Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards a Digital Shift in Museum Visiting Experience. Drafting the Research Agenda Between Academic Research and Practice of Museum Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Architecture and Design for Industry 4.0

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

This chapter reviews the state of the art in digital applications for museums and exhibitions, with a particular focus on the visiting experience. The authors have measured the gap between academic research and the current practice of museum management through a mixed-methodology approach. On one hand, the text presents the result of a systematic literature review of articles on museum digitalization that have been published since 2000. On the other hand, it includes the results of an interview with a group of experts, directors, and curators of Italian museums to understand the degree to which digitalization is currently adopted in those cultural institutions. COVID-19 is an additional factor that has been considered in terms of its impact on scientific production and museums’ strategies. Such cultural institutions, having ticketing and similar forms of revenue related to physical visitors at the core of their model of economic sustainability, suddenly realized the need for a different approach to promoting art, namely forms of engagement from a distance. Within the frame of industry 4.0, it has become evident the crucial role experts play in the field of digitalization and implementation of virtual environments for the art sector. This text aims to draft a research agenda on museum digitalization for the near future, looking at trending topics, academic networks, and research geographies. The qualitative survey with experts’ opinions discussed whether regular employment of digital platforms and virtual tours can engage new visitors in the long term, and established the current status of their day-to-day activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barberio M, Colella M.: Architettura 4.0. Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli Editore (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Figliola A, Battisti A.: Post-industrial Robotics: Exploring Informed Architecture. Singapore: Springer Singapore (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Figliola, A.: The role of didactics in the post-digital age. AGATHÓN International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design. 3, 29–36 (2018). https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/342018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Parry, R.: Recoding the Museum: Digital Heritage and the Technologies of Change. Routledge, London (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Tallon Lc, Walker K, editors. Digital technologies and the museum experience: handheld guides and other media. Plymouth: AltaMira Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Resta, G., Dicuonzo, F., Karacan, E., Pastore, D.: The impact of virtual tours on museum exhibitions after the onset of COVID-19 restrictions: visitor engagement and long-term perspectives. SCIRES-IT. 11(1), 151–166 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2423/i22394303v11n1p151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., Lampis, A.: Italian state museums during the COVID-19 crisis: from onsite closure to online openness. Museum Management and Curatorship. 35(4), 362–372 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2020.1790029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Levent, N., Pascual-Leone, A. (eds.): The Multisensory Museum: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives on Touch, Sound, Smell, Memory, and Space. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Classen C.: The Museum of the Senses: Experiencing Art and Collections. London-New York: Bloomsbury (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bacci, F., Pavani, F.: First hand, not ‘first eye’ knowledge: bodily experience in museums. In: Levent, N., Pascual-Leone, A. (eds.) The Multisensory Museum: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Touch, Sound, Smell, Memory, and Space, pp. 17–28. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper, C.: You Can Handle It: 3D Printing for Museums. Adv. Archaeol. Pract. 7(4), 443–447 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2019.39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schubert T, Friedmann F, Regenbrecht H. The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 2001;10(3):266–81. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343603

  13. Bouvier, P., Lavoué, E., Sehaba, K.: Defining Engagement and Characterizing Engaged-Behaviors in Digital Gaming. Simul. Gaming 45(4–5), 491–507 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114553571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Resta G, Dicuonzo F.: Isn’t metaverse just a secular version of paradise? The visual experience of possible realities. In: Weidinger A, Müller-Nittel F, Reindl M, editors. Metaspace – Visions of Space from the Middle Ages to the Digital Age. Berlin: Distanz (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bekele MK, Champion E.: A Comparison of Immersive Realities and Interaction Methods: Cultural Learning in Virtual Heritage. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 2019;6. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00091

  16. Falk, J. H.: Learning from museums: visitor experiences and the making of meaning. In: Dierking LD, editor. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dalgarno, B., Lee, M.J.W.: What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? Br. J. Edu. Technol. 41(1), 10–32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hanussek, B.: Enhanced Exhibitions? Discussing Museum Apps after a Decade of Development. Adv. Archaeol. Pract. 8(2), 206–212 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2020.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor, J., Gibson, L.K.: Digitisation, digital interaction and social media: embedded barriers to democratic heritage. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 23(5), 408–420 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2016.1171245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu J, Muñoz-Justicia J. A Bibliometric Overview of Twitter-Related Studies Indexed in Web of Science. Future Internet. 2020;12(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi12050091

  21. Suess A, Barton G. Instagram and the museum experience: theorising the connection through aesthetics, space and sharing. Museum Management and Curatorship. 2022:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2022.2073563

  22. Kelpšienė, I.: Exploring Archaeological Organizations’ Communication on Facebook: A Review of MOLA’s Facebook Page. Adv. Archaeol. Pract. 7(2), 203–214 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2019.9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tzouganatou, A.: Can Heritage Bots Thrive? Toward Future Engagement in Cultural Heritage. Adv. Archaeol. Pract. 6(4), 377–383 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2018.32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Watson, S.: Museums and their Communities. Routledge, London (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Simon N. The Participatory Museum. Santa Cruz, CA: Museum 2.0 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bishop C, editor. Participation. Documents of Contemporary Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT press; (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Feng X. Curating and Exhibiting for the Pandemic: Participatory Virtual Art Practices During the COVID-19 Outbreak in China. Social Media + Society. 2020;6(3):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948232

  28. Xu, W., Dai, T.-T., Shen, Z.-Y., Yao, Y.-J., Effects of technology application on museum learning: a meta-analysis of 42 studies published between,: and 2021. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2021, 1–16 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1976803

  29. Ayala, I., Cuenca-Amigo, M., Cuenca, J.: Examining the state of the art of audience development in museums and heritage organisations: a Systematic Literature review. Museum Management and Curatorship. 35(3), 306–327 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2019.1698312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Serravalle, F., Ferraris, A., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Christofi, M.: Augmented reality in the tourism industry: A multi-stakeholder analysis of museums. Tourism Management Perspectives. 32, 100549 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C.: bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informet. 11(4), 959–975 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Elango, B., Rajendran, P.: Authorship Trends and Collaboration Pattern in the Marine Sciences Literature : A Scientometric Study. Int. J. Inf. Dissem. Technol. 2(3), 166–169 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Koseoglu, M.A.: Growth and Structure of Authorship and Co-Authorship Network in the Strategic Management Realm: Evidence from the Strategic Management Journal. BRQ Bus. Res. Q. 19(3), 153–170 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2016.02.001

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Sag A. Virtual Reality In 2017: A Year In Review. Forbes (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Garfield, E., Sher, I.H.: KeyWords Plus™—algorithmic derivative indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 44(5), 298–299 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199306)44:5%3c298::AID-ASI5%3e3.0.CO;2-A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mao, N., Wang, M.-H., Ho, Y.-S.: A Bibliometric Study of the Trend in Articles Related to Risk Assessment Published in Science Citation Index. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 16(4), 801–824 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2010.501248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Clarivate Analytics: Web of Science Core Collection Help. https://images-webofknowledge-com.lproxy.yeditepe.edu.tr/images/help/WOS/hp_full_record.html (2020). Accessed 14/05/2022.

  38. Zhang, J., Yu, Q., Zheng, F., Long, C., Lu, Z., Duan, Z.: Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords: A case study of patient adherence research. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 67(4), 967–972 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bradford, S.C.: Documentation. Crosby Lockwood, London (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vickery, B.C.: Bradford’s Law of Scattering. Journal of Documentation. 4(3), 198–203 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Egghe, L.: Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 69(1), 131–152 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Costas, R., Bordons, M.: Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level. Scientometrics 77(2), 267–288 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1997-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., van Eck, N.J.: Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. J. Informet. 10(4), 1178–1195 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., Lema, M.D.: New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money & Management. 41(1), 69–72 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1764206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lotka, A.J.: The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 16(12), 317–323 (1926)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yoon, S.A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., Tucker, S.: Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 7(4), 519–541 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9156-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hwang, G.J., Wu, P.H., Zhuang, Y.Y., Huang, Y.M.: Effects of the inquiry-based mobile learning model on the cognitive load and learning achievement of students. Interact. Learn. Environ. 21(4), 338–354 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.575789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Girardin, F., Fiore, F.D., Ratti, C., Blat, J.: Leveraging explicitly disclosed location information to understand tourist dynamics: a case study. Journal of Location Based Services. 2(1), 41–56 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/17489720802261138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Marty, P.F.: Museum websites and museum visitors: digital museum resources and their use. Museum Management and Curatorship. 23(1), 81–99 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770701865410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. López X, Margapoti I, Maragliano R, Bove G. The presence of Web 2.0 tools on museum websites: a comparative study between England, France, Spain, Italy, and the USA. Museum Management and Curatorship. 2010;25(2):235–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647771003737356

  51. Falk, J.H.: Identity and the museum visitor experience. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Falk JH. The museum experience. In: Dierking LD, editor. Washington, D.C.: Whalesback Books; (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hein, G.E.: Learning in the Museum. Routledge, Museum and Heritage Studies. London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Carrozzino, M., Bergamasco, M.: Beyond virtual museums: Experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. J. Cult. Herit. 11(4), 452–458 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2010.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Styliani, S., Fotis, L., Kostas, K., Petros, P.: Virtual museums, a survey and some issues for consideration. J. Cult. Herit. 10(4), 520–528 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2009.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Marx, W., Bornmann, L., Barth, A., Leydesdorff, L.: Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS). J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 65(4), 751–764 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Parry R, editor. Museums in a Digital Age. Leicester Readers in Museum Studies. London & New York: Routledge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bruno, F., Bruno, S., De Sensi, G., Luchi, M.-L., Mancuso, S., Muzzupappa, M.: From 3D reconstruction to virtual reality: A complete methodology for digital archaeological exhibition. J. Cult. Herit. 11(1), 42–49 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2009.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ardissono, L., Kuflik, T., Petrelli, D.: Personalization in cultural heritage: the road travelled and the one ahead. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 22(1), 73–99 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-011-9104-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Lombardo, V., Damiano, R.: Storytelling on mobile devices for cultural heritage. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia. 18(1–2), 11–35 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2012.617846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Capriotti, P., Pardo, K.H.: Assessing dialogic communication through the Internet in Spanish museums. Public Relations Review. 38(4), 619–626 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Charitonos, K., Blake, C., Scanlon, E., Jones, A.: Museum learning via social and mobile technologies: (How) can online interactions enhance the visitor experience? Br. J. Edu. Technol. 43(5), 802–819 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01360.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Fletcher, A., Lee, M.J.: Current social media uses and evaluations in American museums. Museum Management and Curatorship. 27(5), 505–521 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2012.738136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Petrelli D, Ciolfi L, Dijk Dv, Hornecker E, Not E, Schmidt A. Integrating material and digital: a new way for cultural heritage. interactions. 2013;20(4):58–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/2486227.2486239

  65. Coenen T, Mostmans L, Naessens K. MuseUs: Case study of a pervasive cultural heritage serious game. J Comput Cult Herit. 2013;6(2):Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460376.2460379.

  66. Falk, J.H., Dierking, L.D.: The Museum Experience Revisited. Routledge, London & New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Börner, K., Chen, C., Boyack, K.W.: Visualizing knowledge domains. Ann. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 37(1), 179–255 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Smith, R.C., Iversen, O.S.: Participatory heritage innovation: designing dialogic sites of engagement. Digital Creativity. 25(3), 255–268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2014.904796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. King, L., Stark, J.F., Cooke, P.: Experiencing the Digital World: The Cultural Value of Digital Engagement with Heritage. Heritage & Society. 9(1), 76–101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2016.1246156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Pierdicca R, Marques-Pita M, Paolanti M, Malinverni ES. IoT and Engagement in the Ubiquitous Museum. Sensors. 2019;19(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19061387

  71. Petrelli, D., Marshall, M.T., O’Brien, S., McEntaggart, P., Gwilt, I.: Tangible data souvenirs as a bridge between a physical museum visit and online digital experience. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 21(2), 281–295 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0993-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Gonizzi Barsanti S, Caruso G, Micoli LL, Covarrubias Rodriguez M, Guidi G. 3D Visualization of Cultural Heritage Artefacts with Virtual Reality devices. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 2015;XL-5/W7:165–72. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W7-165-2015

  73. Caggianese, G., Gallo, L., Neroni, P.: Evaluation of spatial interaction techniques for virtual heritage applications: A case study of an interactive holographic projection. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 81, 516–527 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.07.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Damala, A., Hornecker, E., van der Vaart, M., van Dijk, D., Ruthven, I.: The Loupe: Tangible augmented reality for learning to look at ancient Greek art. Mediter. Archaeol. Archaeom. 16(5), 73–85 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.204970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Small, H.: Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 24(4), 265–269 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  76. Ferris K, Bannon L, Ciolfi L, Gallagher P, Hall T, Lennon M. Shaping experiences in the hunt museum: a design case study. Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. Cambridge, MA, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2004. p. 205–14

    Google Scholar 

  77. Mortara, M., Catalano, C.E., Bellotti, F., Fiucci, G., Houry-Panchetti, M., Petridis, P.: Learning cultural heritage by serious games. J. Cult. Herit. 15(3), 318–325 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Bedford L. Storytelling: The Real Work of Museums. Curator: The Museum Journal. 2001;44(1):27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2001.tb00027.x

  79. Peters, H.P.F., Van Raan, A.F.J.: Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis. Scientometrics 20(1), 235–255 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Azad, A.K., Parvin, S.: Bibliometric analysis of photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) system: From citation mapping to research agenda. Energy Rep. 8, 2699–2711 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Mumu, J.R., Saona, P., Russell, H.I., Azad, M.A.K.: Corporate governance and remuneration: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies. 28(4), 242–262 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-03-2021-0025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Aria, M., Misuraca, M., Spano, M.: Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research. Soc. Indic. Res. 149(3), 803–831 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Visser, M., van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L.: Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies. 2(1), 20–41 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Mason MC, Riviezzo A, Zamparo G, Napolitano MR. It is worth a visit! Website quality and visitors’ intentions in the context of corporate museums: a multimethod approach. Current Issues in Tourism. 2021:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1978947

  85. Magliacani M, Sorrentino D. Reinterpreting museums’ intended experience during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from Italian University Museums. Museum Management and Curatorship. 2021:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2021.1954984

  86. Mujtaba, T., Lawrence, M., Oliver, M., Reiss, M.J.: Learning and engagement through natural history museums. Stud. Sci. Educ. 54(1), 41–67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2018.1442820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Rubino I, Barberis C, Xhembulla J, Malnati G. Integrating a Location-Based Mobile Game in the Museum Visit: Evaluating Visitors’ Behaviour and Learning. J Comput Cult Herit. 2015;8(3):Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724723

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculdade de Arquitectura, Universidade do Porto, Porto, 4150-564, Portugal

    Giuseppe Resta

  2. CITCEM, Universidade do Porto, Porto, 4150-564, Portugal

    Fabiana Dicuonzo

Authors
  1. Giuseppe Resta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fabiana Dicuonzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Resta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Meccanica, Matematica e Management, Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy

    Maurizio Barberio

  2. Dipartimento di Architettura, Costruzione e Design, Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy

    Micaela Colella

  3. Dipartimento di Pianificazione, Design e Tecnologia dell’Architettura, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy

    Angelo Figliola

  4. Dipartimento di Pianificazione, Design e Tecnologia dell’Architettura, Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy

    Alessandra Battisti

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4 Interactive systems used during the physical museum visit
Full size table
Table 5 Digital systems/platforms disconnected from the physical visit
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Resta, G., Dicuonzo, F. (2024). Towards a Digital Shift in Museum Visiting Experience. Drafting the Research Agenda Between Academic Research and Practice of Museum Management. In: Barberio, M., Colella, M., Figliola, A., Battisti, A. (eds) Architecture and Design for Industry 4.0. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36922-3_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36922-3_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36921-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36922-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation