Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter begins with establishing feminist theory’s dominant narrative on Women and War before problematizing it via Queer theory. As feminist theory in International Relations emerged in the 1980s, it began to articulate and problematize the binary of the Just Warrior and the Beautiful Soul. These two figurations, of a chivalrous man fighting war on behalf of state and the nurturing woman, who is in turn located as either safely behind the lines or as a victim of war, helped feminist thought to identify where women were in war and how this led to expectations of women as (lesser) citizens. Yet, feminist theory has come a long way in the past 30 years and this binary should be problematized, particularly as not all men are soldiers and some are indeed victims of war and not all women are passive in war but are actively engaged in the fighting. Thus, we aim to ‘queer’ how men and women are located in war and how this leads to queering the politics of sovereignty and citizenship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åhäll, L. 2012. Motherhood, Myth and Gendered Agency in Political Violence. International Feminist Journal of Politics 14 (1): 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alison, Miranda. 2009. Women and Political Violence: Female Combatants in Ethno-National Conflict. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Auchter, Jessica. 2012. Gendering Terror: Discourses of Terrorism and Writing Woman-as-Agent. International Feminist Journal of Politics 14 (1): 121–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeley, Ruth. 2009. State Terrorism and Neoliberalism: The North in the South. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. Routledge: Abingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Amanda, and Joanna Tidy. 2017. Beyond the Hegemonic in the Study of Militaries. Masculinities, and War, Critical Military Studies 3 (2): 99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Carol. 1987. Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defence Intellectuals. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12 (4): 687–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Wars, Wimps and Women: Talking Gender and Thinking War. In Gender War Talk, ed. Mariam Cook and Angela Woollacott. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Women and Wars: Towards a Conceptual Framework. In Women and Wars, ed. Carol Cohn. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, Maya. 2014. Militarised Masculinities in International Relations. Brown Journal of World Affairs 21 (1): 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshtain, J.B. 1981. Public Man, Private Woman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1987. Women and War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enloe, Cynthia. 1983. Does Khaki Become You? The Militarisation of Women’s Lives. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Womenandchildren: Making Feminist Sense of the Persian Gulf Crisis. The Village Voice, 25 September: 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Manoeuvres: The International Politics of Militarising Women’s Lives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Globalisation and Militarism: Feminists Make the Link. Latham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1997. The Abnormals. In Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, M. Foucault, ed. P. Rabinow, trans. R. Hurley. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, C.E. 2009. Twisted Maternalism: From Peace to Violence. International Feminist Journal of Politics 11 (2): 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. Disordered Violence: How Gender, Race, and Heteronormativity Structures Terrorism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, C.E., and L. Sjoberg. 2011. The Gendering of Women's Terrorism. In Women, Gender, and Terrorism, ed. L. Sjoberg and C.E. Gentry. Georgia: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Beyond Mothers Monsters Whores. Thinking About Women’s Violence in Global Politics. London: Zed Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Joshua S. 2001. War and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Marsha. 2017. Problematizing Military Masculinity, Intersectionality and Male Vulnerability in Feminist Critical Military Studies. Critical Military Studies 3 (2): 182–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, Charlotte. 2015. Manly States. Masculinities, International Relations and Gender Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, Alison. 2018. Forget “Militarization”: Race, Disability and the “Martial Politics” of the Police and of the University. International Feminist Journal of Politics 20 (2): 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, Kimberly. 2008. Making Sense of Masculinity and War. Men and Masculinities. 10 (4): 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Richard. 2005. Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics, and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, Amy. 2014. “Out” in International Relations: Why Queer Visibility Matters. International Studies Review 16 (4): 601–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Megan. 2015. Beyond the Band of Brothers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrttinen, Henri, Lana Khattab, and Jana Naujoks. 2017. Re-thinking Hegemonic Masculinities in Conflict-Affected Contexts. Critical Military Studies 3 (2): 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, J. 2005. Nation. In Handbook of Studies on Men & Masculinities, ed. M.S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, and R.W. Connell. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parashar, Swati. 2009. Feminist International Relations and Women Militants: Case Studies from Sri Lanka and Kashmir. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 (2): 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Women and Militant Wars: The Politics of Injury. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. 1980. ‘The Disorder of Women’: Women, Love and the Sense of Justice. Ethics 91 (1): 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, V. Spike. 2014. Family Matters: How Queering the Intimate Queers the International. International Studies Review 16 (4): 604–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, V. Spike, and Ann Sisson Runyan. 2010. Global Gender Issues in the New Millennium. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, L. 2008. Gender, War and Militarism: Making and Questioning the Links. Feminist Review 88 (1): 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, L. 2015. Bodies in Global Politics. In Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations, ed. L. Shepherd. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, L. 2009. Gender, Just War and Non-state Actors. In Ethics, Authority, and War: Non-state Actors and the Just War Tradition, ed. E. Heinz and B. Steele. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Gendering Global Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, L., and C.E. Gentry. 2007. Mothers, Monsters, Whores: Women’s Violence in Global Politics. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steans, J. 2012. Gender and International Relations. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Third, Amanda. 2010. Imprisonment and Excessive Femininity: Reading Ulrike Meinhof’s Brain. Parallax 16 (4): 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, A. 1992. Gender in International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. From Queer to Queer IR. International Studies Review 16 (4): 596–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Queer International Relations, Sovereignty, Sexuality and the Will to Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welland, Julia. 2013. Militarised Violences, Basic Training and the Myths of Asexuality and Discipline. Review of International Studies 39 (4): 881–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. 2003. The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State. Signs 29: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. 1999. Gender and Nation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalewski, M. 2017. What’s the Problem with the Concept of Military Masculinities? Critical Military Studies 3 (2): 200–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caron E. Gentry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gentry, C.E., Wilson, R. (2023). Women and War. In: Williams, H., Boucher, D., Sutch, P., Reidy, D., Koutsoukis, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of International Political Theory. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36111-1_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics