Abstract
This research evaluated the phenomenon of white evangelical Christian women’s endorsement of Donald J. Trump as the President of the United States. Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were utilized with high-identifying evangelical, conservative Christian women who voted for Trump in the 2016 US presidential election to reveal the motives for their patronage. This qualitative study aimed to identify how the participants resolved potential cognitive dissonance in their support of Trump. The data from this study showed that, while the participants viewed Trump as a flawed and coarse man, they believed their vote for him was most consistent with their religious identity and moral values, given the alternative candidates they had to choose from. A long-standing prejudice of white evangelical Christian women against Hillary Clinton appeared to form an asymmetrical moral assessment between Clinton and Trump. The participants were able to downplay any conflict they felt regarding Trump’s morality. Trump’s unchristian-like behaviors were minimized or dissipated under the manifestation of their communal religious identity and situational moral principles. The participants dismissed negative mainstream news stories about Trump as “fake news.” A free press is an essential component of any healthy democracy and is protected by the First Amendment in the U.S. Constitution. When citizens do not have confidence in the press to be truthful while holding the government and powerful people accountable, democracy is put under pressure and is weakened.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Many thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their comments and to Dr. AD Akande for his professorial editorial assistance. Portions of this chapter were originally published in Brisbane, (2019). “That Reminds me of Jesus: White Evangelical Christian Women’s Perceptions of News Outlets Persecution of Donald J. Trump” at the University of Colorado Boulder, and also in ProPublica (Brisbane, 2019).
References
Aronson, E. (1969). The theory of cognitive dissonance. A current perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–34.
Bailey, S. P. (2017). Photo surfaces of evangelical pastors laying hands on Trump in Oval Office. Washington Post, July 12, 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2017/07/12/photo-surfaces-of-evangelical-pastors-laying-hands-on-trump-in-the-oval-office/
Bebbington, D. (2005). The dominance of evangelicalism: The age of Spurgeon and moody. Intervarsity Press.
Bermejo-Rubio, F. (2017, March 8). The process of Jesus’ deification and cognitive dissonance theory. BRILL, 64(2–3), 119–152.
Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2010). The role of prejudice and the need for closure in religious fundamentalism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(5), 715–725.
Brint, S., & Schroedel, J. R. (2009). Evangelicals and democracy in America (Vol. 2): Religion and politics. Russell Sage.
Burack, C., & Snyder-Hall, R. C. (2012). Introduction: Right-wing populism and the media. New Political Science, 34(4), December 2012.
Brisbane, G. (2019). "That Reminds Me of Jesus": White Evangelical Christian Women's Perception of New Outlets Persecution of Donald J. University of Colorado Boulder. https://www.proquest.com/openview/fedb6abbe4509e87428a391903ab543c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Cooper, E., & Jahoda, M. (1947). The evasion of propaganda: How prejudiced people respond to anti-prejudice propaganda. Journal of Psychology, 23, 15. Retrieved from https://colorado.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.colorado.idm.oclc.org/docview/1290662607?accountid=14503
Dreher, R. (2017). The Benedict option: A strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation. Penguin Random House.
Fea, J., Gifford, L., Griffith, R. M., & Martin, L. A. (2018). Evangelicalism and Politics. The American Historian. https://www.oah.org/tah/issues/2018/november/evangelicalism-and-politics/
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Fitzgerald, F. (2017). The evangelicals: The struggle to shape America. Simon & Schuster.
Gallup/Knight. (2020). Americans’ concerns about the media bias deepen, even as they see it as vital for democracy, September 4, 2020. https://knightfoundation.org/press/releases/gallup-knight-poll-americans-concerns-about-media-bias-deepen-even-as-they-see-it-as-vital-for-democracy/
Guardino, M., & Snyder, D. (2012). The tea party and the crisis of neoliberalism: Mainstreaming new right populism in the corporate news media. New Political Science, 34(4), December 2012.
Guth, J. L. (2019). Are White Evangelicals Populists? The View from the 2016 American National Election Study. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 17(3), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2019.1643991
Hankins, B. (2008). American evangelicals: A contemporary history of a mainstream religious movement. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Hoover, S. M. (2017). Residual and resurgent protestantism in the american media (and political) imaginary. International Journal of Communication, 11(2017), 2982–2999.
Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The centrality of religiosity scale. Religions, 3(3), 710–724. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030710
Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define America. Making sense of the battles over the family, art, education, law, and politics. Basic Books.
Kalb, M. (2018). Enemy of the people: Trump’s war on the press, the new McCarthyism, and the threat to American Democracy. Brookings Institution Press.
Kauffman, E. (2019). Whiteshift: Populism, Immigration, and the Future of White Majorities. Abrams Press.
Kellner, D. (2016). American nightmare: Donald Trump, media spectacle, and authoritarian populism. Sense Publishers.
Klapper, J. (1949). Effects of Mass Media. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University, August 1949. (A report to the director of Public Library Inquiry.)
Liebovich, L. (2003). Richard Nixon, Watergate, and the press: A historical perspective. Praeger.
Lindsay, D. M. (2007). Faith in the halls of power: How evangelicals joined the American Elite. Oxford University Press.
Marsden, G. M. (1980). Fundamentalism and American culture: The shaping of the twentieth-century evangelicalism 1879–1925. Oxford Press.
Mattingly, T. (2013). Define “evangelical” please! Virtue Online: The Voice for Global Orthodox Anglicanism. https://www.virtueonline.org/define-evangelical-please-terry-mattingly.
Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
Mudde, C. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. : Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001
Nortey, J. (2021). Most White Americans who regularly attend worship services voted for Trump in 2020. Pew Research Center. August 30, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/08/30/most-white-americans-who-regularly-attend-worshipservices-voted-for-trump-in-2020/#:~:text=Trump%20expanded%20his%20support%20among,%25%20support%20in%20both%20elections).
Pew Research Center. (2011). Evangelical beliefs and practices, June 22, 2011. http://www.pewforum.org/2011/06/22/global-survey-beliefs/
Pew Research Center. (2016). How the faithful voted: A preliminary 2016 analysis, Nov. 9, 2016. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/how-the-faithful-voted-a-preliminary-2016-analysis/
Pindell, J. (2018). Whatever happened to the Tea Party?: It died last night. Boston Globe, February 9, 2018. https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2018/02/09/whatever-happened-tea-party-died-last-night/BngSUNF0imTWwYozAZDDfO/story.html
Ross, L. D., Lelkes, Y., & Russell, A. G. (2012). How Christians reconcile their personal political views and the teachings of their faith: Projection as a means of dissonance reduction. PNAS, 109(10), March 6.
Schmiedel, U. & Ralston, J. (2021). Populism, Christianity, and the Role of the Theologian. In The Spirit of Populism: Political Theologies in Polarized Times (Volume 1).
Steensland, B., & Wright, E. (2014). American evangelicals and conservative politics: Past, present, and future. Sociology Compass, 8(5), 705–717.
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In. H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40).
Turner, J. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 42–67). Blackwell.
Vitiello, M. (2022). Trump’s Legacy: The Long-Term Risks to American Democracy. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 26, 467–529.
Winston, D. (2007, Sept). Back to the future: Religions, politics, and the media. American Quarterly, 59(3), 969–989.
Ysseldyk, R., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 60–71.
Zuckerman, P. (2016). Trump’s sexism is deeply biblical. Psychology Today, 10/12/2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brisbane, G.J. (2023). Why Evangelical Christian Women Voted for Donald Trump: A Crisis of Conscience and Moral Integrity—The Cognitive Dissonance. In: Akande, A. (eds) U.S. Democracy in Danger. Springer Studies on Populism, Identity Politics and Social Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36099-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36099-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36098-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36099-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)