Skip to main content

Correlation Between Researchers’ Centrality and H-Index: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Distributed Computing XV (IDC 2022)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 1089))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The quality of research’ work is often very hard to assess, While controversial, the use of indices to measure the performance of the researchers and of institutions is widely accepted in scientific communities. In this paper, we build and study the co-authorship network of the MAT/05 “academic discipline” (as defined by Italian law), and investigate if the centrality measures from Network Science are enough to predict the h-index of a researcher, when fed to classic Machine Learning algorithms. Our results show that some models and combinations of features work better than others, and also that the partial network (e.g., without authors that do not belong to MAT/05) may not be enough to predict accurate h-index values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Subramanyam, K.: Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review. J. Inf. Sci. 6(1), 33–38 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hirsch, J.E.: An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102(46), 16569–16572 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Lundberg, J., Tomson, G., Lundkvist, I., Skr, J., Brommels, M.: Collaboration uncovered: exploring the adequacy of measuring university-industry collaboration through co-authorship and funding. Scientometrics 69(3), 575–589 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Acedo, F.J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., Galán, J.L.: Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: an empirical and network analysis*. J. Manag. Stud. 43(5), 957–983 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeong, S., Choi, J.Y., Kim, J.: The determinants of research collaboration modes: exploring the effects of research and researcher characteristics on co-authorship. Scientometrics 89, 967–983 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moschini, U., Fenialdi, E., Daraio, C., Ruocco, G., Molinari, E.: A comparison of three multidisciplinarity indices based on the diversity of scopus subject areas of authors’ documents, their bibliography and their citing papers. Scientometrics 125(2), 1145–1158 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carchiolo, V., Grassia, M., Malgeri, M., Mangioni, G.: Preliminary characterization of Italian academic scholars by their bibliometrics. In: Camacho, D., Rosaci, D., Sarne, G.M.L., Versaci, M. (eds.) Intelligent Distributed Computing XIV. IDC 2021. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 1026. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96627-0_31

  8. Carchiolo, V., Grassia, M., Malgeri, M., Mangioni, G.: Analysis of the co-authorship sub-networks of Italian academic researchers. Stud. Comput. Intell. 1015, 321–327 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hu, X., Li, O.Z., Pei, S.: Of stars and galaxies - co-authorship network and research. China J. Account. Res. 13(1), 1–30 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca : Professori e Ricercatori. Accessed May 2021

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elsevier B.V.: Elsevier Developer - API Service Agreement. https://dev.elsevier.com/academic_research_scopus.html. Accessed July 2021

  12. Elsevier B.V.: Elsevier Developer - Academic Research. https://dev.elsevier.com/api_service_agreement.html. Accessed July 2021

  13. Das, K., Samanta, S., Pal, M.: Study on centrality measures in social networks: a survey. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 8(1), 1–11 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-018-0493-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peixoto, T.P.: Graph-tool - efficient network analysis. Accessed April 2022

    Google Scholar 

  15. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., Skvoretz, J.: Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc. Netw. 32(3), 245–251 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brandes, U.: A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J. Math. Soc. 25(2), 163–177 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Langville, A.N., Meyer, C.D.: A survey of eigenvector methods for web information retrieval. SIAM Rev. 47(1), 135–161 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. In: WWW 1999 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Carchiolo, V., Grassia, M., Malgeri, M., Mangioni, G.: Co-authorship networks analysis to discover collaboration patterns among Italian researchers. Future Internet 14(6) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carchiolo, V., Cavallo, C., Grassia, M., Malgeri, M., Mangioni, G.: Link prediction in time varying social networks. Information 13(3) (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Carchiolo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Carchiolo, V., Grassia, M., Malgeri, M., Mangioni, G. (2023). Correlation Between Researchers’ Centrality and H-Index: A Case Study. In: Braubach, L., Jander, K., Bădică, C. (eds) Intelligent Distributed Computing XV. IDC 2022. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1089. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29104-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics