Skip to main content

Semen Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Andrology

Abstract

Semen is analyzed for both diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Whether spermatozoa are present, in what numbers and in what condition (viable, motile, morphologically normal), are useful indicators that reflect testicular, epididymal, and accessory gland function and provide information on the quality of semen transferred at coitus. As variation in semen quality produced by the same man on different days is high, the use of standard methods for collecting and quantifying semen constituents and sperm characteristics is obligatory for an objective interpretation of the semen analysis result. The major semen analysis tests are described here along with the terminology and reference values provided by the sixth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen (2021).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agarwal A, Panner Selvam MK, Sharma R, Master K, Sharma A, Gupta S, Henkel R (2018) Home sperm testing device versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer: comparison of motile sperm concentration. Fertil Steril 110:1277–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ayad BM, Van der Horst G, Du Plessis SS (2018) Revisiting the relationship between the ejaculatory abstinence period and semen characteristics. Int J Fertil Steril. 11:238–246. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2018.5192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Yaari S, Katz N, Barr I, Fishman A, Bartoov B (2005) The morphological normalcy of the sperm nucleus and pregnancy rate of intracytoplasmic injection with morphologically selected sperm. Hum Reprod 20:185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell MJ, Lotti F, Baldi E, Schlatt S, Festin MP, Björndahl L, Toskin I, Barratt CL (2021) Distribution of Semen Examination Results 2020 - a follow up of data collated for the WHO semen analysis manual 2010. Andrology. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12983

  • Check JH, Tubman A, Wilson C (2013) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection allows normal pregnancy rates for males 40 with low hypoosmotic swelling test scores even when complicated by very low motility percentage. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 40:18–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper TG, Yeung CH, Nashan D, Jockenhoevel F, Nieschlag E (1990) Improvement in the assessment of human epididymal function by the use of inhibitors in the assay of α-glucosidase in seminal plasma. Int J Androl 13:297–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper TG, Keck C, Oberdieck U, Nieschlag E (1993) Effects of multiple ejaculations after extended periods of sexual abstinence on total, motile and normal sperm numbers, as well as accessory gland secretions from healthy normal and oligozoospermic men. Hum Reprod 8:1251–1258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper TG, Atkinson AD, Nieschlag E (1999) Experience with external quality control in spermatology. Hum Reprod 14:765–769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper TG, Bjorndahl L, Vreeburg J, Nieschlag E (2002) Semen analysis and external quality control schemes for semen analysis need global standardization. Int J Androl 25:306–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper TG, Hellenkemper B, Jonckheere J, Callewaert N, Grootenhuis AJ, Kersemaekers WM, Leung A, Wang C (2006) Azoospermia: virtual reality or possible to quantify? J Androl 27:483–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper TG, Hellenkemper B, Nieschlag E (2007) External quality control for semen analysis in Germany - Qualitätskontrolle der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Andrologie (QuaDeGA) the first five years. J Reprod Med Endocrinol 4:331–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HW, Behre HM, Haugen TB, Kruger T, Wang C, Mbizvo MT, Vogelsong KM (2010) World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update 16:231–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corea M, Campagnone J, Sigman M (2005) The diagnosis of azoospermia depends on the force of centrifugation. Fertil Steril 83:920–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas-Hamilton DH, Smith NG, Kuster CE, Vermeiden JP, Althouse GC (2005) Capillary-loaded particle fluid dynamics: effect on estimation of sperm concentration. J Androl 26:115–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drobnis EZ, Rothmann SA (2018) A semen analysis phone app does not replace laboratory testing. Fertil Steril 110:1255–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elzanaty S (2008) Time-to-ejaculation and the quality of semen produced by masturbation at a clinic. Urology 71:883–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eustache F, Jouannet P, Auger J (2001) Evaluation of flow cytometric methods to measure human sperm concentration. J Androl 22:558–567

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Medical Board of Germany (Bundesärztekammer) (2019) Richtlinie der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung laboratoriumsmedizinischer Untersuchungen. Dtsch Arztebl 116(51–52): A-2422 / B-1990 / C-1930. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2019.rili_baek_QS_Labor20192312

  • Fréour T, Jean M, Mirallié S, Dubourdieu S, Barrière P (2010) Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) parameters and their evolution during preparation as predictors of pregnancy in intrauterine insemination with frozen-thawed donor semen cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 149:186–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.12.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher MT, Smith DJ, Kirkman-Brown JC (2018) CASA: tracking the past and plotting the future. Reprod Fertil Dev 30:867–874. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD17420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett C, Liu DY, Clarke GN et al (2003) Automated semen analysis: ‘zona pellucida preferred’ sperm morphometry and straight-line velocity are related to pregnancy rate in subfertile couples. Hum Reprod 18:1643–1649

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett C, Liu DY, Baker HW (2007) Comparison of human sperm morphometry assessment models based on zona pellucida selectivity. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 65:357–361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker-Klom UN, Gòhde W, Nieschlag E, Behre HM (1999) DNA flow cytometry of human semen. Hum Reprod 14:2506–2512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson BM, Aston KI, Jenkins TG, Carrell DT, Hotaling JM (2017) The impact of ejaculatory abstinence on semen analysis parameters: a systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet 35:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1086-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ito C, Toshimori K (2016) Acrosome markers of human sperm. Anat Sci Int 91:128–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-015-0323-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe TM, Kim ED, Hoekstra TH, Lipshultz LI (1998) Sperm pellet analysis: a technique to detect the presence of sperm in men considered to have azoospermia by routine semen analysis. J Urol 159:1548–1550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeyendran RS, Van der Ven HK, Perez-Palaez M, Crabo BG, Zeanveld LJD (1984) Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fertil 70:219–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay KS, Floyd I, Swan R (1995) Classification of azoospermic samples. Lancet 345:1642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu DY, Garrett C, Baker HW (2003) Low proportions of sperm can bind to the zona pellucida of human oocytes. Hum Reprod 18:2382–2389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mallidis C, Cooper TG, Hellenkemper B, Lablans M, Rückert F, Nieschlag E (2012) Ten years experience with an external quality control program for semen analysis. Fertil Steril 98:611–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer ST, van der Horst G, Mortimer D (2015) The future of computer-aided sperm analysis. Asian J Androl 17:545–553

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Neuwinger J, Behre HM, Nieschlag E (1990) External quality control in the andrology laboratory: an experimental multicenter trial. Fertil Steril 54:308–314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieschlag E, Pock T, Hellenkemper B (2017) External quality control of semen analysis reveals low compliance with who guidelines. J Reprod Endokrinol 14:306–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhoff V (2015) How to select immotile but viable spermatozoa on the day of intracytoplasmic sperm injection? An embryologist's view. Andrology 3:156–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pacey AA (2009) Quality assurance and quality control in the laboratory andrology. Asian J Androl 12:21–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2009.16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pound N, Javed MH, Ruberto C, Shaikh MA, Del Valle AP (2002) Duration of sexual arousal predicts semen parameters for masturbatory ejaculates. Physiol Behav 76:685–689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Messner M, Vockel M, Wirleitner B, Pinggera GM, Witsch-Baumgartner M, Murtinger M, Kliesch S, Swoboda M, Sänger N, Zschocke J, Tüttelmann F (2020) Andrological findings in infertile men with two (biallelic) CFTR mutations: results of a multicentre study in Germany and Austria comprising 71 patients. Hum Reprod. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa348

  • Solomon M, Henkel R (2017) Semen culture and the assessment of genitourinary tract infections. Indian J Urol 33:188–193. https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_407_16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Talwar P, Hayatnagarkar S (2015) Sperm function test. J Hum Reprod Sci 8:61–69. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.158588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vicram AS, Dhama K, Chakraborty S, Samad HA, Latheef SK, Sharun K, Khurana SK, K A, Tiwari R, Bhatt P, K V, Chaicumpa W (2019) Role of antisperm antibodies in infertility, pregnancy, and potential forcontraceptive and antifertility vaccine designs: research progress and pioneering vision. Vaccines (Basel). 7:116. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines7030116

  • WHO (1993) WHO Manual for the standardized investigation and diagnosis of the infertile couple. In: Rowe PJ, Comhaire FH, Hargreave TB, Mellows HJ (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (1999) WHO Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2010) WHO Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2021) WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, sixth edition. World Health Organization, Geneva. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung CH, Beiglböck-Karau L, Tüttelmann F, Nieschlag E (2007) The presence of germ cells in the semen of azoospermic, cryptozoospermic and severe oligozoospermic patients: stringent flow cytometric analysis and correlations with hormonal status. Clin Endocrinol 67:767–775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Youn JS, Cha SH, Park CW, Yang KM, Kim JY, Koong MK, Kang IS, Song IO, Han SC (2011) Predictive value of sperm motility characteristics assessed by computer-assisted sperm analysis in intrauterine insemination with superovulation in couples with unexplained infertility. Clin Exp Reprod Med 38:47–52. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2011.38.1.47

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zuvela E, Matson P (2020) Performance of four chambers to measure sperm concentration: results from an external quality assurance programme. Reprod Biomed Online 41:671–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.07.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Verena Nordhoff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nordhoff, V., Baldi, E., Hellenkemper, B., Nieschlag, E. (2023). Semen Analysis. In: Nieschlag, E., Behre, H.M., Kliesch, S., Nieschlag, S. (eds) Andrology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31574-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31574-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-31573-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-31574-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics