Abstract
This chapter presents a business ethics framework that can be used to determine the moral responsibility that firms have when it comes to human rights. It starts with a discussion of the relatively new phenomenon of firms being sued for human rights violations in developed countries as is shown by the case of Shell. It also discusses when a firm should be considered complicit in a human rights violation, and what duties firms have to promote human rights.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brenkert, G. (2016). Business ethics and human rights: An overview. Business and Human Rights Journal, 1(2), 277–306. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2016.1
Burgers, L. (2020). Should judges make climate change law? Transnational Environmental Law, 9(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102519000360
De Rechtspraak. (2021, mei 26). Royal Dutch Shell moet uitstoot terugbrengen [online]. Assessed on 4 April 2022, via https://www.rechtspraak.nl/Organisatie-en-contact/Organisatie/Rechtbanken/Rechtbank-Den-Haag/Nieuws/Paginas/Royal-Dutch-Shell-moet-CO2-uitstootterugbrengen.aspx
Dubbink, W., & van de Ven, B. (2012). On the duties of commission in commercial life. A Kantian criticism of moral institutionalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9283-x
Habermas. (1996). Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. The MIT Press.
International Standard ISO 26000. (2010). Guidance on social responsibility. ISO.
Luttikhuis, P. (2018, April 4). Milieudefensie begint zaak tegen Shell om milieuschade. NRC Handelsblad. Retrieved May 5, 2022, from https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2018/04/04/zaaktegen-shell-om-milieuschade-a1598077
Schaffer, J. K. (2015). The co-originality of human rights and democracy in a democratic order. International Theory, 7(1), 96–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000426
UN Global Compact. (n.d.). Principle 2. Retrieved May 15, 2022, from https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles/principle-2
Wood, S. (2012). The case for leverage-based corporate human rights responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1), 63–98. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23223699
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van de Ven, B. (2023). Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights. In: Dubbink, W., Deijl, W.v.d. (eds) Business Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37932-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37932-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37931-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37932-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)