Skip to main content

Authoritarian Populism, De-democratization, and Social Policy Dismantling: Lessons from Brazil

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Policy Dismantling and De-democratization in Brazil

Abstract

With the defeat of the Bolsonaro government in the 2022 elections and President Lula’s return to power supported by a broad coalition in defense of democracy, the country entered a new phase with the challenge of rebuilding democratic institutions, citizenship rights, and a sustainable economic model.

We offer valuable lessons on the need for reconstruction to go beyond mere restoration and move toward a new, democratic, and inclusive model of development, overcoming the dichotomy between the economic model and social policies. Austerity policies shaped by liberal canons have strangled the capacity of public investment. At the same time, policies aimed at protecting economic and social rights should be articulated to an inclusive economic development model, overcoming accumulated institutional weaknesses that facilitated their subsequent dismantling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaskoven, L., & Grundholm, A. T. (2021). Stability through constraints: The impact of fiscal rules on autocratic survival. Democratization, 28(8), 1564–1562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1978). The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. W., & Becker, S. (2020). Democratic backsliding, populism, and public administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. W., & Knill, C. (2014). A conceptual framework for the comparative analysis of policy change: Measurement, explanation and strategies of policy dismantling. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(1), 28–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, R. (1964). Nation-building and citizenship: Studies of four changing social order. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1997). Media control: The spectacular achievements of propaganda. Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Matta, R. (1988). Brasil: Uma nação em Mudança e uma Sociedade Imutável? Considerações sobre o dilema brasileiro. Estudos Históricos, 1(2), 204–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos, W. G. (2006). O Ex-Leviatã brasileiro: Do voto disperso ao clientelismo concentrado. Civilização Brasileira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eatwell, R., & Goodwin, M. (2018). National populism: The revolt against liberal democracy. Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, S. (1994). Estado sem cidadãos: Seguridade social na América Latina. Editora Fiocruz.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, S. (2003). La expansión de la ciudadanía. In VV AA. Inclusión Social y Nuevas Ciudadanías (pp. 167–194). Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, S. (2009). Reforma sanitária brasileira: dilemas entre o instituinte e o instituído. Ciência &Saúde Coletiva, 14(3), 743–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, S. (2014). Building democracy in an emerging society: Challenges of the welfare state in Brazil. In J. N. Pieterse & A. Cardoso (Eds.), Brazil emerging – Inequality and emancipation (pp. 11–31). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, S., Sandoval, H., Yanes, P., Penchaszadeh, V., & Abramovich, V. (2013). Right to health in Latin America: Beyond universalization. CEPAL. Series Financing for Development. United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2017). From progressive neoliberalism to Trump - and beyond. American Affairs, 1(4), 46–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvêa, C. B., & Castelo Branco, P. H. V. (2022). Populist governance in Brazil. Bolsonaro in theoretical and comparative perspective. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2020). Let them eat tweets: How the right rules in an age of extreme inequality. Liveright Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, P. (2020). The age of reaction: Retrenchment populism in India and Brazil. International Sociology, 35(6), 590–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, C., Christophe, B., Liebau, H., & Saupe, A. (Eds.). (2021). The politics of authenticity and populist discourses. Media and education in Brazil, India and Ukraine. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (2005). Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasilshchikov, V. (2022). Brazil - emerging forever? A case study of the mid-level development trap. Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louault, F. (2022). Populism and authoritarian drift: The presidency of Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil. In A. Dieckhoff, C. Jaffrelot, & E. Massicard (Eds.), Contemporary populists in power (pp. 93–111). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1993). The sources of social power. The rise of classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbembe, A. (2018). Necropolítica: biopoder, soberania, estado de exceção, política da morte. Tradução Renata Santini. N-1 edições.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, G. E. (2017). 1930s redux: The administrative state under siege. Harvard Law Review, 131(1), 2–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., & RoviraKaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? University of Philadelphia Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence: Public opinion - our social skin. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnel, G., & Schmitter, P. (1988). Transições do regime autoritário. Primeiras conclusões. Vértice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papas, T. (2019). Populism and liberal democracy. A comparative and theoretical analysis. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2019). Populism and public administration: Confronting the administrative state. Administration and Society, 51(10), 1521–1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2001). Introduction: Investigating the welfare state at century’s end. In P. Pierson (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state (pp. 1–14). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rockman, B. A. (2019). Bureaucracy between populism and technocracy. Administration and Society, 51(10), 1546–1575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S. (1975). Dimension of state formation and nation-building: A possible paradigm of for research on variations within Europe. In C. Tilly (Ed.), The formation of national states in Western Europe (pp. 562–600). Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy. Politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sátyro, N., Pino, E., & Mydaglia, C. (Eds.). (2021). Latin American social policy developments in the twenty-first century. Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. (2014). Buying time: The delayed crisis of democratic capitalism. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. (2014). Democracy disfigured: Opinion, truth and the people. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. (2015). The tyranny of the moderns. Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. (2019). Me the people. How populism transforms democracy. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • V-Dem Institute. (n.d.). Autocratization changing nature? Democracy report. Retrieved from https://www.v-dem.net/documents/19/dr_2022_ipyOpLP.pdf

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1978). The constitution of liberty. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, K. (1986). The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy, 6(4), 371–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fleury, S. et al. (2023). Authoritarian Populism, De-democratization, and Social Policy Dismantling: Lessons from Brazil. In: Fleury, S. (eds) Social Policy Dismantling and De-democratization in Brazil. Societies and Political Orders in Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35110-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics