Skip to main content

The Botho Perspective on Human and Animal Welfare

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tourism and Culture in Philosophical Perspective
  • 63 Accesses

Abstract.

This paper is an exploration of the intersection between animals, tourists, and host communities. While the conservation of animals serves the dual purpose of preserving the species for future generations as well as giving tourists the opportunity to see them in the wild, it also has existential implications for local people who share the environment with these animals. This is not only with respect to the advantages of tourism but also in terms of the dangers, losses and disadvantages of living alongside these animals, including the presence of poachers. The paper highlights the dilemma that such an intersecting relationship presents for ordinary people in their attempt to balance conservation and animal-based tourism with their traditional interaction with animals, including their historical dependence on the animals for food. At the same time, the paper undertakes an overview of contemporary ethical arguments on animal welfare alongside contemporary ethical arguments on the existence and ethical use of animal-based tourist attractions. It approaches the relationship of animals, tourists, and host communities from the framework of Ubuntu/Botho, an African philosophy that is based on the maxim, “I am because we are,” and argues for accommodations that reflect the symbiotic relationship between the intersecting variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amanze, James N. 2002. African Traditional Religions and Culture in Botswana. Gaborone: Pula Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles. 1859. The Origin of Species. New York: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Warren, and Brendan Brady. 2011. The Reflective-Phenomena Criterion: Finding Personhood Through Machines, Subjectivity Band Reflection. Dialogue 54: 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Julian H. 2005. Animal Rights and Moral Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaie, Joseph B.R. 2007. The Setswana Concept of Botho: Unpacking the Metaphysical and Moral Aspects. In The Concept of Botho and HIV/AIDS in Botswana, ed. Joseph B.R. Gaie and Sana K. Mmolai, 29–44. Kenya: Zapf Chancery.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison-Barbet, Anthony. 1990. Mastering Philosophy. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Machan, Tibor R. 2004. Putting Humans First: Why We Are Nature’s Favorite. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbaiwa, Joseph E. 2018a. Effects of Safari Hunting Tourism on Rural Livelihoods. South African Geographic Journal 100: 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018b. Human Wildlife Conflict in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Journal of African Studies 32: 22–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, Thaddeus. 2011. Ubuntu as a Moral Theory and Human Rights in South Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal 11: 535–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogapi, Kgomotso. 1984. Thutapuo Ya Setswana. Lobatse: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. Ngwao Ya Setswana. Gaborone: Sikwane Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postel, Sandra and James Arthur Peterson. 1996. Dividing the waters: Food Security, Ecosystem, Health, and the New Politics of Scarcity. World Watch Paper. Washington: World Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, Tom. 2004. The Case for Animal Rights: Berkeley. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, Richard. 1998. The Moral Philosophers: An Introduction to Ethics (2nd ed.) New York: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Peter. 1974. All Animals are Equal. Philosophical Exchange 5 (1(6)): 103–116. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Equality for Animals? In Practical Ethics, P. Singer, 55–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempels, Placide. 1959. Bantu Philosophy. Congo: Collection presence Africaine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalefang, Charles. 2017. Elephants are Coming Down South. Mmegi Online. April 21, 2017. https://www.mmegi.bw/index.php?aid=68293&dir=2017/april/21

  • Thomson, Shawn. 2019. How to Resist Anxiety when you write an Overly Ambitious Article about Science. ASEBL Journal 14: 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutu, Desmond. 1997. The Essential Desmond Tutu. Cape Town: Philip Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sesiro, D. (2023). The Botho Perspective on Human and Animal Welfare. In: Zovko, MÉ., Dillon, J. (eds) Tourism and Culture in Philosophical Perspective. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36659-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics