Skip to main content

Portals to the Gods: Reciprocity, Sacrifice, and Warfare in the Northern Mixteca

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ritual Human Sacrifice in Mesoamerica

Part of the book series: Conflict, Environment, and Social Complexity ((CESC))

  • 137 Accesses

Abstract

Ritualized violence in the Late Postclassic Northern Mixteca of Oaxaca is explored via artifacts, pictograms, and field identifications of landforms within the territory of the highland seigneury of Coixtlahuaca. The landforms, believed to have been the place where the gods convened and then sacrificed themselves, are depicted on colonial period painted maps and described in documents written in alphabetic script. Several ancient cosmogonic myths were projected onto the landscape of the Coixtlahuaca Basin and memorialized through the production of luxury material artifacts. Rulers and other high-status nobles, entrusted with maintaining sacred traditions and receptive to messages from the sacred sphere, patronized local artisans to produce works that perpetuated the memory of these creation narratives. Replicated in different media and codified as having occurred within the bounds of the seigneury’s lands, these artifacts exalt the supreme sacrifice of the patron deities described in the narratives. They provide tangible evidence of events that took place in primeval times around which a bonding, religious understanding, devotion, and sense of identity for this area’s inhabitants developed. Reciprocating the sacrifice of the patron gods, humans were sacrificed during the observance of feasts cued to the agricultural cycle and warfare. The underlying structure of the relationship with the sacred reveals a concern with war and human sacrifice borne of a long-standing obligatory tradition of ritual petitioning and invocation of sacred forces consonant with the wider Mesoamerican worldview. Blood-letting rituals were aimed at maintaining balance and assurance that sustenance would be provided for and properly reciprocated. This treatment advances an enriched perspective that emerges by contextualizing the origin myths within the frameworks of regional archaeology, ethnohistory, and ethnographic accounts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These spirit owners of places live there in subterranean houses, protecting them. In Ñudzahui (Mixteco) they are called ñu’u or nu ñu un meaning the “face of the earth” they are distinguished by the sounds they make (Monaghan 1995: 98–104). The association of deity, hill or cave, and settlement is widespread throughout the Mixteca and Tehuacan Valley with supernatural power concentrated on promontory features with springs (Bernal García and García Zambrano, 2006; Ravicz and Kimball Romney 1969: 394; Stone 1992). The inhabitants of San Juan Yolotepec and Chinango, communities located north of Huajuapan de León in the Mixteca Baja, refer to the tupa or “spirit of the mountain” (González Huerta 2003). This particular supernatural inhabits caves in hills. An especially powerful hill may have more than one tupa. No one created this entity, which has always been there. It can show up as a man, a woman, an animal, or a stone. It can appear at any time and any place but never descends upon settlements. It may share its power with some humans, and it may hurt them, but does not kill them. Those who venerate it petition its favor by requesting rain in times of drought, healing the sick, or even wealth.

  2. 2.

    The riparian vegetation in the area is a gallery forest consisting primarily of Bald cypress (Taxodium mucronatum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and willow (Salix sp.). Sometimes alder (Alnus sp.) and sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) are present. These species produce a pleasant scent. Perfume, especially from flowers, was associated with the nobility since it was their privilege to carry nosegays in public. In contrast, common folk who were farmers smelled of earth and perspiration.

  3. 3.

    From the Latin word sacrificium, a composite term from the roots sacer meaning sacred and facere, to make, that is “to transform into sacred.” The German word opfer, offering, complements the meaning (González Torres 1985:25).

  4. 4.

    The Nahuatl noun for bloodletting autosacrifice by piercing or cutting some part of the body as an offering to the images of the gods is nextlahualli: “sacrificio de sangre, que ofrecían a los ydolos, sajándose u horadando alguna parte del cuerpo” (Molina 1992 [2]: f. 71v). It is a noun derived from the verb ixtlahua: “pagar lo que se debe” that translates as “to pay what is owed” (Molina 1992 [2]: f. 48v).

  5. 5.

    A symbol is a device that allows humans to make abstractions for nonverbal transmission of information. Symbols serve as instruments of communication, expression, knowledge, and control (Firth 1984: 26–27).

  6. 6.

    Aposematic from the Greek apo “away” and sema “sign.” A conspicuous warning signal in biological taxa, such as vivid coloration, that identifies menacing creatures and communicates the unprofitability of a prey to potential predators.

  7. 7.

    “Those known for their bravery and daring wore an ocelot’s pelt [sic jaguar] that had been skinned completely, head, legs, paws and tail, and its head was placed on the that of the Indian and the tail hanging behind. And this meant, that just as the ocelot is fierce and offends by tearing to pieces, he who wore it was to do the same; the same applied to those who wore mountain lion pelts… ..And they would paint themselves with different colors, and they regarded black as the fiercest, and they would stain their faces and eyes, and their whole bodies, so that they looked like the demon himself, And that is how some go out to dances, so common today, which they regard as bravery… . They would tie their hair behind and others in front and they would dress so they were very ugly, all to look like the demon whom they loved and with whom they communicated” (Suárez de Peralta 1990: 58–59, translated by the author).

  8. 8.

    Insight as to how rulers were perceived can be found in the response to the question of how the natives were governed in the Relación Geográfica of Tecomahuaca (Velázquez de Lara 1984: 240). “El gobernador era siempre señor natural, y éste era obedecido mucho y temido. Tenía otros coadjutores a quienes respetaban mucho…”. Translation: “The ruler was a natural lord who was well obeyed and feared. He had other assistant enforcers who were very respected… .”

  9. 9.

    Nahual is the name given to an entity who can introduce one of its souls into another being and act within it, as well as to the one that suffers the invasion (López Austin 1990: 199, note, 13).

  10. 10.

    Sounds and music produce emotional responses based on culturally generated associations (Berger 1989: 28). Sounds may mimic what is being represented by acting as the aural equivalent of icons, offering cues to an enculturated collective by accentuating the effect of what is being witnessed, creating memories that serve to guide and visualize the progression of a ritual ceremony or feast.

  11. 11.

    The Christian Calendar was similarly structured as a succession of holy days and feasts to be observed and celebrated.

  12. 12.

    Hamann (2002, 2008) has focused primarily on how ruins and heirlooms gave meaning and shaped Postclassic period understandings of time and were used in time reckoning on several scales that ranged from the intimate domestic and familial to the cosmic.

  13. 13.

    Pages 12 and 20 present individuals that wear headdresses like those worn by the Rain God priests (tlaloque) and mortuary bundles on the Selden Roll and Lienzo of Ihuitlan (Rincón Mautner 2012a: 266, 268, Fig. 13.5A&B). These are among the pages that Cassidy (2004: 82, 125,127) established which had been partially or completely repainted, which suggests perhaps a rescripting and adaptation to circumstances.

  14. 14.

    Indurated C-horizon of the soil profile formed by the accumulation of calcium carbonate. It can be easily cut and hardens when exposed to air and is often used in constructions in the Mixteca.

  15. 15.

    Bones are seeds from which new life springs. In Mexico and Guatemala, the Spanish word for pit (a large seed) is “hueso,” meaning bone (Furst 1978: 318).

  16. 16.

    Maize cobs are metaphorically beheaded in the field at the end of the growing season. Prior to harvest, farmers bend the stem leaving cobs attached and dangling from the stalk, i.e., “broken necks”. This practice allows cobs to dry out faster, protecting the grain against excess humidity from dew and rainfall. Pulque on the other hand continues to be offered in at the time of planting as a sacrifice to the Earth and Rain gods responsible for fertility and plant development to ensure a bountiful harvest. Pulque is poured into the center of the first cajete or “bowl” made in the field before the maize seeds are sown. Prayers are offered to the spirit owners of the field requesting their permission, to the earth, the wind, and God Almighty. Men participating in the sowing also drink pulque and other libations as they move across the fields to complete their commitment to this duty.

  17. 17.

    In the context of this creation myth, it seems helpful to follow López Austin’s (1990: 198–203) ideas who proposed that there were two groups of gods that divided the universe and furthermore links creation to the death of the very gods who had participated in it. He also addresses several key Mesoamerican concepts related to the divisibility, fragmentation, and uniting of divine energy: i.e., fusion, fission, replication, and images, aspects that also apply and help understand the symbolic nature of human sacrifice.

  18. 18.

    Tezcatlipoca also known as Titlacahuan, “… .it was said, was the creator of heaven and earth, and was all powerful. It was he who gave the living all that was necessary in terms of food, drink and riches. He was invisible as air and darkness, and when he made his appearance or spoke to a man, he was like a shadow. And it was said that he gave the living poverty and misery, and incurable diseases… .” (Sahagún 1989: vol., 1, Book III, Chapter 11: 206–207).

  19. 19.

    A stone statue of Mictlantecuhtli, god of death, was also worshipped in the ceremonial precinct at this site. Another stone sculpture of an anthropomorphic torso wearing flayed skin indicates that Xipe Totec was also celebrated (INAH 2019). Interestingly, Tehuacan would become one of the principal locations for the yearly slaughter, butchering, and processing of thousands of goats beginning in colonial times and as will be discussed below, a tradition with religious connotations that continues to this day (see Chapter “The Myth of the Willing Human Sacrifice: The Complex Nature of Human Sacrifice in Aztec Ceremonialism”).

  20. 20.

    The Rain God was known by several names including Dzahui (Mixteco), Cociyo (Zapotec), and Tlaloc (Nahuatl). The latter is a plural name derived from the qualifying adjective meaning “full of earth, covered with earth, or made of earth” (Sullivan 1974). The deity lived in the earth. His houses were caves, landform features abundant in the karst geology of the Southern Mexican Highlands.

  21. 21.

    The “assistants” were other earth deities known as the Tlaloque (plural of Tlaloc) or gods of rain associated with the Earth Goddess upon whom she depended for her fertility (Sullivan 1965: 43, note 6).

  22. 22.

    The carved femur was found in the 1960s and retrieved from this cave’s floor near the western access. The distal and proximal ends of the bone were cut off, and the body was decorated by incising elaborate imagery related to the role of the Colossal Bridge in the Creation narrative with a very fine-edged tool, such as an obsidian blade. It is housed in the collections of the Frissell Museum in Mitla, Oaxaca.

  23. 23.

    Instead of human hearts decorating the western cave access, Burland (1955: 24–25) saw flowers which he considered to be a reference to the goddess Xochiquetzal (7-Flower), and to the legendary Chicomoztoc or Place of Seven Caves, a place of origins. Other scholars (Caso 1979: I: 119–120; Boone 2000: 153) agree with his Chicomoztoc interpretation.

  24. 24.

    The name is a translation for Nahuatl expression tepeyollotli. Olivier (1998, 2004: 137) provides an analysis of the ancient ocelot (jaguar) deity of the Mexica known by this name and as an aspect of Tezcatlipoca, whose favored nahual or animal double was this animal.

  25. 25.

    This god’s compound name links the night and star “deity complex” and Tezcatlipoca, reflecting this deity’s transformation and renaming as Mixcoatl, after inventing the fire drill to provide humanity with fire (Nicholson 1971: 400, 411–412, 426; Olivier 2015a).

  26. 26.

    See Paddock (1985: 319); Olivier 2004: 129–130, 135, 137, 511).

  27. 27.

    The distinct depiction of these Late Postclassic serpents suggests opposition and complementarity.

  28. 28.

    Santa María Asunción Nochixtlán is a town on the Pan-American Highway, 40 km south of San Juan Bautista Coixtlahuaca, Oaxaca, Mexico. Whether this polychrome tripod vessel was found in Nochixtlan is debatable (Paddock, 1994: 102–103). Given the nature of its subject matter representing Coixtlahuaca’s patron deities before the entrance to the Colossal Bridge, it would have had the most meaning for the nobility from Coixtlahuaca. Eulalia Guzmán (1934: 31–32) visited the ruins and reported seeing no polychrome sherds. Mickey Lind is the only archaeologist who excavated the Pueblo Viejo of Nochixtlan (N428) and in its N205 sector. Among the ceramics, he only found Yanhuitlan Fine Cream and Cacique Burnished, but no polychrome (Lind, personal email communication, August, 16, 2017, 9:59 PM). It therefore seems more likely that the vase was looted from a tomb in Coixtlahuaca in the late nineteenth century and taken to Nochixtlan, which at the time had a good deal more traffic than Coixtlahuaca, and where it would have been more easily sold.

  29. 29.

    Pohl (2017: 125–126) and Urcid (2014) provide alternate interpretations and locations for the cave depicted on the vessel.

  30. 30.

    Olivier (personal communication, February 2020, Olivier 1998) considers this representation of Tezcatlipoca as Tepeyollotli offering tobacco which he carries in a gourd characteristic of priests. Interestingly, López Austin (2001) considers the figures on this vessel as two aspects of the Plumed Serpent. Furthermore, Olivier’s (2015b) proposal of Quetzalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca as twin brothers has echoes in an origin legend recorded by a priest in Cuilapan in, 1607 (García, 1981). It involves two supernatural brothers who shared Quetzalcoatl’s calendar name 9 Wind. Although unnamed in Codex Vindobonensis Obverse p. 48c, they are both depicted in the story as an eagle and fire serpent to each side of Quetzalcoatl in his descent from heaven. Furst (1978: 60–62, 106) discusses parallels between the Cuilapan legend and this codex, and she did not identify these individuals shown as the brothers described in the story. They appear to be aspects of Quetzalcoatl’s name 9 Wind (Nicholson 2001:146–147). Both gods and the brothers were known to be shape-shifters, magically transforming into serpents and other manifestations, performing bloodletting sacrifices, and ultimately establishing the earth. Living up to their shared “wind” name they are described as wind. Quetzalcoatl as day wind and Tezcatlipoca as the night wind. The wind reverses direction inside the Colossal Bridge where these gods were believed to dwell blowing from the east during the day and from the west at night (Rincón Mautner 2005a: 128).

  31. 31.

    The hill’s name Ndaga, was obtained from a 1590 map that accompanied the land-grant request made to the Spanish Crown by Tepelmeme’s ruler who sought an area on which to keep a herd of sheep and goats (Archivo General de la Nación-México, Tierras vol., 2729, exp.5, f.117, Painting # 2225). As late as, 1617, the same lord again requested a land grant in this shrine’s vicinity, for which he submitted another map depicting it, which underscores the close relationship between nobles and powerful places where the gods were consulted (Rincón Mautner 2012a: 262–266).

  32. 32.

    Tepelmeme’s place sign on the Lienzo of Tlapiltepec (n.d.) is depicted by a flaming incense burner on a rectangular sacrificial stone above an altar (see Johnson 2015: 104–105).

  33. 33.

    Burland (1955: 25) described the mountain as the Place of Xochiquetzal, a deity that is one of the advocations of the Mother Goddess Complex. In turn, I identified the representation as the Earth Goddess and, based on her depiction in the Roll, provided alternative names in Nahuatl since her Nguigua and Ñudzahui names are unknown (Rincón Mautner 2007: 158, 2012a: 260).

  34. 34.

    The Late Postclassic ceremonial Atlatl #2 (Rincón Mautner 2019), the Lienzo of Coixtlahuaca I (Seler II (n.d.) and Lienzo of Tlapiltepec (n.d.) painted in 1572, the Lienzo of Tepelmeme (ex-Tequixtepec II, and the early, seventeenth century Codex Baranda (1989) from Tequixtepec refer to the same priests identified by their calendar names: 10 House, 13 Lizard, 4 Monkey, and 9 Vulture.

  35. 35.

    The above ideas related to the significance of the calendrics were first pointed out to me by Osvaldo Murillo Soto (personal communication 05/26/2020), who in addition mentioned a similar propitious ritual protocol showing the lighting of the New Fire on the back of a xiuhcoatl associated with “1 Cipactli” depicted in Codex Borgia (1976: 49), as armed deities descend from the sky.

  36. 36.

    Many scholars consider the New Fire ceremony to be an exceptional event that marks the beginning of a new 52-year cycle. Dehouve (2018) and Olivier (2008: 278) have pointed out that there were many different types of New Fire ceremonies celebrated for different reasons, all of which varied in time and place. Fire was generally regarded as a supernatural that marked the passage of time. A fire was lit if it had gone out during the night, and “reanimated” each day in every hearth across the land. For Dehouve, every ritual begins with fire-lighting, the first ceremonial act of a ritual sequence, which entails blood-letting sacrifice and other penitential mortifications including fasting, sleep deprivation, and sexual abstinence.

  37. 37.

    These thrones were not the result of systematic excavation, there is no record indicating in which building(s) they were found, or even whether they are contemporaneous with each other. Personal communication Luis M. Gamboa Cabezas, researcher in charge of cultural assets at Tula, September 2007.

  38. 38.

    The Anales de Cuauhtitlan (Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas 1975: 52) cites the years 4 House and 5 Rabbit, equivalent to 1445 or 1446, as the dates when Moctecuhzoma’s troops prepared to conquer Coixtlahuaca. The Lienzo of Tlapiltepec (n.d.) and the Lienzo of Ihuitlan (n.d.) present a date each associated with Lord 6-Water Atonaltzin. I interpret these dates as related to the Mexica conquest, possibly following two battles in the year 7 House, Days 4 Motion, and 11 Grass which correspond to June and July 1461. The discrepancy in the dates reported in the Anales and those of the lienzos is of 15 years.

  39. 39.

    In all likelihood, the Mexica-appointed ruler seems to have had a council composed of members of his ethnic group. I base this proposal because members of Coixtlahuaca’s 1571 governing council, portrayed on Lienzo Coixtlahuaca I (Seler II) in the area to the right of the church, all have Nahuatl personal names rather than the customary day sign and coefficient combination traditionally used in the area.

  40. 40.

    While Durán (1994: 188) mentions that the monumental sacrificial stone called a cuauhxicalli portrayed carvings of the Aztec wars during Moctecuhzoma’s reign (1440–1469 CE) including the war with Coixtlahuaca, it is unlikely this would be the Tizoc Stone, which according to López Austin and López Luján (2012: 440) was carved during that subsequent lord’s reign (1481–1486 CE). It also lacks the depiction of Coixtlahuaca’s place sign mentioned by Durán and a reference to its famous ruler Atonaltzin, descendant of Toltecs.

  41. 41.

    Muñoz Camargo (1984: 202–203) recorded the belief of this setting of mountains as gods in the sixteenth century for which scholars have revealed additional aspects of their nature and personalities (Iwaniszewski 2001: 113–147; Iwaniszewski and García 2001: 95–111; Morante López 2001; Montero García 2012; Saunders and Baquedano 2015: 1–6).

References

Primary Sources: Codices and Lienzos

  • Codex Bodley. 1960. Facsimile Reproduction. México D.F: Sociedad Mexicana de Antropología.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codex Borbonicus. 1974. Codices Selecti No. 44, Facsimile reproduction, commentary by Karl Anton Nowotny. Graz: Akademische Druck u. Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codex Borgia. 1976. Codices Selecti No. 58, Facsimile reproduction, commentary by Karl Anton Nowotny. Graz: Akademische Druck u. Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codex Colombino-Becker. n.d. Renamed as Códice Alfonso Caso: La Vida de 8 Venado, Garra de Tigre. México: Patronato Indígena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codex Mendoza. 1992. Facsimile Reproduction. Description and Commentary by Francis F. Berdan and Patricia R. Anawalt. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Códice Baranda. 1989. [17th century] In Facsimile and Compilation of Published Commentaries, René Acuña, ed., México, D.F.: Ediciones Toledo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lienzo of Coixtlahuaca I (Seler II). n.d. Original, Staatliches Museum, Berlin. Painted ca. 1572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lienzo of Coixtlahuaca II (Ixtlan). n.d. Codex Collection, Library of the National Museum of Anthropology and History, México D.F., painted ca. 1540s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lienzo of Coixtlahuaca III (Meixueiro). n.d. Whereabouts unknown. Tracing in the Latin American Library, Tulane University, lost original, painted ca. 1550s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lienzo of Ihuitlan. n.d. Original, Brooklynn: Brooklynn Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lienzo of Otla. n.d. Original, Community Museum, Village of San Jerónimo Otla, Coixtlahuaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lienzo of Tlapiltepec. n.d. Original, Toronto: Royal Ontario Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matrícula de Tributos. 1980. Facsimile Reproduction. Commentary by Frances F. Berdan and Jacqueline de Durand-Forest, Codices Selecti No. 68. Graz: Akademische Druck u. Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources: References

  • Baquedano, Elizabeth, and Michel Graulich. 1993. Mythology, Agriculture and Politics, and Hunting. Estudios de Cultura Nahuatl 23: 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabas, Alicia. 2006. Dones, dueños y santos. Ensayo sobre religiones en Oaxaca. México, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdan, Frances F. 2007. Material Dimensions of Aztec Religion and Ritual. In Mesoamerican Ritual Economy: Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives, ed. E. Christian Wells and Karla L. Davis-Salazar, 245–266. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Arthur Asa. 1989. Signs in Contemporary Culture: An Introduction to Semiotics. Salem, Wisconsin: Sheffield Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernal García, Maria Elena and Ángel Julián García Zambrano. 2006. El altepetl colonial y sus antecedentes prehispánicos: contexto teórico-historiográfico. In Fernández Christlieb, Federico y Angel Julián García Zambrano. (coords.), Territorialidad y paisaje en el Altepetl del Siglo XVI. pp. 31–101, México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, Elizabeth Hill. 2000. Stories in Red and Black: Pictorial Histories of Aztecs and Mixtecs. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. A Web of Understanding: Pictorial Codices and the Shared Intellectual Culture of Late Postclassic Mesoamerica. In The Postclassic Mesoamerican World, ed. Michael E. Smith and Frances F. Berdan, 207–221. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Cycles of Time and Meaning in the Mexican Books of Fate. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broda, Johanna. 2000. Calendrics and Ritual Landscape at Teotihuacan: Themes of Continuity in Mesoamerican Cosmovision. In Mesoamerica’s Classic Heritage: From Teotihuacan to the Aztecs, ed. David Carrasco, Lindsay Jones, and Scott Sessions, 397–432. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulbulia, Joseph, Gloria Fraser, Joseph Watts, John H. Shaver, and Russell Gray. 2017. Can Honest Signaling Theory Clarify Religion’s Role in the Evolution of Social Inequality? Religion, Brain and Behavior 7 (4): 285–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burland, Cottie. 1955. The Selden Roll: an Ancient Mexican Picture Manuscript in the Bodleian Library at Oxford. Monumenta Americana II. Berlin: Verlag Gebr. Mann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmack, Robert M., Janine L. Gasco, Marilyn A. Masson, and Michael E. Smith. 2007. Late Postclassic Mesoamerica. In The Legacy of Mesoamerica: History and Culture of a Native American Civilization, ed. Robert M. Carmack, Janine L. Gasco, and Gary H. Gossen, 2nd ed., 74–119. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmagnani, Marcello. 1988. El Regreso de los Dioses: El Proceso de Reconstitución de la Identidad Étnica en Oaxaca-Siglos XVII-XVIII. México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caso, Alfonso. 1967. Los Calendarios Prehispánicos. México, D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. Reyes y Reinos de la Mixteca. Vol. I-II. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, Anne Walke. 2004. Divination by Image: The Borgia Group of Pre-Hispanic Mexican Manuscripts. Doctoral Dissertation. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehouve, Danièle. 2018. The New Fire and Corporal Penance. Comparative Perspectives between the Tlapanecs and the Aztecs. In Smoke, Flames and the Human Body in Mesoamerican Ritual Practice, ed. Andrew Scherer and Vera Tiesler, 411–434. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dichter, Ernest. 1964. The Handbook of Consumer Motivation: The Psychology of the World of Objects. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domenici, Davide, and Élodie Dupey García. 2021. The Wind God and the Descent of the Tzitzimitl: New Insights on the Iconography and Provenance of the Mosaic-Encrusted Bird Head at the Friedenstein Palace, Gotha, Germany. Ancient Mesoamerica: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durán, Fray Diego. 1971. Book of the Gods and Rites and the Ancient Calendar. Translated and edited by Fernando Horcasitas and Doris Heyden, Forward by Miguel León Portilla. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. The History of the Indies of New Spain. Translated, Annotated and with an Introduction by Doris Heyden. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, Christian. 1983. La Flor Letal. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Mesoamérica: Arte y Antropología. México D.F.: CONACULTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fash, Barbara W., and William L. Fash. 2007. The Roles of Ballgames in Mesoamerican Ritual Economy. In Mesoamerican Ritual Economy: Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives, ed. E. Christian Well and Karla L. Davis-Salazar, 267–284. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, Raymond. 1984. Symbols -Public and Private. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidel, David, Linda Schele, and Joy Parker. 1993. Maya Cosmos: Three Thousand Years on the Shaman’s Path. New York: William Morrow and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furst, Jill Leslie. 1978. Codex Vindobonensis Mexicanus I: A Commentary. Institute for Mesoamerican Studies Publication # 4. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. Skeletonization in Mixtec Art: A Re-Evaluation. In Art and Iconography of Late Post-Classic Central Mexico, ed. Elizabeth H. Boone, 207–225. Washington D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, Fray Gregorio. 1981. Origen de los indios del Nuevo Mundo, Estudio preliminar de Franklin Pease G.Y. México D.F: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambrano, García, and Ángel Julián. 2006. Pasaje Mítico Paisaje Fundacional. Cuernavaca, México: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garibay, Ángel María. 1985. Teogonía e Historia de los Mexicanos: Tres Opúsculos del Siglo XVI. México D.F.: Editorial Porrúa.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Llave del Náhuatl. México D.F.: Editorial Porrúa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, Susan. 1991. Ballgames and Boundaries. In The Mesoamerican Ballgame, ed. Vernon L. Scarborough and David R. Wilcox, 317–345. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • González Huerta, Neftalí. 2003. El Tupa: el mito de un ser fantástico en una comunidad mixteca. Huajuapan de León, Oaxaca, México: CONACULTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • González Torres, Yolotl. 1985. El Sacrificio Humano Entre los Mexicas. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, Nicholas. 2017. Sacred Dialogues: Christianity and the Native Religions in the Colonial Americas (1492–1700). Morrisville, NC: Lulu Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gúzman, Eulalia. 1934. Exploración Arqueológica en la Mixteca Alta. Anales del Museo Nacional de Arqueología, Historia y Etnografía, V Época 1: 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, Byron Ellsworth. 2002. The Social Life of Pre-sunrise Things. Current Anthropology 43 (3): 351–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Heirlooms and Ruins: High Culture, Mesoamerican Civilization, and the Postclassic Oaxacan Tradition. In After Monte Albán: Transformation and Negotiation in Oaxaca, Mexico, ed. Jeffrey Bloomster, 119–168. Boulder: Colorado University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Linda Jane. 2017. Aztec Human Sacrifice as Entertainment? The Physio-Psycho- Social Rewards of Aztec Sacrificial Celebrations. PhD. Dissertation. Denver: University of Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassig, Ross. 1988. Aztec Warfare. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Comercio, Tributo y Transportes: La Economía Política del Valle de México en el Siglo XVI. México D.F.: Editorial Patria.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. War and Society in Ancient Mesoamerica. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann Lejarazu, Manuel A. 2008. Religiosidad y bultos sagrados en la Mixteca prehispánica. Desacatos 27: 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hironymous, Michael Owen. 2007. Santa María Ixcatlan, Oaxaca: From Colonial Cacicazgo to Modern Municipio. Doctoral dissertation. Austin: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • INAH (Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia-México). 2019. Descubren el primer templo dedicado a Xipe Tótec en la Zona Arqueológica de Ndachjian–Tehuacán. http://inah.gob.mx/boletines/7883-descubren-el-primer-templo-dedicado-a-xipe-totec-en-la-zona-arqueologica-de-ndachjian-tehuacan, Downloaded 3 Jan 2019.

  • Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas. 1975. Códice Chimalpopoca: Anales de Cuauhtitlan y Leyenda de Los Soles, (trans: Primo Feliciano Velázquez). México, D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Moreno, Wigberto. 1941. Tula y los Toltecas según las Fuentes Históricas. Revista Mexicana de Estudios Antropológicos 5: 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwaniszewski, Stanislaw. 2001. Y las Montañas Tienen Género. Apuntes para el Análisis de los Sitios Rituales de la Iztaccihuatl y el Popocatepetl. In La Montaña en el Paisaje Ritual, ed. Johanna Broda, Stanislaw Iwaniszewski, and Arturo Montero. (coords.), 113–147. México, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwaniszewski, Stanislaw, and Ismael Arturo Montero García. 2001. La Sagrada Cumbre de la Iztaccihuatl. In La Montaña en el Paisaje Ritual, ed. Johanna Broda, Stanislaw Iwaniszewski, and Arturo Montero. (coords.), 95–111. México, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Nicholas. 2015. The Language of Lines on the Lienzo of Tlapiltepec. In The Lienzo de Tlapiltepec: A Painted History from the Northern Mixteca, ed. Arni Brownstone, 94–149. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, Arthur. 2010. Mixtecs, Zapotecs, and Chatinos: Ancient Peoples of Southern Mexico. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, Alice. 2018. Militant Christianity: An Anthropological History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Las Casas, Fray Bartolomé de. 1967. Apologética historia sumaria. México D.F: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Austin, Alfredo. 1973. Hombre-Dios: Religión y Política en el Mundo Náhuatl. México, D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Los mitos del Tlacuache: Caminos de la Mitología Mesoamericana. México D.F.: Alianza Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Quetzalcoatl Dédoublé: Religion Mésoaméricaine et Céramique Mixtèque. In L’image au Mexique: Usages, appropriations et transgressions, ed. Aline Hémond and Pierre Ragon, 15–34. México D.F.: Centre d’Études Mexicaines & Centraméricaines.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Austin, Alfredo, and Leonardo López Luján. 2012. The Posthumous History of the Tizoc Stone. In Fanning the Sacred Flame: Mesoamerican Studies in Honor of H.B. Nicholson, ed. Matthew A. Boxt and Brian Dervin Dillon, 439–460. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Luján, Leonardo, Robert H. Cobean, and Alba Guadalupe Mastache. 2001. Xochicalco y Tula. México D.F.: CONACULTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magaloni Kerpel, Diana. 2012. History under the Rainbow: The Conquest of Mexico in the Florentine Codex. In Contested Visions in the Spanish Colonial World, Ilona Katzew, (curator), pp. 78-95, Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) and New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, Joyce, and Kent V. Flannery. 2004. The Coevolution of Ritual and Society: New, 14C Dates from Ancient Mexico. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 (52): 18257–18261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastache, Alba Guadalupe, and Robert H. Cobean. 2000. Ancient Tollan: The Sacred Precinct. RES 38: 100–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matadamas Díaz, Raúl. 1997. Pictografía de San Pedro Jaltepetongo, Cuicatlan. In Historia del Arte de Oaxaca: Arte Prehispánico, ed. Margarita Dalton Palomo, Verónica Loera, and C. Chávez, vol. 1, 201–209. México D.F.: Instituto Oaxaqueño de las Culturas, Gobierno del Estado de Oaxaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Jaltepetongo, Tumba 1. In La Pintura Mural Prehispánica en México III: Oaxaca Tomo II, Catálogo, ed. Beatriz de la Fuente and Bernd Fahmel Beyer, 392–409. México D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, Rubén G. 2007. Aztec Militarism and Blood Sacrifice: The Archaeology and Ideology of Ritual Violence. In Latin American Indigenous Warfare and Ritual Violence, ed. Richard J. Chacon and Rubén Mendoza, 35–54. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, Rubén G., and Jennifer A. Lucido. 2017. Tollan Teotihuacan Multiethnic Mosaics, Corporate Interaction, and Social Complexity in Mesoamerica. In Feast, Famine or Fighting?: Multiple Pathways to Social Complexity, Studies in Human Ecology and Adaptation, ed. Richard J. Chacon and Ruben G. Mendoza, vol. 8, 337–392. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, Susan. 2013. Heaven and Earth in Ancient Mexico: Astronomy and Seasonal Cycles in the Codex Borgia. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina, Fray Alonso. 1992. Vocabulario en lengua castellana y mexicana y mexicana y castellana. México D.F.: Editorial Porrúa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, John. 1990. Sacrifice, Death and the Origins of Agriculture in the Codex Vienna. American Antiquity 55: 559–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. The Covenants of the Earth and Rain: Exchange, Sacrifice and Revelation in Mixtec Sociality. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero García, Ismael Arturo. 2012. Matlalcueye: El Volcán del Alma Tlaxcalteca. México D.F.: Porrúa Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morante López, Rubén. 2001. El Pico de Orizaba en la Cosmovisión del México Prehispánico. In La Montaña en el Paisaje Ritual, ed. Johanna Broda, Stanislaw Iwaniszewski, and Arturo Montero. (coords.), 49–63. México, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz Camargo, Diego. 1984. Descripción de la Ciudad y Provincia de Tlaxcala. In Relaciones Geográficas del Siglo XVI: Tlaxcala, ed. René Acuña, vol. 1, 34–285. México, D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, Henry B. 1971. Religion in Pre-Hispanic Central Mexico. In Archaeology of Northern Mesoamerica, Part One, Handbook of Middle American Indians, ed. Gordon F. Ekholm and Ignacio Bernal, vol. 10, Robert Wauchope, general editor, 395–446. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl: The Once and Future Lord of the Toltecs. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, Zelia. 1891. The Atlatl or Spear-thrower of Ancient Mexicans. Papers of the Peabody Museum 3:1. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, Guilhem. 1995. Les Paquets Sacrés ou la Mémoire Cachée des Indiens du Mexique Central (XVe -XVIe Siècles). Journal de la Société des Américanistes 81: 105–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Tepeyóllotl, “Corazón de la Montaña” y “Señor del Eco”: El Dios Jaguar de los Antiguos Mexicanos. Estudios de Cultura Nahuatl 28: 99–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Tezcatlipoca: Burlas y metamorfósis de un dios azteca. In Fondo de Cultura Económica. México D.F..

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. The Sacred Bundles and the Coronation of the Aztec King in Mexico-Tenochtitlan. In Sacred Bundles: Ritual Acts of Wrapping and Binding in Mesoamerica, Special Issue of Ancient Mesoamerica, ed. Julia Guernsey and F. Kent Reilly, 199–225. Barnardsville, NC: Boundary End Archaeology Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Sacred Bundles, Arrows, and New Fire. In Cave, City and Eagle’s Nest: An Interpretive Journey Through the Mapa de Cuauhtinchan #2, ed. David Carrasco and Scott Sessions, 281–313. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Las Tres Muertes Simbólicas del Nuevo Rey Mexica: Reflexiones en Torno a los Ritos de Entronización en el México Central Prehispánico. In Símbolos de Poder en Mesoamérica, ed. Guilhem Olivier. (coord.), 263–291. México, D.F.: Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. El Simbolismo Sacrificial de los Mimixcoa: Cacería, Guerra, Sacrificio e Identidad entre los Mexicas. In El Sacrificio Humano en la Tradición Religiosa Mesoamericana, ed. Leonardo López Luján and Guilhem Olivier. (coords.), 453–482. México, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015a. Cacería, Sacrificio y Poder en Mesoamérica: Tras las huellas de Mixcóatl, Serpiente de Nube. In Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, Centro de Estudios Mexicanos y Centroamericanos, Fondo de Cultura Económica. México D.F..

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. Enemy Brothers or Divine Twins? A Comparative Approach Between Tezcatlipoca and Quetzalcoatl, Two Major Deities from Ancient Mexico, translated by Michel Besson. In Tezcatlipoca Trickster and Supreme Deity, ed. Elizabeth Baquedano, 59–82. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. The Word, Sacrifice, and Divination: Aztec Man in the Realm of the Gods. In The Adventure of the Human Intellect -Self, Society, and the Divine in Ancient World Cultures, ed. Kurt A. Raaflaub. (coord.), 216–238. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Adivinación, Manipulación del Destino y Mito de Origen Entre los Antiguos Mexicanos. In Adivinar para Actuar: Miradas Comparativas sobre practices Adivinatorias Antiguas y Contemporáneas, ed. Olivier Guilhem and Jean-Luc Lambert. (coordinators), 163–204. México, D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México y Centro de Estudios Mexicanos y Centroamericanos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paddock, John. 1985. Tezcatlipoca in Oaxaca. Ethnohistory 32 (4): 309–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. A Codex Style Vessel from Nochixtlan, Oaxaca. In Caciques and Their People: A Volume in Honor of Ronald Spores, ed. Joyce Marcus and Judith F. Zeitlin, 101–109. Anthropological Papers No. 89. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, John M.D. 1998. Themes of Drunkenness, Violence and Factionalism in Tlaxcalan Altar Paintings. RES 33: 185–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, John M.D. 2017. The Nahua Mixteca International Style and the Confederacies of Southern Mexico, AD 1200-1600. In On the Mount of Intertwined Serpents: Lienzo Seler II's Pictorial History of Power, Rule and Land, ed. Viola König, 121–129. Berlin: Staatliche Museum zu Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • _ _ _ . 2003a. Creation Stories, Hero Cults, and Alliance building: Confederacies of Central and Southern Mexico. In The Postclassic Mesoamerican World, ed. Michael E. Smith and Frances F. Berdan, 61–66. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003b. Ritual Ideology and Commerce in the Southern Mexican Highlands. In The Postclassic Mesoamerican World, ed. Michael E. Smith and Frances F. Berdan, 172–177. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003c. Ritual and Iconographic Variability in Mixteca-Puebla Polychrome Pottery. In The Postclassic Mesoamerican World, ed. Michael E. Smith and Frances F. Berdan, 201–206. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003d. Royal Marriage and Confederacy Building among the Eastern Nahuas, Mixtecs and Zapotecs. In The Postclassic Mesoamerican World, ed. Michael E. Smith and Frances F. Berdan, 243–248. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravicz, Robert, and A. Kimball Romney. 1969. The Mixtec. In Handbook of Middle American Indians, Ethnology Part 1, ed. Evon Z. Vogt, vol. 7, 367–399. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, Kay A. 1998. Time and Sacrifice in the Aztec Cosmos. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, Fray Antonio de los. 1976 [1593]. Arte en Lengua Mixteca. Publications in Anthropology 14. Nashville: Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes García, Luis. 2000. Notas sobre organización social y política de los Toltecas según fuentes históricas. Paper presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rincón Mautner, Carlos. 1995. The Ñuiñe Codex from the Colossal Natural Bridge on the Ndaxagua: An Early Pictographic Text from the Coixtlahuaca Basin. Institute of Maya Studies Journal (Miami) 1 (2): 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rincón Mautner, Carlos. 1997. Reading the History of Place-Becoming in the Codices from the Coixtlahuaca Basin. In Messages and Meanings, ed. Mary Preuss, 129–148. Lancaster, California: Labyrinthos.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Man and the Environment in the Coixtlahuaca Basin of Northwestern Oaxaca Mexico: Two Thousand Years of Historical Ecology. Doctoral dissertation. Austin: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. La Reconstrucción Cronológica del Linaje Principal de Coixtlahuaca. In Códices y Documentos Sobre México, Tercer Simposio, Serie Historia, ed. Constanza Vega. (coord.), 25–43. México, D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005a. Sacred Caves and Rituals from the Northern Mixteca of Oaxaca, Mexico: New Revelations. In In the Maw of the Earth Monster: Studies of Mesoamerican Ritual Cave Use, ed. James E. Brady and Keith A. Prufer, 117–152. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005b. The Pictographic Assemblage from the Colossal Natural Bridge on the Ndaxagua, Coixtlahuaca Basin, Northwestern Mixteca Alta of Oaxaca, Mexico. Ketzalcalli 2 (2): 2–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Donde ataron a nuestra madre: la diosa de la tierra y el Coatepec de la Mixteca. In Iconografía mexicana: volumen VII. Atributos de las deidades femeninas, Homenaje a la Maestra Noemí Castillo Tejero. Beatriz Barba Ahuatzin and Alicia Blanco Padilla (coordinators), pp. 155–171, Colección Científica 511, Serie Antropología, México D.F.: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia,

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012a. Cave, Mountain and Ancestors: Weaving History and Cartography in the Preservation of Native Dominions of the Early Colonial Mixteca of Oaxaca, Mexico. In Mesoamerican Memory: Comparative Studies in Systems of Remembrance, ed. Amos Megged and Stephanie Wood, 249–276. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012b. Linajes y casas señoriales de los Tolteca-Chichimeca de Coixtlahuaca en la Mixteca de Oaxaca. In El Poder Compartido: Ensayos sobre la Arqueología de Organizaciones Políticas Segmentarias y Oligárquicas, ed. Annick Daneels and Gerardo Gutierrez, 115–172. México D.F.: CIESAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Coixtlahuaca’s Longue Durée. In Bridging the Gaps- Integrating Archaeology and History in Oaxaca, Mexico, ed. Danny Zborover and Peter C. Kroefges, 157–206. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Seeking the Imprimatur Dei: Coixtlahuaca’s, 1571–1575 Boundary Dispute with Zapotitlán. In On the Mount of Intertwined Serpents: Lienzo Seler II’s Pictorial History of Power, Rule and Land, ed. Viola König, 109–119. Berlin: Staatliche Museum zu Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. A Pair of Xantil Censers with Ballcourt Pendants from the Coixtlahuaca Basin of Oaxaca. Mexicon XL 4: 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Mixcoatl-Tezcatlipoca’s Atlatls from the Coixtlahuaca Basin, Oaxaca, Mexico. Mexicon XLI 2: 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, Gilbert. 2011. The Delusions of Economics: The Misguided Certainties of a Hazardous Science. Translated by Patrick Camiller. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po. Reprint, London: Zed. Originally published (2010) as L’économie ordinaire entre songes et mensonges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, Nicholas. 1998. Icons of Power: Feline Symbolism in the Americas. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, Nicholas, and Elizabeth Baquedano. 2015. Introduction. In Tezcatlipoca: Trickster and Supreme Deity, ed. Elizabeth Baquedano, 1–6. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahagún, Fray Bernardino de. 1989 [1577]. Historia General de las cosas de Nueva España. Introducción, Paleografía, Glosario y Notas por Josefina García Quinta y Alfredo López Austin, 2 vols., México D.F.: CONACYT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seler, Eduard. 1902. Codex Vaticanus No. 3773 (Codex Vaticanus B): an old Mexican pictorial manuscript in the Vatican Library. English edition by Augustus Henry Keane, Berlin and London: [s.n.]; Edinburgh: T. and A. Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solares, Blanca. 2007. Madre Terrible: La Diosa en la Religión del México Antiguo. México D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spores, Ronald. 1984. The Mixtecs in Ancient and Colonial Times. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spores, Ronald, and Andrew K. Balkansky. 2013. The Mixtecs of Oaxaca: Ancient Times to the Present. Norman: Oklahoma University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahle, David W., José Villanueva Diaz, Dorian J. Burnette, Julián Cerano Paredes, R.R. Heim Jr., Falko K. Fye, Rodolfo Acuna Soto, Matthew D. Therrell, Malcolm K. Cleaveland, and Daniel K. Stahle. 2011. Major Mesoamerican Droughts of the Past Millennium. Geophysical Research Letters 38 (5): L05703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Andrea. 1992. From Ritual in the Landscape to Capture in the Urban Center: The Recreation of Ritual Environments in Mesoamerica. Journal of Ritual Studies 6 (1) Special Issue: Art in Ritual Context: 109–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez de Peralta, Juan. 1990 [1589]. Tratado del Descubrimiento de las Indias (Noticias Históricas de Nueva España). Estudio preliminar y notas por Teresa Silva Tena, Consejo Nacional Para la Cultura y las Artes, México, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Thelma D. 1965. A Prayer to Tlaloc. Estudios de Cultura Nahuatl 5: 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1974. Tlaloc: A New Etymological Interpretation of the God’s Name and What Reveals of his Essence and Nature. In Atti del XL Congresso Internazionale degli Americanisti, Rome-Genova, 3-10 Settembre, 1972, Tilgher, Genova, vol., 2, 213–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terraciano, Kevin. 2001. The Mixtecs of Colonial Oaxaca: Nudzahui History, Sixteenth Through Eighteenth Centuries. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urcid, Javier. 2014. Mythical Past and Historied Present: Another Interpretation of a Polychrome Vessel from Nochixtlan, Oaxaca. Signs and Society 2 (1): 127–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velázquez de Lara, Gonzalo. 1984 [1579]. Relación de Ixcatlan, Quiotepec y Tecomahuaca. In Relaciones Geográficas del Siglo XVI: Antequera. Vol. 2 (1), René Acuña (ed.), 223–241, México, D.F.: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Joseph, Oliver Sheehan, Quentin D. Atkinson, Joseph Bulbulia, and Russell D. Gray. 2016. Ritual human sacrifice promoted and sustained the evolution of stratified societies. Nature 532: 228–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, Harvey. 2004. Modes of Religiosity: A Cognitive Theory of Religious Transmission. Lanham, MD: Rowman Altamira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, Harvey, Jonathan Jong, Michael D. Buhrmester, Ángel Gómez, Brock Bastian, Christopher M. Kavanagh, Martha Newson, Miriam Matthews, Jonathan A. Lanman, Ryan McKay, and Sergey Gavrilets. 2017. The Evolution of Extreme Cooperation via Shared Disphoric Experiences. Scientific Reports 7: 44292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This essay is dedicated to the memory of the great Mesoamerican scholar, Alfredo López Austin. Many people aided me in the process of developing this essay. My sincere thanks to members of the local Ayuntamientos of Tepelmeme and Coixtlahuaca, to my friends Gustavo Salazar and his late wife, Josefina, Dr. Edgar Mendoza, and Mrs. Elena Hernández, for the company in the field and generous hospitality in their homes. I am grateful for the valuable insights gained through discussions sustained with Ruth Gubler, Guilhem Olivier, Karen Bassie-Sweet, Michael Brose, Robert Cobean, Richard Diehl, Martha Ehrlich, Luis M. Gamboa Cabezas, Michael Lind, Nahúm Guzmán Nava, Nick Hopkins, Alfredo López Austin, Leonardo López Luján, Guido Krempel, Michael McGuirt, James B. Kiracofe, Carl Johnson, Johannes Neurath, and the late Barbara Price. Special thanks to Victor Manuel Pablo Martínez, David Smee, and Irvan Ramdani for the artwork they prepared to illustrate this essay. I am especially indebted to Computer Engineer Marcos García Yeh at CEPHCIS-UNAM, Mérida, for his help with the Mixtec Calendar-Julian Correlation Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mautner, C.R. (2024). Portals to the Gods: Reciprocity, Sacrifice, and Warfare in the Northern Mixteca. In: Mendoza, R.G., Hansen, L. (eds) Ritual Human Sacrifice in Mesoamerica. Conflict, Environment, and Social Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36600-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36600-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36599-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36600-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics