Abstract
Thomas S. Kuhn gave a lecture on November 19, 1991, at Harvard University entitled “The Problem with the Historical Philosophy of Science” in which he analyzed the evolution of philosophy of science and its connection with history of science 30 years after the publication of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Kuhn’s verdict ought to be understood as the explicit exposition of his viewpoint on a problem raised by his masterpiece, the legitimization of relativism, seen as the central element in the historic and sociological approaches. Since the mid-1960s, many philosophers, sociologists, and historians of science have sought to overcome such resistances, seeking narratives that promote integration, like historical epistemology. Despite resorting to numerous sources and immersed in the historicist tradition, historical epistemology consciously intends to avoid a relativistic interpretation of the construction and definition of scientific knowledge. Our contribution has two main objectives. First to (re)introduce historical epistemology in the context of discussions that began in the 1960s, a time when relativism “invaded” the domains of philosophy, history, and sociology of science, not leaving them since then. In other words, we intend to analyze whether or not the goal of proposing rational reconstructions of the scientific past is actually achieved as advocated by historical epistemology. The second central theme we discuss concerns the formulation of a critical analysis as built from a Latin American perspective on historical epistemology in order to contribute to the development of a practice in history of science more suited to our realities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Daston L (1994) Historical epistemology. In: Davidson AI, Harootunian HD (eds) Questions of evidence: proof, practice, and persuasion across the disciplines by James Chandler. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Daston L (1995) Classical probability in the enlightenment. Princeton University Press
Daston L (2009) Science studies and the history of science. Crit Inquiry 35(4):798–813
Daston L (2017) Historicidade e objetividade. Liber Ars, São Paulo
Daston L (2020) Observar el conocimiento: el seminario. In: Queijo Olano JA, Wschebor I (eds) Lorraine Daston en Montevideo. AGU, Universidad de la Republica Uruguay, pp 35–40
Daston L, Queijo Olano JA, Videira AAP (2019) The power of History: an interview with Lorraine Daston. Contemporánea: Historia y problemas del siglo XX 10(10):197–202
de Mendonça ALO, Videira AAP (2019) Reinstating institutions: the return of natural philosophy in times of academic postmodernity. In: Ana Paula Bispo da Silva AP, Moura BA (eds) Objetivos humanísticos, conteúdos científicos: contribuições da história e da filosofia da Ciência para o ensino de Ciências. EDUEPB, Campina Grande
Foucault M (1977) Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In: Bouchard DF (ed) Language, Counter-Memory. Practice, Selected Essays and Interviews
Fuller S (1991) Is history and philosophy of science withering on the vine? Philos Soc Sci 21(2):149–174
Gingras Y (2010) Naming without necessity. Revue de synthèse 131(3):439–454
Heidelberger M (2001) Origins of the logical theory of probability: von Kries, Wittgenstein, Waismann. Int Stud Philos Sci 15(2):177–188
Krüger L (1978) Vorwort des Heausgebrs. In: Kuhn T (ed) Die Enstehung des Neuen. Studien zur Struktur der Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Suhrkamp
Krüger L, Daston L, Heidelberger M (1987) The probabilistic revolution. Vols I and II. MIT Press Book, Cambridge, MA
Krüger L, Sturm T, Carl W, Daston L (2005) Why does history matter to philosophy and the sciences? Selected essays. De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
Kuhn TS (2000) The road since structure: philosophical essays, 1970–1993, with an autobiographical interview. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Laudan L (1996) Beyond positivism and relativism: theory, method, and evidence. Westview Press, Boulder/Oxford
Masterman M (1970) The nature of a paradigm. In: Latakos I, Musgrave A (eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge
Queijo Olano JA (2019) ¿Epistemológica o histórica? La Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia en una nueva tensión. Epistemología e Historia de la Ciencia 6(1):88–104. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/afjor/article/view/29177
Rheinberger HJ (2010) On historicizing epistemology: an essay. Stanford University Press
Richards RJ, Daston L (eds) (2016) Kuhn‘s’ structure of scientific revolutions’ at fifty: reflections on a science classic. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Rouse J (1991) Philosophy of science and the persistent narratives of modernity. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A 22(1):141–162
Shapin S (1992) Discipline and bounding: the history and sociology of science as seen through the externalism-internalism debate. Hist Sci 30(4):333–369
Steinle F (1995) Lorenz Krüger. Oktober 1932-29. September 1994. NTM N.S (3):57–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02913693
Stolleis M, Daston L (eds) (2016) Natural law and laws of nature in early modern Europe: jurisprudence, theology, moral and natural philosophy. Routledge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Queijo Olano, J.A., Videira, A.A.P. (2023). Historical Epistemology: A German Connection. In: Condé, M.L., Salomon, M. (eds) Handbook for the Historiography of Science. Historiographies of Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27510-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27510-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27509-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27510-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities