Skip to main content

Promoting Voice and Agency in Community Development Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Connectedness, Resilience and Empowerment

Part of the book series: Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being ((CQLWB))

  • 221 Accesses

Abstract

While community development is defined variously, there is consensus that it is a process of collectively working to improve the living standards of the members as democratically agreed upon by them. The ultimate goal being to have communities be able to control their destiny, by being able to make choices and enlarge the range of opportunities available to better their lives. Evidence suggests that boosting shared prosperity demand that all people have the opportunity to realize their potential and participate fully in all aspects of life (World Bank, 2012). However—the premise is that—the voice and agency of each individual in the community should count. However, voice and agency does not always happen, due to many reasons, including asymmetrical power relations in communities; communities are not always homogeneous; gender power asymmetry because of ideology (patriarchy); social stratification; Socio economic status; systemic issues; rigid bureaucratic systems in development agencies; time-framed development programming that reduce community participation into a series of events—rather than a process; vulnerability of communities (poverty, ethnic and racial minority status); power asymmetry between communities and community development practitioner; and even elite capture. Community development is interventionist. Community development practitioners have to work with marginalized and communities at risk of exclusion and ensure community empowerment, so that individuals and communities can speak for themselves and have control over what happens to them and their spaces. This calls for a structured community engagement process—where community development practitioners work collaboratively with and through groups of people (community)—to address issues affecting the well-being of people. For this to happen a community analysis as well as stakeholder analysis are key actions so that ultimately the key interests as well as the power matrix that are at the core of unraveling voice and agency amongst community members can be addressed, and thereby a transformation agenda based on identified key actions that community members can undertake to change community context and deepen their voice and agency can be put in motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bassler, A., Brasier, K., Fogel, N., & Taverno, R. (2008). Developing effective citizen engagement: A how-to guide for community leaders. Center for Rural Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, J. (2009). Theorizing community development. Journal of the Community Development Society, 34(2), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330409490110. Published online: 09 Dec 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDC. (1997). Principles of community engagement (1st ed.). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: CDC/ATSDR Committee on Community Engagement. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitere, P. O. (Ed.). (1994). Community Development: Its conceptions and practice with emphasis on Africa. G. S. Were Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Community Places (2012) Community Planning Toolkit - Community Engagement. Community Places: Belfast

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A., & Sparkes, J. (2010). The ‘agency’ of sustainable community development. Community Development Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsq013

  • Fairhurst, G. T., & Grant, D. (2010). The social construction of leadership: A sailing guide. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(2), 171–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gneiting, U., Bruno-Van Vijfeijken, T., & Schmitz, H. P. (2009). Setting higher goals: Rights and development. Monday Development, 27(12), 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, V. (2003). Gender, agency and change: Anthropological perspectives. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Association for Community development. (2018). Towards international standards for community development. IACD.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAP2. (2009). IAP2 core values. International Association for Public Participation (IAP2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, K. A., & Lane, A. (2018). Building relational capital: The contribution of episodic and relational community engagement. Public Relation Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.006

  • Klugman, J., Hanmer, L., Twigg, S., Hasan, T., McCleary-Sills, J., & Santamaria, J. (2014). Voice and agency: Empowering women and girls for shared prosperity. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0359-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, C., Paul, A., & Paul, K. (2022). Engaging with communities. In C. McConnell, D. Muia, & A. Clarke (Eds.), International Community Development Practice (Community Development Research and Practice Series). Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muia, D. (2022). Organising for change. In C. McConnell, D. Muia, & A. Clarke (Eds.), International Community Development Practice (Community Development Research and Practice Series). Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, L., & Dale, A. (2005). The role of agency in sustainable local community development. Local Environment, 10(5), 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1998). Capabilities and human rights. Fordham Law Review, 66(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Kenya. (2010). Constitution of Kenya. Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Kenya. (2012a). County Governments Act No. 17 of 2012. National Council for Law Reporting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Kenya. (2012b). Non-Governmental Organizations Co-Ordination Act No. 19 of 1990. Revised Edition 2012 [1990]. National Council for Law Reporting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach. New York Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1990). Human Development Report, 1990. http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr1990

  • United Nations. (1948). The universal declaration of human rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby, P. (2014). Theorising the practice of community development: A South African perspective. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2021). Voice, agency, empowerment: Handbook on social participation for universal health coverage. World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2012). Voice Agency and Empowering women and girls for shared prosperity. World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Muia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Muia, D. (2023). Promoting Voice and Agency in Community Development Processes. In: Muia, D., Phillips, R. (eds) Connectedness, Resilience and Empowerment. Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35744-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35744-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35743-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35744-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics