F. P. (2020). Teaching English through drama to tribal students of undergraduate level at remote area of South Gujarat Region in India. Education Quarterly Reviews, 3(4), 521–537. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.03.04.159

  • Dooly, M., & Vinagre, M. (2021). Research into practice: Virtual exchange in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 55(3), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekmekçi, E. (2015). Distance-education in foreign language teaching: Evaluations from the perspectives of freshman students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 390–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engin, M. (2014). Extending the flipped classroom model: Developing second language writing skills through student-created digital videos. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(5), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotlv14i5.12829

  • Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. D. (2021). Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. PNAS, 118(17), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022376118/-/DCSupplemental.y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, L., & Cooper, H. (2021). (2021). Technology-enabled remote learning during COVID-19: Perspectives of Australian teachers, students and parents. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1868562

  • Gill, A. (2020). Teaching during a pandemic: Designing asynchronous online materials teaching during a pandemic. Special section of Literacies and Language Education: Research and Practice. Kanda University of International Studies (KUIS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R. J. (2000). Psychological testing: Principles and applications. Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gromik, N. A. (2012). Computers & education cell phone video recording feature as a language learning tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 58(1), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha, M., & Lee, S. (2021). The effectiveness of online language learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 14(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadadnia, S., & Shahidi, N. (2012). Effects of teaching through online teacher versus real teacher on student learning in the classroom. Contemporary Educational Technology, 3(1), 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, S., & Kennedy, O. (2020). The practical realities of virtual exchange. In E. Hagley & Y. Wang (Eds.), Virtual exchange in the Asia-Pacific: Research and practice (pp. 125–144). Research Publishing.net.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. (2017). The feedback fix: Dump the past, embrace the future, and lead the way to change. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, S. J., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2021). Ready, set, go! Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching in secondary education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 141–158.https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1839543

  • Kaur, P., & Naderajan, R. (2019). Kahoot! In the English language classroom. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 20(6), 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyan, W. (2012). Statistik pendidikan teknik analisis data kuantitatif. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusuma, A. (2021). Learners’ perspectives on the effectiveness of online language learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian EFL Journal, 25(1), 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai E., & Xue Y. (2012) On the influence of online education on teacher-student relationship. In J. Luo (Ed.), Soft computing in information communication technology: Advances in intelligent and soft computing (p. 161). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larbi-Siaw, O., & Owusu-Agyeman, Y. (2017). Miscellany of students’ satisfaction in an asynchronous learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(4), 456–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516667499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepore, C. E. (2014). Influencing students’ pronunciation and willingness to communicate through interpersonal audio discussions. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1080228

  • Mahdi, H. S. (2020). EFL teachers’ perceptions and practices of online language teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iraq. Journal of Educational Sciences, 33(1), 126–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning online: What research tells us about whether, when and how. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, M., McLeod, M, Grabill, J., & Hart-Davidson, B. (2021). Feedback and improvement: Becoming a better writer by helping other writers. https://elireview.com/content/students/feedback/

  • Miftach, N. A. (2020). The role of collaboration and sharing among English teachers in developing digital competencies. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(3), 411–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mtebe, J. (2015). Learning management system success: Increasing learning management system usage in higher education in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 11(2), 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliphant, T., & Branch-mueller, J. (2016). Developing a sense of community and the online student experience. Education for Information, 32, 307–321. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-160979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prestridge, S., Exley, B., Pendergast, D., O’Brien, M., Cox, D., & Schmid, M. (2021). Teaching in a virtual world: Defining teacher practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 29(3), 417–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana, H., Rajiv, R., & Lal, M. (2014). E-learning: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Computer Applications, 97(5), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.5120/17004-7154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rintaningrum, R. (2018). lnvestigating reasons why listening in English is difficult: Voice from foreign language learners. Asian EFL Journal, 20(11), 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, T. (2013). Sample size determination and power. John Wiley and Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sencer Corlu, M. (2014). FeTeMM eÄźitimi makale çaÄźrı mektubu [Call for STEM education research in the Turkish context]. Turkish Journal of Education, 3(3), 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setiawan, R., & Wiedarti, P. (2020). The effectiveness of quizlet application towards students’ motivation in learning vocabulary. Studies in English Language and Education, 7, 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. H. (2016). Book review of learning online: What research tells us about whether, when and how. Open Praxis, 8(3), 277–278. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subekti, A.S. (2020). Covid-19-triggered online learning implementation: Pre-Service English teachers’ beliefs, Metathesis: Journal of English Language Literature And Teaching 4(3), 232–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumardi, S., & Nugrahani, D. (2021). Adaptation to emergency remote teaching: Pedagogical strategy for pre-service language teachers amid COVID-19 pandemic. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.906553

  • Taguchi, N. (2020). Digitally mediated remote learning of pragmatics. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utami, I. G. A. L. P. (2018). The online learning of teacher profession education program (ppg) for in-service English teachers: Challenges and accelerated learning factors. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 7(2), 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, T. (2021). Emergency remote studio teaching: Notes from the field. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v9i2.31580

  • Xie, Y., & Ke, Y. (2020). Students’ perception and expectation of online teaching: A case study of Chinese international students during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of International Students, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v10iS2.1812

  • Yakubu, M. N. (2019). The effect of quality antecedents on the acceptance of learning management systems: A case of two private universities in Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 15(4), 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. (2010). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, A. H. K., & Ma, W. W. K. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660802232779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yundayani, A., Abdullah, F., Tandiana, S. T., & Sutrisno, B. (2021). Students’ cognitive engagement during emergency remote teaching: Evidence from the Indonesian EFL milieu. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.2

  • Yusnilita, N. (2020). The impact of online learning: Student’s views. English Teaching Journal, 11(1), 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakarneh, B. M. (2018). Effectiveness of e-learning mode for teaching English language in Arab universities. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature (IJALEL), 7(7), 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. G. A. Lokita Purnamika Utami .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lokita Purnamika Utami, I.G.A., Prestridge, S. (2023). Effective Remote Language Teaching. In: Tajeddin, Z., Griffiths, C. (eds) Language Education Programs. Language Policy, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38754-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38754-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38753-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38754-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics