Skip to main content

Knowledge Management (KM) as Performance Amelioration’s First-Order Capability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essentials on Dynamic Capabilities for a Contemporary World

Abstract

The advent of the second economy changed entirely the understanding of the competitive drivers in a contemporary world and accentuated the need for organizations to focus on their knowledge base (far beyond the realm of information and communication technologies). Knowledge utilization has become in many industries the dominant paradigm of organizational management. Indelibly surrendered to a resource-based view of the growth, incumbents aimed, in most cases, at transforming such phenomenon (knowledge utilization) into a strategic asset for their survival, growth, and sustainability of the firm.

Historical data on revenue, profit earnings, and market capitalization of the Northern American corporations corroborates this undergoing information/communication revolution as it demonstrates an indisputable upsurging alignment of intangible asset’s possession and value-appropriation. On the contrary, the stats of old heavy industry manufacturers uncover a declining spiral (in number and value), in counter cycle with knowledge-based companies exhibiting an extraordinary ability to flourish (proliferating in vibrant entrepreneurial ecosystems) and an extraordinary resilience, dominating already at this stage the top 10 Fortune 500 companies list. Hence, the firm’s prosperity is intrinsically linked with the formation of an essential dynamic capability—knowledge management (KM), nowadays being a categorical imperative not to be ignored at any exercise of organizational strategy’s redesign.

Moreover, the bustle of reinforcing knowledge gains, updating skills, and refining KM systems implies an attentive screening of the outlook of the IT infrastructure options and a rupture with traditional view from the past of an all-in-one technological backend or frontend solution (e.g., ERP or CMS).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrantes, B. F., & Venkataraman, A. (2022). Environment kinesis and organisational adaptability: Effects of EU’s general data protection regulation on the Danish software industry. International Journal of Learning and Change, 14(1), 22–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrantes, B. F., & Ostergaard, K. G. (2022). Digital footprint wrangling: Are analytics used for better or worse? A concurrent mixed methods research on the commercial (ab) use of dataveillance. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 10, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrantes, B. F., Preto, M. T., & António, N. (2022a). Toward a dynamic capabilities’ diffusion model for international business headway of SMEs: Evidence from the metallurgic and metal-mechanic (MMI) sectors. Review of International Business and Strategy, 32(2), 204–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-10-2020-0125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrantes, B. F., Preto, M. T., & António, N. (2022b). Unraveling collaborative learning stimuli and effective dynamic capability integration on MNCs: The global capabilities administration model (GCAM). Review of International Business and Strategy, 33(2), 272–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-06-2021-0085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrantes, B. F., Eatmon, T. D., & Forsberg, C. (2021). Ethical issues and the Nordic education model: Learning-driven ecosystems applied to international cohorts. In International perspectives in social justice programs at the institutional and community levels. Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreeva, T., & Kianto, A. (2011). Knowledge processes, knowledge-intensity and innovation: A moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 1016–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W., Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (1992). The network organization in theory and practice. Classics of Organization Theory, 8, 401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienkowska, A., & Ignacek-Kuznicka, B. (2017). The dilemma of knowledge Management in an Organization. In CBU International conference on innovation in Science and Education, March 22-24, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddy, D. (2017). Management: An introduction (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cepeda, G., & Vera, D. (2007). Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Business Research, 60(2007), 426–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, H., & Bixler, D. (2005). Developing a foundation for a Successful Knowledge Management System. In M. Stankoshy (Ed.), Creating the discipline of knowledge management (pp. 64–78). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortune (online) Global 500. Available at: https://fortune.com/ranking/global500/

  • Fortune (online) Fortune 500. Available at: https://fortune.com/ranking/fortune500/

  • Fortune. (2022). Finance – Fortune 500. Available at: https://fortune.com/2022/05/24/fortune-500-most-profitable-companies-apple-berkshire-amazon-google-microsoft/

  • Gebert, H., Geib, M., Kolbe, L., & Brenner, W. (2003). Knowledge-enabled customer relationship management: Integrating customer relationship management and knowledge management concepts. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(5), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T., & Nohria, N. (2004). How to build collaborative advantage. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource – based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., & Winter, S. G. (2011). Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (N)ever-changing world. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 1243–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkow, M. (2020). Organizational innovation capability as a result of knowledge management processes a literature review. Science, 24(1), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.2478/manment-2019-0040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, V. (2019). Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities. Springer. Springer nature Switzerland: Springer international publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Managing creative abrasion in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morawski, J. (2011). Our debates: Finding, fixing, and enacting reality. Theory & Psychology, 21(2), 260–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford. (2022). Knowledge, Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. Retrieved March 8, 2022, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/

  • Pandey, S. C., & Andrew, D. (2013). Role of knowledge infrastructure capabilities in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3), 435–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2017). Capital in the twenty-first century. In, capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan, J., & Bhatnagar, V. (2011). Role of knowledge management and analytical CRM in business: Data mining-based framework. The Learning Organization, 18, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Research & Market (2022). Knowledge Management – Global Market Trajectory and Analytics. available at: Retrieved July 29, 2022, from https://www.researchandmarkets.com.

  • Rouhani, S., Hosseini, S., & Zanjani, M. S. (2017). The role of knowledge management processes in ERP implementation success. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations, 7(3), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santoro, G., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Thrassou, A., & Dezi, L. (2018). The internet of things: Building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 347–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samiei, E., & Habibi, J. (2020). The mutual relation between enterprise resource planning and knowledge management: A review. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21, 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. E., & Prieto, I. M. (2008). Dynamic capabilities and knowledge management: An integrative role for learning. British Journal of Management, 19(3), 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabaszewska, E. (2011). Implementation and development of knowledge management system – research results. In, Pobrano Z. Available at: http://dbc.wroc.pl/Content/35646/PDF/Tabaszewska_Implementation_And_Development_Of_Knowlegde_2011.pdf

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandaie, R. (2008). The role of organizational knowledge management in successful ERP implementation projects. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21(3), 920–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2003). Organizational learning and knowledge management: Toward an integrative framework. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge man- agreement (pp. 123–141). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, K. M. (1997). Knowledge management: An introduction and perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1), 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. J., Melnyk, S. A., & Flynn, B. B. (2010). Operational capabilities: The secret ingredient, Decision Science. A Journal of Decision Science institute, 41(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2022). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nepal, M., Abrantes, B.F. (2023). Knowledge Management (KM) as Performance Amelioration’s First-Order Capability. In: Abrantes, B.F., Madsen, J.L. (eds) Essentials on Dynamic Capabilities for a Contemporary World. Studies on Entrepreneurship, Structural Change and Industrial Dynamics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34814-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics