Skip to main content

Animals and Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, Volume 2

Abstract

The sociology of morality’s core concerns with social structure and power, sociohistorical context, and the impact of social identities and social practices on institutions (Hitlin and Vaisey, Handbook of the sociology of morality, Springer Science & Business Media, 2010; Annual Review of Sociology, 39:51–68, 2013) are broadly shared among sociologists who study animals and society. At the same time, we would also argue that acknowledging and grappling with the role of animals in society and in sociology is critical to any type of comprehensive sociology of morality. In this chapter, we articulate the mutual relevance of these fields by discussing the anthropocentric legacy in both sociology and anthropology, the emergence of alternative perspectives on animals and subsequent negative reactions, and recent developments in the animal study literatures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, C. J. (2000). The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. (10th anniversary ed. Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alger, J. M., & Alger, S. F. (2003). Drawing the line between humans and animals: An examination of introductory sociology textbooks. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(3), 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arluke, A. (2002). A sociology of sociological animal studies. Society and Animals, 10(4), 369–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B., Bloor, D., & Henry, J. (1996). Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, S. (2006). Rethinking revolution: Animal liberation, human liberation, and the future of the left. The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy, 2(3), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, S. (2009). The rise of critical animal studies: Putting theory into action and animal liberation into higher education. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 7(1), 9–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. (2017). Archaeology and human–animal relations: Thinking through anthropocentrism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46, 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W., & Dunlap, R. (1978). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm. The American Sociologist, 13(February), 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, E. (2021). Vegan studies in sociology. In The Routledge handbook of vegan studies (pp. 150–160). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Constance, D. (2009). The four questions in agrifood studies: A view from the bus. Agriculture and Human Values, 26(1–2), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cudworth, E. (2016). A sociology for other animals: Analysis, advocacy, intervention. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 36(3/4), 242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dromi, S. M., & Stabler, S. D. (2019). Good on paper: Sociological critique, pragmatism, and secularization theory. Theory and Society, 48(2), 325–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenebaum, J. (2018). Vegans of color: Managing visible and invisible stigmas. Food, Culture & Society, 21(5), 680–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2018.1512285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, A. B. (2010). Sistah vegan: Food, identity, health, and society: Black female vegans speak. Lantern Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan, J., Jr. (2021). Knowing animals: Multispecies ethnography and the scope of anthropology. American Anthropologist, 123(4), 846–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, T. (1997). Anthropocentrism: A misunderstood problem. Environmental Values, 6(1), 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (2010). Handbook of the sociology of morality. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (2013). The new sociology of morality. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson-West, P. (2007). Beasts and boundaries: An introduction to animals in sociology, science and society. Qualitative Sociology Review, 3(1), 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, L. (2008). Animals and sociology. Sociology Compass, 2(6), 1954–1971. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00163.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, L. (2012). Sociology and anthrozoology: Symbolic interactionist contributions. Anthrozoös, 25(sup1), s123–s137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krannich, R. S. (2008). Rural sociology at the crossroads. Rural Sociology, 73(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, C. R. (2002). Social animals: Animal studies and sociology. Society and Animals, 10(4), 375–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S. (2004). Collective agency, non-human causality and environmental social movements: A case study of the Australian ‘landcare movement’. Journal of Sociology, 40(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, J., Mullett, E., Brown, J., & Cloitre, M. (2006). Cultivating resiliency: A guide for parents and school personnel. Diunduh dari. http://teacher.scholastic.com/products/tradebooks/discguide/owen.

  • Nibert, D. (2003). Humans and other animals: Sociology’s moral and intellectual challenge. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(3), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peggs, K. (2013). The ‘animal-advocacy agenda’: Exploring sociology for non-human animals. The Sociological Review, 61(3), 591–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellow, D. N. (2014). Total liberation: The power and promise of animal rights and the radical earth movement. U of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, B. (2011). What is this quintessence of dust? The concept of the ‘human’ and its origins Anthropocentrism (pp. 19–36). Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segata, J., & Lewgoy, B. (2016). Animals in anthropology. VIBRANT-Vibrant Virtual Brazilian Anthropology, 13(2), 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1990). Animal liberation (2nd ed.). New York Review of Books: Distributed by Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N. (2011). Can sociology contribute to the emancipation of animals? In Theorizing animals (pp. 201–220). Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N. (2012). Animals, mess, method: Post-humanism, Sociology and animal studies. In Crossing boundaries (pp. 37–50). Brill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Magneson Chiles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chiles, R.M., Mendel, C. (2023). Animals and Society. In: Hitlin, S., Dromi, S.M., Luft, A. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, Volume 2 . Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32022-4_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics