Abstract
Traditional approaches to examining neighborhood-level ecological effects on risk of child maltreatment have primarily focused on residential neighborhoods (i.e., the risks and resources families encounter within the neighborhoods in which the live). These methods typically involve linkage of geocoded home address coordinates to identify geographic areas (e.g., zip code or census tracts) with child welfare administrative data sources, permitting integration of geographic data from other sources to reflect residential characteristics. More recent developments in the field are pushing boundaries on understanding environmental influences on risk of child maltreatment. Among these are the incorporation of “activity spaces” reflecting a broader understanding of individual mobility across a variety of environments (e.g., work, recreation, school, etc.) and incorporate a broader array of types of information including exposure to risks and resources, as well as social interactions that may occur in such spaces. Child maltreatment researchers may utilize survey methods, GPS-enabled devices, and other linked data sources to create activity spaces and identify a range of different indicators derived from these contexts. Researchers must be aware of potential limitations to geographic data included in administrative data sources, but these methods can provide a wealth of information relevant to risks of child maltreatment or child welfare system outcomes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berger, L. M. (2005). Income, family characteristics, & physical violence toward children. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 107–133.
Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4), 699–706.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71.
Coulton, C., Crampton, D., Irwin, M., Spilbury, J., & Korbin, J. (2007). How neighborhoods influence child maltreatment: A review of the literature and alternative pathways. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1117–1142.
Freisthler, B., & Gruenewald, P. J. (2013). Where the individual meets the ecological: A study of parent drinking patterns, alcohol outlets and child physical abuse. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 27(6), 993–1000.
Freisthler, B., Merritt, D. H., & LaScala, E. A. (2006). Understanding the ecology of child maltreatment: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Child Maltreatment, 11(3), 263–280.
Freisthler, B., Lipperman-Kreda, S., Bersamin, M., & Gruenewald, P. J. (2014). Tracking the when, where, and with whom of alcohol use: Integrating ecological momentary assessment and geospatial data to examine risk for alcohol-related problems. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 36, 29–38.
Freisthler, B., Thomas, C. A., Curry, S. R., & Price Wolf, J. (2016). An alternative to residential neighborhoods: An exploratory study of how activity spaces and perception of neighborhood social processes relate to maladaptive parenting. Child and Youth Care Forum, 45(2), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-015-9329-7
Freisthler, B., Thurston, H., & Price Wolf, J. (2020). An exploratory study of parenting in public places: What can we learn from parents’ activity locations and physical punishment? International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice, 3(2), 249–269.
Freisthler, B., Kepple, N. J., Wolf, J. P., & Carson, L. (2021). Activity spaces: Assessing differences in alcohol exposures and alcohol use for parents. GeoJournal, 86(1), 69–79.
Granovetter, M. S. (1977). The strength of weak ties. In Social networks (pp. 347–367). Academic Press.
Lane, V. R., & Fastoso, F. (2016). The impact of repeated ad exposure on spillover from low fit extensions to a global brand. International Marketing Review, 33(2), 298–318.
McCoy, S., Everard, A., Galletta, D. F., & Moody, G. D. (2017). Here we go again! The impact of website ad repetition on recall, intrusiveness, attitudes, and site revisit intentions. Information & Management, 54(1), 14–24.
Monk, R. L., & Heim, D. (2013). Panoramic projection: Affording a wider view on contextual influences on alcohol-related cognitions. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21(1), 1.
Sastry, N., Pebley, A. R., & Zonta, M. (2002). Neighborhood definitions and the spatial dimension of daily life in Los Angeles (CCPR Working Paper 033–04). California Center for Population Research, University of California–Los Angeles.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by grant number P60-AA-006282 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism or the National Institutes of Health.
A version of this chapter was presented by the first author at the Strengthening Child Safety and Wellbeing through Integrated Data Solutions Conference in Pennsylvania State University on September 27, 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Freisthler, B., Kepple, N.J., Price Wolf, J. (2023). Going Beyond Where You Live: Innovative Uses for Spatial Data Using Linked Child Welfare Datasets. In: Connell, C.M., Crowley, D.M. (eds) Strengthening Child Safety and Well-Being Through Integrated Data Solutions. Child Maltreatment Solutions Network. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36608-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36608-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36607-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36608-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)