Skip to main content

A Priori to Investigate Innovation in Management Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The A Priori Method in the Social Sciences
  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims at discussing an antecedent approach to innovation in management science. Innovation management is an inherently interdisciplinary field. It also of course addresses specific research interests. To what extent have the inherited commonplaces of innovation in social science influenced the construction of innovation management scholars’ self-related beliefs? How do they shape current leading approaches to innovation management? Our objective is to answer these questions by supposing that antecedents do mold, forge, and shape the very identity of the object of study. To follow this antecedent reasoning, we will first outline the historical and theoretical foundations of innovation management. We will then present the specificities of the managerial approach to innovation by focusing on its strategic and organizational dimensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aoki, M. (1986). Horizontal vs vertical information structure of the firm. The American Economic Review, 76(5), 971–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 171, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogers, M., Zobel, A. K., Afuah, A., & Almirall, A. (2017). The open innovation research landscape: Established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation., 24, 8–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohendet, P., Grandadam, D., & Simon, L. (2010a). The anatomy of the creative city. Industry and Innovation, 17(1), 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohendet, P., Llerena, P., & Simon, L. (2010b). The innovative firm: Nexus of communities and creativity. Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 139–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F. (1987). The adoption of technological, administrative and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational Factors. Journal of Management, 13, 675–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization : Designing dual structures for innovation. In R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy, & D. P. Slevin (Eds.), The management of organization design (Vol. 1, pp. 167–188). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, T. (2004). Bringing technology and innovation into the boardroom, european institute for technology and management, chap. 3, 47–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: Three core process archetypes. In R&D management conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J. R. (1981). Managerial Innovation, in NYSTROM P. and. STARBUCK W. (Eds), Handbook of Organizational Design, Vol. 1, New York : Oxford University Press, 84–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2016). Fayol, Guillaume, Chevenard – la science, l’industrie et l’exploration de l’inconnu: logique et gouvernance d’une recherche conceptive. Entreprise et histoire, 2(83), 79–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maunoury, Y. J. L. (1968). La genèse des innovations. Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1990). Le management. Voyage au centre des organisations, Les Editions d’Organisation, Paris, Traduction de Inside our Strange World of Organizations. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. B. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2009). The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices, Journal of Business Research, 62, 1269–1280.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. In Harvard business review (pp. 74–81). Avril.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pénin, J. (2016). Joseph Aloïs Schumpeter. Père de l’économie et de la gestion de l’innovation? In Les grands auteurs en management de l’innovation et de la créativité (pp. 13–36)., Thierry Burger-Helmchen, Caroline Hussler, Patrick Cohendet (dir.), Editions EMS.

  • Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage, creating and sustaining superior performance. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randhawa, R., Wilden, R., & Hoberger, J. (2016). A bibliometric review of open innovation: Setting a research agenda. The Journal of Product Innovation Management., 33(6), 750–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2006). Reflections on “profiting from innovation”. Research Policy, 35, 1131–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valibhay, C.. (2021). Le brevet, norme de gestion de l’activité inventive – Nouveaux modèles pour penser une gestion des capacités inventives (thèse de doctorat). Université PSL-Mines Paris Tech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Engelman, R. E. (2004). Event- and outcome-driven explanations of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., Angle, H., & Poole, M. S. (Eds.). (1989). Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies. Ballinger/Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cécile Ayerbe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ayerbe, C. (2023). A Priori to Investigate Innovation in Management Science. In: Bergé, JS. (eds) The A Priori Method in the Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38260-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38260-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38259-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38260-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics