Skip to main content

Project-Based Approach to Enhance Online Learning: A Case of Teaching Systems Thinking and System Dynamics Modeling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Online Teaching and Learning in Asian Higher Education
  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

Teaching online poses challenges in terms of meaningful student engagement, physical interactions, and also delivering the content. To keep students actively engaged and motivated for their learning and to achieve the intended learning outcomes of a course, it is essential to implement appropriate learner-centric pedagogy. For this, project-based approach favors collaborative learning in small groups and offers opportunities to engage students for effective and active participation online. Any systems thinking course also requires a project/problem-based approach to enable students to learn to model real-world problems. This chapter presents an example of the implementation of a project-based approach to teach systems thinking and system dynamics modeling while engaging students in online settings. It also focuses on how students can be engaged online effectively to learn collaboratively from the project, and through a workable framework of TPACK. The author integrates content knowledge (CK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), and technology-enabled learning (TPK) via Zoom as the online platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, V., & Johnson, L. (1997). Systems thinking basics. From concepts to causal loops. Pegasus Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2017). A complete set of systems thinking skills. Insight, 20(3), 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeten, M., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2013). The effects of different learning environments on students’ motivation for learning and their achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 484–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, P. (2019). Making learning centered teaching work. Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J. (2020). Engaging Students through Zoom (1st ed.). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education and Accreditation, 6(1), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eker, S., Zimmermann, N., Carnohan, S., & Davies, M. (2018). Participatory system dynamics modeling for housing, energy and wellbeing interactions. Building Research & Information, 46(7), 738–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1971). World dynamics. Pegasus Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1994). System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. System Dynamics Review, 10, 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, E. M. (2018). Teaching systems thinking to general education students. Ecological Modelling, 373, 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., & Miller, S. (2014). Using systems thinking to educate for sustainability in a business school. Systems, 2, 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, W., Palmer, S., & Bennett, M. (2012). A longitudinal evaluation of a project-based learning initiative in an engineering undergraduate programme. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(2), 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannafin, M. J., & Hannafin, K. M. (2010). Cognition and student-centered web-based learning: Issues and implications for research and theory. In M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, & Kinshuk (Eds.), Learning and instruction in the digital age (pp. 11–23). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. (2007). The student-centered classroom. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanuka, H., & Garrison, D. (2004). Cognitive presence on online learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(2), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., & Hannafin, M. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers and Education, 56(2), 403–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, J., & Boss, S. (2013). Thinking through project-based learning: Guiding deeper inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melrose, S., & Bergeron, K. (2007). Instructor immediacy strategies to facilitate group work in online graduate study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technologies, 23(1), 132–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munich, K. (2014). Social support for online learning: Perspectives of nursing students. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 29(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palaima, T., & Skařzauskienė, A. (2010). Systems thinking as a platform for leadership performance in a complex world. Baltimore J. Management, 5(3), 330–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S., & Hall, W. (2011). An evaluation of a project-based learning initiative in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 357–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, O. V., Doyle, J. K., Saeed, K., Lyneis, J. M., & Radzicki, M. J. (2014). The design of educational programs in system dynamics at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). Systems, 2(1), 54–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. P., Black, L. J., Deegan, M., Ghaffarzadegan, N., Greer, D., Kim, H., Luna-Reyes, L. F., MacDonald, R., Rich, E., Stave, K. A., Zimmermann, N., & Andersen, D. F. (2015). Reflections on peer mentoring for ongoing professional development in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 31(3), 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G. P., & Pugh, A. L. (1981). Introduction to system dynamics modeling with DYNAMO. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, B. (1991). Systems Thinking: Four Key Questions. Watkins, GA: High Performance Systems, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, B. (1994). System dynamics/systems thinking: Let’s just get on with it. System Dynamics Review, 10(2–3), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, B. (2000). The “Thinking” in systems thinking: Seven essential skills. Pegasus Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooney-Varga, J. N., Kapmeier, F., Sterman, J. D., Jones, A. P., Putko, M., & Rath, K. (2020). The climate action simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 51(2), 114–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation. Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starobin, S. S., Chen, Y., Kollasch, A., Baul, T., & Laanan, F. S. (2014). The effects of a pre-engineering project-based learning curriculum on self-efficacy among community college students. Community Colleges J, 38(2−3), 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw Hill Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroh, D. P. (2015). Systems thinking for social change: A practical guide to solving complex problems, avoiding unintended consequences, and achieving lasting results. Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suprun, E., Horvat, A., & Andersen, D. F. (2021). Making each other smarter: Assessing peer mentoring groups as a way to support learning system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 37, 212–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventana Systems Inc. (1990). Vensim® Version 9.2.0. https://vensim.com/vensim-personal-learning-edition/

  • Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. JosseyBass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheat, I. D. (2007). The feedback method. A system dynamics approach to teaching macroeconomics. (Doctoral thesis). University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheat, I. D. (2008). The feedback method of teaching macroeconomics: Is it effective? System Dynamics. Review, 23(4), 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, B., Aguiar, A., Gkini, C., Czermainski de Oliveira, I., Lunde Trellevik, L.-K., & Kopainsky, B. (2020). Reflections on adapting group model building scripts into online workshops. System Dynamics Review, 36, 358–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. B. (2011). Student-centered learning in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 92–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S. A., Goh, S. E., & Park, M. (2017). Teaching and learning about complex systems in K–12 science education: A review of empirical 1995-2015. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 285–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K., Peng, S. W., & Hung, J. (2009). Online collaborative learning in a project-based learning environment in Taiwan: A case study on undergraduate students’ perspectives. Educational Media International, 46(2), 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, N., Pluchinotta, I., Salvia, G., Touchie, M., Stopps, H., Hamilton, I., Kesik, T., Dianati, K., & Chen, T. (2021). Moving online: Reflections from conducting system dynamics workshops in virtual settings. System Dynamics Review, 37, 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sreenivasulu Bellam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bellam, S. (2023). Project-Based Approach to Enhance Online Learning: A Case of Teaching Systems Thinking and System Dynamics Modeling. In: So-Sum Wai-Cook, M., Saleh, A., Bista, K. (eds) Online Teaching and Learning in Asian Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38129-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38129-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-38128-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-38129-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics