Abstract
Assistive technology is often framed as a problem-solving approach to a medical model of disability. When viewed in this way, disability and neurodiversity are pathologised, demanding a ‘cure’ for afflictions that position the person as ‘less than’. In this chapter, we explore the potential of assistive technology to augment and empower the user. We take the position that a strengths based, social model of disability is not only more effective in helping us develop assistive technologies, but it also places the user at the centre of the design process. This community-led approach to research and design recognises the value of lived experience in understanding and overcoming the many mismatches between people with a disability and their environment. In investigating this position, we will look not only at novel research projects with disabled and neurodivergent people, but also the ethics of cultural robotics and AI in human research more broadly. We will question the proposition that emerging technology is being positioned as a ‘silver bullet’ solution to many cognitive impairments and look at a range of embodied human–machine interactions that point to what the future may hold for the field of assistive technology. This chapter will examine a range of perspectives on cultural robotics in therapeutic and educational contexts and include the voices of people for whom these technologies claim to support.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brown S (2013) Autism and theory of mind in interactive spaces. In: 19th International symposium on electronic art, ISEA 1 4
Dastin J (2018) Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight-idUSKCN1MK08G. Accessed 27 Nov 2022
Fussell S (2017) Why can’t this soap dispenser identify dark skin? Gizmodo. https://gizmodo.com/why-cant-this-soap-dispenser-identify-dark-skin-1797931773. Accessed 27 Nov 2022
Holmes K (2018) Mismatch: how inclusion shapes design. MIT Press, Cambridge
Huber J, Shilkrot R, Maes P, Nanayakkara S (eds) (2018) Assistive augmentation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6404-3
Jackson L, Haagaard A, Williams R (2022) Disability dongle. Platypus. https://blog.castac.org/2022/04/disability-dongle/. Accessed 27 Nov 2022
Leyfer OT, Folstein SE, Bacalman S, Davis NO, Dinh E, Morgan J, Tager-Flusberg H, Lainhart JE (2006) Comorbid psychiatric disorders in children with autism: interview development and rates of disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 36:849–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0123-0
Mauldin L (2022) Care tactics. https://thebaffler.com/salvos/care-tactics-mauldin. Accessed 27 Nov 2022
McKercher KA (2020) Beyond sticky notes: co-design for real: mindsets, methods and movements. Beyond Sticky Notes, Sydney
Monteiro M (2019) Ruined by design: how designers destroyed the world, and what we can do to fix it. Mule Design, San Francisco
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brown, S.A. (2023). From Assistive to Adaptive: Can We Bring a Strengths-Based Approach to Designing Disability Technology?. In: Dunstan, B.J., Koh, J.T.K.V., Turnbull Tillman, D., Brown, S.A. (eds) Cultural Robotics: Social Robots and Their Emergent Cultural Ecologies. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28138-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28138-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28137-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28138-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)