Abstract
Semiochemicals, such as sex pheromones or predator kairomones, trigger inter- and intraspecific interactions among animals. With more thanĀ 7500 species, frogs (Anura) are a highly diverse group with complex life cycles and adaptations to aquatic and terrestrial habitats. In this review we give a comprehensive and numerical overview about the research conducted concerning semiochemical use in different anuran live stages. Analysing more thanĀ 300 studies, we found that chemical communication and kairomone recognition are best studied in tadpoles. Tadpoles of different species are well known to react for example to damage-released alarm substances or predator kairomones. This knowledge has been used in some species to elope more complex research questions about learning mechanisms or the impact of chemical pollution. But also juvenile frogs and adults have been in the focus of semiochemical research, e.g., analysing the recognition of predator kairomones, conspecific semiochemicals, substances involved in parental care, or potential courtship pheromones. However, compared to tadpoles the research efforts in these life stages are still scarce. Furthermore, the species studied regarding semiochemical use do not remotely reflect the diversity of anuran species known today. Future studies of anuran chemical communication should provide additional insight to the role of semiochemicals across different life stages and species.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achtymichuk, G. H., Crane, A. L., Simko, O. M., Stevens, H. E. F., & Ferrari, M. C. O. (2022). The choice of euthanasia techniques can affect experimental results in aquatic behavioural studies. Animal Behaviour, 185, 1ā8.
Adams, M. J., & Claeson, S. (1998). Field response of tadpoles to conspecific and heterospecific alarm. Ethology, 104(11), 955ā961.
Agosta, W. C. (1992). Chemical communication: the language of pheromones. Henry Holt and Company.
Ali, M. F., & Morgan, E. D. (1990). Chemical communication in insect communities: A guide to insect pheromones with special emphasis on social insects. Biological Reviews, 65(3), 227ā247.
Altig, R., & Christensen, M. T. (1981). Behavioral characteristics of the tadpoles of Rana heckscheri. Journal of Herpetology, 15(2), 151ā154.
Anderson, R. B., & Lawler, S. P. (2016). Behavioral changes in tadpoles after multigenerational exposure to an invasive intraguild predator. Behavioral Ecology, 27(6), 1790ā1796.
Asey, M. J., Harowicz, P. G., & Su, L. (2005). Chemically mediated mate recognition in the Tailed Frog (Ascaphus truei). In R. T. Mason, M. P. LeMaster, & D. MĆ¼ller-Schwarze (Eds.), Chemical signals in vertebrates 10 (pp. 24ā31). Springer.
Austin, C. E., March, R. E., Stock, N. L., & Murray, D. L. (2018). The origin and ecological function of an ion inducing anti-predator behavior in Lithobates tadpoles. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 44(2), 178ā188.
Bairos-Novak, K. R., Crane, A. L., Achtymichuk, G. H., Hsin, J., Rivera-HernĆ”ndez, I. A. E., Simko, O. M., Wrynn, T. E., Chivers, D. P., & Ferrari, M. C. O. (2020). Forget the audience: tadpoles release similar disturbance cues regardless of kinship or familiarity. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 74(12), 1ā10.
Balestrieri, A., Gazzola, A., Pellitteri-Rosa, D., & Vallortigara, G. (2019). Discrimination of group numerousness under predation risk in anuran tadpoles. Animal Cognition, 22(2), 223ā230.
Barbasch, T., & Benard, M. F. (2011). Past and present risk: Exposure to predator chemical cues before and after metamorphosis influences juvenile wood frog behavior. Ethology, 117(5), 367ā373.
Batabyal, A., Gosavi, S. M., & Gramapurohit, N. P. (2014). Determining sensitive stages for learning to detect predators in larval bronzed frogs: Importance of alarm cues in learning. Journal of Biosciences, 39(4), 701ā710.
Belanger, R. M., & Corkum, L. D. (2009). Review of aquatic sex pheromones and chemical communication in anurans. Journal of Herpetology, 43(2), 184ā191.
Belden, L. K., Wildy, E. L., Hatch, A. C., & Blaustein, A. R. (2000). Juvenile western toads, Bufo boreas, avoid chemical cues of snakes fed juvenile, but not larval, conspecifics. Animal Behaviour, 59, 871ā875.
Benard, M. F., & Fordyce, J. A. (2003). Are induced defenses costly? Consequences of predator-induced defenses in western toads, Bufo boreas. Ecology, 84(1), 68ā78.
Bennett, A. M., Pereira, D., & Murray, D. L. (2013). Investment into defensive traits by anuran prey (Lithobates pipiens) is mediated by the starvation-predation risk trade-off. PLoS One, 8(12), e82344.
Berec, M., Klapka, V., & Zemek, R. (2016). Effect of an alien turtle predator on movement activity of European brown frog tadpoles. The Italian Journal of Zoology, 83(1), 68ā76.
Blaustein, A. R., & OāHara, R. K. (1982). Kin recognition in Rana cascadae tadpoles: Maternal and paternal effects. Animal Behaviour, 30(4), 1151ā1157.
Blaustein, A. R., Yoshikawa, T., Asoh, K., & Walls, S. C. (1993). Ontogenetic shifts in tadpole kin recognition: Loss of signal and perception. Animal Behaviour, 46, 525ā538.
Bossuyt, F., Maex, M., Treer, D., Schulte, L. M., Van Bocxlaer, I., & Janssenswillen, S. (2019a). Chemistry between salamanders: Evolution of the SPF courtship pheromone system in Salamandridae. In C. D. Buesching (Ed.), Chemical signals in vertebrates 14 (pp. 205ā220). Springer.
Bossuyt, F., Schulte, L. M., Maex, M., Janssenswillen, S., Novikova, P. Y., Biju, S. D., Van de Peer, Y., Matthijs, S., Roelants, K., Martel, A., & Van Bocxlaer, I. (2019b). Multiple independent recruitment of sodefrin precursor-like factors in anuran sexually dimorphic glands. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 36(9), 1921ā1930.
Brizzi, R., Delfino, G., & Jantra, S. (2003). An overview of breeding glands. In B. G. M. Jamieson (Ed.), Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Anura (pp. 253ā317). Science Publishers, Inc.
Buttermore, K. F., Litkenhaus, P. N., Torpey, D. C., Smith, G. R., & Rettig, J. E. (2011). Effects of mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) cues on wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) tadpole activity. Acta Herpetologica, 6(1), 81ā85.
Buxton, V. L., & Sperry, J. H. (2017). Reproductive decisions in anurans: A review of how predation and competition affects the deposition of eggs and tadpoles. BioScience, 67(1), 26ā38.
Byrne, P. G., & Keogh, J. S. (2007). Terrestrial toadlets use chemosignals to recognize conspecifics, locate mates and strategically adjust calling behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 74(5), 1155ā1162.
CapellĆ”n, E., & Nicieza, A. G. (2010). Constrained plasticity in switching across life stages: Pre- and post-switch predators elicit early hatching. Evolutionary Ecology, 24(1), 49ā57.
Carlson, B. E., Newman, J. C., & Langkilde, T. (2015). Food or fear: Hunger modifies responses to injured conspecifics in tadpoles. Hydrobiologia, 743(1), 299ā308.
Casillas-BarragĆ”n, I., Costa-Pereira, R., & Peixoto, P. E. C. (2016). Perceived predation risk decreases movement and increases aggregation of Amazon milk frog (Anura, Hylidae) tadpoles throughout ontogeny. Hydrobiologia, 765(1), 379ā386.
Chivers, D. P., & Mirza, R. S. (2001). Importance of predator diet cues in responses of larval wood frogs to fish and invertebrate predators. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27(1), 45ā51.
Chivers, D. P., & Smith, R. J. F. (1998). Chemical alarm signalling in aquatic predator-prey systems: A review and prospectus. Ecoscience, 5(3), 338ā352.
Chivers, D. P., Kiesecker, J. M., Marco, A., Wildy, E. L., & Blaustein, A. R. (1999a). Shifts in life history as a response to predation in western toads (Bufo boreas). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25(11), 2455ā2463.
Chivers, D. P., Kiesecker, J. M., Wildy, E. L., Belden, L. K., Kats, L. B., & Blaustein, A. R. (1999b). Avoidance response of post-metamorphic anurans to cues of injured conspecifics and predators. Journal of Herpetology, 33(3), 472ā476.
Chivers, D. P., Wildy, E. L., Kiesecker, J. M., & Blaustein, A. R. (2001). Avoidance response of juvenile pacific treefrogs to chemical cues of introduced predatory bullfrogs. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27(8), 1667ā1676.
Chivers, D. P., Kiesecker, J. M., Marco, A., DeVito, J., Anderson, M. T., & Blaustein, A. R. (2003). Predator-induced life history changes in amphibians: Egg predation induces hatching. Oikos, 92(1), 135ā142.
Chivers, D. P., Mathiron, A., Sloychuk, J. R., & Ferrari, M. C. O. (2015). Responses of tadpoles to hybrid predator odours: Strong maternal signatures and the potential risk/response mismatch. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20150365.
Chuirazzi, C., Ocampo, M., & Takahashi, M. K. (2021). Influence of prey diet quality on predator-induced traits in wood frog tadpoles (Lithobates sylvaticus). Amphibia-Reptilia, 42(3), 331ā341.
Clarke, G. S., Crossland, M. R., Shilton, C., & Shine, R. (2015). Chemical suppression of embryonic cane toads Rhinella marina by larval conspecifics. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52(6), 1547ā1557.
Clarke, G. S., Crossland, M. R., & Shine, R. (2016). Can we control the invasive cane toad using chemicals that have evolved under intraspecific competition? Ecological Applications, 26(2), 463ā474.
Costa, R. N., & Nomura, F. (2014). Assessment risk and limited behavioral plasticity in tadpoles of Rhinella ornata (Anura, Bufonidae). Iheringia, 104(2), 162ā167.
Crane, A. L., & Ferrari, M. C. O. (2017). Evidence for risk extrapolation in decision making by tadpoles. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1ā7.
Crane, A. L., Chivers, D. P., & Ferrari, M. C. O. (2019). Time-dependent latent inhibition of predator-recognition learning. Biology Letters, 15(5), 20190183.
Crossland, M. R., & Shine, R. (2011). Cues for cannibalism: Cane toad tadpoles use chemical signals to locate and consume conspecific eggs. Oikos, 120(3), 327ā332.
Crossland, M. R., & Shine, R. (2012). Embryonic exposure to conspecific chemicals suppresses cane toad growth and survival. Biology Letters, 8(2), 226ā229.
Crossland, M. R., Haramura, T., Salim, A. A., Capon, R. J., & Shine, R. (2012). Exploiting intraspecific competitive mechanisms to control invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, rspb20120821.
Crossland, M. R., Salim, A. A., Capon, R. J., & Shine, R. (2019). The effects of conspecific alarm cues on larval cane toads (Rhinella marina). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 45(10), 838ā848.
Crossland, M. R., Salim, A. A., Capon, R. J., & Shine, R. (2021). Chemical cues that attract cannibalistic cane toad (Rhinella marina) larvae to vulnerable embryos. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1ā8.
Crump, M. L. (1996). Parental care among the amphibia. In J. S. Rosenblatt & C. T. Snowdon (Eds.), Parental care. Evolution, mechanisms, and adaptive significance. Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 25p, pp. 109ā144). Academic Press.
Curi, L. M., Cuzziol Boccioni, A. P., Peltzer, P. M., Attademo, A. M., BassĆ³, A., LeĆ³n, E. J., & Lajmanovich, R. C. (2022). Signals from predators, injured conspecifics, and pesticide modify the swimming behavior of the gregarious tadpole of the Dorbignyās Toad, Rhinella dorbignyi (Anura: Bufonidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 100(999), 19ā27.
Delaney, K., & Bishop, P. J. (2007). Communication in the worldās most ancestral frogs. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 34(3), 262.
Deng, K., He, Q.-L., Zhou, Y., Zhu, B.-C., Wang, T.-L., Wang, J.-C., & Cui, J.-G. (2020). Male serrate-legged treefrogs adjust competition strategies according to visual or chemical cues from females. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 223(21), jeb229245.
Deng, K., Zhou, Y., He, Q.-L., Zhu, B.-C., Wang, T.-L., Wang, J.-C., & Cui, J.-G. (2021). Conspecific odor cues induce different vocal responses in serrate-legged small treefrogs, but only in the absence of acoustic signals. Frontiers in Zoology, 18(1), 1ā6.
Deng, K., Zhou, Y., Zhang, H.-D., He, Q.-L., Zhu, B.-C., Wang, T.-L., Wang, J.-C., Halfwerk, W., & Cui, J.-G. (2022). Conspecific disturbance odors act as alarm cues to affect female mate choice in a treefrog. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 76(4), 1ā8.
Dibble, C. J., Kauffman, J. E., Zuzik, E. M., Smith, G. R., & Rettig, J. E. (2009). Effects of potential predator and competitor cues and sibship on wood frog (Rana sylvatica) embryos. Amphibia-Reptilia, 30(2), 294ā298.
Dicke, M., & Sabelis, M. W. (1988). Infochemical terminology: Based on cost-benefit analysis rather than origin of compounds? Functional Ecology, 2, 131ā139.
Dijk, B., Laurila, A., Orizaola, G., & Johansson, F. (2016). Is one defence enough? Disentangling the relative importance of morphological and behavioural predator-induced defences. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 70(2), 237ā246.
Dodson, S. I., Crowl, T. A., Peckarsky, B. L., Kats, L. B., Covich, A. P., & Culp, J. M. (1994). Non-visual communication in freshwater benthos: An overview. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 13(2), 268ā282.
Dole, J. W., Rose, B. B., & Tachiki, K. H. (1981). Western toads (Bufo boreas) learn odor of prey insects. Herpetologica, 37(1), 63ā68.
Ehrsam, M., Knutie, S. A., & Rohr, J. R. (2016). The herbicide atrazine induces hyperactivity and compromises tadpole detection of predator chemical cues. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 35, 2239ā2244.
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1949). Ćber das Vorkommen von Schreckstoffen bei Erdkrƶtenquappen. Experientia, 5, 236.
Eklƶv, P. (2000). Chemical cues from multiple predator-prey interactions induce changes in behavior and growth of anuran larvae. Oecologia, 123(2), 192ā199.
El Balaa, R., & Blouin-Demers, G. (2013). Does exposure to cues of fish predators fed different diets affect morphology and performance of Northern Leopard Frog (Lithobates pipiens) larvae? Canadian Journal of Zoology, 91(4), 203ā211.
Eluvathingal, L. M., Shanbhag, B. A., & Saidapur, S. K. (2009). Association preference and mechanism of kin recognition in tadpoles of the toad Bufo melanostictus. Journal of Biosciences, 34(3), 435ā444.
Escalona SulbarĆ”n, M. D., Ivo SimƵes, P., Gonzalez-Voyer, A., & Castroviejo-Fisher, S. (2019). Neotropical frogs and mating songs: The evolution of advertisement calls in glassfrogs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 32(2), 163ā176.
Feminella, J. W., & Hawkins, C. P. (1994). Tailed frog tadpoles differentially alter their feeding behavior in response to von-visual cues from four predators. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 13(2), 310ā320.
Ferland-Raymond, B., March, R. E., Metcalfe, C. D., & Murray, D. L. (2010). Prey detection of aquatic predators: Assessing the identity of chemical cues eliciting prey behavioral plasticity. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 38(2), 169ā177.
Ferrari, M. C. O., & Chivers, D. P. (2008). Cultural learning of predator recognition in mixed-species assemblages of frogs: The effect of tutor-to-observer ratio. Animal Behaviour, 75(6), 1921ā1925.
Ferrari, M. C. O., & Chivers, D. P. (2009a). Latent inhibition of predator recognition by embryonic amphibians. Biology Letters, 5(2), 160ā162.
Ferrari, M. C. O., & Chivers, D. P. (2009b). Sophisticated early life lessons: Threat-sensitive generalization of predator recognition by embryonic amphibians. Behavioral Ecology, 20(6), 1295ā1298.
Ferrari, M. C. O., & Chivers, D. P. (2009c). Temporal variability, threat sensitivity and conflicting information about the nature of risk: Understanding the dynamics of tadpole antipredator behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 78(1), 11ā16.
Ferrari, M. C. O., Messier, F., & Chivers, D. P. (2007). First documentation of cultural transmission of predator recognition by larval amphibians. Ethology, 113(6), 621ā627.
Ferrari, M. C. O., Messier, F., & Chivers, D. P. (2008a). Degradation of chemical alarm cues under natural conditions: Risk assessment by larval woodfrogs. Chemoecology, 17(4), 263ā266.
Ferrari, M. C. O., Messier, F., & Chivers, D. P. (2008b). Larval amphibians learn to match antipredator response intensity to temporal patterns of risk. Behavioral Ecology, 19(5), 980ā983.
Ferrari, M. C. O., Brown, G. E., Messier, F., & Chivers, D. P. (2009). Threat-sensitive generalization of predator recognition by larval amphibians. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63(9), 1369ā1375.
Ferrari, M. C. O., Wisenden, B. D., & Chivers, D. P. (2010). Chemical ecology of predatorāprey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: A review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 88(7), 698ā724.
Ferrari, M. C. O., Brown, G. E., & Chivers, D. P. (2012). Temperature-mediated changes in rates of predator forgetting in woodfrog tadpoles. PLoS One, 7(12), e51143.
Ferrari, M. C. O., Crane, A. L., & Chivers, D. P. (2016). Certainty and the cognitive ecology of generalization of predator recognition. Animal Behaviour, 111, 207ā211.
Ferrari, M. C. O., Brown, G. E., & Chivers, D. P. (2018). Understanding the effect of uncertainty on the development of neophobic antipredator phenotypes. Animal Behaviour, 136, 101ā106.
Ferreira do Amaral, D., MontalvĆ£o, M. F., de Oliveira Mendes, B., de Souza, J. M., Chagas, T. Q., de Lima Rodrigues, A. S., & Malafaia, G. (2018). Insights about the toxic effects of tannery effluent on Lithobates catesbeianus tadpoles. Science of the Total Environment, 621, 791ā801.
Flowers, M. A., & Graves, B. M. (1997). Juvenile toads avoid chemical cues from snake predators. Animal Behaviour, 53(3), 641ā646.
Forester, D. C., & Thompson, K. J. (1998). Gauntlet behaviour as a male sexual tactic in the American toad (Amphibia: Bufonidae). Behaviour, 135(2), 99ā119.
Fraker, M. E. (2009). Predation risk assessment by green frog (Rana clamitans) tadpoles through chemical cues produced by multiple prey. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63(10), 1397ā1402.
Fraker, M. E., Hu, F., Cuddapah, V., McCollum, S. A., Relyea, R. A., Hempel, J., & Denver, R. J. (2009). Characterization of an alarm pheromone secreted by amphibian tadpoles that induces behavioral inhibition and suppression of the neuroendocrine stress axis. Hormones and Behavior, 55(4), 520ā529.
Frost, D. R. (2022). Amphibian species of the world: An online reference. Version 6.1. (2 Nov 2022). American Museum of Natural History, New York. https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/index.php
Garcia, T. S., Urbina, J. C., Bredeweg, E. M., & Ferrari, M. C. O. (2017). Embryonic learning and developmental carry-over effects in an invasive anuran. Oecologia, 184(3), 623ā631.
Garcia, T. S., Bredeweg, E. M., Urbina, J., & Ferrari, M. C. O. (2019). Evaluating adaptive, carry-over, and plastic antipredator responses across a temporal gradient in Pacific chorus frogs. Ecology, 100(11), e02825.
Gascuel, J., & Amano, T. (2013). Exotic models may offer unique opportunities to decipher specific scientific questions: The case of Xenopus olfactory system. The Anatomical Record, 296(9), 1453ā1461.
Gazzola, A., Brandalise, F., Rubolini, D., Rossi, P., & Galeotti, P. (2015). Fear is the mother of invention: Anuran embryos exposed to predator cues alter life-history traits, post-hatching behaviour and neuronal activity patterns. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 218(24), 3919ā3930.
Gazzola, A., Balestrieri, A., Scribano, G., Fontana, A., & Pellitteri-Rosa, D. (2021). Contextual behavioural plasticity in Italian agile frog (Rana latastei) tadpoles exposed to native and alien predator cues. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 224(9), jeb240465.
Gerhardt, H. C., & Huber, F. (2002). Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. University of Chicago Press.
Giri, A., Yadav, S. S., Giri, S., & Sharma, G. D. (2012). Effect of predator stress and malathion on tadpoles of Indian skittering frog. Aquatic Toxicology, 106ā107, 157ā163.
Gomez-Mestre, I., & DĆaz-Paniagua, C. (2011). Invasive predatory crayfish do not trigger inducible defences in tadpoles. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1723), 3364ā3370.
Gong, Y., Zeng, Y., Zheng, P., Liao, X., & Xie, F. (2020). Structural and bio-functional assessment of the postaxillary gland in Nidirana pleuraden (Amphibia: Anura: Ranidae). Zoological Letters, 6(1), 1ā16.
Gonzalo, A., Cabido, C., Galan, P., Lopez, P., & Martin, J. (2006). Predator, but not conspecific, chemical cues influence pond selection by recently metamorphosed Iberian green frogs, Rana perezi. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 84(9), 1295ā1299.
Gonzalo, A., Lopez, P., & Martin, J. (2010). Risk level of chemical cues determines retention of recognition of new predators in Iberian green frog tadpoles. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64(7), 1117ā1123.
Gonzalo, A., LĆ³pez, P., & MartĆn, J. (2013). Adaptive forgetting in Iberian green frog tadpoles (Pelophylax perezi): Learned irrelevance and latent inhibition may avoid predator misidentification. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 127(1), 56.
Gosner, K. L. (1960). A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica, 16(3), 183ā190.
Graham, B. M., OāHearn, D. J., MacAllister, I. E., & Sperry, J. H. (2020). Behavioral responses by adult Northern leopard frogs to conspecific chemical cues. Journal of Herpetology, 54(2), 168ā173.
Graves, B. M., Summers, C. H., & Olmstead, K. L. (1993). Sensory mediation of aggregation among postmetamorphic Bufo cognatus. Journal of Herpetology, 27(3), 315ā319.
Grubb, J. C. (1973). Olfactory orientation in Bufo woodhousei fowleri, Pseudacris clarki and Pseudacris streckeri. Animal Behaviour, 21(4), 726ā732.
Hagman, M., & Shine, R. (2008a). Australian tadpoles do not avoid chemical cues from invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus). Wildlife Research, 35(1), 59ā64.
Hagman, M., & Shine, R. (2008b). Tadpoles of invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) do not respond behaviourally to chemical cues from tadpoles of four species of Australian frogs. Australian Journal of Zoology, 56(4), 211ā213.
Hagman, M., & Shine, R. (2008c). Understanding the toad code: Behavioural responses of cane toad (Chaunus marinus) larvae and metamorphs to chemical cues. Austral Ecology, 33(1), 37ā44.
Hagman, M., & Shine, R. (2009a). Factors influencing responses to alarm pheromone by larvae of invasive cane toads, Bufo marinus. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 35(2), 265ā271.
Hagman, M., & Shine, R. (2009b). Larval alarm pheromones as a potential control for invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) in tropical Australia. Chemoecology, 19(4), 211ā217.
Hagman, M., Hayes, R. A., Capon, R. J., & Shine, R. (2009). Alarm cues experienced by cane toad tadpoles affect post-metamorphic morphology and chemical defences. Functional Ecology, 23(1), 126ā132.
Hamer, R., Lemckert, F. L., & Banks, P. B. (2011). Adult frogs are sensitive to the predation risks of olfactory communication. Biology Letters, 7(3), 361ā363.
Haramura, T., Crossland, M. R., Takeuchi, H., & Shine, R. (2017). Methods for invasive species control are transferable across invaded areas. PLoS One, 12(11), e0187265.
Hazlett, B. A. (1985). Disturbance pheromones in the crayfish Orconectes virilis. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 11(12), 1695ā1711.
Hemnani, M., GuimarĆ£es, I. S. C., Kaefer, I. L., & da Pires, T. H. S. (2022). Alarm reaction depends on multiple chemical cues in tadpoles of the cane toad (Rhinella marina). Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 35, 1ā13.
Hepper, P. G., & Waldman, B. (1992). Embryonic olfactory learning in frogs. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section B, 44(3ā4), 179ā197.
Hettyey, A., TĆ³th, Z., Thonhauser, K. E., Frommen, J. G., Penn, D. J., & Van Buskirk, J. (2015). The relative importance of prey-borne and predator-borne chemical cues for inducible antipredator responses in tadpoles. Oecologia, 179(3), 699ā710.
Hettyey, A., Ćveges, B., MĆ³ricz, Ć. M., Drahos, L., Capon, R. J., Van Buskirk, J., TĆ³th, Z., & BĆ³kony, V. (2019). Predator-induced changes in the chemical defence of a vertebrate. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 88(12), 1925ā1935.
Hews, D. K., & Blaustein, A. R. (1985). An investigation of the alarm response in Bufo boreas and Rana cascadae tadpoles. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 43(1), 47ā57.
Hickman, C. R., & Watling, J. I. (2014). Leachates from an invasive shrub causes risk-prone behavior in a larval amphibian. Behavioral Ecology, 25(2), 300ā305.
Holomuzki, J. R. (1995). Oviposition sites and fish-deterrent mechanisms of two stream anurans. Copeia, 1995(3), 607ā613.
Hossie, T., Landolt, K., & Murray, D. L. (2017). Determinants and co-expression of anti-predator responses in amphibian tadpoles: A meta-analysis. Oikos, 126(2), 173ā184.
Hƶtling, S., Haberlag, B., Tamm, M., Collatz, J., Mack, P., Steidle, J. L. M., Vences, M., & Schulz, S. (2014). Identification and synthesis of macrolide pheromones of the grain beetle Oryzaephilus surinamensis and the frog Spinomantis aglavei. Chemistry - A European Journal, 20(11), 3183ā3191.
Houck, L. D. (2009). Pheromone communication in amphibians and reptiles. Annual Review of Physiology, 71, 161ā176.
HrbĆ”Äek, J. (1950). On the flight reaction of tadpoles of the common toad caused by chemical substances. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 6(3), 100ā102.
Iglesias-Carrasco, M., Cabido, C., & Ord, T. J. (2022). Natural toxins leached from Eucalyptus globulus plantations affect the development and life-history of anuran tadpoles. Freshwater Biology, 67(2), 378ā388.
Jefferson, D. M., Hobson, K. A., & Chivers, D. P. (2013). Understanding the information value of repeated exposure to chemical alarm cues: What can growth patterns tell us? Annales Zoologici Fennici, 50, 237ā246.
Kam, Y.-C., & Yang, H.-W. (2002). Female-offspring communication in a Taiwanese tree frog, Chirixalus eiffingeri (Anura: Rhacophoridae). Animal Behaviour, 64(6), 881ā886.
Karlson, P., & LĆ¼scher, M. (1959). āPheromonesā: A new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature, 183(4653), 55ā56.
Kats, L. B., & Dill, L. M. (1998). The scent of death: Chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience, 5(3), 361ā394.
Kats, L. B., Petranka, J. W., & Sih, A. (1988). Antipredator defenses and the persistence of amphibian larvae with fishes. Ecology, 69(6), 1865ā1870.
Kiesecker, J. M., & Blaustein, A. R. (1997). Population differences in responses of red-legged frogs (Rana aurora) to introduced bullfrogs. Ecology, 78(6), 1752ā1760.
Kiesecker, J. M., Chivers, D. P., & Blaustein, A. R. (1996). The use of chemical cues in predator recognition by western toad tadpoles. Animal Behaviour, 52(6), 1237ā1245.
Kiesecker, J. M., Chivers, D. P., Marco, A., Quilchano, C., Anderson, M. T., & Blaustein, A. R. (1999a). Identification of a disturbance signal in larval red-legged frogs, Rana aurora. Animal Behaviour, 57(6), 1295ā1300.
Kiesecker, J. M., Skelly, D. K., Beard, K. H., & Preisser, E. (1999b). Behavioral reduction of infection risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(16), 9165ā9168.
Kiesecker, J. M., Chivers, D. P., Anderson, M., & Blaustein, A. R. (2002). Effect of predator diet on life history shifts of red-legged frogs, Rana aurora. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 28(5), 1007ā1015.
Kikuyama, S., Yamamoto, K., Iwata, T., & Toyoda, F. (2002). Peptide and protein pheromones in amphibians. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 132(1), 69ā74.
King, J. D., Rollins-Smith, L. A., Nielsen, P. F., John, A., & Conlon, J. M. (2005). Characterization of a peptide from skin secretions of male specimens of the frog, Leptodactylus fallax that stimulates aggression in male frogs. Peptides, 26(4), 597ā601.
Kiseleva, E. I. (1989). Reactions of Bufo bufo L. toad tadpoles on chemical signals of individuals of the same and different species. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii, 50(6), 794ā798.
Kiseleva, E. I. (1996). The Chemical interaction of frog tadpoles (Rana temporaria L., Anura, Amphibia) with conspecific and heterospecific anuran tadpoles. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii, 57(6), 740ā746.
Kloskowski, J. (2020). Better desiccated than eaten by fish: distribution of anurans among habitats with different risks to offspring. Freshwater Biology, 65(12), 2124ā2134.
Korbeck, R. G., & McRobert, S. P. (2005). Home area recognition via olfactory cues in the tropical poison frog Dendrobates auratus. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 12(3), 161ā166.
Kramer, G. (1933). Untersuchungen Ć¼ber die Sinnesleistungen und das Orientierungsverhalten von Xenopus laevis Daud. Zoologische Jahrbucher Abteilung FĆ¼r Allgemeine Zoologie Und Physiologie Der Tiere, 52, 629ā676.
Kuhn, J., & Schulz, S. (2022). Cinnamomeoventrolideādouble bond regioisomerism in frog semiochemicals. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 48(5), 531ā545.
Kulzer, E. (1954). Untersuchungen Ć¼ber die Schreckreaktion der Erdkrƶtenkaulquappen (Bufo bufo). Zeitschrift FĆ¼r Vergleichene Physiologie, 36, 443ā463.
Kumpulainen, N. (2022). Communication between the tadpoles of the dyeing poison frog Dendrobates tinctorius (Anura, Dendrobatidae). Master Thesis, University of JyvƤskylƤ
Kurali, A., PĆ”sztor, K., Hettyey, A., & TĆ³th, Z. (2016). Toxin depletion has no effect on antipredator responses in common toad (Bufo bufo) tadpoles. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 119(4), 1000ā1010.
Laurila, A. (2000). Behavioural responses to predator chemical cues and local variation in antipredator performance in Rana temporaria tadpoles. Oikos, 88(1), 159ā168.
Law, J. H., & Regnier, F. E. (1971). Pheromones. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 40(1), 533ā548.
Lee, J. S. F., & Waldman, B. (2002). Communication by fecal chemosignals in an archaic frog, Leiopelma hamiltoni. Copeia, 2002(3), 679ā686.
Lefcort, H. (1996). Adaptive, chemically mediated fright response in tadpoles of the southern leopard frog, Rana utricularia. Copeia, 1996(2), 455ā459.
Lefcort, H., & Eiger, S. M. (1993). Antipredatory behaviour of feverish tadpoles: Implications for pathogen transmission. Behaviour, 126(1/2), 13ā27.
Lucon-Xiccato, T. (2019). Chemical alarm cues allow prey to adjust their defensive behaviour to cover abundance. Behavioural Processes, 162, 86ā89.
Lucon-Xiccato, T., Chivers, D. P., Mitchell, M. D., & Ferrari, M. C. O. (2016). Making the dead talk: alarm cue-mediated antipredator behaviour and learning are enhanced when injured conspecifics experience high predation risk. Biology Letters, 12(8), 20160560.
Lucon-Xiccato, T., Chivers, D. P., Mitchell, M. D., & Ferrari, M. C. O. (2017). Prenatal exposure to predation affects predator recognition learning via lateralization plasticity. Behavioral Ecology, 28(1), 253ā259.
Maag, N., Gehrer, L., & Woodhams, D. C. (2012). Sink or swim: a test of tadpole behavioral responses to predator cues and potential alarm pheromones from skin secretions. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 198(11), 841ā846.
Madison, D. M. (1977). Chemical communication in amphibians and reptiles. In D. MĆ¼ller-Schwarze & M. Mozell (Eds.), Chemical signals in vertebrates (pp. 135ā168). Plenum Press.
Mandrillon, A. L., & Saglio, P. (2005). Prior exposure to conspecific chemical cues affects predator recognition in larval common toad (Bufo bufo). Archiv fĆ¼r Hydrobiologie, 164(1), 1ā12.
Mandrillon, A. L., & Saglio, P. (2007a). Effects of embryonic exposure to conspecific chemical cues on hatching and larval traits in the common frog (Rana temporaria). Chemoecology, 17(3), 169ā175.
Mandrillon, A. L., & Saglio, P. (2007b). Herbicide exposure affects the chemical recognition of a non native predator in common toad tadpoles (Bufo bufo). Chemoecology, 17(1), 31ā36.
Mandrillon, A. L., & Saglio, P. (2009). Effects of single and combined embryonic exposures to herbicide and conspecific chemical alarm cues on hatching and larval traits in the common frog (Rana temporaria). Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 56(3), 566ā576.
Manteifel, Y. (1995). Chemically-mediated avoidance of predators by Rana temporaria tadpoles. Journal of Herpetology, 29(3), 461ā463.
Manteifel, Y. B. (2001). Avoidance of alarm pheromone by tadpoles of the common toad, Bufo bufo, in nature. ZoologicheskiÄ Zhurnal, 80, 67ā70.
Manteifel, Y. B., & Kiseleva, E. I. (2011). Ammonia as a pheromone in anuran tadpoles. Physiological Research, 60(1), S185āS191.
Manteifel, Y. B., & Zhushev, A. V. (1996). Avoidance of natural chemical stimuli by tadpoles of three anuran species. Russian Journal of Zoology, 75(6), 900ā906.
Manteifel, Y. B., Kiseleva, E. I., & Margolis, S. E. (2005). An increase in ammonium concentration as a non-specific pheromone signal that is avoided by amphibian larvae. ZoologiÄeskij Žurnal, 84(10), 1289ā1297.
Manteifel, Y. B., Margolis, S. E., & Kiseleva, E. I. (2006). Disturbance pheromone in the common toad (Bufo bufo) larvae: The possible communicative role of ammonium-containing excretions. Doklady Biological Sciences, 406(3), 82ā83.
Marino, J. A., Holland, M. P., & Middlemis Maher, J. (2014). Predators and trematode parasites jointly affect larval anuran functional traits and corticosterone levels. Oikos, 123(4), 451ā460.
Mathis, A., Ferrari, M. C. O., Windel, N., Messier, F., & Chivers, D. P. (2008). Learning by embryos and the ghost of predation future. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1651), 2603.
Maturana, H. R., Lettvin, J. Y., McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. H. (1960). Anatomy and physiology of vision in the frog (Rana pipiens). The Journal of General Physiology, 43(6), 129.
McCann, S., Crossland, M., Greenlees, M., & Shine, R. (2019a). Invader control: Factors influencing the attraction of cane toad (Rhinella marina) larvae to adult parotoid exudate. Biological Invasions, 21(6), 1895ā1904.
McCann, S., Crossland, M. R., & Shine, R. (2019b). Pheromones can cull an invasive amphibian without releasing survivors from intraspecific competition. Ecosphere, 10(12), e02969.
McCoy, M. W., Wheat, S. K., Warkentin, K. M., & Vonesh, J. R. (2015). Risk assessment based on indirect predation cues: Revisiting fine-grained variation. Ecology and Evolution, 5(20), 4523ā4528.
McIntyre, P. B., & McCollum, S. A. (2000). Responses of bullfrog tadpoles to hypoxia and predators. Oecologia, 125(2), 301ā308.
McMahon, T. A., Laggan, N. A., & Hill, M. N. (2019). Metabolites produced by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis alter development in tadpoles, but not growth or mortality. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 135(3), 251ā255.
McMahon, T. A., Hill, M. N., Lentz, G. C., Scott, E. F., Tenouri, N. F., & Rohr, J. R. (2021). Amphibian species vary in their learned avoidance response to the deadly fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58(8), 1613ā1620.
Melnik, K., Menke, M., Rakotoarison, A., Vences, M., & Schulz, S. (2019). Identification and synthesis of luteolide, a highly branched macrolide semiochemical from the mantellid frog Gephyromantis luteus. Organic Letters, 21(8), 2851ā2854.
Melo, G. R., SolĆ©, M., & Eterovick, P. C. (2021). Invisible or fearless: Tadpole response to predator cues depends on color. Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 33(2), 99ā107.
Menke, M., Peram, P. S., Starnberger, I., Hƶdl, W., Jongsma, G. F. M., Blackburn, D. C., Rƶdel, M.-O., Vences, M., & Schulz, S. (2016). Identification, synthesis and mass spectrometry of a macrolide from the African reed frog Hyperolius cinnamomeoventris. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry, 12(1), 2731ā2738.
Menke, M., Melnik, K., Peram, P. S., Starnberger, I., Hƶdl, W., Vences, M., & Schulz, S. (2018). Frogolideāan unprecedented sesquiterpene macrolactone from scent glands of African frogs. European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2018(20ā21), 2651ā2656.
MikĆ³, Z., Ujszegi, J., GĆ”l, Z., Imrei, Z., & Hettyey, A. (2015). Choice of experimental venue matters in ecotoxicology studies: Comparison of a laboratory-based and an outdoor mesocosm experiment. Aquatic Toxicology, 167, 20ā30.
Mirza, R. S., & Chivers, D. P. (2001). Do chemical alarm signals enhance survival of aquatic vertebrates? An analysis of the current research paradigm. In A. Marchlewska-Koj, J. J. Lepri, & D. MĆ¼ller-Schwarze (Eds.), Chemical signals in vertebrates 9 (pp. 19ā26). Springer.
Mirza, R. S., & Kiesecker, J. M. (2005). Chemically mediated life-history shifts in embryonic amphibians. In Chemical signals in vertebrates 10 (pp. 373ā380). Springer.
Mirza, R. S., Ferrari, M. C. O., Kiesecker, J. M., & Chivers, D. P. (2006). Responses of American toad tadpoles to predation cues: Behavioural response thresholds, threat-sensitivity and acquired predation recognition. Behaviour, 143, 877ā889.
Mirza, R. S., Laraby, C. A., & Marcellus, A. M. (2013). Knowing your behaviour: the importance of behavioural assays in the characterisation of chemical alarm cues in fishes and amphibians. In M. L. East & M. Dehnhard (Eds.), Chemical signals in vertebrates 12 (pp. 295ā308). Springer.
Mitchell, M. D., Chivers, D. P., Brown, G. E., & Ferrari, M. C. O. (2016a). Living on the edge: How does environmental risk affect the behavioural and cognitive ecology of prey? Animal Behaviour, 115, 185ā192.
Mitchell, M. D., Ferrari, M. C. O., Lucon-Xiccato, T., & Chivers, D. P. (2016b). Diet cues alter the development of predator recognition templates in tadpoles. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 70(10), 1707ā1713.
Mitchell, M. D., Bairos-Novak, K. R., & Ferrari, M. C. O. (2017). Mechanisms underlying the control of responses to predator odours in aquatic prey. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 220(11), 1937ā1946.
Mitchell, M. D., Crane, A. L., Bairos-Novak, K. R., Ferrari, M. C. O., & Chivers, D. P. (2018). Olfactory cues of habitats facilitate learning about landscapes of fear. Behavioral Ecology, 29(3), 693ā700.
Mogali, S. M., Saidapur, S. K., & Shanbhag, B. A. (2011). Levels of predation modulate antipredator defense behavior and metamorphic traits in the toad Bufo melanostictus. Journal of Herpetology, 45(4), 428ā431.
Mogali, S. M., Shanbhag, B. A., & Saidapur, S. K. (2015). Strong food odours mask predation risk and affect evocation of defence behaviours in the tadpoles of Sphaerotheca breviceps. Journal of Ethology, 33(1), 41ā46.
Mogali, S. M., Saidapur, S. K., & Shanbhag, B. A. (2020). Behavioral responses of tadpoles of Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Anura: Bufonidae) to cues of starved and fed dragonfly larvae. Phyllomedusa: Journal of Herpetology, 19(1), 93ā98.
Moore, H., Chivers, D. P., & Ferrari, M. C. O. (2015). Sub-lethal effects of Roundup on tadpole anti-predator responses. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 111, 281ā285.
Murray, D. L., Roth, J. D., & Wirsing, A. J. (2004). Predation risk avoidance by terrestrial amphibians: The role of prey experience and vulnerability to native and exotic predators. Ethology, 110(8), 635ā647.
Natale, G. S., Alcalde, L., Herrera, R., Cajade, R., Schaefer, E. F., Marangoni, F., & Trudeau, V. L. (2011). Underwater acoustic communication in the macrophagic carnivorous larvae of Ceratophrys ornata (Anura: Ceratophryidae). Acta Zoologica, 92(1), 46ā53.
Nieuwkoop, P. D., Faber, J., Gerhart, J., & Kirschner, M. (2020). Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin): A systematical and chronological survey of the development from the fertilized egg till the end of metamorphosis. Garland Science.
Nordlund, D. A. (1981). Semiochemicals; their role in pest control (Issues 04; SB951, N6.). Wiley
Nowack, C., Peram, P. S., Wenzel, S., Rakotoarison, A., Glaw, F., Poth, D., Schulz, S., & Vences, M. (2017). Volatile compound secretion coincides with modifications of the olfactory organ in mantellid frogs. Journal of Zoology, 303(1), 72ā81.
Nunes, A. L., Richter-Boix, A., Laurila, A., & Rebelo, R. (2013). Do anuran larvae respond behaviourally to chemical cues from an invasive crayfish predator? A community-wide study. Oecologia, 171(1), 115ā127.
Nunes, A. L., Orizaola, G., Laurila, A., & Rebelo, R. (2014a). Morphological and life-history responses of anurans to predation by an invasive crayfish: An integrative approach. Ecology and Evolution, 4(8), 1491ā1503.
Nunes, A. L., Orizaola, G., Laurila, A., & Rebelo, R. (2014b). Rapid evolution of constitutive and inducible defenses against an invasive predator. Ecology, 95(6), 1520ā1530.
Nystrom, P., & Abjornsson, K. (2000). Effects of fish chemical cues on the interactions between tadpoles and crayfish. Oikos, 88(1), 181ā190.
Ogurtsov, S. V. (2004). Olfactory orientation in anuran amphibians. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 11, 35ā40.
PaÅ”ukonis, A., Trenkwalder, K., Ringler, M., Ringler, E., Mangione, R., Steininger, J., Warrington, I., & Hƶdl, W. (2016). The significance of spatial memory for water finding in a tadpole-transporting frog. Animal Behaviour, 116, 89ā98.
Pearl, C. A., Cervantes, M., Chan, M., Ho, U., Shoji, R., & Thomas, E. O. (2000). Evidence for a mate-attracting chemosignal in the dwarf African clawed frog Hymenochirus. Hormones and Behavior, 38(1), 67ā74.
Pearl, C. A., Adams, M. J., Schuytema, G. S., & Nebeker, A. V. (2003). Behavioral responses of anuran larvae to chemical cues of native and introduced predators in the Pacific Northwestern United States. Journal of Herpetology, 37(3), 572ā576.
Pease, K. M., & Wayne, R. K. (2014). Divergent responses of exposed and naive Pacific tree frog tadpoles to invasive predatory crayfish. Oecologia, 174(1), 241ā252.
Peram, P. S., Vences, M., & Schulz, S. (2017). A synthetic dodecanolide library for the identification of putative semiochemicals emitted by mantellid frogs. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, 15(33), 6967ā6977.
Petranka, J. W. (1989). Response of toad tadpoles to conflicting chemical stimuli: Predator avoidance versus optimal foraging. Herpetologica, 45, 283ā292.
Petranka, J., & Hayes, L. (1998). Chemically mediated avoidance of a predatory odonate (Anax junius) by American toad (Bufo americanus) and wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpoles. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 42(4), 263ā271.
Petranka, J. W., Kats, L. B., & Sih, A. (1987). Predator-prey interactions among fish and larval amphibians: Use of chemical cues to detect predatory fish. Animal Behaviour, 35(2), 420ā425.
Pfeiffer, W. (1966). Die Verbreitung der Schreckreaktion bei Kaulquappen und die Herkunft des Schreckstoffes. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 52, 79ā98.
Phuge, S., & Phuge, A. (2019). Predator-prey interactions of tadpoles in different layers of the water column. Journal of Ethology, 37(2), 197ā202.
Pizzatto, L., & Shine, R. (2009). Native Australian frogs avoid the scent of invasive cane toads. Austral Ecology, 34(1), 77ā82.
Pizzatto, L., Stockwell, M., Clulow, S., Clulow, J., & Mahony, M. (2014). Chemical communication in green and golden bell frogs: Do tadpoles respond to chemical cues from dead conspecifics? Chemoecology, 24(5), 171ā177.
Pizzatto, L., Stockwell, M., Clulow, S., Clulow, J., & Mahony, M. (2015). Finding a place to live: Conspecific attraction affects habitat selection in juvenile green and golden bell frogs. Acta Ethologica, 19(1), 1ā8.
Polo-Cavia, N., & Gomez-Mestre, I. (2014). Learned recognition of introduced predators determines survival of tadpole prey. Functional Ecology, 28(2), 432ā439.
Polo-Cavia, N., Gonzalo, A., Lopez, P., & Martin, J. (2010). Predator recognition of native but not invasive turtle predators by naive anuran tadpoles. Animal Behaviour, 80(3), 461ā466.
Polo-Cavia, N., Burraco, P., & Gomez-Mestre, I. (2016). Low levels of chemical anthropogenic pollution may threaten amphibians by impairing predator recognition. Aquatic Toxicology, 172, 30ā35.
Poth, D., Wollenberg, K. C., Vences, M., & Schulz, S. (2012). Volatile amphibian pheromones: Macrolides from Mantellid frogs from Madagascar. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, 51(9), 2187ā2190.
Poth, D., Peram, P. S., Vences, M., & Schulz, S. (2013). Macrolides and alcohols as scent gland constituents of the Madagascan frog Mantidactylus femoralis and their intraspecific diversity. Journal of Natural Products, 76(9), 1548ā1558.
Preston, D. B., & Forstner, M. R. J. (2015). Houston Toad (Bufo (Anaxyrus) houstonensis) tadpoles decrease their activity in response to chemical cues produced from the predation of conspecifics and congeneric (Bufo (Incilius) nebulifer) Tadpoles. Journal of Herpetology, 49(2), 170ā175.
Pueta, M., & Perotti, M. G. (2016). Anuran tadpoles learn to recognize injury cues from members of the same prey guild. Animal Cognition, 19(4), 745ā751.
Pueta, M., Ardanaz, D., & Tallone, J. C. (2022). Habituation in anuran tadpoles and the role of risk uncertainty. Animal Cognition, 25(1), 63ā72.
Pyron, A. R., & Wiens, J. J. (2011). A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 61(2), 543ā583.
Rabb, G. B., & Rabb, M. S. (1963). Additional observations on breeding behavior of the Surinam toad, Pipa pipa. Copeia, 1963(4), 636ā642.
Raices, M., Jungblut, L. D., & Pozzi, A. G. (2020). Evidence of the peptide identity of the epidermal alarm cue in tadpoles of the toad Rhinella arenarum. Herpetological Journal, 30(4), 230ā233.
Rajchard, J. (2005). Sex pheromones in amphibians: A review. Veterinary Medicine, 50(9), 383ā389.
Rajchard, J. (2006). Antipredator pheromones in amphibians: A review. Veterinary Medicine, 51(8), 409ā413.
Ramamonjisoa, N., Rakotonoely, H., & Natuhara, Y. (2018). Defense investments and growth responses under different predation risks and gape-limitation predation threats in a tadpole prey. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 72(9), 1ā11.
Raven, C., Shine, R., Greenlees, M., Schaerf, T. M., & Ward, A. J. W. (2017). The role of biotic and abiotic cues in stimulating aggregation by larval cane toads (Rhinella marina). Ethology, 123(10), 724ā735.
Rivera-HernĆ”ndez, I. A. E., Crane, A. L., Pollock, M. S., & Ferrari, M. C. O. (2022). Disturbance cues function as a background risk cue but not as an associative learning cue in tadpoles. Animal Cognition, 25, 1ā9.
Rƶdin, P., Forsman, A., & Hagman, M. (2011). Taxonomic patterns of tadpole behavioural responses to alarm cues. In J. Murray (Ed.), Frogs: Biology, ecology and uses (pp. 123ā140). Nova Science Publishers.
Rojas, V., Labra, A., ValdĆ©s, J. L., & VelĆ”squez, N. A. (2021). Females of the four-eyed frog, Pleurodema thaul (Anura, Leptodactylidae), respond behaviourally to conspecific male scent. Herpetozoa, 34, 115ā120.
Ruther, J., Meiners, T., & Steidle, J. L. (2002). Rich in phenomena-lacking in terms. A classification of kairomones. Chemoecology, 12(4), 161ā167.
Saidapur, S. K., Veeranagoudar, D. K., Hiragond, N. C., & Shanbhag, B. A. (2009). Mechanism of predator-prey detection and behavioral responses in some anuran tadpoles. Chemoecology, 19(1), 21ā28.
Sbarbati, A., & Osculati, F. (2006). Allelochemical communication in vertebrates: Kairomones, allomones and synomones. Cells, Tissues, Organs, 183(4), 206ā219.
Scherer, A. E., & Smee, D. L. (2016). A review of predator diet effects on prey defensive responses. Chemoecology, 26(3), 83ā100.
Schley, L., & Griffiths, R. A. (1998). Midwife toads (Alytes muletensis) avoid chemical cues from snakes (Natrix maura). Journal of Herpetology, 32(4), 572ā574.
Schoeppner, N. M., & Relyea, R. A. (2005). Damage, digestion, and defence: The roles of alarm cues and kairomones for inducing prey defences. Ecology Letters, 8(5), 505ā512.
Schulte, L. M. (2016). Semiochemicals in anurans: Testing different categories with one poison frog species. In B. A. Schulte, T. E. Goodwin, & M. H. Ferkin (Eds.), Chemical signals in vertebrates, volume 13 (pp. 339ā350). Springer.
Schulte, L. M., & Lƶtters, S. (2013). The power of the seasons: Rainfall triggers parental care in poison frogs. Evolutionary Ecology, 27(4), 711ā723.
Schulte, L. M., & Lƶtters, S. (2014). A danger foreseen is a danger avoided: how chemical cues of different tadpoles influence parental decisions of a Neotropical poison frog. Animal Cognition, 17(2), 267ā275.
Schulte, L. M., & Mayer, M. (2017). Poison frog tadpoles seek parental transportation to escape their cannibalistic siblings. Journal of Zoology, 303(2), 83ā89.
Schulte, L. M., & RƶĆler, D. C. (2013). Do poison frogs recognize chemical cues of the other sex or do they react to cues of stressed conspecifics? Behavioural Processes, 100, 32ā35.
Schulte, L. M., & Veith, M. (2014). Is the response of a Neotropical poison frog (Ranitomeya variabilis) to larval chemical cues influenced by relatedness? The Herpetological Journal, 24(3), 189ā192.
Schulte, L. M., Yeager, J., Schulte, R., Veith, M., Werner, P., Beck, L. A., & Lƶtters, S. (2011). The smell of success: choice of larval rearing sites by means of chemical cues in a Peruvian poison frog. Animal Behaviour, 81(6), 1147ā1154.
Schulte, L. M., Schulte, R., & Lƶtters, S. (2013). Avoiding predation: The importance of chemical and visual cues in poison frog reproductive behaviour. In M. L. East & M. Dehnhard (Eds.), Chemical signals in vertebrates 12 (Vol. 12, pp. 309ā321). Springer.
Schulte, L. M., Krauss, M., Lƶtters, S., Schulze, T., & Brack, W. (2015). Decoding and discrimination of chemical cues and signals: Avoidance of predation and competition during parental care behavior in sympatric poison frogs. PLoS One, 10(7), e0129929.
Schulte, L. M., Ringler, E., Rojas, B., & Stynoski, J. L. (2020). Developments in amphibian parental care research: History, present advances, and future perspectives. Herpetological Monographs, 34(1), 71ā97.
Schulte, L. M., Martel, A., Cruz-Elizalde, R., RamĆrez-Bautista, A., & Bossuyt, F. (2021). Love bites: male frogs (Plectrohyla, Hylidae) use teeth scratching to deliver sodefrin precursor-like factors to females during amplexus. Frontiers in Zoology, 18(1), 1ā14.
Schulte, L. M., Jendras, J., Twomey, E., Ramirez-Bautista, A., & Bossuyt, F. (2022). Gene expression of secretory proteins in the nuptial pads of three Lithobates species (Anura: Ranidae). Amphibia-Reptilia, 1, 1ā9, online first.
Schulz, S., Poth, D., Peram, P. S., Hƶtling, S., Menke, M., Melnik, K., & Rƶpke, R. (2021). Chemical diversity of volatile macrocylic lactones from frogs. Synlett, 32(17), 1683ā1701.
Scribano, G., Balestrieri, A., Gazzola, A., & Pellitteri-Rosa, D. (2020). Strong behavioural defensive responses of endemic Rana latastei tadpoles induced by a native predatorās odour. Ethology, 126(9), 922ā930.
Shaffery, H. M., & Relyea, R. A. (2016). Dissecting the smell of fear from conspecific and heterospecific prey: Investigating the processes that induce anti-predator defenses. Oecologia, 180(1), 55ā65.
Sharma, S. S., Veeranagoudar, D. K., Shanbhag, B. A., & Saidapur, S. K. (2008). Activity of Sphaerotheca breviceps tadpoles in response to chemical cues of the predaceous tadpoles Hoplobatrachus tigerinus. Journal of Ethology, 26(3), 303ā307.
Sievers, M., Hale, R., Swearer, S. E., & Parris, K. M. (2018). Contaminant mixtures interact to impair predator-avoidance behaviours and survival in a larval amphibian. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 161, 482ā488.
Smith, G. R., & Fortune, D. T. (2009). Hatching plasticity of wood frog (Rana sylvatica) eggs in response to mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) cues. Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 4(1), 43ā47.
South, J., Botha, T. L., Wolmarans, N. J., Wepener, V., & Weyl, O. L. F. (2020). Playing with food: Detection of prey injury cues stimulates increased functional foraging traits in Xenopus laevis. African Zoology, 55(1), 25ā33.
Stabell, O. B. (2005). Latent alarm signals: Are they present in vertebrates? In R. T. Mason, M. P. LeMaster, & D. MĆ¼ller-Schwarze (Eds.), Chemical signals in vertebrates 10 (pp. 381ā388). Springer.
Starnberger, I., Poth, D., Schulz, S., Vences, M., Knudsen, J., Barej, M. F., Rƶdel, M.-O., Walzl, M., & Hƶdl, W. (2013). Take time to smell the frogs ā Vocal sac glands of reed frogs contain chemical cues on species identity. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 110(4), 828ā838.
Steiger, S., Schmitt, T., & Schaefer, H. M. (2011). The origin and dynamic evolution of chemical information transfer. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1708), 970ā979.
Still, M. B., Lea, A. M., Hofmann, H. A., & Ryan, M. J. (2019). Multimodal stimuli regulate reproductive behavior and physiology in male tĆŗngara frogs. Hormones and Behavior, 115, 104546.
Stynoski, J. L., & Noble, V. R. (2012). To beg or to freeze: Multimodal sensory integration directs behavior in a tadpole. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66(2), 191ā199.
Stynoski, J. L., & Porras-Brenes, K. (2022). Meta-analysis of tadpole taste tests: Consumption of anuran prey across development and predator strategies. Oecologia, 199(4), 845ā857.
Summey, M. R., & Mathis, A. (1998). Alarm responses to chemical stimuli from damaged conspecifics by larval anurans: Tests of three neotropical species. Herpetologica, 54(3), 402ā408.
Supekar, S. C., & Gramapurohit, N. P. (2017). Can embryonic skipper frogs (Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis) learn to recognise kairomones in the absence of a nervous system? Journal of Biosciences, 42(3), 459ā468.
Supekar, S. C., & Gramapurohit, N. P. (2022). Experience window influences development and retention of memory to recognize predators in the larval skipper frogs. Current Science, 122(8), 951ā957.
Swart, C. C., & Taylor, R. C. (2004). Behavioral interactions between the giant water bug (Belostoma lutarium) and tadpoles of Bufo woodhousii. Southeastern Naturalist, 3(1), 13ā24.
Symonds, M. R. E., & Elgar, M. A. (2008). The evolution of pheromone diversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(4), 220ā228.
Szabo, B., Mangione, R., Rath, M., PaŔukonis, A., Reber, S. A., Oh, J., Ringler, M., & Ringler, E. (2021). Naive poison frog tadpoles use bi-modal cues to avoid insect predators but not heterospecific predatory tadpoles. Journal of Experimental Biology, 224(24), jeb243647.
Takahara, T., Kohmatsu, Y., Maruyama, A., Yamanaka, H., & Yamaoka, R. (2012). Inducible defense behavior of an anuran tadpole: Cue-detection range and cue types used against predator. Behavioral Ecology, 23(4), 863ā868.
Takahashi, M. (2007). Oviposition site selection: pesticide avoidance by gray treefrogs. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 26(7), 1476ā1480.
Ten Hagen, L., RodrĆguez, A., Menke, N., Gƶcking, C., Bisping, M., Frommolt, K.-H., Ziegler, T., Bonkowski, M., & Vences, M. (2016). Vocalizations in juvenile anurans: Common spadefoot toads (Pelobates fuscus) regularly emit calls before sexual maturity. The Science of Nature, 103(9), 1ā8.
Thomas, E. O., Tsang, L., & Licht, P. (1993). Comparative histochemistry of the sexually dimorphic skin glands of anuran amphibians. Copeia, 1993(1), 133ā143.
Touchon, J. C., Gomez-Mestre, I., & Warkentin, K. M. (2006). Hatching plasticity in two temperate anurans: Responses to a pathogen and predation cues. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 84(4), 556ā563.
Troyer, R. R., & Turner, A. M. (2015). Chemosensory perception of predators by larval amphibians depends on water quality. PLoS One, 10(6), e0131516.
UrszĆ”n, T. J., Garamszegi, L. Z., Nagy, G., Hettyey, A., Tƶrƶk, J., & Herczeg, G. (2018). Experience during development triggers between-individual variation in behavioural plasticity. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 87, 1264ā1273.
Ćveges, B., Basson, A. C., MĆ³ricz, Ć. M., BĆ³kony, V., & Hettyey, A. (2021). Chemical defence effective against multiple enemies: Does the response to conspecifics alleviate the response to predators? Functional Ecology, 35(10), 2294ā2304.
Van Bocxlaer, I., Treer, D., Maex, M., Vandebergh, W., Janssenswillen, S., Stegen, G., Kok, P., Willaert, B., Matthijs, S., Martens, E., Mortier, A., de Greve, H., Proost, P., & Bossuyt, F. (2015). Side-by-side secretion of Late Palaeozoic diverged courtship pheromones in an aquatic salamander. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 282(1803) 20142960.
Van Buskirk, J., KrĆ¼gel, A., Kunz, J., Miss, F., & Stamm, A. (2014). The rate of degradation of chemical cues indicating predation risk: An experiment and review. Ethology, 120(9), 942ā949.
Vandenbergh, J. (2012). Pheromones and reproduction in mammals. Elsevier.
Vences, M., Wahl-Boos, G., Hoegg, S., Glaw, F., Spinelly Oliveira, E., Meyer, A., & Perry, S. (2007). Molecular systematics of mantelline frogs from Madagascar and the evolution of their femoral glands. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 92(3), 529ā539.
VodrĆ”Å¾kovĆ”, M., Å etlĆkovĆ”, I., & Berec, M. (2020). Chemical cues of an invasive turtle reduce development time and size at metamorphosis in the common frog. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1ā6.
Wabnitz, P. A., Bowie, J. H., Tyler, M. J., Wallace, J. C., & Smith, B. P. (1999). Aquatic sex pheromone from a male tree frog. Nature, 401(6752), 444ā445.
Wabnitz, P. A., Bowie, J. H., Tyler, M. J., Wallace, J. C., & Smith, B. P. (2000). Differences in the skin peptides of the male and female Australian tree frog Litoria splendida. European Journal of Biochemistry, 267(1), 269ā275.
Waldman, B. (1985). Olfactory basis of kin recognition in toad tadpoles. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 156(5), 565ā577.
Waldman, B. (1986). Chemical ecology of kin recognition in anuran amphibians. In D. Duvall, D. MĆ¼ller-Schwarze, R. M. Silverstein (Eds.), Chemical signals in vertebrates 4, (Issue 4, pp. 225ā242). Plenum Press
Waldman, B. (2016). Chemical communication in archaic New Zealand frogs. In Chemical signals in vertebrates 13 (pp. 351ā360). Springer.
Waldman, B., & Bishop, P. J. (2004). Chemical communication in an archaic anuran amphibian. Behavioral Ecology, 15(1), 88.
Warbeck, A., & Parzefall, J. (2001). Mate recognition via waterborne chemical cues in the viviparous caecilian Typhlonectes natans (Amphibia: Gymnophiona). In A. Marchlewska-Koj, J. L. Lepri, & D. MĆ¼ller-Schwarze (Eds.), Chemical signals in vertebrates 9 (pp. 263ā268). Springer.
Wassersug, R. J., Lum, A. M., & Potel, M. J. (1981). An analysis of school structure for tadpoles (Anura: Amphibia). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 9(1), 15ā22.
Weiss, L., Manzini, I., & Hassenklƶver, T. (2021). Olfaction across the waterāair interface in anuran amphibians. Cell and Tissue Research, 383(1), 301ā325.
Westrick, S. E., Laslo, M., & Fischer, E. K. (2022). The natural history of model organisms: The big potential of the small frog Eleutherodactylus coqui. eLife, 11, e73401.
Whittaker, D. J. (2022). The secret perfume of birds: uncovering the science of Avian Scent. JHU Press.
Willaert, B., Bossuyt, F., Janssenswillen, S., Adriaens, D., Baggerman, G., Matthijs, S., Pauwels, E., Proost, P., Raepsaet, A., & Schoofs, L. (2013). Frog nuptial pads secrete mating season-specific proteins related to salamander pheromones. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 216(22), 4139ā4143.
Wilson, D. J., & Lefcort, H. (1993). The effect of predator diet on the alarm response of red-legged frog, Rana aurora, tadpoles. Animal Behaviour, 46(5), 1017ā1019.
Wirsing, A. J., Roth, J. D., & Murray, D. L. (2005). Can prey use dietary cues to distinguish predators? A test involving three terrestrial amphibians. Herpetologica, 61(2), 104ā110.
Woodley, S. K. (2010). Pheromonal communication in amphibians. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 196(10), 713ā727.
Woodley, S. K., & Staub, N. L. (2021). Pheromonal communication in urodelan amphibians. Cell and Tissue Research, 383, 1ā19.
Wyatt, T. D. (2014). Pheromones and animal behavior: Chemical signals and signatures. Cambridge University Press.
Xu, C., Gao, X., Crossland, M. R., Liu, Z., Wang, S., Zhu, W., Shine, R., & Li, Y. (2017). Foraging responses of the larvae of invasive bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus): Possible implications for bullfrog control and ecological impact in China. Asian Herpetological Research, 4, 253ā256.
Zamora-Camacho, F. J., Medina-GĆ”lvez, L., & Zambrano-FernĆ”ndez, S. (2019). The roles of sex and morphology in burrowing depth of Iberian spadefoot toads in different biotic and abiotic environments. Journal of Zoology, 309(3), 224ā230.
Zhang, F., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Messenger, K., & Wang, Y. (2015). Antipredator behavioral responses of native and exotic tadpoles to novel predator. Asian Herpetological Research, 6, 51ā58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schulte, L.M., Lipkowski, K., Abondano Almeida, D. (2023). Chemical Communication and Semiochemical Recognition in Frogs: From Eggs to Adults. In: Schaal, B., Rekow, D., Keller, M., Damon, F. (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 15. CSiV 2021. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35159-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35159-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-35158-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-35159-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)