Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction: Convergence and Divergence in Times of Crisis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Are Legal Systems Converging or Diverging?

  • 116 Accesses

Abstract

While legal harmonisation/convergence is considered to be one of the most influential theses in the discipline of law, the law of harmonisation is full of paradoxes. On the one hand, legal borrowing is commonplace, leading to a phenomenon of convergence; on the other hand, it is widely accepted that legal systems are not converging.

Legal convergence is not a new concept. However, as the twenty-first century unfolds, individual nations’ affairs, news, and problems increasingly reach and captivate global audiences. During the last few decades, the internationalisation and transnationalisation of law have reached unprecedented levels. Due to its ability to bring cultures and laws together, globalisation has facilitated legal transplants as law makers have resorted to the use foreign legal models. In spite of this, wars, ideological conflicts, divergent national interests, and cultural clashes have led to some resistance to legal convergence. As a result, the legal world remains fragmented and governed by many different regimes.

Therefore, the question of whether legal systems are converging or diverging remains unanswered. This book inserts itself in this intellectual odyssey of the concepts of legal convergence and legal pluralism. It contributes to the rich comparative law and legal transplants literature by examining legal convergence through the prism of contemporary crises.

This book attempts to determine whether, in times of crisis, foreign laws, rules, and concepts can transcend countries’ levels of maturity and branches of law, or whether states’ responses to crises lead to legal divergence and disintegration. In doing so, the book investigates whether policy and legal responses from Russia to Germany and from bankruptcy law to environmental law, have adopted or copied features, policies, principles and/or rules of other legal systems or international standards (convergence) or rather, have departed from existing legal norms, or adopted dissimilar policies and rules (divergence), as a result of crises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Platsas (2009).

  2. 2.

    Legrand (1996).

  3. 3.

    Plato (1997).

  4. 4.

    Watson (1974), pp. 22–24.

  5. 5.

    Owen (2002).

  6. 6.

    Giddens (1990), p. 64.

  7. 7.

    Twining (2000), p. 4.

  8. 8.

    Platsas (2009).

  9. 9.

    Higgins (1999), p. 82.

  10. 10.

    Smits (2007), p. 1181.

  11. 11.

    Twining (2009), p. 271.

  12. 12.

    Sabine (1961), pp. 405–407.

  13. 13.

    Hobbes (1651).

  14. 14.

    Savigny (1973).

  15. 15.

    Sewell Jr (1996), pp. 262–263.

  16. 16.

    Wendell Holmes (1998), p. 708.

  17. 17.

    Posner (2000), p. 573.

  18. 18.

    Montesquieu (1748), Book I, Chapter 3.

  19. 19.

    Kahn-Freund (1974).

  20. 20.

    Friedman (1985), p. 12.

  21. 21.

    Legrand (2003), p. 248.

  22. 22.

    Ibid, p. 299.

  23. 23.

    Legrand (1996).

  24. 24.

    Koschaker (1953).

  25. 25.

    Wieacker (1981, 1990).

  26. 26.

    See Watson (1991); Tuori and Björklund (2018).

  27. 27.

    See Burman and Harrell-Bond (1979); Chanock (1985).

  28. 28.

    See Merryman (1977); Merry (1988); Whytock (2009).

  29. 29.

    Örücü (1995, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2004).

  30. 30.

    Watson (1974, 1976).

  31. 31.

    See Watson (2000a, b, 2007); Kahn-Freund (1974); Mattei (1997).

  32. 32.

    Watson (1974), p. 95.

  33. 33.

    Ghio (2022); Andenas and Baasch Andersen (2011); Legrand (2002).

  34. 34.

    Zweigert and Kötz (1998), pp. 39–40.

  35. 35.

    Lorenz (1963).

  36. 36.

    Ghio et al. (2021).

  37. 37.

    See Dyevre et al. (2018); Leruth et al. (2019); Sornarajah (2020).

  38. 38.

    Democracy Now (2020).

  39. 39.

    Vashon-Maury Island Beachcomber (2020).

  40. 40.

    Van Middelaar (2014).

  41. 41.

    Reisman and Willard (1988), p. 15.

  42. 42.

    Naude (2019); Siems (2008); van Niekerk (2002); Mullineux (2007); Robertson and Tilbury (2016); Goanta (2016).

  43. 43.

    Mattei and Pres (2008); Nottage (2001).

  44. 44.

    Legrand (1996).

  45. 45.

    Fahey (2020); Martinico and Pollicino (2012); Beaumont et al. (2002).

  46. 46.

    Crettez (2014); Platsas (2009); Fahey (2020).

  47. 47.

    Gant (2016); Shadad (2009); Hernes (2018).

References

  • Andenas M, Baasch Andersen C (eds) (2011) Theory and practice of harmonisation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont P et al (2002) Convergence and divergence in European public law. Hart Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman S, Harrell-Bond B (eds) (1979) The imposition of law. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanock M (1985) Law, custom, and social order: the colonial experience in Malawi and Zambia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Crettez B (2014) Legal convergence and endogenous preferences. Int Rev Law Econ 39:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Democracy Now (2020) “Coronavirus capitalism”: Naomi Klein’s case for transformative change amid coronavirus pandemic (19 March 2020). https://www.democracynow.org/2020/3/19/naomi_klein_coronavirus_capitalism

  • Dyevre A et al (2018) Uncertainty and legal disintegration: evidence from Brexit. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3276189

  • Fahey E (ed) (2020) Framing convergence within the global legal order. The EU and the world. Hart Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman L (1985) A history of American law. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gant J (2016) Studies in convergence? Post-crisis effects on corporate rescue and the influence of social policy: the EU and the USA. Int Insolv Rev 25:72–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghio E (2022) Redefining harmonisation. Lessons from EU insolvency law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghio E et al (2021) Harmonising insolvency law in the EU: new thoughts on old ideas in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Insolv Rev 30:427–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1990) The consequences of modernity. Stanford University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Goanta C (2016) Convergence in European consumer sales law. Intersentia, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hernes V (2018) Cross-national convergence in times of crisis? Integration policies before, during and after the refugee crisis. West Eur Polit 41:1305–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins R (1999) International law in a changing international system. Camb Law J 58:78–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes T (1651) The Leviathan. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn-Freund O (1974) On the uses and misuses of comparative law. Mod Law Rev 37:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschaker P (1953) Europa und das römische Recht. Biederstein, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Legrand P (1996) European legal systems are not converging. Int Comp Law Q 45:52–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legrand P (2002) On the unbearable localness of the law: academic fallacies and unseasonable observations. Eur Rev Priv Law 10:61–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legrand P (2003) The same and the different. In: Legrand P, Munday R (eds) Comparative legal studies: traditions and transitions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leruth B et al (2019) Exploring differentiated disintegration in a Post-Brexit European Union. J Common Mark Stud 57:1013–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz E (1963) Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci 20:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinico G, Pollicino O (2012) The interaction between Europe’s legal systems. Judicial dialogue and the creation of supranational laws. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mattei U (1997) Comparative law and economics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mattei U, Pres L (2008) Civil law and common law: toward convergence? In: Caldeira G et al (eds) The Oxford handbook of law and politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 267–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry S (1988) Legal pluralism. Law Soc Rev 22:869–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merryman J (1977) Comparative law and social change. On the origins, style, decline and revival of the law and development movement. Am J Comp Law 25:457–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montesquieu C (1748) De L’Esprit des Lois. Barillot et fils, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullineux A (2007) Financial sector convergence and corporate governance. J Financ Regul Compliance 15:8–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naude T (2019) Fragmentation versus convergence of consumer law within one legal system and across legal systems: an African perspective. J Consum Policy 43:11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nottage L (2001) Comment on civil law and common law: two different paths leading to the same goal. Vic Univ Wellingt Law Rev 32:843–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Örücü E (1995) A theoretical framework for transfrontier mobility of law. In: Jagtenberg R et al (eds) Transfrontier mobility of law. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn

    Google Scholar 

  • Örücü E (1999) Critical comparative law: considering paradoxes for legal systems in transition. Kluwer, Deventer

    Google Scholar 

  • Örücü E (2000) Turkey facing the European Union – old and new harmonies. Eur Law Rev 25:523–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Örücü E (2002) Law as transposition. Int Comp Law Q 51:205–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Örücü E (2004) The enigma of comparative law: variations on a theme for the 21st century. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Owen J (2002) The foreign imposition of domestic institutions. Int Organ 56:375–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1997) The Republic. Wordsworth Editions, Ware

    Google Scholar 

  • Platsas A (2009) The idea of legal convergence and international economic law. Int J Priv Law 2:385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner R (2000) Past-dependency, pragmatism, and critique of history in adjudication and legal scholarship. Univ Chic Law Rev 67:573–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisman M, Willard A (eds) (1988) International incidents: the law that counts in world politics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson A, Tilbury M (2016) The common law of obligations. Divergence and unity. Hart Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabine G (1961) A history of political theory. Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Savigny FC (1973) Vom Beruf unserer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft. In: Hattenhauer H (ed) Thibaut und Savigny: Ihre programmatischen Schrifften. F Vahlen, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell W Jr (1996) Three temporalities: toward an eventful sociology. In: McDonald T (ed) The historic turn in the human sciences. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadad H (2009) Coming together after the crisis: global convergence of private equity and hedge funds. Northwest J Int Law Bus 29:603–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Siems M (2008) Convergence in shareholder law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits J (2007) Law making in the European Union: on globalization and contract law in divergent legal cultures. Louisiana Law Rev 67:1181–1203

    Google Scholar 

  • Sornarajah M (2020) Disintegration and change in the international law on foreign investment. J Int Econ Law 23:413–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuori K, Björklund H (eds) (2018) Roman law and the idea of Europe. Bloomsbury Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Twining W (2000) Globalisation and legal theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Twining W (2009) General jurisprudence: understanding law from a global perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Middelaar L (2014) The crises in the Eurozone and Ukraine have heralded the “return of politics” to European integration. LSE European Politics and Policy Blog (21 May 2014). https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/eurocrisispress/2014/05/21/the-crises-in-the-eurozone-and-ukraine-have-heralded-the-return-of-politics-to-european-integration/

  • Van Niekerk G (2002) The convergence of legal systems in Southern Africa. Comp Int Law J South Africa 35:308–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Vashon-Maury Island Beachcomber (2020) A tipping point for humanity (4 June 2020). https://www.vashonbeachcomber.com/opinion/a-tipping-point-for-humanity/

  • Watson A (1974) Legal transplants: an approach to comparative law. Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson A (1976) Legal transplants and law reform. Law Q Rev 92:79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson A (1991) Roman law and comparative law. University of Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson A (2000a) Legal transplants and European private law. Ius Commune Lecture, Maastricht

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson A (2000b) Law out of context. University of Georgia Press, Athens

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watson A (2007) Comparative law: law, reality and society. Vandeplas Publications, Lake Mary

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendell Holmes O (1998) The path of law. Boston Univ Law Rev 78:699–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Whytock C (2009) Legal origins, functionalism, and the future of comparative law. Brigham Young Univ Law Rev 2009:1879–1905

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieacker F (1981) The importance of Roman law for modern western civilization and western legal thought. Boston Coll Int Comp Law Rev IV:257–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieacker F (1990) Foundations of European legal culture. Am J Comp Law 38:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweigert K, Kötz H (1998) An introduction to comparative law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    Emilie Ghio

Authors
  1. Emilie Ghio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilie Ghio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    Emilie Ghio

  2. Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Ricardo Perlingeiro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ghio, E. (2024). Introduction: Convergence and Divergence in Times of Crisis. In: Ghio, E., Perlingeiro, R. (eds) Are Legal Systems Converging or Diverging?. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38180-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38180-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38179-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38180-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation