Skip to main content

Re:Design Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inventing the Almost Impossible

Abstract

The rise of human-centered design thinking in the 1980s could not predict the growing number of products and services we would invite into our lives. As we continue to innovate and build upon the design of these devices, our emphasis on design shifts to support the weak points of these outdated systems rather than empowering the humans who inhabit them. This leads to short-term fixes rather than long-term improvements, driving a wedge further between the actors within the ecosystem and the solutions these systems are trying to solve. Short-term thinking has put us in this situation. For us to move forward as a species, we need to stop kidding ourselves and focus on improving the human condition rather than continuing to serve the same what we have designed for ourselves. Through long-term thinking, visionary movements, and building for a better tomorrow, we can create a better environment for all actors involved in the systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1998). Business marketing: Understand what customers value. Harvard Business Review, pp. 76, 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehring, J. H., & Liedtka, J. (2018). Embracing systematic future thinking at the intersection of strategic planning, foresight and design. Journal of Innovation Management, 6(3), 134–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carleton, T. L., & Cockayne, W. R. (2023). Building moonshots: 50+ ways to turn radical ideas into reality. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiles, T. H., Bluedorn, A. C., & Gupta, V. K. (2007). Beyond creative destruction and entrepreneurial discovery: A radical Austrian approach to entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 28(4), 467–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P., & Daniel, L. (2010). Understanding social innovation: A provisional framework. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (2009). Edward de Bono on innovation vs creativity how’s it different. The Business Voice. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/eWM1PK2XrJ4

  • Dedehayir, O., & Steinert, M. (2016). The hype cycle model: A review and future directions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 108, 28–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M., & Phillips, N. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of innovation management. OUP Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (2013). Enter the triple bottom line. In The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? (pp. 1–16). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foelsing, J., & Schmitz, A. (2021). Check-out. In New Work braucht New Learning. Springer Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-32758-3_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, L., Walters, H., Pikkel, R., & Quinn, B. (2013). Ten types of innovation: The discipline of building breakthroughs. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, J., Cova, B., & Salle, R. (2013). Zooming in vs zooming out on value co-creation: Consequences for BtoB research. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(7), 1102–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewrick, M., Link, P., & Leifer, L. (2018). The design thinking playbook: Mindful digital transformation of teams, products, services, businesses and ecosystems. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview (Vol. 13). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986229

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinchot, G., III. (1985). Intrapreneuring: Why you don’t have to leave the corporation to become an entrepreneur. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, F. E., Baxter, G. D., Churchill, E. F., Ritter, F. E., Baxter, G. D., & Churchill, E. F. (2014). User-centered systems design: a brief history. In Foundations for designing user-centered systems: What system designers need to know about people (pp. 33–54).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbeck, R., & Kum, M. E. (2018). Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: A longitudinal analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawaguchi, M. (2011). Innovation activities based on s-curve analysis and patterns of technical evolution–“From the standpoint of engineers, what is innovation?”. Procedia Engineering, 9, 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. (2010). The cynefin framework. YouTube video, 8, 38. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7oz366X0-8

  • Stickdorn, M., Hormess, M. E., Lawrence, A., & Schneider, J. (2018). This is service design doing: Applying service design thinking in the real world. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valtakoski, A. (2017). Explaining servitization failure and deservitization: A knowledge-based perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden, K. (2005). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Maryam Afshar of Studio401, who created the artwork in double quick time based on our rather bad descriptions and prompts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaun West .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

West, S., Schönweitz, T., Amin, A. (2023). Re:Design Thinking. In: Carleton, T., West, S., Cockayne, W.R. (eds) Inventing the Almost Impossible. Future of Business and Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36224-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics