Abstract
Wildfires are considered one of the costliest natural hazards in Canada. Significant fire events that occurred had threatened and destroyed buildings at the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). Standard methods for wildfire risk assessment include hazards’ analysis, inventory of exposed buildings and vulnerability analysis that correlates expected losses to fire intensity measure and distance from forest boundary. On the other hand, there is limited research on buildings’ vulnerability assessment to wildfire impacts and scarcity of models that correlate the likely response and expected loss of different types of buildings to varying levels of fire intensity. This article presents a methodology for geospatial data collection of post-fire buildings damage at Canadian WUI communities with the objective of developing community-scale empirical building fire vulnerability models that can be integrated in community-scale wildfire risk assessment tools. In this study, the empirical fire vulnerability model is developed in terms of the loss rate defined by the proportion of buildings burned as a percentage of the total exposed buildings as a function of the distance from forest edge and the corresponding fire intensity. The methodology consists of consecutive steps including geospatial digitization of burned and survived buildings from post-fire open-source satellite imagery; characterization of building types and occupancy based on open-source municipal databases; estimation of distances to burned forest boundary based on burn scar satellite imagery and the measurement of distance increments to buildings. The buildings data are then combined to develop an empirical fire vulnerability model. The methodology is demonstrated by a case study WUI community in Canada that was exposed to a damaging wildfire event.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alberta Government (2016) Home again: recovery after the Wood Buffalo wildfire. https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/3c8f8b73-d7a5-42b0-85b2-12367c7d82bf/resource/147e872d-10a1-491f-826a-10e803c40bfe/download/2016-home-again-recovery-after-wood-buffalo-wildfire.pdf
Canadian Underwriter (2016) https://www.canadianunderwriter.ca/catastrophes/nearly-3-6-billion-insured-losses-fort-mcmurray-wildfire-catiq-1004096018/
Global News (2017) B.C. wildfires destroy over 300 buildings. https://globalnews.ca/news/3641081/b-c-wildfires-destroy-over-300-buildings/
Scott JH, Thompson MP, Calkin DE (2013) A wildfire risk assessment framework for land and resource management. In: Generation of the technical report RMRS-GTR-315. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, p 83. https://doi.org/10.2737/rmrs-gtr-315
Johnston LM, Wang X, Erni S, Taylor SW, McFayden CB, Oliver JA, Stockdale C, Christianson A, Boulanger Y, Gauthier S, Arseneault D (2020) Wildland fire risk research in Canada. Environ Rev 28(2):164–186
Calkin DE, Cohen JD, Finney MA, Thompson MP (2014) How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland-urban interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(2):746–751
Cohen JD (2000) Preventing disaster: home ignitability in the wildland-urban interface. J For 98(3):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/98.3.15
Alberta Infrastructure (2013) Guideline for wildfire protection of institutional building in forested regions in Alberta. https://www.alberta.ca/assets/documents/tr/tr-wildfireprotection.pdf
FireSmart Canada (2022) https://firesmartcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/FSC_NRP_HIZ-ScoreCard_Form-final-03-15-TM-1.pdf
Kramer HA, Mockrin MH, Alexandre PM, Radeloff VC (2019) High wildfire damage in interface communities in California. Int J Wildland Fire 28(9):641–650. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF18108
Alberta Government (2011) Flat top complex, Wildfire science documentation report.https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/dee39e20-8832-4175-8f3a-a313dade523f/resource/37b00384-79d7-4ea3-aa82-12b6ab64fef6/download/flattopcomplex-sciencedocreport-2012.pdf
FLNROR (2017) Provincial strategic threat analysis: 2017 update. BC Wildfire Service; Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development, BC
National Post (2011) https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/slave-lake-fire-destroyed-374-properties-damaged-52/
TSL (2010) Town of Slave Lake zoning map. https://www.slavelake.ca/DocumentCenter/View/197/Zoning-Map-PDF
Chen K, McAneney J (2004) Quantifying bushfire penetration into urban areas in Australia. Geophys Res Lett 31(12):147
Chen K, McAneney J (2010) Bushfire penetration into urban areas in Australia: a spatial analysis. Report for the Bushfire CRC. https://www.bushfirecrc.com/sites/default/files/managed/resource/bushfire-penetration-urban-areas.pdf
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by funding from the Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abo-El-Ezz, A., AlShaikh, F., Farzam, A., Côté, MO., Nollet, MJ. (2023). Post-fire Damage Assessment of Buildings at the Wildland Urban Interface. In: Gupta, R., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2022. CSCE 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 363. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34593-7_55
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34593-7_55
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34592-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34593-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)