Skip to main content

Comparison Between Ventricular and Spinal Infusion Tests in Suspected Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Funnel: From the Skull Base to the Sacrum

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 135))

Abstract

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is an often-overlooked or misdiagnosed brain disorder characterized by overt ventriculomegaly and associated with gait disturbances, cognitive impairment, and urinary incontinence. If correctly diagnosed, it is considered the only form of dementia treatable with surgery, namely through a ventriculoperitoneal or ventriculoatrial shunt with programmable valves.

Among the 856 spinal and ventricular infusion tests performed from 2001 to 2017 at our institution, we analyzed 106 cases selected for suspected normotensive hydrocephalus. In all cases, Intracranial Elastance Index (IEI) and outflow resistance (Rout) values were calculated: 52 of these patients underwent Spinal Katzman Test (SKT), and the remaining 54 underwent an intraventricular infusion test (IVKT). Of the 40 patients in the SKT group with pathological elastance (71%), 17 also had a Rout >12 mmHg and 23 a Rout <12 mmHg. Of the 50 patients in the IVKT group with pathological elastance (92%), 38 also had a Rout >12 mmHg and 12 a Rout <12 mmHg.

IVKT and SKT to date represent two useful tools in the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Despite being more invasive, IVKT, including both the intracranial elastance index (IEI) and Rout analysis, could be considered more reliable than SKT and therefore could be reserved for the most controversial cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Andersson J, Rosell M, Kockum K, Söderström L, Laurell K. Challenges in diagnosing normal pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation of the diagnostic guidelines. eNeurologicalSci. 2017;7:27–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Halperin JJ, Kurlan R, Schwalb JM, Cusimano MD. Practice guideline: idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: response to shunting and predictors of response. Published online: 9. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hellström P, Klinge P, Tans J, Wikkelsø C. The neuropsychology of iNPH: findings and evaluation of tests in the European multicentre study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114(2):130–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.09.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Raneri F, Zella MAS, Di Cristofori A, Zarino B, Pluderi M, Spagnoli D. Supplementary tests in idiopathic Normal pressure hydrocephalus: a single-center experience with a combined lumbar infusion test and tap test. World Neurosurg. 2017;100:567–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wikkelsø C, Hellström P, Klinge PM, Tans JTJ. European iNPH multicentre study group. The European iNPH multicentre study on the predictive values of resistance to CSF outflow and the CSF tap test in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(5):562–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mattoli MV, Treglia G, Calcagni ML, Mangiola A, Anile C, Trevisi G. Usefulness of brain positron emission tomography with different tracers in the evaluation of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalous. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(18):6523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hussey F, Schanzer B, Katzman R. A simple constant-infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absorption. II Clinical studies. Neurology. 1970;20(7):665–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Katzman R, Hussey F. A simple constant-infusion manometric test for measurement of CSF absorption. Rationale and method. Neurology. 1970;20(6):534–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahlon B. Comparison between the lumbar infusion and CSF tap tests to predict outcome after shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73(6):721–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.73.6.721.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Anile C, De Bonis P, Albanese A, Di Chirico A, Mangiola A, Petrella G, Santini P. Selection of patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus for shunt placement: a single-institution experience. J Neurosurg. 2010;113:64–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Trevisi G, Signorelli F, de Waure C, Stifano V, Sturdà C, Rapisarda A, Pompucci A, Mangiola A, Anile C. Intraventricular infusion test accuracy in predicting short- and long-term outcome of iNPH patients: a 10-year update of a three-decade experience at a single institution. Neurosurg Rev. 2021;44(6):3323–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nucci CG, De Bonis P, Mangiola A, Santini P, Sciandrone M, Risi A, Anile C. Intracranial pressure wave morphological classification: automated analysis and clinical validation. Acta Neurochir. 2016;158:581–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Trevisi G, Frassanito P, Di Rocco C. Idiopathic cerebrospinal fluid overproduction: case-based review of the pathophysiological mechanism implied in the cerebrospinal fluid production. Croat Med J. 2014;55(4):377–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Giordan E, Palandri G, Lanzino G, Murad MH, Elder BD. Outcomes and complications of different surgical treatments for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg. 2018:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Junkkari A, Luikku AJ, Danner N, Jyrkkänen HK, Rauramaa T, Korhonen VE, Koivisto AM, Nerg O, Kojoukhova M, Huttunen TJ, Jääskeläinen JE, Leinonen V. The Kuopio idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus protocol: initial outcome of 175 patients. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2019;16:21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Czosnyka Z, Owler B, Keong N, Santarius T, Baledent O, Pickard JD, Czosnyka M. Impact of duration of symptoms on CSF dynamics in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: duration of symptoms and CSF dynamics. Acta Neurol Scand. 2011;123:414–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01420.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eide PK. The correlation between pulsatile intracranial pressure and indices of intracranial pressure-volume reserve capacity: results from ventricular infusion testing. J Neurosurg. 2016;125:1493–503. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.11.JNS151529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eide PK, Sorteberg W. Outcome of surgery for idiopathic Normal pressure hydrocephalus: role of preoperative static and pulsatile intracranial pressure. World Neurosurg. 2016;86:186–193.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bech-Azeddine R, Gjerris F, Waldemar G, Czosnyka M, Juhler M. Intraventricular or lumbar infusion test in adult communicating hydrocephalus? Practical consequences and clinical outcome of shunt operation. Acta Neurochir. 2005;147(10):1027–35. discussion 1035-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Halperin JJ, Kurlan R, Schwalb JM, Cusimano MD, Gronseth G, Gloss D. Practice guideline: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Response to shunting and predictors of response: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the american academy of neurology. Neurology. 2015;85(23):2063–71. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002193. Erratum in: Neurology. 2016 Feb 23;86(8):793. PMID: 26644048; PMCID: PMC4676757.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Signorelli, F., Trevisi, G., Visocchi, M., Anile, C. (2023). Comparison Between Ventricular and Spinal Infusion Tests in Suspected Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. In: Visocchi, M. (eds) The Funnel: From the Skull Base to the Sacrum. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 135. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36083-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-36084-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics