Skip to main content

A Review of Monitoring Probes for Cloud Computing Continuum

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 655))

  • 695 Accesses

Abstract

Nowadays, we consider optimizing data-intensive applications imperative for the digital enterprise to exploit the vast amounts of available data and maximize its business value. This fact necessitated the broad adoption of multicloud and fog deployment models towards enhanced use of distributed hosting resources that may reach the edge of the network. However, this poses significant research challenges concerning how one can automatically discover the best initial deployment of such an application and then continuously adapt it according to the defined Service Level Objectives (SLOs), even in extreme scenarios of workload fluctuations. Among the key tools for managing such multicloud applications are advanced distributed monitoring mechanisms. In this work, we consider some of their fundamental components, which refer to the means for efficiently measuring and propagating information on the application components and their hosting. Specifically, we analyze the 20 most well-known monitoring tools and compare them against several criteria. This comparison allows us to discuss their fit for the distributed complex event processing frameworks of the future that can efficiently monitor applications and trigger reconfigurations across the Cloud Computing Continuum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://aws.amazon.com/cloudwatch/.

  2. 2.

    http://chukwa.apache.org.

  3. 3.

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-monitor/overview.

  4. 4.

    https://www.cacti.net/.

  5. 5.

    https://collectd.org/.

  6. 6.

    https://www.datadoghq.com/.

  7. 7.

    https://www.dynatrace.com/.

  8. 8.

    https://cloud.google.com/monitoring/.

  9. 9.

    https://cloud.google.com/monitoring/agent.

  10. 10.

    https://collectd.org/.

  11. 11.

    https://icinga.com/.

  12. 12.

    https://www.logicmonitor.com/.

  13. 13.

    http://munin-monitoring.org/.

  14. 14.

    https://www.nagios.org/.

  15. 15.

    https://www.netdata.cloud/.

  16. 16.

    https://humdi.net/vnstat/.

  17. 17.

    https://newrelic.com/.

  18. 18.

    https://github.com/openstack/telemetry-specs.

  19. 19.

    https://github.com/openstack/aodh.

  20. 20.

    https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer.

  21. 21.

    https://github.com/openstack/panko.

  22. 22.

    https://www.opsview.com/.

  23. 23.

    https://prometheus.io/.

  24. 24.

    https://grafana.com/.

  25. 25.

    https://github.com/sequenceiq.

  26. 26.

    shorturl.at/enBP3.

  27. 27.

    https://www.elastic.co.

  28. 28.

    http://logstash.net.

  29. 29.

    https://www.elastic.com/producs/kibana.

  30. 30.

    http://www.shinken-monitoring.org/

  31. 31.

    https://docs.pnp4nagios.org/

  32. 32.

    http://graphiteapp.org/.

  33. 33.

    https://www.zabbix.com/.

References

  1. Aceto, G., Botta, A., de Donato, W., Pescape, A.: Cloud monitoring: a survey. Comput. Netw. 57(9), 2093–2115 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2013.04.001

  2. Horn, G., Skrzypek, P., Prusinski, M., Materka, K., Stefanidis, V., Verginadis, Y.: MELODIC: selection and integration of open source to build an autonomic cross-cloud deployment platform. In: International Conference on TOOLS 50+1: Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and System, 14–19 October, Innopolis, Russia (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Verginadis, Y., et al.: PrEstoCloud - a novel framework able to dynamically manage data-intensive multi-cloud, fog, and edge function-as-a-service applications. IGI Inf. Resour. Manage. J. (IRMJ) 34(1), Article 4, 66–85 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drăgan, I., Iuhasz, G., Petcu, D.: A scalable platform for monitoring data intensive applications. J. Grid Computing 17(3), 503–528 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-019-09483-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bautista Villalpando, L.E., April, A., Abran, A.: Performance analysis model for big data applications in cloud computing. J. Cloud Comput. 3(1), 1–20 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-014-0019-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Verginadis, Y., Kritikos, K., Patiniotakis, I.: Data and cloud polymorphic application modelling in multi-clouds and fog environments. In: La Rosa, M., Sadiq, S., Teniente, E. (eds.) CAiSE 2021. LNCS, vol. 12751, pp. 449–464. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79382-1_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Baur, D., Griesinger, F., Verginadis, Y., Stefanidis, V., Patiniotakis, I.: A model driven engineering approach for flexible and distributed monitoring of cross-cloud applications. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM 11th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC), pp. 31–40 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/UCC.2018.00012

  8. Stefanidis, V., Verginadis, Y., Patiniotakis, I., Mentzas, G.: Distributed complex event processing in multiclouds. In: Kritikos, K., Plebani, P., de Paoli, F. (eds.) ESOCC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11116, pp. 105–119. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99819-0_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Trihinas, D., Pallis, G., Dikaiakos, M.D.: Low-cost adaptive monitoring techniques for the Internet of Things. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 14(2), 487–501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2018.2808956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Trihinas, D., Pallis, G., Dikaiakos, M.D.: Monitoring elastically adaptive multi-cloud services. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 6(3), 800–814 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2015.2511760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Demirbaga, U., et al.: AutoDiagn: an automated real-time diagnosis framework for big data systems. IEEE Trans. Comput. 71, 1035–1048 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2021.3070639

  12. Do, N.H., Van Do, T., Farkas, L., Rotter, C.: Provisioning input and output data rates in data processing frameworks. J. Grid Comput. 18(3), 491–506 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-020-09508-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tamburri, D.A., Miglierina, M., Di Nitto, E.: Cloud applications monitoring: an industrial study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 127, 106376 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106376

  14. Venner, J., Wadkar, S., Siddalingaiah, M.: Pro Apache Hadoop, 2nd edn. Apress, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 871643 MORPHEMIC project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiannis Verginadis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Verginadis, Y. (2023). A Review of Monitoring Probes for Cloud Computing Continuum. In: Barolli, L. (eds) Advanced Information Networking and Applications. AINA 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 655. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28694-0_59

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics