Skip to main content

Therapeutic Genome Editing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I

Part of the book series: Collaborative Bioethics ((CB,volume 2))

  • 598 Accesses

Abstract

Efforts to cure single gene disorders by replacing the responsible genes using stem cell transplantation and gene transfer have been pursued for decades. These approaches, however, have been confined to serious diseases due in large part to their toxicity. Somatic gene editing (SGE), which repairs undesirable variants, is changing the landscape. It may well have fewer side effects than prior technologies. Thus, it is possible to consider using this approach to address a much broader array of a single gene variants, including treating milder genetic disorders and even improving function in otherwise healthy people. With these possibilities in mind, we discuss three implications of SGE. The first is the complexity of distinguishing between therapy and enhancement as well as the multifaceted debate about the acceptability of the latter, noting that many in the public are opposed to what they see as unfair advantage. The second, which previously has received little attention, is the tremendous price that is likely to be charged for SGE, which makes the debate about enhancement almost moot because even the needs of the most seriously ill will almost surely not be met, raising serious concerns about equity. The last is ensuring adequate regulation and governance of somatic gene editing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chapman, R. H., Kumar, V. M., Whittington, M. D., & Pearson, S. D. (2021). Does cost-effectiveness analysis overvalue potential cures? Exploring alternative methods for applying a “shared savings” approach to cost offsets. Value in Health, 24(6), 839–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cring, M. R., & Sheffield, V. C. (2020). Gene therapy and gene correction: Targets, progress, and challenges for treating human diseases. Gene Therapy., 29, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Fuente, J., Gluckman, E., Makani, J., Telfer, P., Faulkner, L., Corbacioglu, S., et al. (2020). The role of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for sickle cell disease in the era of targeted disease-modifying therapies and gene editing. The Lancet Haematology, 7(12), e902–e911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De La Morena, M. T., & Gatti, R. A. (2011). A history of bone marrow transplantation. Hematology/Oncology Clinics, 25(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhove, J., Osenk, I., Prichard, I., & Donnelley, M. (2019). Public acceptability of gene therapy and gene editing for human use: A systematic review. Human Gene Therapy, 31(1–2), 20–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. H. (2020). The human gene editing debate. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. H. (2021). Setting ethical limits on human gene editing after the fall of the somatic/germline barrier. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, T. A., & Booth, C. (2021). Gene therapy for primary immunodeficiencies. British Journal of Haematology, 193(6), 1044–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelsinger, P., & Shamoo, A. E. (2008). Eight years after Jesse’s death, are human research subjects any safer? The Hastings Center Report, 38(2), 25–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gostin, L. O., Altevogt, B. M., & Lenzi, R. N. (2014). Oversight and review of clinical gene transfer protocols: Assessing the role of the recombinant DNA advisory committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, E. L., Yang, S., Beets, B., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2020). What do we (not) know about global views of human gene editing? Insights and blind spots in the CRISPR era. The CRISPR Journal, 3(3), 148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, A. (2019). Paying for CRISPR cures: The economics of genetic therapies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S., Hurlbut, J. B., & Saha, K. (2019). Democratic governance of human germline genome editing. The CRISPR Journal, 2(5), 266–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. J., & DeBaun, M. R. (2021). Leukemia after gene therapy for sickle cell disease: Insertional mutagenesis, busulfan, both or neither. Blood, 138, 942–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juengst, E. T. (2020). Annotating the moral map of enhancement: Gene doping, the limits of medicine, and the spirit of sport. In The ethics of sports technologies and human enhancement (pp. 173-202). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juengst, E. T., Henderson, G. E., Walker, R. L., Conley, J. M., MacKay, D., Meagher, K. M., et al. (2018). Is enhancement the Price of prevention in human gene editing? The CRISPR Journal, 1(6), 351–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, J. (2021). Gene therapy that once led to tragedy scores success. Science, 372(6544), 776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti, L. (2021). Hematopoietic cell transplantation for sickle cell disease. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 8(846).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, G. E. (2021). Global governance of human genome editing: What are the rules? Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 22, 385–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, C. (2003). FDA halts gene therapy trials after leukaemia case in France. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 326(7382), 181–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MedlinePlus. (2021). FGFR3. Retrieved from https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/gene/fgfr3/

  • Mehlman, M. J. (2018). How will we regulate genetic enhancement? In Rights and resources (pp. 249–281). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, T. H. (2018). Good sport: Why games matter and how doping undermines them. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine. (2017). Human genome editing: Science, ethics, and governance. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine. (2020). Heritable human genome editing. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regulation for the Protection of Human Reseach Participants, Additional protections for research with children, 45 CFR 46, Subpart D, (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggan, K. A., Sharp, R. R., & Allyse, M. (2019). Where will we draw the line? Public opinions of human gene editing. Qualitative Health Research, 29(12), 1823–1835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha, K., Sontheimer, E. J., Brooks, P. J., Dwinell, M. R., Gersbach, C. A., Liu, D. R., et al. (2021). The NIH somatic cell genome editing program. Nature, 592(7853), 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, J. (2009). Genetic interventions and the ethics of enhancement of human beings. Readings in the Philosophy of Technology, 417–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., Howell, E. L., Rose, K. M., Brossard, D., & Hardy, B. W. (2017). US attitudes on human genome editing. Science, 357(6351), 553–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. F. (2010). The death of Jesse Gelsinger: New evidence of the influence of money and prestige in human research. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 36(2–3), 295–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2023). Sickle Cell Disease. Retrieved from https://www.afro.who.int/health-topics/sickle-cell-disease

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen Wright Clayton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Clayton, E.W. (2023). Therapeutic Genome Editing. In: Valdés, E., Lecaros, J.A. (eds) Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume I. Collaborative Bioethics, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29451-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics