Skip to main content

What the World has Learned About Their Governments During the COVID-19 Pandemic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Government Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic
  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

As we take stock of all aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic history, one important lesson to be learned concerns government behavior. While defense by immunity was in the works in vaccine research labs, defense by government action took the front seat, and political incumbents in every country and locale became "doctors to the public.” Did some governments perform better than others? Were there any predictable or explainable shortcomings in their crisis responses? Will governments and countries that underperformed in this crisis fall short in other crises where responsible leadership might be required? The contributors to this volume compare and contrast what governments around the world did and did not do when they were called upon to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the synchronicity of the threat and all governments’ initially similar helplessness in the face of the virus, their actions differed greatly around the world. The speed of the responses also varied from country to country, even when we account for the variable time frames on which the virus was initially detected. Importantly, the stringency of the enacted nonmedical interventions (NMIs) varied significantly as well. Arguably, these differences at least partially determined the variation in health outcomes seen in different countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M., 2004. Blind retrospection: Electoral responses to drought, flu, and shark attacks. Estudio/Working Paper 2004/199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adeel, A.B., & Zhirnov, A. (2023). COVID-19 response in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh: Shared history, different processes. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajana, B., 2021. Immunitarianism: defence and sacrifice in the politics of Covid-19. History and philosophy of the life sciences, 43(1), pp.1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayar, M.C., Seyis, D. (2023). Populist responses to COVID-19: The cases of Turkey and Israel as examples of pro-science populism and the cases of the United States and Brazil as examples of science-skeptic populism. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayrali, O.G. (2023). Center-regional political risk sharing in COVID-19 public health crisis: Nigeria and South Africa. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoît, C. and Hay, C., 2022. The antinomies of sovereigntism, statism and liberalism in European democratic responses to the COVID-19 crisis: a comparison of Britain and France. Comparative European Politics, pp.1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. and Sonnicksen, J. 2017. “Patterns of federal democracy: tensions, friction, or balance between two government dimensions.” European Political Science Review, 9(1): 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey. J.M. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, M., Chan, A. (2023). Common law systems and COVID-19 policy response: protective public health policy in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016. “The Continuum of Pandemic Phase.” National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/planning-preparedness/global-planning.html.

  • Chu, H. (2023). The Visegrad populist leaders’ responses to the pandemic in 2020. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature

    Google Scholar 

  • Daher-Nashif, S., 2022. In sickness and in health: The politics of public health and their implications during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sociology Compass, 16(1), p.e12949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daoust, J.F., Bélanger, É., Dassonneville, R., Lachapelle, E. and Nadeau, R., 2022. Is the Unequal COVID–19 Burden in Canada Due to Unequal Levels of Citizen Discipline across Provinces?. Canadian Public Policy, 48(1), pp.124–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, M., De Paepe, J., Evans, P., Head, B., and Yarnold, J., 2022. Embedding expertise for policy responses to COVID-19: comparing decision-making structures in two federal democracies. Public Organization Review

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, A. Q., & Smith, A., 2013. Leader survival and natural disasters. British Journal of Political Science, 43(4): 821–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Fonseca, E.M., Shadlen, K.C. and Bastos, F.I., 2021. The politics of COVID-19 vaccination in middle-income countries: Lessons from Brazil. Social Science & Medicine, 281, p.114093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasulla, Ó., Bel, G. and Mazaira-Font, F.A., 2022. Ideology, political polarisation and agility of policy responses: was weak executive federalism a curse or a blessing for COVID-19 management in the USA?. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, S.L., King, E.J., da Fonseca, E.M. and Peralta-Santos, A., 2020. The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses. Global public health, 15(9), pp.1413–1416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, S.L., King, E., Massard da Fonseca, E. and Peralta-Santos, A., 2021. Coronavirus politics: The comparative politics and policy of COVID-19 (p. 663).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, T., Webster, S., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., and Kira, B., 2020. Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker, Blavatnik School of Government. Available at https://covidtracker.bsg.ox.ac.uk/

  • Hale, Thomas, et al. “What have we learned from tracking every government policy on COVID-19 for the past two years.” BSG Research Note (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, A., and Malhotra, N., 2009. Myopic voters and natural disaster policy. American Political Science Review, 103(3): 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heersink, B., Peterson, B. D., and Jenkins, J. A., 2017. Disasters and elections: Estimating the net effect of damage and relief in historical perspective. Political Analysis, 25(2): 260–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, W.B., Muftuoglu, E., Rosenberg, D. (2023). The institutional underpinnings of policy-making in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang, S., Allen, D., Annan-Phan, S. et al., 2020. The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2404-8

  • Iverson, T. and Barbier, E., 2021. National and sub-national social distancing responses to COVID-19. Economies, 9(2), p.69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S., Hilgartner, S., Hurlbut, J.B., Ozgode, O. and Rayzberg, M., 2021. Comparative Covid response: crisis, knowledge, politics. Ithaca: CompCoRe Network, Cornell University

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukovič, S., 2022. How Novel Coronavirus has Shaken Public Trust in Decision-Making Institutions: Comparative Analysis of Selected European Union Members. Journal of Comparative Politics, 15(1), pp.9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladi, S. and Wolff, S., 2021. The EU Institutional Architecture in the Covid-19 Response: Coordinative Europeanization in Times of Permanent Emergency. Journal of Common Market Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • León, S., 2012. How do citizens attribute responsibility in multilevel states? Learning, biases and asymmetric federalism. Evidence from Spain. Electoral Studies 31(1):120–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipscy, P.Y., 2020. COVID-19 and the Politics of Crisis. International Organization, 74(S1), pp.E98–E127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N., and Kuo, A. G., 2008. Attributing blame: The public’s response to Hurricane Katrina. The Journal of Politics, 70(1): 120–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMann, K.M. and Tisch, D., 2021. Democratic regimes and epidemic deaths. V-Dem Working Paper, 126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. Bingham (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy. Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pueyo, T., 2020. “Coronavirus: Why you must act now. Politicians, community leaders and business leaders: what should you do and when.” Medium. March 10, 2020. https://medium.com/@tomaspueyo/coronavirus-act-today-or-people-will-die-f4d3d9cd99ca

  • Shvetsova, Olga; Zhirnov, Andrei; VanDusky-Allen, Julie; Adeel, Abdul Basit; Catalano, Michael; Catalano, Olivia; Giannelli, Frank; Muftuoglu, Ezgi; Riggs, Tara; Sezgin, Mehmet Halit; Tahir, Naveed; Zhao, Tianyi. 2020. Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy. Vol. 1: No. 4, pp 585–613. https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000023

  • Shvetsova, O., VanDusky-Allen, J., Zhirnov, A., Adeel, A.B., Catalano, M., Catalano, O., Giannelli, F., Muftuoglu, E., Rosenberg, D., Sezgin, M.H. and Zhao, T., 2021. Federal Institutions and Strategic Policy Responses to COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, p.66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shvetsova, O., Zhirnov, A., Giannelli, F.R., Catalano, M.A. and Catalano, O., 2022a. Governor’s party, policies, and COVID-19 outcomes: further evidence of an effect. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 62(3), pp.433–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shvetsova, O., Zhirnov, A., Giannelli, F., Catalano, M. and Catalano, O., 2022b. Can Correlation Between Governor’s Party and COVID-19 Morbidity Be Explained by the Differences in COVID-19 Mitigation Policies in the States?. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 62(6), pp.e381–e383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shvetsova, O., Zhirnov, A., Adeel, A.B., Bayar, M.C., Bayrali, O.G., Catalano, M., Catalano, O., Chu, H., Giannelli, F., Muftuoglu, E. and Rosenberg, D., 2022c. Protective Policy Index (PPI) global dataset of origins and stringency of COVID 19 mitigation policies. Scientific Data, 9(1), p.319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, M.A., Shyllon, O., Hohman, A., Jansen, R.J., Sidhu, S. and McDonough, S., 2022. Evaluating the Association of Face Covering Mandates on COVID-19 Severity by State. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 13, p.21501319221086720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, K. Parliamentary Democracy and Delegation. In Eds. Kaare Strøm, K., Muller, W.C. & Bergman, T. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 55–106. (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Troisi, R. and Alfano, G., 2021. Is regional emergency management key to containing COVID-19? A comparison between the regional Italian models of Emilia-Romagna and Veneto. International Journal of Public Sector Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ven, Hamish, and Yixian Sun. “Varieties of crises: Comparing the politics of COVID-19 and climate change.” Global Environmental Politics 21.1 (2021): 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanDusky-Allen, J. (2023). An Analysis of Government Responses to COVID-19 in Latin America’s Three Federations. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R.K. 1986. “The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of public policy 6(4), pp.371–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahariadis, N., Petridou, E. and Oztig, L.I., 2020. Claiming credit and avoiding blame: political accountability in Greek and Turkish responses to the COVID-19 crisis. European Policy Analysis, 6(2), pp.159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T. (2023). Pick your poison: Political expediencies, economic necessities, and COVID-19 response in Malaysia and Indonesia. In O. Shvetsova (Ed.), Political institutions and governments’ behavior in pandemic mitigation: Year 2020 around the world (pp. …). Springer Nature

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Shvetsova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shvetsova, O. (2023). What the World has Learned About Their Governments During the COVID-19 Pandemic. In: Shvetsova, O. (eds) Government Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30844-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics