Skip to main content

Methodology for Systematic Reviews on Measurement Properties of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Patient Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Surgery

Abstract

The current chapter serves as an introduction and guide to the methodology for performing systematic reviews of the measurement properties of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). The aim of this chapter is to inform clinicians of the most commonly used terms, definitions and processes in the field, in order to enable them to participate meaningfully in any relevant research projects, bearing in mind the limitations discussed at the chapter. A step-wise approach is followed, initially informing the readers about the definitions related to PROMs, but most importantly, explaining what the measurement properties entail. Following this, the methodology for performing a systematic review, is discussed. The chapter’s authors have opted to follow the methodological recommendations that have been proposed by the COSMIN initiative (Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments), who has produced significant publications in the field, providing detailed guidance for each step. All steps are reviewed and discussed, with particular focus on the evaluation of content validity, internal structure and the remaining measurement properties. Examples and tables of the necessary steps to perform the aforementioned assessments are presented throughout. Lastly, the process of how the results of this evaluation are amalgamated in order to produce the systematic review is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chapter 18: Patient-reported outcomes. Cochrane training. Available at https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v6/chapter-18. Accessed 4 Oct 2022.

  2. COSMIN. Improving the selection of outcome measurement instruments. Available at https://www.cosmin.nl/. Accessed 4 Oct 2022.

  3. Mokkink LB, et al. Evaluation of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of health status measurement instruments. Qual Life Res. 2009;18:313–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mokkink LB, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1147–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. COSMIN manual for systematic reviews of PROMs COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) user manual. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Terwee CB, et al. COSMIN methodology for assessing the content validity of PROMs. Available at https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-methodology-for-content-validity-user-manual-v1.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2022.

  8. Terwee CB, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1159–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. GRADE Home. Available at https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/. Accessed 4 Oct 2022.

  10. Mokkink LB. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist [PDF File]. The Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute; 2018. p. 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Page MJ, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. McKenna SP, Heaney A. Setting and maintaining standards for patient-reported outcome measures: can we rely on the COSMIN checklists? 2021;24:502–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2021.1907092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orestis Argyriou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Argyriou, O., Chatzikonstantinou, M., Patel, V., Athanasiou, T. (2023). Methodology for Systematic Reviews on Measurement Properties of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS). In: Athanasiou, T., Patel, V., Darzi, A. (eds) Patient Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27597-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27597-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27596-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27597-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics