Abstract
This chapter reports on the interactional patterns and topics addressed in problem-based peer group mentoring (PPGM) with PhD supervisors affiliated with a national research school in health and social sciences. The textual data comprised video-recorded observations of the interactions in PPGM groups over the course of 1 year, which were supplemented by an analysis of written case descriptions submitted prior to meetings and meta-discussions after the sessions. The analysis revealed a broad range of problems and topics of concern for the participating PhD supervisors. The interactions, framed by the PPGM model, allowed the participants to analyse the problems raised by their colleagues in depth from different angles. These discussions frequently resulted in radically new understandings of the discussed cases. The meta-discussions following the PPGM sessions suggest that the structured interactional patterns supported by the PPGM model provide the supervisors with new insights that help open up new avenues for action and interaction between supervisors and their PhD students. The outcome of the PPGM activity is here pointing towards a reconceptualisation of how supervisors defined their roles and relations to their students. PPGM proved to be particularly useful in addressing specific problems presented as concrete cases, while participants presenting principal and overarching issues related to PhD supervision tended to end up with less useful input and more vague discussions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Bastiansen, S., & Wittek, L. (this volume). Problem-based peer group mentoring: A tool for faculty development. In T. de Lange, & L. Wittek (Eds.), Faculty peer group mentoring in higher education: Developing collegiality through organised supportive collaboration. Springer.
Boud, D., & Lee, A. (Eds.). (2009). Changing practices of doctoral education. Routledge.
Brill, J. L., Balcanoff, K. K., Land, D., Gogarty, M. M., & Turner, F. (2014). Best practices in doctoral retention: Mentoring. Higher Learning Research Communications, 4(2), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v2i2.66
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (Vol. 4). Oxford University Press.
Carter, S., & Laurs, D. (2014). Developing generic support for doctoral students. Practice and pedagogy. Routledge.
de Lange, T., & Lauvås, P. (2018). Kollegaveiledning i høyere utdanning. UNIPED, 3, 259–274. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1893-8981-2018-03-07
de Lange, T., & Wittek, L. (this volume). Chapter 9: Tracing the emergence of relational trust in peer group mentoring. In T. de Lange, & L. Wittek (Eds.), Faculty peer group mentoring in higher education: Developing collegiality through organised supportive collaboration. Springer.
De Lange, T., Esterhazy, R., & Wittek, L. (this volume). Chapter 1: Peer group mentoring among faculty staff in higher education. In T. de Lange, & L. Wittek (Eds.), Faculty peer group mentoring in higher education: Developing collegiality through organised supportive collaboration. Springer.
Dysthe, O. (2006). Rettleiaren som lærar, partnar eller meister? [The supervisor as teacher, partner or master?]. In O. Dysthe & A. Samara (Eds.), Forskningsveiledning på master- og doktorgradsnivå (pp. 228–248). Abstrakt forlag.
Erlandsen, L., & de Lange, T. (2017). Studenten som veileder – erfaringer fra Krigsskolens lederutdanning. UNIPED, 40(2), 109–128.
González-Ocampo, G., & Badia, M. C. (2019). Research on doctoral supervision: What we have learnt in the last 10 years. In T. Machin, M. Clarà, & P. Danaher (Eds.), Traversing the doctorate. Palgrave studies in education research methods (pp. 117–141). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23731-8_7
Harwood, N., & Petrić, B. (2020). Adaptive master’s dissertation supervision: A longitudinal case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1541881
Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet. (2014). HelseOmsorg21. Et kunnskapssystem for bedre folkehelse. [HealthCare21. A knowledge system for better public health]. Rapport. Nasjonal forsknings- og innovasjonsstrategi for helse og omsorg.
Kingston, A., Robinson, L., Booth, H., Knapp, M., Jagger, C., & the MODEM Project. (2018). Projections of multi-morbidity in the older population in England to 2035: Estimates from the population ageing and care simulation (PACSim) model. Age and Ageing, 47(3), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx201
Kommunenes strategiske forskningsorgan (KSF). (2019). Sluttrapport til HelseOmsorg21-rådet. The Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities (KS).
Kvale, S. (2001). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju. [The qualitative research interview]. Gyldendal Akademisk.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews – Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
Lauvås, P., Lycke, K. H., & Handal, G. (2016). Kollegaveiledning med kritiske venner [Peer mentoring with critical friends]. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Lindén, J., Ohlin, M., & Brodin, E. M. (2013). Mentorship, supervision, and learning experience in PhD education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 639–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.596526
Lycke, K. H. (2006). Erfaringsbasert læring – caseundervisning, problembasert læring og prosjektarbeid. In I. H. I. Strømsø, P. Lauvås, & K. H. Lycke (Eds.), Når læring er det viktigste (pp. 157–176). Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Maasø, A., & Simonsen, H. G. (this volume). Chapter 7: Problem-based peer group mentoring and organisational learning. In T. de Lange, & L. Wittek (Eds.), Faculty peer group mentoring in higher education: Developing collegiality through organised supportive collaboration. Springer.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016). Strengthening primary care systems. Health at a glance: Europe 2016: State of health in the EU cycle Paris, France. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/state/docs/health_glance_2016_rep_en.pdf.
Ringdal, K. (2013). Enhet og mangfold. Samfunnsvitenskapelig forskning og kvantitativ metode [Unity and diversity. Social science research and quantitative method]. Fagbokforlaget.
Robertson, M. J. (2017a). Team modes and power: Supervision of doctoral students. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1208157
Robertson, M. J. (2017b). Aspects of mentorship in team supervision of doctoral students in Australia. Australian Educational Researcher, 44(4–5), 409–424.
Robertson, M. J. (2017c). Trust: The power that binds in team supervision of doctoral students. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(7), 1463–1475.
UHR (Universities Norway). (2018). Guidelines for philosophie doctor (Ph.D.). Approved by the UHR board on 9th April 2018. Document retrieved from official webiste: https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.uhr.no%2F_f%2Fp1%2Fi8073335f-a0cd-4dd3-b9bd-d7db94c5b351%2Fveiledning-for-bedommelse-av-norske-doktorgrader-2022_eng.docx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK
Whittington, K., Barnes, S., & Lee, A. (2021). What influences how we supervise? In A. Lee & R. Bongaardt (Eds.), The future of doctoral research: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 209–223). Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kirkevold, M., de Lange, T. (2023). Developing Research Supervision Capacity in Clinical Health Professions: Structured Peer Group Mentoring as Collegial Support in a Research School Context. In: de Lange, T., Wittek, L. (eds) Faculty Peer Group Mentoring in Higher Education. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 61. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37458-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37458-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-37457-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-37458-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)