Skip to main content

Developing Research Supervision Capacity in Clinical Health Professions: Structured Peer Group Mentoring as Collegial Support in a Research School Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Faculty Peer Group Mentoring in Higher Education

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 61))

  • 200 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reports on the interactional patterns and topics addressed in problem-based peer group mentoring (PPGM) with PhD supervisors affiliated with a national research school in health and social sciences. The textual data comprised video-recorded observations of the interactions in PPGM groups over the course of 1 year, which were supplemented by an analysis of written case descriptions submitted prior to meetings and meta-discussions after the sessions. The analysis revealed a broad range of problems and topics of concern for the participating PhD supervisors. The interactions, framed by the PPGM model, allowed the participants to analyse the problems raised by their colleagues in depth from different angles. These discussions frequently resulted in radically new understandings of the discussed cases. The meta-discussions following the PPGM sessions suggest that the structured interactional patterns supported by the PPGM model provide the supervisors with new insights that help open up new avenues for action and interaction between supervisors and their PhD students. The outcome of the PPGM activity is here pointing towards a reconceptualisation of how supervisors defined their roles and relations to their students. PPGM proved to be particularly useful in addressing specific problems presented as concrete cases, while participants presenting principal and overarching issues related to PhD supervision tended to end up with less useful input and more vague discussions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiansen, S., & Wittek, L. (this volume). Problem-based peer group mentoring: A tool for faculty development. In T. de Lange, & L. Wittek (Eds.), Faculty peer group mentoring in higher education: Developing collegiality through organised supportive collaboration. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Lee, A. (Eds.). (2009). Changing practices of doctoral education. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, J. L., Balcanoff, K. K., Land, D., Gogarty, M. M., & Turner, F. (2014). Best practices in doctoral retention: Mentoring. Higher Learning Research Communications, 4(2), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v2i2.66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (Vol. 4). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S., & Laurs, D. (2014). Developing generic support for doctoral students. Practice and pedagogy. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Lange, T., & Lauvås, P. (2018). Kollegaveiledning i høyere utdanning. UNIPED, 3, 259–274. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1893-8981-2018-03-07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lange, T., & Wittek, L. (this volume). Chapter 9: Tracing the emergence of relational trust in peer group mentoring. In T. de Lange, & L. Wittek (Eds.), Faculty peer group mentoring in higher education: Developing collegiality through organised supportive collaboration. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lange, T., Esterhazy, R., & Wittek, L. (this volume). Chapter 1: Peer group mentoring among faculty staff in higher education. In T. de Lange, & L. Wittek (Eds.), Faculty peer group mentoring in higher education: Developing collegiality through organised supportive collaboration. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dysthe, O. (2006). Rettleiaren som lærar, partnar eller meister? [The supervisor as teacher, partner or master?]. In O. Dysthe & A. Samara (Eds.), Forskningsveiledning på master- og doktorgradsnivå (pp. 228–248). Abstrakt forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlandsen, L., & de Lange, T. (2017). Studenten som veileder – erfaringer fra Krigsskolens lederutdanning. UNIPED, 40(2), 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Ocampo, G., & Badia, M. C. (2019). Research on doctoral supervision: What we have learnt in the last 10 years. In T. Machin, M. Clarà, & P. Danaher (Eds.), Traversing the doctorate. Palgrave studies in education research methods (pp. 117–141). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23731-8_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, N., & Petrić, B. (2020). Adaptive master’s dissertation supervision: A longitudinal case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1541881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet. (2014). HelseOmsorg21. Et kunnskapssystem for bedre folkehelse. [HealthCare21. A knowledge system for better public health]. Rapport. Nasjonal forsknings- og innovasjonsstrategi for helse og omsorg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, A., Robinson, L., Booth, H., Knapp, M., Jagger, C., & the MODEM Project. (2018). Projections of multi-morbidity in the older population in England to 2035: Estimates from the population ageing and care simulation (PACSim) model. Age and Ageing, 47(3), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kommunenes strategiske forskningsorgan (KSF). (2019). Sluttrapport til HelseOmsorg21-rådet. The Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities (KS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (2001). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju. [The qualitative research interview]. Gyldendal Akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews – Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauvås, P., Lycke, K. H., & Handal, G. (2016). Kollegaveiledning med kritiske venner [Peer mentoring with critical friends]. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindén, J., Ohlin, M., & Brodin, E. M. (2013). Mentorship, supervision, and learning experience in PhD education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 639–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.596526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lycke, K. H. (2006). Erfaringsbasert læring – caseundervisning, problembasert læring og prosjektarbeid. In I. H. I. Strømsø, P. Lauvås, & K. H. Lycke (Eds.), Når læring er det viktigste (pp. 157–176). Cappelen Damm Akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maasø, A., & Simonsen, H. G. (this volume). Chapter 7: Problem-based peer group mentoring and organisational learning. In T. de Lange, & L. Wittek (Eds.), Faculty peer group mentoring in higher education: Developing collegiality through organised supportive collaboration. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016). Strengthening primary care systems. Health at a glance: Europe 2016: State of health in the EU cycle Paris, France. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/state/docs/health_glance_2016_rep_en.pdf.

  • Ringdal, K. (2013). Enhet og mangfold. Samfunnsvitenskapelig forskning og kvantitativ metode [Unity and diversity. Social science research and quantitative method]. Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, M. J. (2017a). Team modes and power: Supervision of doctoral students. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1208157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, M. J. (2017b). Aspects of mentorship in team supervision of doctoral students in Australia. Australian Educational Researcher, 44(4–5), 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, M. J. (2017c). Trust: The power that binds in team supervision of doctoral students. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(7), 1463–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UHR (Universities Norway). (2018). Guidelines for philosophie doctor (Ph.D.). Approved by the UHR board on 9th April 2018. Document retrieved from official webiste: https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.uhr.no%2F_f%2Fp1%2Fi8073335f-a0cd-4dd3-b9bd-d7db94c5b351%2Fveiledning-for-bedommelse-av-norske-doktorgrader-2022_eng.docx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK

  • Whittington, K., Barnes, S., & Lee, A. (2021). What influences how we supervise? In A. Lee & R. Bongaardt (Eds.), The future of doctoral research: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 209–223). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marit Kirkevold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kirkevold, M., de Lange, T. (2023). Developing Research Supervision Capacity in Clinical Health Professions: Structured Peer Group Mentoring as Collegial Support in a Research School Context. In: de Lange, T., Wittek, L. (eds) Faculty Peer Group Mentoring in Higher Education. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 61. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37458-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37458-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37457-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37458-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics