Skip to main content

Communication and Resolution Programs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Patient Safety
  • 346 Accesses

Abstract

A systems approach to patient safety is a relatively recent approach. The modern patient safety movement is generally thought to have started with the 1994 publication of Lucian Leape’s Error in Medicine, or for others even later with the Institute of Medicine’s To Err is Human published in 2000. Appreciation for the impact clinical culture has on safety and systems thinking described by the “science of safety,” “high reliability,” “Just Culture,” and others have evolved since; what has not evolved however, is the way medicine responds to patient harm. Aptly described “deny and defend” is not only ineffective for its singular purpose, litigation avoidance, but also it is counterproductive to the clinical mission, effectively undermining the values and practices of most modern patient safety strategies.

Communication and Resolution Programs (CRPs) conspicuously align organizational and personal responses to patients who suffer unintended clinical outcomes with the clinical mission and complement essential qualities of modern patient safety improvement. CRPs proactively respond to the individual patient harmed with compassion and nonnegotiable honesty, while decisively moving to protect against similar harm to other patients. CRPs accelerate improvement and promote a clinical culture of safety while happily saving professional liability costs. They are an indispensable component of any modern patient safety program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leape LL. Making healthcare safe; The story of the patient safety movement. Springer; 2021. isbn:978-3-030-71122-1; 978-3-030-71123-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71123-8; Forward by Donald M. Berwick, p. viii.

  2. Clapper C, Merlino J, Stockmeier CZH. How to achieve patient and workforce safety in healthcare. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2019. p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Communication and Optimal Resolution (CANDOR). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Content last reviewed April 2018. https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/capacity/candor/index.html.

  4. Powis Smith JM. Origin & history of Hebrew Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hill YB. 48 Edw. III, f. 6 (1374).

    Google Scholar 

  6. DeVille KA. Medical malpractice in nineteenth-century America: origins and legacy. New York: NYU Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Risk control in professional liability insurance. Duke Law J. 1960:106. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1702&context=dlj.

  8. Note, 26 VA. L. REV. 919 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Young, Rx: For modern medicine some sympathy added to science, Life. 1959, p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Brennan TA. Health policy report: medical malpractice. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sage W. Medical malpractice: insurance and the emperor’s clothes 54 DePaul Law Rev 463, 464, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  12. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1985/10/22/In-possibly-the-largest-state-capital-protest-since-the/1204498801600/. Accessed 17 July 2022.

  13. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2003/04/29/in-pa-doctors-rally-for-malpractice-limits/bb2f2bd0-395e-4c33-abcd-9e4ec17a384a/. Accessed 17 July 2022.

  14. Leape L. Making healthcare safe. The story of the patient safety movement. Springer; 2021, pp. 3–4. isbn:978-3-030-71122-1, 978-3-030-71123-8 (eBook). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71123-8

  15. Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Githens PB, Sloan FA. Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following perinatal injuries. JAMA. 1992;267:1359–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kraman SS, Hamm G. Risk management: extreme honesty may be the best policy. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:963–7. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-131-12-199912210-00010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boothman RC, Blackwell AC, Campbell DA Jr, Commiskey E, Anderson S. A better approach to medical malpractice claims? The University of Michigan experience. J Health Life Sci Law. 2009;2(2):125–59. PubMed PMID: 19288891.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kachalia A, Kaufman SR, Boothman R, Anderson S, Welch K, Saint S, Rogers MA. Liability claims and costs before and after implementation of a medical error disclosure program. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(4):213–21. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-153-4-201008170-00002. PubMed PMID: 20713789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Clinton H, Obama B. Making patient safety the centerpiece of medical liability reform. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2205–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. S. 1784 (IS)—National MEDiC Act; 42 U.S.C. 1320d-2 and 299. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-109s1784is. Accessed 17 July 2022.

  21. https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/capacity/candor/modules.html. Accessed 17 July 2022.

  22. Gallagher T, Boothman R, Schweitzer L, Benjamin E. Making communication and resolution programmes mission critical in healthcare organisations. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020;29(11):875–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010855.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Etchells E. AHRQ presentation: anchoring bias with critical implications. 2015. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/web-mm/anchoring-bias-critical-implications#References.

  24. The financial and human cost of medical error, The Betsy Lehman Center. 2019. https://betsylehmancenterma.gov/assets/uploads/Cost-of-Medical-Error-Report-2019.pdf.

  25. Wu AW, Boyle DJ, Wallace G, Mazor KM. Disclosure of adverse events in the United States and Canada: an update, and a proposed framework for improvement. J Public Health Res. 2013;2(3):e32. Published 2013 Dec 1. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2013.e32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu AW. Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):726–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.726.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Localio AR, Lawthers AG, Brennan TA, et al. Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:245–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Studdert DM, Thomas EJ, Burstin HR, Zbar BI, Orav EJ, Brennan TA. Negligent care and malpractice claiming behavior in Utah and Colorado. Med Care. 2000;38:250–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard C. Boothman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boothman, R.C. (2023). Communication and Resolution Programs. In: Agrawal, A., Bhatt, J. (eds) Patient Safety. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35933-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35933-0_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35932-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35933-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics