Skip to main content

A Review on the Use of SCMs and Alternative By-Products in Eco-Efficient Concrete

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Building for the Future: Durable, Sustainable, Resilient (fib Symposium 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 349))

  • 1673 Accesses

Abstract

The concern about global warming and the environmental impact of human activities has greatly increased in recent years. The construction sector has an important role to play in reducing greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere, which includes the Portland cement industry.

In the scope of the sustainability of the concrete sector, the addition of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) to concrete mixtures has been studied in the last decades, aiming at reducing the content of Portland cement, without impairing concrete’s mechanical and durability properties. On the contrary, it has been proved that low carbon concrete guarantees similar or improved mechanical performance and enhanced durability, assuring higher sustainability.

More recently, since some traditional SCMs are no longer available in developed countries, mainly due to environmental restrictions, several other by-products from industries in great expansion (e.g., metallurgic, ceramic, paper, and glass) are being studied as possible alternatives to traditional SCMs.

This paper presents a review on SCMs and alternative by-products that can potentially be used as Portland cement replacement, leading to eco-efficient concrete mixtures. In addition, few of those alternative by-products were characterized as a part of an experimental program in progress. The results are presented, and the main conclusions are drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Scrivener KL, John VM, Gartner EM (2018) Eco-efficient cements: potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. Cem Concr Res 114:2–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Colaço R (2019) Reduce the environmental impact of cement (in Portuguese). Construção Magazine 90:12–14

    Google Scholar 

  3. Muralidharan R, Park T, Yang HM, Lee SY, Subbiah K, Lee HS (2021) Review of the effects of supplementary cementitious materials and chemical additives on the physical, mechanical and durability properties of hydraulic concrete. Materials 14:7270

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paris JM, Roessler JG, Ferraro CC, DeFord HD, Townsend TG (2016) A review of waste products utilized as supplements to Portland cement in concrete. J Clean Prod 121:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tavakoli D, Hashempour M, Heidari A (2018) Use of waste materials in concrete: a review. Pertanika J Sci Technol 26:499–522

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shi C, Zheng K (2007) A review on the use of waste glasses in the production of cement and concrete. Res Conserv Recycl 52:234–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peyronnard O, Benzaazoua M (2012) Alternative by-product based binders for cemented mine backfill: recipes optimisation using Taguchi method. Miner Eng 29:28–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shayan A, Xu A (2006) Performance of glass powder as a pozzolanic material in concrete: a field trial on concrete slabs. Cem Concr Res 36:457–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pereira DA, de Aguiar B, Castro F, Almeida MF, Labrincha JA (2000) Mechanical behaviour of Portland cement mortars with incorporation of Al-containing salt slags. Cem Concr Res 30:1131–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rahman SA, Shaikh FUA, Sarker PK (2022) A comprehensive review of properties of concrete containing lithium refinery residue as partial replacement of cement. Constr Build Mater 328:127053

    Google Scholar 

  11. Soldado E, Antunes A, Costa H, do Carmo R, Júlio E (2021) Influence of pozzolan, slag and recycled aggregates on the mechanical and durability properties of low cement concrete. Materials 14:4173

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sabir BB, Wild S, Bai J (2001) Metakaolin and calcined clays as pozzolans for concrete: a review. Cem Concr Compos 23:441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmed Shaikh FU, Nath P, Hosan A, John M, Biswas WK (2019) Sustainability assessment of recycled aggregates concrete mixes containing industrial by-products. Mater Today Sustainabil 5:100013

    Google Scholar 

  14. Siddique R. (2014) Utilization of industrial by-products in concrete. Procedia Eng 95:335–347

    Google Scholar 

  15. Duchesne J (2021) Alternative supplementary cementitious materials for sustainable concrete structures: a review on characterization and properties. Waste Biomass Valorization 12:1219–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsaousi GM, Sakkas KM, Panias D. (2022) Development of advanced materials from industrial waste, with high thermal performance. Constr Build Mater 315:125779

    Google Scholar 

  17. Acordi J, Luza A, Fabris DCN, Raupp-Pereira F, de Noni A, Montedo ORK (2020) New waste-based supplementary cementitious materials: mortars and concrete formulations. Constr Build Mater 240:117877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Teixeira ER, Camões A, Branco FG (2019) Valorisation of wood fly ash on concrete. Res Conserv Recycl 145:292–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Juenger MCG, Snellings R, Bernal SA (2019) Supplementary cementitious materials: new sources, characterization, and performance insights. Cem Concr Res 122:257–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Snellings R (2016) Assessing, understanding and unlocking supplementary cementitious materials. RILEM Tech Lett 1:50–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta S, Chaudhary S (2022) State of the art review on supplementary cementitious materials in India – II: Characteristics of SCMs, effect on concrete and environmental impact. J Clean Prod 357:131945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Silva KDC, Silva GC, Natalli JF, Mendes JC, Silva GJB, Peixoto RAF. (2018) Rock wool waste as supplementary cementitious material for portland cement-based composites. ACI Mater J 115:653–661

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu R-X, Poon C-S (2016) Utilization of red mud derived from bauxite in self-compacting concrete. J Clean Prod 112:384–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bagheri SM, Koushkbaghi M, Mohseni E, Koushkbaghi S, Tahmouresi B (2020) Evaluation of environment and economy viable recycling cement kiln dust for use in green concrete. J Build Eng 32:101809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li L, Liu W, You Q, Chen M, Zeng Q (2020) Waste ceramic powder as a pozzolanic supplementary filler of cement for developing sustainable building materials. J Clean Prod 259:120853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Keppert M, Davidová V, Doušová B, Scheinherrová L, Reiterman P (2021) Recycling of fresh concrete slurry waste as supplementary cementing material: Characterization, application and leaching of selected elements. Constr Build Mater 300:124061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gopalakrishnan R, Nithiyanantham S (2020) Microstructural, mechanical, and electrical properties of copper slag admixtured cement mortar. J Build Eng 31:101375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vashistha P, Kumar V, Singh SK, Dutt D, Tomar G, Yadav P (2019) Valorization of paper mill lime sludge via application in building construction materials: a review. Constr Build Mater 211:371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gesoglu M, Güneyisi E, Hansu O, Etli S, Alhassan M (2017) Mechanical and fracture characteristics of self-compacting concretes containing different percentage of plastic waste powder. Constr Build Mater 140:562–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Makul N, Sua-Iam G (2018) Innovative utilization of foundry sand waste obtained from the manufacture of automobile engine parts as a cement replacement material in concrete production. J Clean Prod 199:305–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nuruzzaman M, Kuri JC, Sarker PK (2022) Strength, permeability and microstructure of self-compacting concrete with the dual use of ferronickel slag as fine aggregate and supplementary binder. Constr Build Mater 318:125927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Islam GMS, Akter S, Reza TB (2022) Sustainable high-performance, self-compacting concrete using ladle slag. Clean Eng Technol 7:100439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. de Matos PR, Oliveira JCP, Medina TM, Magalhães DC, Gleize PJP, Schankoski RA et al (2020) Use of air-cooled blast furnace slag as supplementary cementitious material for self-compacting concrete production. Constr Build Mater 262:120102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sosa I, Thomas C, Polanco JA, Setién J, Tamayo P (2020) High performance self-compacting concrete with electric arc furnace slag aggregate and cupola slag powder. Appl Sci 10:773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. de Brito J, Kurda R (2021) The past and future of sustainable concrete: a critical review and new strategies on cement-based materials. J Clean Prod 281:123558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Suwanmaneechot P, Nochaiya T, Julphunthong P (2015) Improvement, characterization and use of waste corn cob ash in cement-based materials. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 103:012023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tangchirapat W, Saeting T, Jaturapitakkul C, Kiattikomol K, Siripanichgorn A (2007) Use of waste ash from palm oil industry in concrete. Waste Manag 27:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gursel AP, Maryman H, Ostertag C (2016) A life-cycle approach to environmental, mechanical, and durability properties of “green” concrete mixes with rice husk ash. J Clean Prod 112:823–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lin W-T, Ho H-L, Cheng A, Huang R, Huang C-C (2012) Using sugarcane bagasse ash as partial cement replacement in cement-based composites. Adv Sci Lett 13:762–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Neves A, Godina RG, Azevedo SCO, Matias J (2019) Current status, emerging challenges, and future prospects of industrial symbiosis in Portugal. Sustainability 11:5497

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the FCT (the Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology) for the Doctoral Grant with the reference 2021.05856.BD awarded to the first author, and Celbi, Duritcast, Maltha Glass Recycling Portugal, Novarroz, Prilux, The Navigator Company, Valente Marques and Vidrexport for providing the waste by-products for this study. The work is also part of the research carried out at CERIS research centre in IST (University of Lisbon) and has been funded by FCT in the framework of project UIDB/04625/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eliana Soldado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Soldado, E., Costa, H., do Carmo, R., Júlio, E. (2023). A Review on the Use of SCMs and Alternative By-Products in Eco-Efficient Concrete. In: Ilki, A., Çavunt, D., Çavunt, Y.S. (eds) Building for the Future: Durable, Sustainable, Resilient. fib Symposium 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 349. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32519-9_101

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32519-9_101

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32518-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32519-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics