Skip to main content

Research Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Education Scholarship in Healthcare
  • 267 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter builds upon the previous chapter by providing an understanding of methodological approaches used to examine research questions for exploring educational problems within the health profession. As such, the three research paradigms, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research, are explored. First, an introduction provides a broad overview of the characteristics for each research paradigm. The three research paradigms are then discussed with respect to the philosophical underpinnings, study designs and types, data collection, and data analysis. Examples throughout this chapter aim to provide clarity on the use of these approaches for the variety of research studies that examine educational problems within the health profession. As such, the concepts are applied to basic, applied, evaluation, and action research to name a few. In sum, the ideas presented in this chapter aim to provide a foundational understanding of definitions and applications of research methods to answer a variety of research questions for educational researchers within the health field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Johnson B, Christensen LB. Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nagel T. The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res. 2004;33(7):14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x033007014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Michael K, Dror MG, Karnieli-Miller O. Students’ patient-centered-care attitudes: the contribution of self-efficacy, communication, and empathy. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(11):2031–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stake RE. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nilmanat K, Kurniawan T. The quest in case study research. Pac Rim Int J Nurs. 2019;25(1):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Glaser BG, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Co.; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chun Tie Y, Birks M, Francis K. Grounded theory research: a design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Med. 2019;7:205031211882292. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marshall MN. Sampling for qualitative research. Fam Pract. 1996;13(6):522–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marshall C, Rossman GB. Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levine HG, Gallimore R, Weisner TS, Turner JL. Teaching participant-observation research methods: a skills-building approach. Anthropol Educ Q. 1980;11(1):38–54. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1980.11.1.05x1849c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Spradley JP. The ethnographic interview. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kvale S. Interviews: an introduction to qualitive research interviewing. Sage; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gesch-Karamanlidis E. Reflecting on novice qualitative interviewer mistakes. The Qualitative Report. 2015. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2145.

  17. Galesic M, Bosnjak M. Effects of questionnaire length on participation and indicators of response quality in a web survey. Public Opin Q. 2009;73(2):349–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guba EG. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ECTJ. 1981;29(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02766777.

  19. Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member checking. Qualitative Health Research. 2016;26(13):1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870.

  20. Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inf. 2004;22(2):63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-2004-22201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Sage; 1985.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making sense of qualitative data: complementary research strategies. Sage; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Erickson F. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: Wittrock MC, editor. Handbook of research on teaching. Macmillan; 1986. p. 119–59.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Sage; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wolcott HF. Writing up qualitative research. Sage; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bergman MM. Advances in mixed methods research: theories and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Leech NL, Onwuegbuzie AJ. A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual Quantity Int J Methodol. 2009;43(2):265–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1(2):112–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Creamer EG. An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Plano Clark VL, Badiee M. Research questions in mixed methods research. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Handbook of mixed methods research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Onwuegbuzie A, Leech N. Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. Qual Rep. 2006;11(3):474–98. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2006.1663.

  32. Ridenour CS, Newman I. Mixed methods research: exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ramnanan C, Pound L. Advances in medical education and practice: student perceptions of the flipped classroom. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:63–73. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s109037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camille L. Bryant .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bryant, C.L. (2023). Research Methods. In: Fitzgerald, A.S., Bosch, G. (eds) Education Scholarship in Healthcare. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38534-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38534-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38533-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38534-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics