Skip to main content

Supracerebellar Infratentorial Approach, Indications, and Technical Pitfalls

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery

Part of the book series: Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery ((NEUROSURGERY,volume 46))

  • 373 Accesses

Abstract

Posterior tentorial incisura not infrequently requires to be exposed for tumors of pineal gland, pulvinar, midbrain and cerebellum, aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations. Residing almost at the center of the brain, this area is almost equal distance to any point on the calvarium behind coronal sutures enabling alternative routes to encounter. Compared to supratentorial routes either subtemporal or suboccipital approach, infratentorial supracerebellar route has several advantages as providing shortest, most direct approach to the lesions of this area without encountering any important arteries and veins. Since its initial description at the early twentieth century, a wide range of complications arising from cerebellar infarction, air embolism, and neural tissue damage have been encountered. Working in a deep, narrow corridor without enough illumination and visibility under very limited anesthesiology support hindered popularization of this approach. In the contemporary era of neurosurgery, advanced diagnostic tools and surgical microscopes with state-of-the-art microsurgery techniques coupled with modern anesthesiology have eliminated almost all drawbacks of infratentorial supracerebellar approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brunner C, Rorschach H. Uber einen fall von tumor der glandula pinealis cerebri. Cor Bl Schweiz Arzte 1911;642–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Krause F. Chirurgie des Gehirns und Rückenmarks nach eigenen Erfahrungen, vol. 2. Munich: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pendl G, Vorkapic P. Surgery of pineal region lesions in childhood. In: Lesions of the cerebral midline. Berlin: Springer; 1985. p. 114–8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Tandler J, Ranzi E. Chirurgische Anatomie und Operationstechnik des Zentralnervensystems. Berlin: Springer; 1920.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Stein BM. The infratentorial supracerebellar approach to pineal lesions. J Neurosurg. 1971;35(2):197–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yasargil M. Paramedian supracerebellar approach. In: Microneurosurgery. Microsurgical anatomy of the basal cisterns and vessels of the brain, vol. 1. New York: Georg Thieme; 1984. p. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ogata N, Yonekawa Y. Paramedian supracerebellar approach to the upper brain stem and peduncular lesions. Neurosurgery. 1997;40(1):101–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van den Bergh R. Lateral-paramedian infratentorial approach in lateral decubitus for pineal tumours. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1990;92(4):311–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Voigt K, Yaşargil M. Cerebral cavernous haemangiomas or cavernomas. Neurochirurgia. 1976;19(2):59–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cavalcanti DD, Preul MC, Kalani MYS, Spetzler RF. Microsurgical anatomy of safe entry zones to the brainstem. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(5):1359–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jittapiromsak P, Wu A, Nakaji P, Spetzler RF, Preul MC. The challenge of access to the pontomesencephalic junction: an anatomical study of lateral approach and exposure. Skull Base. 2010;20(05):311–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Recalde RJ, Figueiredo EG, de Oliveira E. Microsurgical anatomy of the safe entry zones on the anterolateral brainstem related to surgical approaches to cavernous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(Suppl_1):ONS9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  13. La Pira B, Sorenson T, Quillis-Quesada V, Lanzino G. The paramedian supracerebellar infratentorial approach. Acta Neurochir. 2017;159(8):1529–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rhoton AL Jr. Rhoton’s cranial anatomy and surgical approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ausman JI, Malik GM, Dujovny M, Mann R. Three-quarter prone approach to the pineal-tentorial region. Surg Neurol. 1988;29(4):298–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cavalcanti DD, Morais BA, Figueiredo EG, Spetzler RF, Preul MC. Supracerebellar infratentorial variant approaches to the intercollicular safe entry zone. World Neurosurg. 2019;122:e1285–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta P, Rath GP, Prabhakar H, Bithal PK. Complications related to sitting position during pediatric neurosurgery: an institutional experience and review of literature. Neurol India. 2018;66(1):217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Porter J, Pidgeon C, Cunningham A. The sitting position in neurosurgery: a critical appraisal. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82(1):117–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Winn HR. Youmans and Winn neurological surgery. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ammirati M, Bernardo A, Musumeci A, Bricolo A. Comparison of different infratentorial—supracerebellar approaches to the posterior and middle incisural space: a cadaveric study. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(4):922–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smrcka M, Navratil O. What is the risk of venous cerebellar infarction in the supracerebellar infratentorial approach? Neurosurg Rev. 2021;44(2):897–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ueyama T, Al-Mefty O, Tamaki N. Bridging veins on the tentorial surface of the cerebellum: a microsurgical anatomic study and operative considerations. Neurosurgery. 1998;43(5):1137–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krogager ME, Jakola AS, Poulsgaard L, Couldwell W, Mathiesen T. Safe handling of veins in the pineal region—a mixed method study. Neurosurg Rev. 2021;44(1):317–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsuo S, Baydin S, Güngör A, Miki K, Komune N, Kurogi R, et al. Midline and off-midline infratentorial supracerebellar approaches to the pineal gland. J Neurosurg. 2016;126(6):1984–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vishteh AG, David CA, Marciano FF, Coscarella E, Spetzler RF. Extreme lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach to the posterolateral mesencephalon: technique and clinical experience. Neurosurgery. 2000;46(2):384–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vougioukas VI, Omran H, Gläsker S, Van Velthoven V. Far lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach for the treatment of upper brainstem gliomas: clinical experience with pediatric patients. Childs Nerv Syst. 2005;21(12):1037–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Konovalov AN, Pitskhelauri DI, Melikyan AG, Shishkina LV, Serova NK, Pronin IN, et al. [Supracerebellar transtentorial approach to tumors of the posterior portions of the medial temporal region]. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2015;79(4):38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weil AG, Middleton AL, Niazi TN, Ragheb J, Bhatia S. The supracerebellar-transtentorial approach to posteromedial temporal lesions in children with refractory epilepsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015;15(1):45–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Giammattei L, Borsotti F, Daniel RT. Extreme lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach: how I do it. Acta Neurochir. 2019;161(5):1013–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Watanabe T, Katayama Y, Fukushima T, Kawamata T. Lateral supracerebellar transtentorial approach for petroclival meningiomas: operative technique and outcome. J Neurosurg. 2011;115(1):49–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tahta, A., Akalan, N. (2023). Supracerebellar Infratentorial Approach, Indications, and Technical Pitfalls. In: Di Rocco, C. (eds) Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28202-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28202-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28201-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28202-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics