Skip to main content

Benefits of Using Digital Twin for Online Fault Diagnosis of a Manufacturing System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence for Smart Manufacturing

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

  • 547 Accesses

Abstract

In this work, we illustrate the interest in the use of a digital twin for the online fault diagnosis in a manufacturing system with sensors and actuators delivering binary signals that can be modeled as Discrete Event Systems. This chapter presents an intelligent diagnostic solution to replace traditional solutions, which are often non-industrialized, with a new data-based method learned from the simulation of the plant behaviors and using recurrent neural networks (RNN) with short-term and long-term memory (Long short-term memory, LSTM).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Souza RP, Moreira MV, Lesage JJ (2020) A hierarchical approach for discrete-event model identification incorporating expert knowledge. IFAC-PapersOnLine 53(4):275–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dou D, Zhou S (2016) Comparison of four direct classification methods for intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Appl Soft Comput 46:459–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. FactoryIO (2022) Sorting by height advanced. https://docs.factoryio.com/manual/scenes/sorting-by-height-advanced/

  4. Graves A, Mohamed Ar, Hinton G (2013) Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing. IEEE, pp 6645–6649

    Google Scholar 

  5. Han T, Jiang D, Zhao Q, Wang L, Yin K (2018) Comparison of random forest, artificial neural networks and support vector machine for intelligent diagnosis of rotating machinery. Trans Inst Meas Control 40(8):2681–2693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9(8):1735–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. José Guilherme Castro MVM, Viana G (2022) Distributed identification of discrete-event systems with the aim of fault detection. In: 16th IFAC workshop on discrete event systems

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karpathy A, Johnson J, Fei-Fei L (2015) Visualizing and understanding recurrent networks. arXiv:1506.02078

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kritzinger W, Karner M, Traar G, Henjes J, Sihn W (2018) Digital twin in manufacturing: a categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(11):1016–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moosavian A, Ahmadi H, Tabatabaeefar A, Khazaee M (2013) Comparison of two classifiers; k-nearest neighbor and artificial neural network, for fault diagnosis on a main engine journal-bearing. Shock Vib 20(2):263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saddem R, Philippot A (2014) Causal temporal signature from diagnoser model for online diagnosis of discrete event systems. In: 2014 international conference on control. decision and information technologies (CoDIT). IEEE, pp 551–556

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saddem R, Marrakh A, Baptiste D, Dabounou J (2022) Data based approach for online diagnosis of discrete event system. In: 14th IFAC workshop on intelligent manufacturing systems, vol 55, no 2, pp 289–294

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sampath M, Sengupta R, Lafortune S, Sinnamohideen K, Teneketzis D (1995) Diagnosability of discrete-event systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 40(9):1555–1575

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Tao F, Qi Q, Wang L, Nee A (2019) Digital twins and cyber—Physical systems toward smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: correlation and comparison. Engineering 5(4):653–661

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vazan P, Janikova D, Tanuska P, Kebisek M, Cervenanska Z (2017) Using data mining methods for manufacturing process control. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50(1):6178–6183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Venkatasubramanian V, Rengaswamy R, Kavuri SN, Yin K (2003) A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: part iii: process history based methods. Comput Chem Eng 27(3):327–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zaytoon J, Lafortune S (2013) Overview of fault diagnosis methods for discrete event systems. Ann Rev Control 37(2):308–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramla Saddem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saddem, R., Baptiste, D. (2023). Benefits of Using Digital Twin for Online Fault Diagnosis of a Manufacturing System. In: Tran, K.P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence for Smart Manufacturing. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30510-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30510-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30509-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30510-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics