Abstract
Reflecting on prejudices in law is difficult because all in law is prejudice. This is due to the ubiquitous place of culture in law. Another obstacle is that, although uncovering common sense and prejudices make particular sense in science, in the field of law, science is challenged, and it exists only in certain legal systems, so it could be considered in itself as a prejudice. This chapter outlines the different aspects of the role played by culture in the field of law. It also tries to chart the basic idiosyncrasies in law.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berman, H. J. (2010). Law and Revolution: The formation of legal western tradition, 1983. Droit et révolution. La formation de la tradition juridique occidentale. Trad. R. Audouin, Librairie de l’université d’Aix-en-Provence, 2002. Droit et Révolution. L’impact des réformes protestantes sur la tradition juridique occidentale, trad. A. Wijffels, note marginale P. Legendre, Fayard.
Cotterrell, R. (2008). Chapter 21: Comparative law and legal culture. In M. Reimann & R. Zimmermann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative law. Oxford University Press.
David, R. (Ed.) (1975). International encyclopedia of comparative law.
Dufour, A. (1991). Droits de l’homme, droit naturel et histoire. PUF.
Friedman, L. M., The Legal System, A Social Science Perspective (1975). Some thoughts on comparative legal culture, in Comparative and private international law. In D. S. Clark (Ed.), Essays in honor of. J. H. Merryman on his seventieth birthday (p. 49), 1990.
Glenn, H. P. (2010). Legal traditions of the world (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. Legal culture and legal tradition. In M. Van Hoecke (Ed.), Epistemology and methodology of comparative law (2004, p. 7). Hart Publishing.
Gordley, J. (2011). The universalist heritage. In P. Legrand & R. Munday (Eds.), Comparative legal studies: Tradition and transitions (p. 31). Cambridge University Press.
Laboratoire d’anthropologie juridique de Paris (2003). Les pluralismes juridiques, ed. Karthala, Paris.
Legrand, P. (1999). Le droit comparé, PUF. The impossibility of legal transplants. Maastricht journal of European and comparative law, 1997, 7, p. 111.
Merryman, J. H., & Perez-Perdomo, R. (2007). The civil law tradition. Stanford University Press.
Riles, A. (2001). Rethinking the masters of comparative law. Hart Publishing.
Rouland, N. (1988). Anthropologie juridique. PUF.
Schnitzer, A. (1961). Vergleichende RechtslehreI (2nd ed., 1945). Basel Recht und Gesellschaft.
Vanderlinden, J. (2013). Anthropologie juridique, Dalloz. Les pluralismes juridiques, Bruylant, 1996.
Villey, M. (2003). La formation de la pensée juridique moderne. PUF.
Watson, A. (1974). Legal transplants, an approach of comparative law. Legal culture v. legal tradition. In M. Van Hoecke (Ed.), Epistemology and methodology of comparative law (p. 1). Hart Publishing, 2004.
Weber, M. (2017). Sociologie du droit (J. Grosclaude, Trans.). PUF. Sociologie des religions, J.-P. Grossein, Gallimard, 1996.
Zenati-Castaing, F. (2021). Repenser le système juridique. In B. Bonnet (Ed.), Traité des rapports entre ordres juridiques, LGDJ (p. 1549). Le savoir des lois. Essai sur le droit romaniste. Dalloz, 2016.
Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (2011). An introduction to comparative law (3rd ed., T. Weir, Trans.). Clarendon Press Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zenati-Castaing, F. (2023). The Cultural Dimension of Law. In: Bergé, JS. (eds) The A Priori Method in the Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38260-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38260-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38259-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38260-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)