Skip to main content

The Hauntology/Narratology of the Neo-Victorian Ghost Story

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Neo-Victorianism
  • 145 Accesses

Abstract

Referring to Derrida’s term, “hauntology,” which is a portmanteau of haunting and ontology, and applying his theory, Ayres investigates the iconic haunted house in neo-Victorian literature as a metaphorical conceit that describes the processes of writing and reading in the pursuit of knowledge. Storytelling, for the neo-Victorian, is layered and rarely linear, in contrast to the traditional Victorian novel. Reality and assertions or presumptions about right and wrong, good and evil, acceptable and unacceptable were endemic depictions in the nineteenth century when novels were entrusted to be social purveyors of morality and preceptors of decorum. Neo-Victorian ghost stories, instead, suggest that, at best, writers and their readers might discover clues to reality and truth from a myriad of physical and preternatural means embedded in the text, but knowledge is a spectre that assumes a variety of forms that can be deceptive and allusive. The “haunting” of narratology in neo-Victorian ghost stories set in Victorian times analysed in this chapter are Home Before Dark (2020) by Riley Sager and The Whispering House (2021) by Elizabeth Brooks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The idea of ghost writers is very popular. Google the term, and you will find a lengthy list of books by that title.

  2. 2.

    Here she is responding to Jameson’s theory about history in his “Postmodernism” (1984, 67).

  3. 3.

    The two stories of Lazarus in the Bible from which Eliot makes reference is apropos to this chapter on ghosts. The first story is when Jesus entered the tomb of his good friend Lazarus and raised him from the dead (John 11:1). The second is when Jesus tells a parable of Lazarus, a poor man who went to heaven, but a rich man was sent to hell. Dives (from the Vulgate which means “rich man” from originally meaning, “favored by the gods”) begs Abraham to let Lazarus come to him to “dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool [his] tongue; for [he is] tormented in this flame.” He also begs Abraham to send Lazarus (like a ghost) back to earth to warn Dives’ five brothers about the reality of hell, that they should repent of their sins. Abraham did not see the value in doing this because they heard Moses and the prophets and did not repent, and if visited by “one rose from the dead,” they still would not repent (Luke 16:19–31 KJV).

  4. 4.

    Although Irigaray makes this point in several of her works and also emphasises that women can be linear in their thinking as well, see Sexes and Genealogies (1993 [1987], 99) in which she ascribes the “linear” to “penile thrust,” whereas women “whirl about in different directions: toward the outside, toward the inside, on the border between the two” (99; emphasis in original). Helene Meyers, however, warns against essentialism when it comes to gender, and writing and reading the Gothic (2001).

  5. 5.

    The “meeting of the minds” made possible by this agreement between the reader and the writer is more fully explain in its entirety, that the author’s “endeavours should be directed to persons and characters supernatural, or at least romantic, yet so as to transfer from our inward nature a human interest and a semblance of truth sufficient to procure for these shadows of imagination that willing suspension of disbelief for the moment, which constitutes poetic faith” (1835 [1817], 365).

  6. 6.

    Specific references to Catherine’s reading of Radcliffe are 50, 127, 131, and 242 (Austen 1903 [1817]).

Bibliography

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brenda Ayres .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ayres, B. (2024). The Hauntology/Narratology of the Neo-Victorian Ghost Story. In: Ayres, B., Maier, S.E. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Neo-Victorianism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32160-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics