Abstract
Greenland has moved from being a colony of Denmark to having Home Rule and now Self-government. The changing political and legal conditions have had profound impacts on the governance and regulatory framework for resource extraction. From being solely handled by Danish governments until 1979, it was a cooperative arrangement between Denmark and Greenland during the Home Rule period. After 2009 the governance of the subsurface mineral resources has been the responsibility of the Self-government with the only exception being that any royalties from large-scale mining have to be negotiated as part of the Danish annual grant. The Self-government’s construction of an extractive bargain offering independence in return for greater mineral exploitation was rejected by many social actors for numerous reasons including those related to past experiences of extractivism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berry, D. A. (2013). Cryolite: Lessons from history for contemporary practice. ARTEK event: Sustainability in mining in the Arctic, Sisimiut. Arctic Center, Technical University of Denmark.
Bjørst, L. R. (2016). Saving or destroying the local community? Conflicting spatial storylines in the Greenlandic debate on uranium. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2016(3, Elsevier), 34–40.
BMP. (2009a). Guidelines for preparing an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum, Nuuk.
BMP. (2009b). Guidelines for Social Impact Assessments for mining projects in Greenland. Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum, Nuuk.
Dahl, J. (1977). Miners in Umanaq Municipality (in Danish). Kragestedet.
Dahl, J., & Berg, H. (1977). Mining in a catcher society (in Danish). Kragestedet.
Dahl, O. (2008). The Nalunaq Goldmine – fifth year (in Danish). Geologisk Nyt 4/08. Economic Council (2013). The economy of Greenland. The Economic Council.
GME. (2018). Kvanefjeld project environmental impact assessment. Greenland Minerals & Energy A/S.
Greenland Commission. (1950). Greenland Commission report. (in Danish).
Greenland Committee. (1964). Report from the Greenland Committee 1960, Report nr. 363. (in Danish).
Hendriksen, K. (2013). Greenland settlements – Economy and development dynamics, Inussuk, Arktisk forskningsjournal 3, Government of Greenland (in Danish).
Hendriksen, K. (2022). The island economy of Greenland (in Danish), Trap Grønland (pp. 232–234).
Hertz, O. (1995). Ecology and living conditions in Uummannamiut, Christian. Ejlers’ Forlag. (in Danish).
Ilismatusarfik & Copenhagen University. (2014). To the benefit of Greenland. Udvalget for samfundsgavnlig udnyttelse af Grønlands naturressourcer.
Jørgensen, A. M. (2015). Miner og eftermæler: Qullissat og Marmorilik. Tidsskriftet Grønland, 2015, 3.
Jørgensen, U. (2003). The hidden networks of knowledge In ISO 14001. Paper. Greening of Industry Network conference, San Francisco.
Jørgensen, U. et al. (2013). Social and environmental conditions for mining in Greenland. ARTEK Event: Sustainability in mining in the Arctic, Sisimiut. Arctic Center, Technical University of Denmark.
Keskitalo, E. C. H., et al. (2011). Adaptive capacity determinants in developed states: Examples from the Nordic countries and Russia. Regional Environmental Change, 11, 579–592.
KNR. (2014). Recordings from the conference: The impacts of uranium mining in Greenland and the rest og the world. Organised by Avataq, The Danish Ecological Council, NOAH Friends of the Earth Denmark and Sustainable Energy. Greenlandic Broadcasting Corporation. https://knr.gl/da/radio/impacts-uranium-mining-greenland-and-rest-og-world-03042014
Langhoff, R. (2013). Raw material activities in Greenland: With the people’s mandate? Consultation processes and public involvement in the mineral resource area. (In Danish) Inuit Circumpolar Council & World Wide Fund.
Naalakkersuisut. (2014). Our raw materials shall create wealth. The oil and mineral strategy of Greenland. Summary. (in Greenlandic). Naalakkersuisut, Nuuk.
Nordregio. (2009). Mobility in Greenland (in Danish). Nordregio.
Poppel, B., & Stenbæk, M. (2005). Birthplace criteria. In M. Nuttall (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Arctic (Vol. 1, pp. 261–262). Routledge.
Report for Mineral Exploitation in Greenland.
Rix, T. K. (2012). Mineplanning in the Aappaluttooq deposit (in Danish). Thesis, Arctic Centre, Technical University of Denmark.
Sørensen, S. P. (2013). Qullissat: The city that would not die (in Danish). Frydenlund.
Vestergaard, C., & Thomasen, G. (2015). Governing Uranium in the Danish Realm (DIIS Report 2015:17). Danish Institute for International Studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jørgensen, U. (2023). Self-government and Resource Extraction in Greenland: From Independence to Diverse Bargains?. In: Bowles, P., Andrews, N. (eds) Extractive Bargains. Frontiers of Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32172-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32172-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32171-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32172-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)