Abstract
Project delays caused by the COVID outbreak are unprecedented. The associated loss and expenses are supposed to be equitably shared between the client and the contractor. Nonetheless, Standard Forms of Building Contracts in many countries do not consider delay caused by COVID-19 lockdown as a qualifying event for any time and monetary claim. Disagreements and disputes have arisen as a result. In this aspect, incentivization has been advocated as an effective measure to fill the equity gap. But how incentivization can be introduced into construction contracts, and how this may help reduce disputes arising from the COVID-19-associated delay has not yet been explored in prior studies. This chapter presents a study investigating how the claims for COVID-related project delays were managed. Sixteen semi-structured interviews with the contract administration experts were conducted in Melbourne, Australia—a city that experienced the world’s most prolonged COVID lockdown in 2020–21. Measures taken to mitigate the consequences of the COVID-related delay were identified. The effect of incentivisation on rebalancing the risk between the client and the contractor was also investigated. The findings reveal that although the existing Standard Forms of Building Contracts cannot be applied flawlessly in managing COVID-related time and monetary claims, interviewees were hesitant to introduce any radical change to the contract provisions. While incentivisation can instigate more active actions towards resolving COVID-related disputes, interviewees preferred the incentive schemes to be developed outside the construction contract regime. Views regarding how incentivisation can be implemented to avoid COVID-related disputes in future projects were sought. The study reported in this chapter illustrates how incentivisation may foster equitable risk sharing between the contracting parties in future contracts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chirieac, R. M. (2020). Considerations on the positive law institutions that may affect on the execution of construction contracts. Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, 9(2), 299–308.
Denison, M. J. (2021). Force majeure clauses in LNG sales and purchase agreements: How do they stand up during the Covid-19 pandemic? Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 14(2), 88–99.
Dix, G. (2020). Incentivization: From the current proliferation to the (re)problematization of incentives. Economy and Society, 49(4), 642–663.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.
Hansen, S., Rostiyanti, S. F., & Rif’at, A. (2020). Causes, effects, and mitigations framework of contract change orders: Lessons learned from GBK aquatic stadium project. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(1), 05019008
Holdsworth, S., Sandri, O., Thomas, I., Wong, P., Chester, A., & McLaughlin, P. (2019). The assessment of graduate sustainability attributes in the workplace: Potential advantages of using the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117929.
Lasrasati, D., Novva, E., Sugeng, T., Aulia, F. M., & Anedya, W. (2021). Impact of the Pandemic COVID-19 on the implementation of construction contracts. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 738, 012075.
Madill, A. (2011). Interaction in the semi-structured interview: A comparative analysis of the use of and response to indirect complaints. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8(4), 333–353.
McDonald, R., Harrison, S., & Checkland, K. (2008). Incentives and control in primary health care: Findings from English pay-for-performance case studies. Journal of Health Organisation and Management, 22(1), 48–62.
Ministry of Law Singapore. (2020). Key Features of Re-Align Framework [online]. Available from: https://www.mlaw.gov.sg/realign/key-features. Accessed 1 November 2021.
Mosey, D. (2021). What can construction contracting learn from Covid-19? Construction Law International [online], 15 (3), Available from: https://www.ibanet.org/article/a6ab6762-65c5-40f9-a990-15081e3e3bcb. Accessed 1 June 2022.
Pablo, Z., London, K., Wong, P. S. P., & Khalfan, M. (2021). Actor-network theory and the evolution of complex adaptive supply networks. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 668–684.
Patton, M. Q. (2020). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Perez, D., Gray, J., & Skitmore, M. (2017). Perceptions of risk allocation methods and equitable risk distribution: A study of medium to large Southeast Queensland commercial construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 17(2), 132–141.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students (7th ed.). Pearson.
Sun, C., & Xu, S. (202). Analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 Epidemic on the construction engineering EPC projects and claims. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 676, 012038.
Talabi, S., Koskeia, L., Tzortzopoulos, P., & Kagioglou, M. (2021). Causes of defects associated with tolerances in construction: A case study. ASCE Journal of Management in Engineering, 37(4), 05021005.
The United Kingdom Cabinet Office. (2020). Guidance on responsible contractual behaviour in the performance and enforcement of contracts impacted by the COVID-19 [online]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-on-responsible-contractual-behaviour-in-the-performance-and-enforcement-of-contracts-impacted-by-the-covid-19-emergency
Vickery, P. (2020). COVID–19: Managing the Impact on Construction Contracts [online]. Available from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5aed91101aef1d132050dad6/t/5ecb016440423e17efc3172e/1590362470323/20200516-COVID-19-Managing-the-Impact-on-Construction-Contracts-Paper-16-May-2020%281%29.pdf
Watkins, R., Goodwin, V.A., Abbott, R.A., Hall, A., & Tarrant, M. (2017). Exploring residents’ experiences of mealtimes in care homes: A qualitative interview study. BMC Geriatrics [online], 17:141, Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0540-2.
West, J. (2014). Collaborative patterns and power imbalance in strategic alliance networks. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(6), 04014010.
Wong, S. P., Holdsworth, S., Crameri, L., & Lindsay, A. (2019). Does carbon accounting have an impact on decision-making in building design? International Journal of Construction Management, 19(2), 149–161.
Zhu, L. Y., & Cheung, S. O. (2021). Towards an equity-based analysis of construction incentivization. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(11), 04021148.
Zhu, L. Y., & Cheung, S. O. (2022). Equity gap in construction contracting: Identification and ramifications. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(1), 262–286.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wong, P.S.P. (2023). The Role of Incentivization to Mitigate the Negative Impact of COVID-Related Disputes. In: Cheung, S.O., Zhu, L. (eds) Construction Incentivization. Digital Innovations in Architecture, Engineering and Construction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28959-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28959-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28958-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28959-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)