Skip to main content

Altruism, Morality, and the Morality of Altruism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, Volume 2

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the prospects for the sociology of altruism in the context of the relations between the notions of altruism and morality. For this purpose, I briefly discuss three problems that, I believe, are important for the sociological comprehension of altruism—namely, those of moral worth, moral boundaries, and impartiality. Ascribing moral worth to the acts of altruism is a plausible mechanism for a normative maintenance of unconditional helping, suggesting that human morality contains certain important layers beyond those explained by the evolutionary-utilitarian factors. The idea of moral boundaries denotes the social processes that restrict altruism to the people of particular backgrounds, groups, and identities. The impartiality of altruism, on the contrary, refers to the normative perspective that recognizes the interests of everyone affected by the action, and it arguably also plays an important part in making meaning of one’s life. I suggest that elaborating on these issues would considerably advance the sociological studies of altruism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abend, G. (2014). The moral background: An inquiry into the history of business ethics. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social psychological answer. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 773–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bykov, A. (2017). Altruism: New perspectives of research on a classical theme in sociology of morality. Current Sociology, 65(6), 797–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, A. J., Novak, L. F., & Fowers, B. J. (2022). Limits of the concept of altruism: Individualism, Batson’s theory of altruism, and a social realist alternative. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 42(2), 78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte, B., Hahnel, U. J. J., & Brosch, T. (2021). The dynamics of humanistic and biospheric altruism in conflicting choice environments. Personality and Individual Differences, 173, 110599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2019). Is it good to cooperate?: Testing the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60 societies. Current Anthropology, 60(1), 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deviatko, I. F., & Bykov, A. (2022). Weighing the moral worth of altruistic actions: A discrepancy between moral evaluations and prescriptive judgments. Philosophical Psychology, 22(1), 95–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dromi, S. M. (2020). Above the fray: The Red Cross and the making of the Humanitarian NGO Sector. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (2010). Sociology and philosophy. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firat, R. B., Kwon, H. W., & Hitlin, S. (2018). A novel measure of moral boundaries: Testing perceived in-group/out-group value differences in a Midwestern sample. Socius, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118818741

  • Gibbs, J. C. (2014). Moral development and reality. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gråd, E., Erlandsson, A., & Tinghög, G. (2021). Do nudges crowd out prosocial behavior? Behavioural Public Policy, 2021, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2013). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, K. (2004). Altruism as an organizational problem: The case of organ procurement. American Sociological Review, 69(3), 387–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (2013). The new sociology of morality. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, V. (Ed.). (2014a). The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity: Formulating a field of study. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, V. (2014b). Altruism, morality, and social solidarity as a field of study. In V. Jeffries (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity: Formulating a field of study (pp. 3–20). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D. L. (2008). Morality: An evolutionary account. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krettenauer, T. (2020). Moral identity as a goal of moral action: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Moral Education, 49(3), 330–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., Schmalzbauer, J., Waller, M., & Weber, D. (1996). Cultural and moral boundaries in the United States: Structural position, geographic location, and lifestyle explanations. Poetics, 24(1), 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangone, E. (2022). Altruistic relationships, responsibility, and sociology: An attempt at theoretical systematization. The American Sociologist, 53, 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, R. M., Kleiman-Weiner, M., & Young, L. (2020). What we owe to family: The impact of special obligations on moral judgment. Psychological Science, 31(3), 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, R. M., Mason, J. E., & Young, L. (2021). Re-examining the role of family relationships in structuring perceived helping obligations, and their impact on moral evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 96(104), 182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., & Schaefer, D. R. (2007). Building solidarity through generalized exchange: A theory of reciprocity. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 205–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1991). The social system. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfattheicher, S., Nielsen, Y. A., & Thielmann, I. (2022). Prosocial behavior and altruism: A review of concepts and definitions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piliavin, J. A. (2009). Altruism and helping: The evolution of a field: The 2008 Cooley-Mead presentation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(3), 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadnam, M., Bykov, A., & Prasad, A. (2021). Opening constructive dialogues between business ethics research and the sociology of morality: Introduction to the thematic symposium. Journal of Business Ethics, 170, 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, B., Willer, R., & Harrell, A. (2017). The enforcement of moral boundaries promotes cooperation and prosocial behavior in groups. Scientific Reports, 7(42), 844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2002). The theory of moral sentiments. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. L. (2016). Paradoxes of dehumanization. Social Theory and Practice, 42(2), 416–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, P. (1914). Prestuplenie i kara, podvig i nagrada: Sotsiologicheskij etyud ob osnovnykh formakh obschestvennogo povedeniya i morali [Crime and punishment, service and reward: A sociological inquiry into the forms of social behavior and morality]. Isdatelstvo Dolbysheva. (in Russ.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, P. (1967). The ways and power of love. Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. (1896). The principles of ethics. D Appleton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappmann, V., Seehaus, A., Mrozowicki, A., & Krasowska, A. (2021). The moral boundary drawing of class: Social inequality and young precarious workers in Poland and Germany. Sociology, 55(3), 451–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrey Bykov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bykov, A. (2023). Altruism, Morality, and the Morality of Altruism. In: Hitlin, S., Dromi, S.M., Luft, A. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, Volume 2 . Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32022-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics