Abstract
This chapter makes the case that, contrary to traditional views of Mencius as not centrally concerned with rhetoric, in the bulk of the book named for him he is pressingly concerned with (a) how Chinese rulers should rule through persuasion rather than coercion, (b) how the emperor’s top advisors should advise him to rule, and (c) how imperial advisors and top officials should be selected and trained to advise the emperor. The ethos of “advice to ordinary people on how to live their lives” to which the Mencius is traditionally reduced is there, of course; but it represents a small portion of the book, and much of that simply seems like personal ethical advice because for whatever reason it has been politically decontextualized. Also, the political advice Mencius gives rulers and their advisors on how to use rhetoric to rule has often angered emperors, and in addition to radical expurgation in the early Ming Dynasty this delicate political response has led to a tendency to depoliticize the book’s advice, promoting personal ethical advice instead.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, Roger T. 2002. Mencius and a Process Notion of Human Nature. In Chan (2002: 72–90).
Behuniak, James, Jr. 2005. Mencius on Becoming Human. Albany: SUNY Press.
Birdwhistell, Joanne D. 2007. Mencius and Masculinities: Dynamics of Power, Morality, and Maternal Thinking. Albany: SUNY Press.
Brooks, E. Bruce, and A. Taeko Brooks. 2002. The Nature and Historical Context of the Mencius. In Chan (2002: 242–281).
Burke, Kenneth. 1950/1969. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chan, Alan K.L. (Chan Kam-Leung 陳金樑), ed. 2002. Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Collie, David, trans. 1828. The Shang Mung and the Hea Mung. In The Chinese Classical Work Commonly Called the Four Books, 171–352. Malacca: Mission Press.
De Bary, Wm. Theodore. 1993. Waiting for the Dawn: A Plan For The Prince; Huang Tsung-His’s Ming-I-Tai-Fang Lu. New York: Columbia University Press.
Huang, Chun-chieh (Huang Junjie 黃俊傑). 2001. Mencian Hermeneutics: A History of Interpretations in China. Piscataway: Transaction.
Lau, D.C. 劉殿爵, trans. 1970/2003. Mencius. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Legge, James, trans. 1861/1970. The Works of Mencius. New York: Dover.
Robinson, Douglas. 2016. The Deep Ecology of Rhetoric in Mencius and Aristotle: A Somatic Guide. Albany: SUNY Press.
Tang, Junyi 唐君毅. 1962. The T’ien Ming (Heavenly Ordinance) in Pre-Ch’in China. Philosophy East and East 11.4: 195–218 and 12.1: 29–49.
Van Norden, Bryan W., trans. 2008. Mengzi: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.
Zhang, Qianfan 张千帆. 2010. Humanity or Benevolence? The Interpretation of Confucian Ren and Its Modern Implications. In Taking Confucian Ethics Seriously: Contemporary Theories and Applications, ed. Kam-por Yu, Julia Tao, and Philip J. Ivanhoe, 55–72. Albany: SUNY Press.
Zhao, Zhentao 趙甄陶, Wenting Zhang 张文庭, and Dingzhi Zhou 周定之, trans. 1993. Mencius. Jinan 濟南: Shandong Friendship Press 山東友誼書社.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robinson, D. (2023). Mencius and Political Rhetoric. In: Xiao, Y., Chong, Kc. (eds) Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Mencius. Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27620-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27620-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27618-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27620-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)