Skip to main content

The Cultural Dimension of Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The A Priori Method in the Social Sciences

Abstract

Reflecting on prejudices in law is difficult because all in law is prejudice. This is due to the ubiquitous place of culture in law. Another obstacle is that, although uncovering common sense and prejudices make particular sense in science, in the field of law, science is challenged, and it exists only in certain legal systems, so it could be considered in itself as a prejudice. This chapter outlines the different aspects of the role played by culture in the field of law. It also tries to chart the basic idiosyncrasies in law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berman, H. J. (2010). Law and Revolution: The formation of legal western tradition, 1983. Droit et révolution. La formation de la tradition juridique occidentale. Trad. R. Audouin, Librairie de l’université d’Aix-en-Provence, 2002. Droit et Révolution. L’impact des réformes protestantes sur la tradition juridique occidentale, trad. A. Wijffels, note marginale P. Legendre, Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterrell, R. (2008). Chapter 21: Comparative law and legal culture. In M. Reimann & R. Zimmermann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative law. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, R. (Ed.) (1975). International encyclopedia of comparative law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, A. (1991). Droits de l’homme, droit naturel et histoire. PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, L. M., The Legal System, A Social Science Perspective (1975). Some thoughts on comparative legal culture, in Comparative and private international law. In D. S. Clark (Ed.), Essays in honor of. J. H. Merryman on his seventieth birthday (p. 49), 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, H. P. (2010). Legal traditions of the world (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. Legal culture and legal tradition. In M. Van Hoecke (Ed.), Epistemology and methodology of comparative law (2004, p. 7). Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordley, J. (2011). The universalist heritage. In P. Legrand & R. Munday (Eds.), Comparative legal studies: Tradition and transitions (p. 31). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laboratoire d’anthropologie juridique de Paris (2003). Les pluralismes juridiques, ed. Karthala, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legrand, P. (1999). Le droit comparé, PUF. The impossibility of legal transplants. Maastricht journal of European and comparative law, 1997, 7, p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merryman, J. H., & Perez-Perdomo, R. (2007). The civil law tradition. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riles, A. (2001). Rethinking the masters of comparative law. Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouland, N. (1988). Anthropologie juridique. PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzer, A. (1961). Vergleichende RechtslehreI (2nd ed., 1945). Basel Recht und Gesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderlinden, J. (2013). Anthropologie juridique, Dalloz. Les pluralismes juridiques, Bruylant, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villey, M. (2003). La formation de la pensée juridique moderne. PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. (1974). Legal transplants, an approach of comparative law. Legal culture v. legal tradition. In M. Van Hoecke (Ed.), Epistemology and methodology of comparative law (p. 1). Hart Publishing, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2017). Sociologie du droit (J. Grosclaude, Trans.). PUF. Sociologie des religions, J.-P. Grossein, Gallimard, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenati-Castaing, F. (2021). Repenser le système juridique. In B. Bonnet (Ed.), Traité des rapports entre ordres juridiques, LGDJ (p. 1549). Le savoir des lois. Essai sur le droit romaniste. Dalloz, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (2011). An introduction to comparative law (3rd ed., T. Weir, Trans.). Clarendon Press Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zenati-Castaing, F. (2023). The Cultural Dimension of Law. In: Bergé, JS. (eds) The A Priori Method in the Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38260-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38260-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38259-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38260-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics