Skip to main content

Security Challenges and Wireless Technology Choices in IoT-Based Smart Grids

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Smart Technologies for Critical Infrastructure

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) smart grid enables many benefits to both customers and energy generators, such as improved outage visibility, billing, and cost reduction. It allows more efficient energy use through improved access to real-time data that supports customers in reducing their energy usage and improving environmental outcomes. Integrating IoT-based data networks into the grid brings these benefits and many more. However, security and performance challenges are introduced. With the plethora of current and emerging technologies, suitable technologies must be used in each network segment that provide a sufficient level of network performance. With the introduction of data networks to the grid, we must also consider what additional threats are introduced regarding network security. This work provides essential background information on the residential smart grid. Security risks and attacks that threaten the IoT smart grid are then identified. A discussion on security challenges and future research directions are presented. A review and discussion of relevant modern IoT transmission technologies covering their benefits, key performance metrics, and their appropriate place within the IoT-based smart grid is then presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Turjman F, Abujubbeh M (2019) IoT-enabled smart grid via SM: an overview. Future Gener Comput Syst 96:579–590

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lavric A, Petrariu AI, Popa V (2019) SigFox communication protocol: the new era of IoT? In: 2019 international conference on sensing and instrumentation in IoT era (ISSI). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haddad Z et al (2015) Secure and privacy-preserving AMI-utility communications via LTE-A networks. In: 2015 IEEE 11th international conference on wireless and mobile computing, networking and communications (WiMob). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Talha SK, Barry BI (2013) Evaluating the impact of AES encryption algorithm on Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) systems. In: 2013 international conference on computing, electrical and electronic engineering (ICCEEE). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  5. U.S. Department of Energy (2022) The smart grid. Cited 31 Aug 2022. Available from: https://www.smartgrid.gov/the_smart_grid/smart_grid.html

  6. Nidhi N, Prasad D, Nath V (2019) Different aspects of smart grid: an overview. In: Nanoelectronics, circuits and communication systems, pp 451–456

    Google Scholar 

  7. Butt OM, Zulqarnain M, Butt TM (2021) Recent advancement in smart grid technology: future prospects in the electrical power network. Ain Shams Eng J 12(1):687–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim SC, Ray P, Reddy SS (2019) Features of smart grid technologies: an overview. ECTI Trans Electr Eng Electron Commun 17(2):169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoldaş Y et al (2017) Enhancing smart grid with microgrids: challenges and opportunities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gunduz MZ, Das R (2020) Cyber-security on smart grid: threats and potential solutions. Comput Netw 169:107094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Straub J (2021) Consideration of the use of smart grid cyberattacks as an influence attack and appropriate deterrence. In: 2021 international conference on computational science and computational intelligence (CSCI). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmed S et al (2019) A survey on communication technologies in smart grid. In: 2019 IEEE PES GTD grand international conference and exposition Asia (GTD Asia). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nejat P et al (2015) A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries). Renew Sustain Energy Rev 43:843–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mendes TD et al (2015) Smart home communication technologies and applications: wireless protocol assessment for home area network resources. Energies 8(7):7279–7311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hu Q, Li F (2013) Hardware design of smart home energy management system with dynamic price response. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 4(4):1878–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jo H-C, Kim S, Joo S-K (2013) Smart heating and air conditioning scheduling method incorporating customer convenience for home energy management system. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 59(2):316–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou B et al (2016) Smart home energy management systems: concept, configurations, and scheduling strategies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 61:30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Joseph S, Menon DM (2015) A novel architecture for efficient communication in smart grid home area network. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and computing research (ICCIC). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  19. Agnew S, Dargusch P (2017) Consumer preferences for household-level battery energy storage. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:609–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar MS, Srinivasan S, Subathra B (2018) A deterministic demand response program for schedulable loads in power distribution system. Int J Pure Appl Math 118(18):2071–2077

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alimi OA, Ouahada K (2018) Security assessment of the smart grid: a review focusing on the NAN architecture. In: 2018 IEEE 7th international conference on adaptive science & technology (ICAST). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nafi NS et al (2018) Software defined neighborhood area network for smart grid applications. Future Gener Comput Syst 79:500–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramirez DF et al (2015) Performance evaluation of future AMI applications in smart grid neighborhood area networks. In: IEEE Colombian conference on communication and computing (IEEE COLCOM 2015). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kulkarni V, Komanapalli VLN, Sahoo SK (2021) A review on requirements for data communication and information technology areas for smart grid. In: Advances in automation, signal processing, instrumentation, and control, pp 3259–3271

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kuzlu M, Pipattanasomporn M, Rahman S (2014) Communication network requirements for major smart grid applications in HAN, NAN and WAN. Comput Netw 67:74–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pandey JC, Kalra M (2022) A review of security concerns in smart grid. In: Innovative data communication technologies and application, pp 125–140

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar NM, Mallick PK (2018) The Internet of Things: insights into the building blocks, component interactions, and architecture layers. Procedia Comput Sci 132:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li L (2012) Study on security architecture in the Internet of Things. In: Proceedings of 2012 international conference on measurement, information and control. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lee S, Kim J, Shon T (2016) User privacy-enhanced security architecture for home area network of smartgrid. Multimed Tools Appl 75(20):12749–12764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Haes Alhelou H et al (2019) A survey on power system blackout and cascading events: research motivations and challenges. Energies 12(4):682

    Google Scholar 

  31. Akatyev N, James JI (2019) Evidence identification in IoT networks based on threat assessment. Future Gener Comput Syst 93:814–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Menon DM, Radhika N (2016) Anomaly detection in smart grid traffic data for home area network. In: 2016 international conference on circuit, power and computing technologies (ICCPCT). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ali W et al (2022) A novel privacy preserving scheme for smart grid-based home area networks. Sensors 22(6):2269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. de Melo PH, Miani RS, Rosa PF (2022) FamilyGuard: a security architecture for anomaly detection in home networks. Sensors 22(8):2895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Menon DM, Radhika N. A trust-based framework and deep learning-based attack detection for smart grid home area network

    Google Scholar 

  36. Holman BA, Hauser J, Amariucai GT (2021) Toward home area network hygiene: device classification and intrusion detection for encrypted communications. In: Advances in security, networks, and Internet of Things. Springer, pp 195–209

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mendel J (2017) Smart grid cyber security challenges: overview and classification. e-mentor 1(68):55–66

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kaveh M, Mosavi MR (2020) A lightweight mutual authentication for smart grid neighborhood area network communications based on physically unclonable function. IEEE Syst J 14(3):4535–4544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yilmaz Y, Uludag S (2017) Mitigating IoT-based cyberattacks on the smart grid. In: 2017 16th IEEE international conference on machine learning and applications (ICMLA). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kalidass J, Purusothaman T, Suresh P (2021) Enhancement of end-to-end security in advanced metering infrastructure. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  41. Alohali B et al (2016) Group authentication scheme for neighbourhood area networks (NANs) in smart grids. J Sens Actuator Netw 5(2):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rawat DB, Bajracharya C (2015) Cyber security for smart grid systems: status, challenges and perspectives. In: SoutheastCon 2015, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kharchouf I et al (2022) On the implementation and security analysis of routable-GOOSE messages based on IEC 61850 standard. In: 2022 IEEE international conference on environment and electrical engineering and 2022 IEEE industrial and commercial power systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  44. Islam SN, Baig Z, Zeadally S (2019) Physical layer security for the smart grid: vulnerabilities, threats, and countermeasures. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 15(12):6522–6530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Komninos N, Philippou E, Pitsillides A (2014) Survey in smart grid and smart home security: issues, challenges and countermeasures. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 16(4):1933–1954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Liang X, Kim Y (2021) A survey on security attacks and solutions in the IoT network. In: 2021 IEEE 11th annual computing and communication workshop and conference (CCWC). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mathas C-M et al (2020) Threat landscape for smart grid systems. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on availability, reliability and security

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chhaya L et al (2020) Cybersecurity for smart grid: threats, solutions and standardization. In: Advances in greener energy technologies. Springer, pp 17–29

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tufail S et al (2021) A survey on cybersecurity challenges, detection, and mitigation techniques for the smart grid. Energies 14(18):5894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yılmaz Y, Uludag S (2021) Timely detection and mitigation of IoT-based cyberattacks in the smart grid. J Franklin Inst 358(1):172–192

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Imteaj A et al (2021) A survey on federated learning for resource-constrained IoT devices. IEEE Internet Things J 9(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Alam S et al (2020) Internet of Things (IoT) enabling technologies, requirements, and security challenges. In: Advances in data and information sciences. Springer, pp 119–126

    Google Scholar 

  53. Singh S et al (2017) Advanced lightweight encryption algorithms for IoT devices: survey, challenges and solutions. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fernández-Caramés TM (2019) From pre-quantum to post-quantum IoT security: a survey on quantum-resistant cryptosystems for the Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Things J 7(7):6457–6480

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bekara C (2014) Security issues and challenges for the IoT-based smart grid. Procedia Comput Sci 34:532–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Arakadakis K et al (2021) Firmware over-the-air programming techniques for IoT networks—a survey. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 54(9):1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Malhotra P et al (2021) Internet of Things: evolution, concerns and security challenges. Sensors 21(5):1809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Raghuvanshi A et al (2021) An investigation of various applications and related security challenges of Internet of Things. Mater Today Proc

    Google Scholar 

  59. Gopstein A et al (2021) NIST framework and roadmap for smart grid interoperability standards, release 4.0. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  60. Karale A (2021) The challenges of IoT addressing security, ethics, privacy, and laws. Internet Things 15:100420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kimani K, Oduol V, Langat K (2019) Cyber security challenges for IoT-based smart grid networks. Int J Crit Infrastruct Prot 25:36–49

    Google Scholar 

  62. Saleem Y et al (2019) Internet of Things-aided smart grid: technologies, architectures, applications, prototypes, and future research directions. IEEE Access 7:62962–63003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Sanchez-Gomez J, Sanchez-Iborra R, Skarmeta A (2017) Transmission technologies comparison for IoT communications in smart-cities. In: GLOBECOM 2017–2017 IEEE global communications conference. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  64. Campo GD et al (2018) Power distribution monitoring using LoRa: coverage analysis in suburban areas. In: Proceedings of the 2018 international conference on embedded wireless systems and networks

    Google Scholar 

  65. Seye MR, Gueye B, Diallo M (2017) An evaluation of LoRa coverage in Dakar Peninsula. In: 2017 8th IEEE annual information technology, electronics and mobile communication conference (IEMCON). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  66. Adelantado F et al (2017) Understanding the limits of LoRaWAN. IEEE Commun Mag 55(9):34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Noreen U, Bounceur A, Clavier L (2017) A study of LoRa low power and wide area network technology. In: 2017 international conference on advanced technologies for signal and image processing (ATSIP). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  68. Mekki K et al (2018) Overview of cellular LPWAN technologies for IoT deployment: SigFox, LoRaWAN, and NB-IoT. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PerCom workshops). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  69. LoRa Alliance (2017) LoRaWANTM security full end-to-end encryption for IoT application providers. Cited 1 May 2022. Available from: https://lora-alliance.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/lorawan_security_whitepaper.pdf

  70. Janssen T et al (2020) LoRa 2.4 GHz communication link and range. Sensors 20(16):4366

    Google Scholar 

  71. Andersen FR et al (2020) Ranging capabilities of LoRa 2.4 GHz. In: 2020 IEEE 6th world forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  72. Semtech (2020) SX1280/SX1281 data sheet DS.SX1280-1.W.APP Rev 3.2

    Google Scholar 

  73. Mulla A et al (2015) The wireless technologies for smart grid communication: a review. In: 2015 fifth international conference on communication systems and network technologies. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  74. Bluetooth SIG (2022) Learn about Bluetooth—Bluetooth technology overview. Cited 11 Sept 2022. Available from: https://www.bluetooth.com/learn-about-bluetooth/tech-overview/

  75. T’Jonck K et al (2021) Optimizing the Bluetooth low energy service discovery process. Sensors 21(11):3812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Bluetooth SIG (2020) Topology options | Bluetooth® technology website. Cited 11 Apr 2020. Available from: https://www.bluetooth.com/learn-about-bluetooth/bluetooth-technology/topology-options/

  77. Yin J et al (2019) A survey on Bluetooth 5.0 and mesh: new milestones of IoT. ACM Trans Sens Netw (TOSN) 15(3):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  78. Anupriya K, Yomas J, Dwarakanath T (2016) Integrating ZigBee and sub GHz devices for long range networks. In: 2016 online international conference on green engineering and technologies (IC-GET). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ahmed N, Rahman H, Hussain MI (2016) A comparison of 802.11ah and 802.15.4 for IoT. ICT Express 2(3):100–102

    Google Scholar 

  80. Kumar T, Mane P (2016) ZigBee topology: a survey. In: 2016 international conference on control, instrumentation, communication and computational technologies (ICCICCT). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  81. Brachmann M et al (2019) IEEE 802.15.4 TSCH in sub-GHz: design considerations and multi-band support. In: 2019 IEEE 44th conference on local computer networks (LCN). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  82. Datta P, Sharma B (2017) A survey on IoT architectures, protocols, security and smart city based applications. In: 2017 8th international conference on computing, communication and networking technologies (ICCCNT). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  83. Herrero R (2022) Thread architecture. In: Fundamentals of IoT communication technologies. Springer, pp 213–225

    Google Scholar 

  84. Rzepecki W, Iwanecki Ł, Ryba P (2018) IEEE 802.15.4 thread mesh network–data transmission in harsh environment. In: 2018 6th international conference on future Internet of Things and cloud workshops (FiCloudW). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  85. Unwala I, Taqvi Z, Lu J (2018) Thread: an IoT protocol. In: 2018 IEEE green technologies conference (GreenTech). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  86. Edirisinghe S, Wijethunge A, Ranaweera C. Wi-Fi 6-based HAN for demand response in smart grid. Available at SSRN 4184450

    Google Scholar 

  87. Sharon O, Alpert Y (2017) Single user MAC level throughput comparison: IEEE 802.11ax vs. IEEE 802.11ac. Wireless Sens Netw 9(5):166–177

    Google Scholar 

  88. Yang G (2022) An overview of current solutions for privacy in the Internet of Things. Front Artif Intell 5

    Google Scholar 

  89. Adame T et al (2014) IEEE 802.11ah: the WiFi approach for M2M communications. IEEE Wireless Commun 21(6):144–152

    Google Scholar 

  90. Wi-Fi Alliance (2021) Wi-Fi certified HaLow technology overview. Cited 9 Sept 2022. Available from: https://www.wi-fi.org/downloads-registered-guest/Wi-Fi_CERTIFIED_HaLow_Technology_Overview_20211102.pdf/36879

  91. Vega LFDC, Robles I, Morabito R (2015) IPv6 over 802.11ah. Internet Engineering Task Force, p 17

    Google Scholar 

  92. Mekki K et al (2019) A comparative study of LPWAN technologies for large-scale IoT deployment. ICT Express 5(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Lavric A, Petrariu AI, Popa V (2019) Long range SigFox communication protocol scalability analysis under large-scale, high-density conditions. IEEE Access 7:35816–35825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Ferreira L (2021) Sigforgery: breaking and fixing data authenticity in SigFox. In: International conference on financial cryptography and data security. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  95. Lalle Y et al (2019) A comparative study of LoRaWAN, SigFox, and NB-IoT for smart water grid. In: 2019 global information infrastructure and networking symposium (GIIS). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  96. Nair KK, Abu-Mahfouz AM, Lefophane S (2019) Analysis of the narrow band Internet of Things (NB-IoT) technology. In: 2019 conference on information communications technology and society (ICTAS). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  97. Aldahdouh KA, Darabkh KA, Al-Sit W (2019) A survey of 5G emerging wireless technologies featuring LoRaWAN, SigFox, NB-IoT and LTE-M. In: 2019 international conference on wireless communications signal processing and networking (WiSPNET). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  98. Amazon Web Services (2022) Implementing low-power wide-area network (LPWAN) solutions with AWS IoT. AWS whitepaper. Cited 11 Sept 2022. Available from: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/implementing-lpwan-solutions-with-aws/lte-m.html

  99. Augustin A et al (2016) A study of LoRa: long range & low power networks for the Internet of Things. Sensors 16(9):1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. de Almeida IBF et al (2021) Alternative chirp spread spectrum techniques for LPWANs. IEEE Trans Green Commun Netw 5(4):1846–1855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Angrisani L et al (2017) LoRa protocol performance assessment in critical noise conditions. In: 2017 IEEE 3rd international forum on research and technologies for society and industry (RTSI). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  102. Magrin D, Centenaro M, Vangelista L (2017) Performance evaluation of LoRa networks in a smart city scenario. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  103. Zorbas D et al (2018) Improving LoRa network capacity using multiple spreading factor configurations. In: 2018 25th international conference on telecommunications (ICT). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  104. The Things Network (2022) Spreading factors. Cited 9 June 2022. Available from: https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/docs/lorawan/spreading-factors/

  105. LoRa Alliance (2022) What is LoRaWAN specification. Cited 1 May 2022. Available from: https://lora-alliance.org/about-lorawan/

  106. del Campo G et al (2018) Power distribution monitoring using LoRa: coverage analysis in suburban areas

    Google Scholar 

  107. Polak L, Milos J (2020) Performance analysis of LoRa in the 2.4 GHz ISM band: coexistence issues with Wi-Fi. Telecommun Syst 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  108. Semtech (2020) Semtech SX1280 datasheet Rev 3.2. Cited 31 May 2021. Available from: https://www.semtech.com/products/wireless-rf/lora-24ghz/sx1280#download-resources

  109. Collotta M et al (2018) Bluetooth 5: a concrete step forward toward the IoT. IEEE Commun Mag 56(7):125–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Bluetooth SIG (2021) Bluetooth core specification v5.3

    Google Scholar 

  111. Mahmood A, Javaid N, Razzaq S (2015) A review of wireless communications for smart grid. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:248–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Krejčí R, Hujňák O, Švepeš M (2017) Security survey of the IoT wireless protocols. In: 2017 25th telecommunication forum (TELFOR). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  113. IEEE Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Networks (2016) IEEE Std 802.15.4-2015 (revision of IEEE Std 802.15.4-2011), pp 1–709

    Google Scholar 

  114. Ali AI et al (2019) ZigBee and LoRa based wireless sensors for smart environment and IoT applications. In: 2019 1st global power, energy and communication conference (GPECOM). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  115. Thread Group (2022) Thread 1.3.0 features white paper. Cited 18 Aug 2022. Available from: https://www.threadgroup.org/Portals/0/documents/support/Thread1.3.0WhitePaper_07192022_3990_1.pdf

  116. Google (2020) OpenThread. Cited 11 Apr 2020. Available from: https://github.com/openthread/openthread

  117. Cilfone A et al (2019) Wireless mesh networking: an IoT-oriented perspective survey on relevant technologies. Future Internet 11(4):99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Herrera T, Núñez F (2019) Scalability and integration of a thread implementation in a home area network. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on consumer electronics (ICCE). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  119. Wi-Fi Alliance (2022) Who we are—our brands. Cited 12 Aug 2022. Available from: https://www.wi-fi.org/who-we-are/our-brands

  120. IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Specific Requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 1 (2021) Enhancements for high-efficiency WLAN. IEEE Std 802.11ax-2021 (amendment to IEEE Std 802.11-2020), pp 1–767

    Google Scholar 

  121. Baños-Gonzalez V et al (2016) IEEE 802.11ah: a technology to face the IoT challenge. Sensors 16(11):1960

    Google Scholar 

  122. Adame T, Carrascosa-Zamacois M, Bellalta B (2021) Time-sensitive networking in IEEE 802.11be: on the way to low-latency WiFi 7. Sensors 21(15):4954

    Google Scholar 

  123. Wi-Fi Alliance (2018) Next generation Wi-Fi®: the future of connectivity. Cited 8 Apr 2020. Available from: https://www.wi-fi.org/download.php?file=/sites/default/files/private/Next_generation_Wi-Fi_White_Paper_20181218.pdf

  124. Seferagić A et al (2020) Survey on wireless technology trade-offs for the industrial Internet of Things. Sensors 20(2):488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Vanhoef M, Ronen E (2019) Dragonblood: a security analysis of WPA3’s SAE handshake. IACR Cryptol ePrint Arch 2019:383

    Google Scholar 

  126. Chacko S, Job MD (2018) Security mechanisms and vulnerabilities in LPWAN. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. IOP Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  127. SigFox (2022) Buy SigFox connectivity for your IoT devices. Cited 17 Aug 2022. Available from: https://buy.sigfox.com

  128. Borkar SR (2020) Long-term evolution for machines (LTE-M). In: LPWAN technologies for IoT and M2M applications. Elsevier, pp 145–166

    Google Scholar 

  129. Dian FJ, Vahidnia R (2020) LTE IoT technology enhancements and case studies. IEEE Consum Electron Mag 9(6):49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Ugwuanyi S, Irvine J (2020) Security analysis of IoT networks and platforms. In: 2020 international symposium on networks, computers and communications (ISNCC). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  131. McCurry J (2019) US dismisses South Korea’s launch of world-first 5G network as ‘stunt’. The Guardian. Cited 28 Aug 2022. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/apr/04/us-dismisses-south-koreas-launch-of-world-first-5g-network-as-stunt

  132. Su J (2019) Verizon launches world’s first commercial 5G smartphone service. Forbes. Cited 28 Aug 2022. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeanbaptiste/2019/04/04/verizon-launches-worlds-first-commercial-5g-smartphone-service/?sh=32c3fa001961

  133. Chettri L, Bera R (2019) A comprehensive survey on Internet of Things (IoT) toward 5G wireless systems. IEEE Internet Things J 7(1):16–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the Cyber Security Research Centre Limited whose activities are partially funded by the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luke Kane .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kane, L., Liu, V., McKague, M., Walker, G. (2023). Security Challenges and Wireless Technology Choices in IoT-Based Smart Grids. In: Pal, S., Jadidi, Z., Foo, E., Mukhopadhyay, S.C. (eds) Emerging Smart Technologies for Critical Infrastructure. Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation, vol 44. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29845-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29845-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29844-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29845-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics