Abstract
In recent years, machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as leading solution providers in almost all real-world problems. Advancements in development of diagnostic procedures have been obtained while implementing these techniques in medical sciences. In this work, five ML techniques: Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have been evaluated on various parameters i.e., accuracy, precision, f1-score, recall, weighted average and macro-average. Experimentation is performed to determine the most precise and accurate forecasting method for the diagnosis of disc disorders. The dataset of 310 records with 12 attributes was considered for the experiment purpose and was divided into two ratios of 80:20 and 90:10 to train and test the different ML models. In addition, different type of model and training based hyperparameter (train-test ratio, depth, width, dropout) optimization was performed to determine the effect on training process of deep learning models and in optimizing the results. Results obtained shows that LR and MLP techniques performed better than other techniques in all instances and best results were obtained for all the methods in the train-test dataset split of 90:10.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Teraguchi, M., Yoshimura, N., et al.: Prevalence and distribution of intervertebral disc degeneration over the entire spine in a population-based cohort: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 22(1), 104-110 (January 2014)
Jouko, S., Erkintalo Minna, O., et al.: Recurrent Low Back Pain and Early Disc Degeneration in the Young. Spine 24(13), 1316 (July 1 1999)
Steenstra, I.A., Verbeek, J.H., Heymans, M.W., Bongers, P.M.: Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature. Occup Environ Med. 62(12), 851–60 (2005)
Ravindra, V.M., Senglaub, S.S., Rattani, A., et al.: Degenerative lumbar spine disease: estimating global incidence and worldwide volume. Global Spine J. 8(8), 784–794 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218770769
Taher, F., et al.: Lumbar degenerative disc disease: current and future concepts of diagnosis and management. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Orthopaedics, vol. 2012, Article ID 970752, p. 7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/970752
Hosny, A., Parmar, C., Quackenbush, J., Schwartz, L.H., Aerts, H.J.: Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer. 18, 510–518 (2018)
Logistic regression: https://www.statisticssolutions.com/what-is-logistic-regression/. Accessed 25 June 2019
Subasi, A.: Machine learning techniques, Practical Machine Learning for Data Analysis Using Python 2020, pp. 91-202. Academic Press. ISBN 9780128213797, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821379-7.00003-5
Support vector machine: https://towardsdatascience.com/support-vector-machine-introduction-to-machine-learning-algorithms-934a444fca47. Accessed 10 July 2019
Lipton, Z.C., Elkan, C., Naryanaswamy, B.: Optimal thresholding of classifiers to maximize F1 measure. In: Proceedings of the Joint European Conf. on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pp. 225–239. Nancy, France (15–19 September 2014)
Bansal, D., Chhikara, R., Khanna, K., Gupta, P.: Comparative analysis of various machine learning algorithms for detecting dementia. Procedia Computer Science 132, 1497-1502 (2018). ISSN 1877-0509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.102
Pai, V., et al.: Comparative analysis of Machine Learning algorithms for Intrusion Detection, Materials Science and Engineering, Volume 1013. In: International Conference on “Futuristic Trends in Mechanical Engineering" (ICOFTIME-2020). Bengaluru, India (24-25 April 2020)
Bataineh, A.A.: A comparative analysis of nonlinear machine learning algorithms for breast cancer detection. Int. J. Machi. Learn. Comp. 9(3) (June 2019)
Bhatt, et al.: A comparative analysis of classificaton methods for diagnosis of lower back pain. Orient. J. Comp. Sci. & Technol. 11(2), 135–139 (2018)
Biagetti, G., Crippa, P., Falaschetti, L., Tanoni, G., Turchetti, C.: A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for physiological signal classification. Procedia Computer Science 126, 1977-1984 (2018). ISSN 1877-0509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.07.255
Mahadevappa, P., Muzammal, S.M., Murugesan, R.K.: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Intrusion Detection in Edge-Enabled IoT Networks (2021). arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.01383
Awan, F.M., Saleem, Y., Minerva, R., Crespi, N.: A comparative analysis of machine/deep learning models for parking space availability prediction. Sensors (Basel) 20(1), 322 (2020). Published 6 Jan 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20010322
Ghosh, M., Mohsin, M., Raihan, M., Akter, L., Bairagi, A.K., et al.: A Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms to predict liver disease. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing 30(3), 917–928 (2021)
Raihan-Al-Masud, M., Mondal, M.R.H.: Data-driven diagnosis of spinal abnormalities using feature selection and machine learning algorithms. PLoS ONE 15(2), e0228422 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228422
Nuredeen, A., Matoug, A., AL-Jebury, H., Akyol, K., Alsarrar, M.R.: Comparison supervised learning algorithms for spinal-column disease. Int. J. Sci. Res. (IJSR) 8(1), 312–315 (January 2019). https://www.ijsr.net/get_abstract.php?paper_id=ART20194133
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hussain, M., Koundal, D., Manhas, J. (2023). Machine Learning Techniques for the Diagnosis of Disc Disorders: Comparative Analysis. In: Abraham, A., Hanne, T., Gandhi, N., Manghirmalani Mishra, P., Bajaj, A., Siarry, P. (eds) Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR 2022). SoCPaR 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 648. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27524-1_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27524-1_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27523-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27524-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)