Skip to main content

Lateral Approach to the Cervical Spine to Manage Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy and Radiculopathy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Funnel: From the Skull Base to the Sacrum

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 135))

  • 349 Accesses

Abstract

Background: The cervical lateral approach can enlarge the spinal canal and foramen to achieve an effective neural decompression without needing spine stabilization. For this review, the authors’ main objective was to illustrate the rationale, advantages, disadvantages, complications, and pitfalls of this technique, highlighting also areas for future development.

Materials and Methods: A Medline via PubMed database search was carried out by using both keywords, namely “cervical oblique corpectomy,” “multilevel oblique corpectomy and foraminotomy,” and “lateral vertebrectomy,” and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms from 1 January 1991, up to 31 December 2021.

Results: The analyzed articles suggested that the use of such a technique has declined over time; only 29 clinical studies met all the inclusion criteria and were retained for data analysis, including 1200 patients undergoing such an approach for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathies (DCMs) or of radiculopathies. The main etiopathogeneses were cervical stenosis, degenerative disk disease, or a mix of them—78% of which had a favorable outcome; the most frequent complications were transient and permanent Horner syndrome in 13.6% and 9.2% of cases, respectively. Long-term stability was reported in 97% of patients.

Conclusion: Multilevel cervical oblique vertebrectomy and/or lateral foraminotomy allow wide neural structure decompression and optimal stability given that the physiological spinal motion is preserved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chibbaro S, Gubian A, Zaed I, et al. Cervical myelopathy caused by ventrally located atlanto-axial synovial cysts: an open quest for the safest and most effective surgical management. Case series and systematic review of the literature. Neurochirurgie. 2020;66(6):447–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chibbaro S, Mirone G, Yasuda M, Marsella M, Di Emidio P, George B. Vertebral artery loop–a cause of cervical radiculopathy. World Neurosurg. 2012;78(3–4):375.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cornelius JF, George B, N’dri Oka D, Spiriev T, Steiger HJ, Hänggi D. Bow-Hunter’s syndrome caused by dynamic vertebral artery stenosis at the cranio-cervical junction–a management algorithm based on a systematic review and a clinical series. Neurosurg Rev. 2012;35(1):127–35; discussion 135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cornelius JF, Pop R, Fricia M, George B, Chibbaro S. Compression syndromes of the vertebral artery at the craniocervical junction. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2019;125:151–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cornelius JF, Slotty PJ, Tortora A, Petridis AK, Steiger HJ, George B. Bow Hunter’s syndrome caused by compression of the subaxial vertebral artery: surgical technique of anterolateral decompression (video). World Neurosurg. 2018;119:358–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. George B, Zerah M, Lot G, Hurth M. Oblique transcorporeal approach to anteriorly located lesions in the cervical spinal canal. Acta Neurochir. 1993;121(3-4):187–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin AR, Jentzsch T, Wilson JRF, et al. Inter-rater reliability of the modified Japanese orthopedic association score in degenerative cervical myelopathy: a cross-sectional study. Spine. 2021;46(16):1063–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tetreault L, Palubiski LM, Kryshtalskyj M, Idler RK, Martin AR, Ganau M, Wilson JR, Kotter M, Fehlings MG. Significant predictors of outcome following surgery for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018;29(1):115–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Adams CB, Logue V. Studies in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. II. The movement and contour of the spine in relation to the neural complications of cervical spondylosis. Brain. J Neurol. 1971;94(3):568–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamori M, Ishihara H, Ohmori K, Nakamura H, Kimura T. Minimum 10-year followup after en bloc cervical laminoplasty. Clin Orthop. 2003;411:129–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hukuda S, Mochizuki T, Ogata M, Shichikawa K, Shimomura Y. Operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A comparison of the results of anterior and posterior procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67(4):609–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Edwards CC, Heller JG, Silcox DH. T-Saw laminoplasty for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: clinical and radiographic outcome. Spine. 2000;25(14):1788–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goel VK, Clark CR, Harris KG, Schulte KR. Kinematics of the cervical spine: effects of multiple total laminectomy and facet wiring. J Orthop Res. 1988;6(4):611–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Graham AW, Swank ML, Kinard RE, Lowery GL, Dials BE. Posterior cervical arthrodesis and stabilization with a lateral mass plate. Clinical and computed tomographic evaluation of lateral mass screw placement and associated complications. Spine. 1996;21(3):323–8; discussion 329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine. 1983;8(7):693–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Iwasaki M, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T, Yonenobu K. Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years’ follow-up. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(2):180–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cantore GP, Ciapetta P, Delfini R, Raco A. Fibular graft in anterior surgery of cervical spondyloarthrosis myelopathy. Zentralbl Neurochir. 1986;47(2):111–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Graham JJ. Complications of cervical spine surgery. A five-year report on a survey of the membership of the Cervical Spine Research Society by the Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine. 1989;14(10):1046–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Heller JG, Edwards CC, Murakami H, Rodts GE. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis. Spine. 2001;26(12):1330–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jeffreys RV. The surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy due to spondylosis and disc degeneration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986;49(4):353–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaptain GJ, Simmons NE, Replogle RE, Pobereskin L. Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 2000;93(2):199–204.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Orabi M, Chibbaro S, Makiese O, Cornelius JF, George B. Double-door laminoplasty in managing multilevel myelopathy: technique description and literature review. Neurosurg Rev. 2008;31(1):101–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kato S, Ganau M, Fehlings MG. Surgical decision-making in degenerative cervical myelopathy - anterior versus posterior approach. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;58:7–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fehlings MG, Barry S, Kopjar B, et al. Anterior versus posterior surgical approaches to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy: outcomes of the prospective multicenter AOSpine North America CSM study in 264 patients. Spine. 2013;38(26):2247–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Aebi M, Zuber K, Marchesi D. Treatment of cervical spine injuries with anterior plating. Indications, techniques, and results. Spine. 1991;16(3):38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bruneau M, Cornelius JF, George B. Multilevel oblique corpectomies: surgical indications and technique. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(3):106–12; discussion 112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chibbaro S, Mirone G, Bresson D, George B. Cervical spine lateral approach for myeloradiculopathy: technique and pitfalls. Surg Neurol. 2009;72(4):318–24; discussion 324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chibbaro S, Mirone G, Makiese O, George B. Multilevel oblique corpectomy without fusion in managing cervical myelopathy: long-term outcome and stability evaluation in 268 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;10(5):458–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Emery SE, Bohlman HH, Bolesta MJ, Jones PK. Anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Two to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(7):941–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fehlings MG, Cooper PR, Errico TJ. Posterior plates in the management of cervical instability: long-term results in 44 patients. J Neurosurg. 1994;81(3):341–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar VG, Rea GL, Mervis LJ, McGregor JM. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: functional and radiographic long-term outcome after laminectomy and posterior fusion. Neurosurgery. 1999;44(4):771–7; discussion 777-778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bruneau M, Cornelius JF, George B. Microsurgical cervical nerve root decompression by anterolateral approach. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(1):108–13; discussion ONS108-113.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4(1):5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Verbiest H. The lateral approach to the cervical spine. Clin Neurosurg. 1973;20:295–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Verbiest H, Paz Geuse HD. Anterolateral surgery for cervical spondylosis in cases of myelopathy or nerve-root compression. J Neurosurg. 1966;25(6):611–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cagli S, Chamberlain RH, Sonntag VKH, Crawford NR. The biomechanical effects of cervical multilevel oblique corpectomy. Spine. 2004;29(13):1420–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. George B. Extracranial vertebral artery anatomy and surgery. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2002;27:179–216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. George B, Gauthier N, Lot G. Multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy treated by multilevel oblique corpectomies without fusion. Neurosurgery. 1999;44(1):81–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. George B, Cornelius JF. Vertebral artery: surgical anatomy. J Oper Tech Neurosurg. 2001;4:168–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yasuda M, Bresson D, Cornelius JF, George B. Anterolateral approach without fixation for resection of an intradural schwannoma of the cervical spinal canal: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(6):1178–81; discussion 1181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bruneau M, Cornelius JF, George B. Anterolateral approach to the V2 segment of the vertebral artery. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(4):262–7; discussion 262–267.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ganau M, Ligarotti GK, Apostolopoulos V. Real-time intraoperative ultrasound in brain surgery: neuronavigation and use of contrast-enhanced image fusion. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019;9(3):350–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Cornelius JF, George B. Cervical nerve root decompression by lateral approach as salvage operation after failed anterior transdiscal surgery: technical case report. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(2):272–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Nicácio JM, Rodrigues JC, Galles MHL, Faquini IV, de Brito Pereira CA, Ganau M. Cervical intramedullary schwannoma: a case report and review of the literature. Rare Tumors. 2009;1(2):e44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Balak N, Baran O, Denli Yalvac ES, Esen Aydin A, Kumbasar A, Tanriover N. Cervical oblique corpectomy: revitalizing the underused surgical approach with step-by-step simulation in cadavers. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(1):337–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ganau M, Holly LT, Mizuno J, Fehlings MG. Future directions and new technologies for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018;29(1):185–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chibbaro, S. et al. (2023). Lateral Approach to the Cervical Spine to Manage Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy and Radiculopathy. In: Visocchi, M. (eds) The Funnel: From the Skull Base to the Sacrum. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 135. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36083-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36084-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics