Skip to main content

The Understanding of Vulnerability of Critical Infrastructure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Critical Information Infrastructures Security (CRITIS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13723))

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present a problem of insufficient understanding of vulnerability of critical infrastructure. The paper looks at this issue with regard to the definition of vulnerability of critical infrastructure, its content as well as the limitations of current approaches to critical infrastructure protection. The recent events linked to the Covid-19 crisis showed the necessity to shift current approach to critical infrastructure protection from prevention-oriented to resilient-based. The implemented in this research methodology is based on a critical analysis of the existing literature.

Specifically, this paper emphasizes the need to understand the concept of vulnerability of critical infrastructure in terms of attributes of the system rather than flaws. It also highlights the marginalization of identification of vulnerability of critical infrastructure only to pre-event actions and its limited applicability solely to physical domain. Due to inability to foresee and prevent all threats from occurring, the approach to critical infrastructure protection requires adaptation of a new strategy based on identification of root causes of vulnerability related to capacity, competence and performance of critical infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klaver, M., Luiijf, H., Nieuwenhuijsen, A.: RECIPE : good practices manual for Cip policies, for policy makers in Europe (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carvalhaes, T., Markolf, S., Helmrich, A., Kim, Y., Li, R., Natarajan, M., et al.: COVID-19 as a Harbinger of Transforming Infrastructure Resilience. Frontiers in Built Environ. 6(148), 1–8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Theocharidou, M., Giannopoulos, G.: Risk Assessment Methodologies for Critical Infrastructure Protection. Part II: a New Approach, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Luxembourg (2015). https://doi.org/10.2788/621843

  4. Zio, E.: Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 152, 137–150 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kröger, W., Zio, E.: Vulnerable Systems. Springer (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-655-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ISO, BS: 27001: 2013. Information technology – Security techniques – Information security management systems - Requirements. BSI (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Department of Homeland Security, DHS Risk Lexicon- 2010 edition, Washington, DC (2010). 21 Apr 2022 https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/dhs-risk-lexicon-2010.pdf

  8. Brooks, N.: Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: A conceptual framework. Tyndall Centre Working Papers, 38, (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tomalska, A.: Preparing critical infrastructure for the future: Lessons learnt from the Covid-19 pandemic. Secur. Defence Q. (2022). https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/146603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Egan, M.: Anticipating future vulnerability: defining characteristics of increasingly critical infrastructure-like systems. J. Contingencies Crisis Manage. 15, 4–17 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2007.00500.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ranney, M., Griffeth, V., Jha, A.: Critical Supply Shortages - The Need for Ventilators and Personal Protective Equipment during the Covid-19 Pandemic. N. Engl. J. Med. 382(18), e41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2006141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. European Commission: Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the resilience of critical entities. COM (2020) 829 final. European Commission, Brussels (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Galbusera, L., Cardarilli, M., Giannopoulos, G.: The ERNCIP Survey on COVID-19: Emergency & business continuity for fostering resilience in critical infrastructures. Saf. Sci. 105161, 139 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baker, G.: A Vulnerability Assessment Methodology for Critical Infrastructure Sites. In DHS Symposium: Rand D Partnerships in Department of Homeland Security, Boston, Massachusetts (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Linkov, I., Bridges, T., Creutzig, F., Decker, J., Fox-Lent, C., Kröger, W., et al.: Changing the resilience paradigm. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4(6), 407–409 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mishra, P.: COVID-19, Black Swan events and the future of disaster risk management in India. Progress in Disaster Science, 8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100137

  17. Longstaff, P.: Security, resilience, and communication in unpredictable environments such as terrorism, natural disasters, and complex technology. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Center for Information Policy Research (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schmid, B., Raju, E., Jensen, P.: COVID-19 and business continuity – Learning from the private sector and humanitarian actors in Kenya. Prog. Disaster Sci. 11, 1–8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McGill, W., Ayyub, B.: The meaning of vulnerability in the context of critical infrastructure protection, in Critical infrastructure protection: Elements of risk, pp.25–48, George Mason University, Fairfax (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Petit, F., Bassett, G., Black, R., Buehring, W., Collins, M., Dickinson, D., et al.: Resilience measurement index: An indicator of critical infrastructure resilience, Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), Argonne National Laboratory (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cardona, O., Van Aalst, M., Birkmann, J., Fordham, M., McGregor, G., Rosa, P., et al.: Determinants of risk: Exposure and vulnerability. In: Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–108 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177245.005

  22. Presidential Policy Directive – PPD21: Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience (2013). Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/12/presidential-policy-directive-critical-infrastructure-security-and-resil, last accessed: 2022/03/24

  23. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Business Process Analysis and Business Impact Analysis User Guide, DC: Department of Homeland Security (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency: National Critical Functions Status Update to the Critical Infrastructure Community, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  25. ISO, BS: 22301: 2012. Societal security. Business continuity management systems. Requirements. BSI (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Torabi, S.A., Rezaei Soufi, H., Sahebjamnia, N.: A new framework for business impact analysis in business continuity management (with a case study). Saf. Sci. 68, 309–323 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Anwar, M., Gill, A., Fitzgibbon, A., Gull, I.: PESTLE+ risk analysis model to assess pandemic preparedness of digital ecosystems. Secur. Priv. 5(1), e187 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/spy2.187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bruneau, M., Chang, S., Eguchi, R., Lee, G., O’Rourke, T., Reinhorn, A., et al.: A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, (19)4, pp. 733–752, (2003). https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497

  29. Fisher, M., Gamper, C.: Policy evaluation framework on the governance of critical infrastructure resilience. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, D.C. (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Monstadt, J., Schmidt, M.: Urban resilience in the making? The governance of critical infrastructures in German cities. Urban Stud. 56(11), 2353–2371 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018808483

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amelia Tomalska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tomalska, A. (2023). The Understanding of Vulnerability of Critical Infrastructure. In: Hämmerli, B., Helmbrecht, U., Hommel, W., Kunczik, L., Pickl, S. (eds) Critical Information Infrastructures Security. CRITIS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13723. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35190-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35190-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35189-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35190-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics