Abstract
The field of child maltreatment science has seen significant investment and growth in the use of administrative data to conduct research that informs policies and practices affecting child protective services (CPS) and child welfare system activities. Administrative data refers to data collected by public agencies to support day-to-day operations, record keeping, billing, or similar activities. Research utilizing administrative data not only offers a number of advantages, such as availability of large, population-level samples and greater time- and cost-efficiencies but also poses challenges such as limits to input on the scope or content of data systems, and possible limits or barriers to access. Increasingly, child maltreatment researchers are working with administrative data from child welfare and other systems (e.g., health care, education, justice, or other public systems) to create integrated data systems, which expand the range of outcomes and research questions that may be investigated through administrative data resources. This chapter provides a brief overview of the strengths and limitations of administrative and integrated data systems, as well as providing a summary of the areas addressed by chapters in the volume.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brownell, M. D., & Jutte, D. P. (2013). Administrative data linkage as a tool for child maltreatment research. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(2–3), 120–124.
Cancian, M., Yang, M., & Slack, K. S. (2013). The effect of additional child support income on the risk of child maltreatment. Social Service Review, 87(3), 417–437.
Christen, P. (2012). Data matching: Concepts and techniques for record linkage, entity resolution, and duplicate detection. Springer.
Connell, C. M., Bergeron, N., Katz, K. H., Saunders, L., & Tebes, J. K. (2007). Re-referral to Child Protective Services: The influence of child, family, and case characteristics on risk status. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 573–588.
Connell, C. M., Vanderploeg, J. J., Katz, K. H., Caron, C., Saunders, L., & Tebes, J. K. (2009). Maltreatment following reunification: Predictors of subsequent child protective services contact after children return home. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 218–228.
DeHart, D., & Shapiro, C. (2017). Integrated administrative data & criminal justice research. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 255–274.
Fang, X., Brown, D. S., Florence, C. S., & Mercy, J. A. (2012). The economic burden of child maltreatment in the United States and implications for prevention. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36(2), 156–165.
Fantuzzo, J. W., Perlman, S. M., & Dobbins, E. K. (2011). Types and timing of child maltreatment and early school success: A population-based investigation. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(8), 1404–1411.
Fix, R. L., & Nair, R. (2020). Racial/ethnic and gender disparities in substantiation of child physical and sexual abuse: Influences of caregiver and child characteristics. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105186.
Fluke, J. D., Yuan, Y. T., & Edwards, M. (1999). Recurrence of maltreatment: An application of the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS). Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(7), 633–650.
Fluke, J. D., Shusterman, G. R., Hollinshead, D. M., & Yuan, Y. T. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of repeated child abuse reporting and victimization: Multistate analysis of associated factors. Child Maltreatment, 13(1), 76–88.
Garcia, A. R., Metraux, S., Chen, C.-C., Park, J. M., Culhane, D. P., & Furstenberg, F. F. (2018). Patterns of multisystem service use and school dropout among seventh-, eighth-, and ninth-grade students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(8), 1041–1073.
Glasson, E. J., & Hussain, R. (2008). Linked data: Opportunities and challenges in disability research. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 33(4), 285–291.
Harron, K., Goldstein, H., & Dibben, C. (Eds.). (2015). Methodological developments in data linkage. John Wiley & Sons.
Herzog, T. N., Scheuren, F. J., & Winkler, W. E. (2007). Data quality and record linkage techniques. Springer Science & Business Media.
Holbrook, H. M., & Hudziak, J. J. (2020). Risk factors that predict longitudinal patterns of substantiated and unsubstantiated maltreatment reports. Child Abuse & Neglect, 99, 104279.
Hurren, E., Stewart, A., & Dennison, S. (2017). New methods to address old challenges: The use of administrative data for longitudinal replication studies of child maltreatment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(9), 1066–1077.
Johnson-Motoyama, M., Ginther, D. K., Phillips, R., Beer, O. W., Merkel-Holguin, L., & Fluke, J. (2022). Differential response and the reduction of child maltreatment and foster care services utilization in the US from 2004 to 2017. Child Maltreatment, 10775595211065761.
Jonson-Reid, M., & Drake, B. (2008). Multisector longitudinal administrative databases: An indispensable tool for evidence-based policy for maltreated children and their families. Child Maltreatment, 13(4), 392–399.
Jonson-Reid, M., Drake, B., Chung, S., & Way, I. (2003). Cross-type recidivism among child maltreatment victims and perpetrators. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27(8), 899–917.
Jud, A., Fegert, J. M., & Finkelhor, D. (2016). On the incidence and prevalence of child maltreatment: A research agenda. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 10(1), 1–5.
Kim, H., & Drake, B. (2019). Cumulative prevalence of onset and recurrence of child maltreatment reports. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 58(12), 1175–1183.
Kohl, P. L., & Barth, R. P. (2007). Child maltreatment recurrence among children remaining in-home: Predictors of re-reports. In R. Haskins, F. Wulczyn, & M. B. Webb (Eds.), Child protection: Using research to improve policy and practice (pp. 207–225). Brookings Institution Press.
Maguire-Jack, K., Font, S. A., & Dillard, R. (2020). Child protective services decision-making: The role of children’s race and county factors. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 90(1), 48.
Penner, A. M., & Dodge, K. A. (2019). Using administrative data for social science and policy. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(2), 1–18.
Peterson, C., Florence, C., & Klevens, J. (2018). The economic burden of child maltreatment in the United States, 2015. Child Abuse & Neglect, 86, 178–183.
Putnam-Hornstein, E., Simon, J. D., Eastman, A. L., & Magruder, J. (2015). Risk of re-reporting among infants who remain at home following alleged maltreatment. Child Maltreatment, 20(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559514558586
Putnam-Hornstein, E., Foust, R., Cuccaro-Alamin, S., Prindle, J., Nghiem, H., Ahn, E., & Palmer, L. (2022). A population-based study of mental health diagnoses and child protection system involvement among Medicaid-insured children. The Journal of Pediatrics.
Rebbe, R., Mienko, J. A., Brown, E., & Rowhani-Rahbar, A. (2019). Hospital variation in child protection reports of substance exposed infants. The Journal of Pediatrics, 208, 141–147. e142.
Ryan, J. P., Herz, D., Hernandez, P. M., & Marshall, J. M. (2007). Maltreatment and delinquency: Investigating child welfare bias in juvenile justice processing. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(8), 1035–1050.
Ryan, J. P., Jacob, B. A., Gross, M., Perron, B. E., Moore, A., & Ferguson, S. (2018). Early exposure to child maltreatment and academic outcomes. Child Maltreatment, 23(4), 365–375.
Shlomo, N. (2019). Overview of data linkage methods for policy design and evaluation. In N. Crato & P. Paruolo (Eds.), Data-driven policy impact evaluation: How access to microdata is transforming policy design (pp. 47–65). Springer.
Soneson, E., Das, S., Burn, A.-M., Van Melle, M., Anderson, J. K., Fazel, M., Fonagy, P., Ford, T., Gilbert, R., & Harron, K. (2022). Leveraging administrative data to better understand and address child maltreatment: A scoping review of data linkage studies. Child Maltreatment, 10775595221079308.
Vidal, S., Prince, D., Connell, C. M., Caron, C. M., Kaufman, J. S., & Tebes, J. K. (2017). Maltreatment, family environment, and social risk factors: Determinants of the child welfare to juvenile justice transition among maltreated children and adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 63, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.11.013
Yampolskaya, S. (2017). Research at work: Administrative data and behavioral sciences research. Families in Society, 98(2), 121–125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Connell, C.M. (2023). Introduction and Volume Overview. In: Connell, C.M., Crowley, D.M. (eds) Strengthening Child Safety and Well-Being Through Integrated Data Solutions. Child Maltreatment Solutions Network. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36608-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36608-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36607-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36608-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)